Obama’s Abominable Obeisance: Cultural Perspectives
“In the ancient world and throughout much of the Middle East today, bowing is just about the worst thing someone can do.”
by Raymond Ibrahim, Pajamas media, April 11, 2009

Obama bows to Saudi King Abudullah at G-20 meeting
Obama bowed; this much is certainly not open to debate. All that is left now is to place his odious obeisance in context. As such, history has much to say about the seemingly innocuous bow.
Millennia before the current war between the West and Islam — the war Obama [3] insists does not exist in the first place — the ancient Greeks (forebears of Western civilization) warred with the Persians (forebears of the soon-to-be-nuclear Islamic theocracy, Iran).
Writing in the 5th century B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus explained: “When the Persians meet one another in the roads, you can see whether those who meet are of equal rank. For instead of greeting by words, they kiss each other on the mouth; but if one of them is inferior to the other, they kiss one another on the cheeks.”
This explanation reminds one of Bush’s hand-holding kissing sessions with the same Saudi monarch, which some insist exonerate Obama’s bow. Not so; as the Greek historian explains above, such behavior is representative of equal rank in Eastern cultures.
As for Obama’s conduct, Herodotus continues, “yet if one is of much less noble rank than the other, he falls down before him and worships him.”
“Much less noble rank”? Could Obama, like his wife Michelle, who only recently became proud of America, be operating under the conviction that being American is not all that noble?
As for “falls down before him and worships,” this phrase is a translation of the Greek word proskunesis, which means “to make obeisance,” to “worship, adore,” as one would a god, or king, or god-king. Basically, to fall on one’s face in prostration to another. Connotatively, it implies “to make like a dog” — base, servile, and submissive.
While common to the caste-like system of Persia, prostration was something the freedom-loving Greeks scorned. Indeed, wars were waged simply because the Greeks refused to submit — literally and figuratively — to Persian tyranny. (Continue Reading this Article)
I watched the video — Obama definitely did obeissance to the Saudi monarch, proclaiming the the USA really does mean “Under Saudi Arabia”. This tops Bush’s kiss, but not by much: The US has been subject to the Saudis for several years now.
Comment by BlandOatmeal — April 12, 2009 @ 6:23 am
As much as I hate the fact that Bush kissed that putrid creature, it wasn’t an act of submission however, which a bow is.
Comment by Laura — April 12, 2009 @ 11:27 am
As a True Believer in Allah why didn’t Hussein O, just kiss the stinking king on both cheeks like all the other Maggot muslims do? A bow in any fashion is a symbolic gesture of submission unless one be an Asian and as far as I know the maggot king is not Asian. I saw saw no return bow. Next time he might kiss the ring on the maggots hand. Bush at least just held hands like godfather to godson. The corrupt Bush at least had an economic debt to pay.
With Bush the Saudis could buy. With Hussein O it’s also a matter of religious beliefs. Muslim to Muslim.
Comment by yamit82 — April 12, 2009 @ 3:19 pm