Iran Admits Iranian Islam is a Fraud, Christianity is Truth
by Bill Levinson
Iran has effectively admitted that what it calls Islam is a fraud and a self-serving lie whose sole purpose is to enable its rulers, and that Christianity is the superior belief framework.
We reported previously that Iran imprisoned, tortured, and threatened to execute two women who converted to Christianity. Iran also hanged Hossein Soodmand for becoming a Christian. This proves that what Iran calls Islam is a lie and a fraud while Christianity, if not a scientifically proven truth, is still the superior belief system. The reason is obvious: mullahs and ayatollahs who spent decades studying the Koran were unable to persuade two young women that Islam is superior to Christianity, and therefore had to resort to the “arguments” of the most primitive jungle ape: the club, the rock, beatings, and other forms of violence and threats of violence.
It is obvious what the mullahs and ayatollahs fear, and it is the same thing that book-burners, Inquisitions, and so on have feared throughout history: the truth. Roman Emperors threw Christians to the lions because neither they nor their priests could argue with a straight face that the Emperor was in fact a god (even though he got sick, bled, and eventually died like anybody else). The Roman people soon realized this, and that is why Rome eventually became the center of Christianity. The Inquisition persecuted Martin Luther because he spoke the truth about corruption and venality in the Catholic Church, and the same thing can be said about the Inquisition’s persecution of Jews; nothing about the Catholic Church’s conduct in those days suggested that its side of the argument consisted of anything but primitive violence. Censors throughout history have burned books and people because they were afraid of what their own people might read or hear.
We do not believe that Jesus was the son of God or that he rose from the dead, but we recognize that a religion whose basic premise is that its founder died for his followers is infinitely superior to a “religion” that was invented to get the founder’s deluded followers to kill and die for him. Note that the following cartoon passes no judgment on whether Jesus was actually the son of God; it indicates only that Christians conduct themselves on the premise that Jesus died for them, while history shows conclusively that Mohammad, a possibly illiterate and definitely violent desert bandit and likely child rapist, created a religion to get people to kill and die for him. (We recognize that Islam in most countries has evolved as far as from what Mohammad preached as modern humans have evolved from their simian ancestors.)
Jesus died for Christians, Muslims died for Mohammed
We also remind our readers of the Old Man of the Mountains, the leader of the Assassins (hashisheen, hashish-users). He gave his followers hashish, and then admitted them into a beautiful garden full of compliant women. He told them they were in Paradise, and would go there forever if they died for him. No religion on earth directs its appeal to a man’s most primitive reproductive instincts, and only the scam known as militant “Islam” promises its followers a lifetime orgy with 72 virgins. We note, however, that none of the goat-bearded mullahs who pant uncontrollably while they describe these virgins to impressionable teenagers with far more testosterone than good sense are all that eager to get their own eternal reward, and that is because they do not believe in it.
The bottom line is that, if there were any truth or merit behind what Iran calls Islam, mullahs and ayatollahs who have studied this so-called religion for decades should have been able to persuade these young woman with logic, reason, and factual arguments. The fact that they had to resort instead to the “logic” of the most primitive and savage jungle denizens speaks for itself; Iranian Islam is a sham, a lie, and a fraud while Christianity is the superior belief system.
[...] Follow this link: Israpundit » Blog… [...]
Pingback by Israpundit » Blog… — November 25, 2009 @ 7:35 am
This is not true. In fact islam hasn’t evolved at all.
Comment by Laura — November 25, 2009 @ 11:12 pm
Re: #2
Islam 1.0 (Mohammad’s version) = a phony religion to get dirt-ignorant savages to murder and die for their leaders. It also condones child rape as practiced by Mohammad.
Islam 2.0 = as practiced in Turkey and most parts of the United States. There are however “mosques” in the U.S. whose imams call for the overthrow of democracy and the implementation of Sharia law, and these are obviously Islam 1.0.
Comment by Bill Levinson — November 26, 2009 @ 1:02 am
Call me a wild-eyed optimist, but I think Islam is in a very precarious state, similar to the Soviet Union before it fell.
Islam has been protected from critical thought for 1400 years. But now, with the internet and satellite TV, renegade ideas are bombarding the Muslim world. For instance, there is a Coptic priest - who is also an expert in the Koran - who broadcasts a show in Arabic in multiple middle-east countries. Zakaria Botros is his name. He is driving the Islamic authorities crazy because they can’t refute his arguments. But millions are watching…
By comparison, Judaism and Christianity have allowed criticism for hundreds of years (if not thousands.) The difference is that Judaism and Christianity (yes I’m Christian) are founded on God’s word. Islam is not. It will not withstand honest scrutiny.
Having said that, the die-hards in their ranks may double-down all the more as they see things slipping away…
Comment by Calvary — November 26, 2009 @ 5:27 am
Calvary:
You may be correct but if you were intellectually honest the same arguments you use against Islam can also be used against Christianity. Think about it!
Then from every thing I have read Christianity is losing ground to Islam all over the world including America.
Of course with fifty to a hundred million Mexicans flooding America in 39 years America will be mostly Roman Catholic and Spanish as the primary culture and Language but that will keep the democrats in power for a long time.
Comment by yamit82 — November 26, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
From everything I see, all major religions are mostly losing ground to secularism/atheism.
Comment by Shy Guy — November 26, 2009 @ 6:11 pm
The Gurus are doing a land office business. Ask Levinson.
Comment by yamit82 — November 26, 2009 @ 6:21 pm
Bill,
two years ago, the publication of cartoons of the prophet Mohammed sparked a violent reaction. As a result, Yale University Press refused to republish the cartoons in their book due to the threat of violence. Comedy Central censored an episode of South Park because of this threat of violence.
In the meantime, people publicly mock Christianity and Christians. Which religion is better- one whose adherents are not willing to defend their God, or one whose adherents are willing to shed other people’s blood for their God? If an atheist were to convert to theism, which religion would he pick?
Comment by Michael Ejercito — November 26, 2009 @ 7:30 pm
It is not an issue of which religion is better. That too much depends on an objective evaluation of what “better” means.
Such an analysis would be a waste of time, because better to Christians and Muslims invariably will be defined by themselves and irrespective of what some supposed honest broker (if there could even be one both respected) might come up with.
The issue comes down to each religion protecting and advancing their beliefs, the extent to which each perceives the other as threatening their religion and religiously influenced culture.
For Christians there is a wealth of evidence that says it is under attack and threat from Islam. Chrisitans, inexplicably have not reacted to these threats and attacks.
Many Muslims see that whatever attacks Islam has made on Christians and non-Muslims, especially those with a Western view, are justified as a defensive measure against the threats Islam is faced with.
The bottom line is that each religious group that wishes its religion to survive, must fight for that survival. The strongest with the strongest survival instinct will survive.
Jews interestingly in spite of being conventionally weak throughout their history, have found strength in less conventional ways to exist to this day while, traditionally far more powerful religious groups and enemy nations of Israel have vanished, save for their stories being recorded in history texts.
Comment by Bill Narvey — November 26, 2009 @ 8:04 pm
It is pretty obvious to the casual observer- people are willing to mock Jesus Christ, Christians, and Christianity, while a major cable television network and a university publisher is afraid of showing certain images for fear of offending Muslims.
Would you rather be ridiculed or feared?
Comment by Michael Ejercito — November 26, 2009 @ 11:01 pm
Apparently ridiculed: What’s that about turning the other cheek? Then Christians may have learned being ridiculed from the Jews. Most Jews ridiculed think it’s complimentary; You stole all our other ideas why not loving being ridiculed as well?
Comment by yamit82 — November 27, 2009 @ 12:36 am
Finish the thought to it’s logical conclusion.
Comment by yamit82 — November 27, 2009 @ 12:40 am