Silent Jihad: Militant Islam’s Incremental Conquest of Europe
by Bill Levinson
Europeans need to wake up to the fact that militant “Muslims” are waging an incremental war of conquest against their countries and societies. Only the fact that some of these invaders lack patience for incremental conquest provides ample warning through violent rhetoric, threats, and behavior. The model for this incremental conquest seems well defined:
(1) Infest the target country with militant “Islamic” immigrants, students, and so on to set up a beachhead for the takeover.
(2) This advance guard does not, under any circumstances, assimilate with the surrounding society. Instead, it insists that the surrounding society conform to its desires and sensitivities. As examples, there are places in France where infidel women dare not walk without face-covering garments, and militant “Muslims” in England proclaimed that the Union Jack’s Saint George’s and Saint Andrew’s Crosses were offensive to their beliefs.
(3) The advance guard sets up organizations like Muslim Student Associations and Islamic Student Associations. These in turn use university disciplinary systems, with the collusion of administrators and faculty members who lack the character, maturity, ethics, and integrity to exercise responsible authority over anything whatsoever, to censor criticism of militant “Islamic” behavior including that of the students in question. Needless to say, this advance guard is foremost in the propagation of so-called speech codes to prevent criticism or exposure of their behavior.
Example of the above took place at Tufts University and Bucknell University, while militant “Muslims” made violent threats against Jews at various Canadian universities. Students who are subjected to disciplinary actions of this nature need to realize that many college administrators and faculty members have never held jobs outside of academia. While they may be eminently qualified to teach the academic material for which they are responsible, some of them are otherwise little more than middle-aged adolescents who lack the maturity to serve as role models or authority figures for young people.
(4) “If we can’t get them [the Scots] out, we will breed them out.” So said Edward Longshanks in Braveheart, and militant “Islamic” immigrants follow this advice through demographic warfare. While most Euro-Americans have only as many children as they can comfortably support, militant “Muslims” breed indiscriminately to overwhelm the surrounding society. Palestinians breed indiscriminately to produce new crops of suicide bombers and to overwhelm Israel demographically the way cancer crowds out healthy tissue.
(5) Once the population of militant “Muslims” has become large enough, it can agitate for separate and parallel Sharia legal systems. This is not speculation but fact, because such agitation has taken place in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. It can also agitate for so-called anti-hate laws to prevent any criticism of their behavior.
(6) In conjunction with items 3 and 5, militant “Muslims” use oil money to suborn legislators, prosecutors, and judges to enforce anti-hate laws selectively against critics of Islamic supremacy, but not against militant “Muslims” who threaten Europe with another 9/11, call for the genocide of Jews (“Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas”), and use epithets like kafirs and infidels to refer to Christians. The fact that these laws are being enforced selectively leaves no explanation other than bribery and subornation of European legislatures and judicial systems. Americans would meanwhile recognize stories about crooked sheriffs who were on the payroll of a gang, a railroad that wanted to put its rivals out of business, cattlemen who wanted to get rid of the sheep herders, and so on.
(7) Sharia-compliant banking is a clear-cut effort to control a good part of the world’s finances. Once militant “Muslims” gain control of enough of the financial sector, they can buy controlling interests in various businesses, which can then in turn refuse to hire Jews, Christians, Hindus, and other infidels. They can also buy controlling interests in news media to control what people are allowed to read and hear.
Europeans and even North Americans need to wake up to the incremental war of conquest that militant “Islam” is being waged against them. If you live in Europe, your Member of Parliament, local prosecutor, or local judge may be receiving money under the table from foreign countries with enough oil wealth to buy entire legislatures and courts. If your MP voted to enact laws to punish any criticism of militant “Islam,” if a prosecutor enforces those laws against critics of Islamic supremacy but not against militant “Muslims” who call for extermination of Jews (or Europe), or if a judge enables those actions, militant “Muslims” may have greased an itching palm. We have seen in the United States that unusual or seemingly inexplicable behavior often indicates professionally unacceptable or even criminal behavior by government officials.
* New York Attorney General (later Governor) Eliot Spitzer arguably misused his authority to threaten corporations with criminal indictments: a virtual death sentence in many cases. He later had to resign after he was caught patronizing a prostitute.
* Luzerne County judge Mark Ciavarella had a long track record of telling juvenile defendants they didn’t need legal representation, and then sentenced them to juvenile detention facilities in which he allegedly had financial interests for extremely minor offenses. This was known in 2008 or even earlier, but only in 2009 was he caught on Federal corruption charges. He pled guilty to a felony and faces more than seven years in prison.
* Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich did many strange things before he was caught trying to sell Barack Obama’s Senate seat.
* Durham prosecutor Mike Nifong’s ongoing prosecution of three men on highly dubious rape charges was a matter of national attention long before he was disbarred for concealing exculpatory evidence.
The enactment of laws to criminalize criticism of militant “Islam,” and these laws’ selective enforcement, should all be seen as symptoms of possible corruption and bribery on the part of those involved. To paraphrase the New Testament, one cannot serve both one’s country and Riyadh (or Tehran) at the same time. Europeans need to wake up to this fact, and take back their countries from the foreign invaders whose agenda is no different than that of Nazi Germany, except for the fact that they realize that an incremental conquest is more likely to succeed than a Blitzkrieg that draws immediate attention to an obvious threat.
If anybody still does not believe us, these pictures will help. As we said, some of the militant “Islamic” invaders lack the patience for an incremental takeover.