MoveOn.org candidates Ned Lamont, Bob Casey, Robert Byrd
Official MoveOn.org bulletin about “neocons” with “divided loyalties”
by Bill Levinson
We just finished talking to Bob Casey’s campaign about Casey’s endorsement of Ned Lamont over “Jew Lieberman” as he is called by MoveOn.org. When we did some online research to further verify Casey’s endorsement of a MoveOn.org candidate, we discovered that it is far worse: Bob Casey is himself a MoveOn.org candidate, along with Robert Byrd (D-KKK, also known as Senator Sheets).
Bob Casey, who is running against Rick Santorum in a hotly-contested race here in Pennsylvania, is nominally a moderate Democrat for whom we could have easily voted had we not discovered his connection to George Soros’ shadow government: the metastasizing cancer that is infesting the Democratic Party. The Democrats must excise Soros and MoveOn.org like cancer or gangrene unless they want to continue to empower the Republicans to put up and win with mediocre candidates. While George Bush may not be the brightest bulb in the chandelier, he is infinitely preferable to a Soros-supported candidate like John Kerry who (like Ned Lamont) consorts openly with prominent racists and anti-Semites like Al Sharpton. A turnip would be preferable to Kerry or Lamont, because at least it would not be disloyal to the United States nor would it stand arm in arm with racists and anti-Semites of the worst sort:
http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichaelBarone/2006/08/28/a_change_in_the_winds
As it happens, the London arrests came almost exactly 24 hours after antiwar candidate Ned Lamont, flanked by Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, claimed victory over Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic primary.
Yes, flanked by Mr. “Bloodsucking Jews” Sharpton and Mr. “Hymietown” Jackson themselves. Ned Lamont and Bob Casey cannot control who endorses them but they can control whether they accept or repudiate the endorsements. The fact that Lamont tolerates Sharpton’s mere presence shows beyond any doubt what he is, and the fact that both have apparently accepted MoveOn.org’s endorsement disqualifies both from any position of trust or responsibility.
To recap, George Soros blames Israel for fomenting anti-Semitism (i.e. the same kind of drivel that can be found on white supremacist Web sites) while calling the United States a threat to world peace. It is necessary to question the very loyalty to the United States of any candidate who accepts support from George Soros or MoveOn.org, which Soros played a major role in founding. As an example
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A24179-2003Nov10?language=printer
Soros, who has financed efforts to promote open societies in more than 50 countries around the world, is bringing the fight home, he said. On Monday, he and a partner committed up to $5 million to MoveOn.org, a liberal activist group, bringing to $15.5 million the total of his personal contributions to oust Bush.
Now here is some very good information about MoveOn.org. It has been argued that the anti-Semitic and anti-American commentary on its discussion board are the contributions of individuals (even though 80-95% of voting participants agree with slurs like “Jew Lieberman”) but this is apparently an official publication of MoveOn.org itself.
http://www.moveon.org/moveonbulletin/bulletin13.html
MoveOn Bulletin
Friday, May 9, 2003
Noah T. Winer, EditorNearly all PNAC participants, whether Jewish or Christian, are right-wing Zionists who support Ariel Sharon’s Likud Party. In 1996, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and others drafted a paper for incoming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urging him to make “a clean break” from the Oslo peace process preferring “peace through strength,” including the ouster of Saddam Hussein.
This essay describes many of the familiar neo-conservatives as having “dual loyalties,” making policy decisions in the interests of the State of Israel as much as the United States.
http://www.counterpunch.org/christison1213.html
We have downloaded this page in case it disappears now that it has been exposed.
MoveOn.org has been good enough to provide a list of prospective Soros puppets at http://pol.moveon.org/2006/endorsed.html
Ned Lamont heads the list. Others include:
Patrick Murphy for U.S. Congress (PA-08)
Diane Farrell for U.S. Congress (CT-04)
Former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd for U.S. Senate (WV), who is on record as using the phrase “white niggers” as recently as 2001.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/03/04/byrd.slur/
“My old mom told me, ‘Robert, you can’t go to heaven if you hate anybody.’ We practice that. There are white niggers. I’ve seen a lot of white niggers in my time. I’m going to use that word. We just need to work together to make our country a better country, and I’d just as soon quit talking about it so much.”
Bob Casey for U.S. Senate (PA)
Nick Lampson for U.S. Congress (TX-22)
Sherrod Brown for U.S. Senate (OH)
Francine Busby for U.S. Congress (CA-50)
Bill Nelson for U.S. Senate (FL)
http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110008837
“The Casey campaign itself has bobbed and weaved on Iraq so far, but the candidate’s gratuitous endorsement this week of Democrat Ned Lamont, the one-issue antiwar victor in this month’s Connecticut senate primary, might help clarify for Pennsylvanians where Mr. Casey stands in the war on terror.”
We have always known that Anti-Zionism and anti-Israel are almost always code words for anti-Semitism. Now we know this to be true.
The “progressive” movement, like all fascist and communist movements are always anti-Semitic.
We need to expose the racism of these movements and their leader. Look how the mainstream media kept Mel Gibson in the news forever. And look how they let slide the racism of the Sharptons, Andrew Youngs, Jesse jacksons because they are progressives!
The Washington Post ran a column in support of Andrew Young Jr.: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/25/AR2006082501194_pf.html
Comment by Jan
— August 30, 2006 @ 4:29 am
Kerry and Lamont are not disloyal to America. I know why you think this way of Kerry, which I believe you are wrong about. But other than criticize the Iraq war what has Lamont done to be considered disloyal? Given this standard, pat buchanan certainly should be considered disloyal. But conservatives like him get a free pass. If you want the names of those who are disloyal to America, try Republicans darrell issa and grover norquist, who may actually have ties to actual terrorists. In the case of issa, he has actually defended hezbollah. So long as the GOP keeps guys like this in their party, serving in prominent positions, one a Congressman and one a political operative with ties to the White House, they are in no position to accuse Democrats of disloyalty to America.
Comment by Laura
— August 30, 2006 @ 10:15 am
Acceptance of an endorsement from MoveOn.org is prima facie evidence of divided loyalties between the U.S. and George Soros.
It’s illegal to offer anything of value, even a pen with your company’s name on it, to a government official. $oro$ is funneling millions of dollars through MoveOn.org for the purpose of taking control of our government. It may even be argued that 527 organizations such as MoveOn were set up to allow $oro$ to subvert and undermine our government legally, the way he has subverted foreign governments.
Lamont can’t control MoveOn endorsing him but he can control his acceptance or rejection of the endorsement. I don’t care for Norquist but I suppose it’s like having to choose between an ordinary fertilizer sandwich (Republican) and a triple-decker sandwich (MoveOn Democrat). At least with the first, the ratio of bread to doo-doo is higher.
Comment by Bill Levinson
— September 7, 2006 @ 4:40 pm