October 22, 2009

Israeli officials: Deal imminent with U.S. on Mideast talks

Its hard to credit this report because it ignores Obama’s embrace of the Saudi Plan in favour of Israel’s embrace of Res 242. It suggests that if Abbas accepts it, it will be because he believes that Res 242 requires full withdrawal. Israel is happy to negotiate on this basis. But this report is silent on whether it means the end of the Roadmap which includes the Saudi Plan and includes the settlement freeze. Res 242 is silent on settlement construction.

HAARETZ

Meanwhile Wednesday, Israeli officials said that Obama’s Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, is close to a deal with Israel on terms for resuming peace talks with the Palestinians.

“There appears to be a meeting of the minds and hopefully the Israeli-Palestinian dialogue will be able to re-start in the near future,” an Israeli official said, summing up talks held by negotiators for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington.

Under the prospective deal, on which Palestinians have not yet commented, the negotiations could be held on the basis of two decades-old United Nations Security Council resolutions, 242 and 338, another official said.

Such a formula could be acceptable to Israel since it interprets those resolutions as falling short of a demand to withdraw from all of the West Bank, territory it captured during the 1967 Six Day War.

Palestinians, who seek a state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, hold that the resolutions, which call for “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”, obliges Israel to return to pre-1967 lines.

Palestinian negotiators were in Washington on Tuesday for talks with U.S. officials on how to relaunch negotiations.

Washington apparently hopes to persuade Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to return to peace talks based on the resolutions, enabling each side to cleave to its own interpretation and avoid conceding diplomatic ground on borders before negotiations resume.

However, Abbas has given no public sign he has dropped a main Palestinian condition for a resumption of negotiations – an Israeli settlement freeze in the West Bank in accordance with a 2003 U.S.-backed peace “road map”.

A progress report U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to deliver within days to Obama on Mitchell’s mediation efforts could clarify the situation.

Posted by Ted Belman @ 1:53 am | 4 Comments »

4 Responses to Israeli officials: Deal imminent with U.S. on Mideast talks

  1. Bill Narvey says:

    What is Netanyahu doing? Obama is weakening in the face of obstructionism from various nations and factions. He was weakening his position as regards the settlement issue in Israel.

    The other day we read a Ha’Aretz report that a deal has been struck with Obama on the settlement issue. Netanyahu had every reason to make no deal and keep all options open. Instead if that report is true, he has foreclosed a number of options.

    Now a new report that Netanyahu has agreed to go further down the peace process road?

    Those who had any hopes that Netanyahu would manoever into position to tell the Palestinians that their incessant lies, dishonesty and breaches of agreements are no longer tolerated even one more day and thus Israel is declaring the Oslo accords dead and demands back concessions Israel gave for Palestinian lies and empty promises will now see their hopes dimming even further.

    Too bad for Israel that Netanyahu is looking more and more like he is bad for Israel.

    Hopefully things are not as suggested in these reports.

  2. Pingback: Israeli officials: Deal imminent with U.S. on Mideast talks | JewPI

  3. BlandOatmeal says:

    Palestinians, who seek a state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, hold that the resolutions, which call for “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”, obliges Israel to return to pre-1967 lines.

    As far as I know, neither HAMAS nor the PLO have ever sought a state in te West Bank and Gaza Strip. According to the PLO, between 1964 and 67, “Palestine” consisted of “Green Line” Israel only, and specifically excluded the “West Bank”. Since then, it has included all of Israel west of the Jordan River. Israel can never be expected to condescend to these demands, which is fine with the PLO — because they actually don’t want peace: They are a terrorist organization which makes its money promoting terror, not a responsible government. As for HAMAS, they don’t aspire to any state smaller than a revived Caliphate. They haven’t even sought independence for Gaza, which they rule.

  4. Pingback: Tweets that mention Israpundit » Blog Archive » Israeli officials: Deal imminent with U.S. on Mideast talks -- Topsy.com