November 27, 2009

The role of fat cat climate profiteers’ bundled contributions in so-called “climate legislation”
by Bill Levinson

We read in our morning paper that the Obama Administration promises that proposed carbon regulations will cost American families less than a dollar a day, and will reduce deaths from air pollution. The latter proposition is an outright fraud because carbon dioxide is not a pollutant; our lungs always contain a far higher concentration than the air around any coal-fired power plant. Obama’s dishonest efforts to equate carbon dioxide to genuine pollutants like sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and so on shows just how eager he is to enrich the special interests whose bundled campaign contributions bought him. Bundled contributions are legal but working Americans who will have to pay to enrich Obama’s sugar daddies nonetheless have the right to know who really runs the Obama Administration.

We reported previously that Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said openly that the real purpose of “climate legislation” is to enrich Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, the Green Exchange, and the New York Stock Exchange. Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan Chase each bundled six figures in contributions to Obama. Goldman Sachs bundled $12.6K for Gillibrand, and J.P. Morgan Chase raised $12.8K for her; now it is easy to see why she remembered these firms when she wrote her letter to the Wall Street Journal.

We remind our readers that Goldman Sachs needed billions of dollars to avoid the consequences of bad investment decisions, but continued to pay its partners–maybe the same ones who gave $2300 each, the maximum allowable contribution, to bundle almost a million dollars for Obama–enormous bonuses.

The struggling Wall Street bank has set aside £7 billion for salaries and 2008 year-end bonuses, it emerged yesterday.

Each of the firm’s 443 partners is on course to pocket an average Christmas bonus of more than £3million.

The size of the pay pool comfortably dwarfs the £6.1 billion lifeline which the U.S. government is throwing to Goldman as part of its £430billion bail-out.

When you get a Christmas bonus of 3 million pounds (a pound is about $1.65), you can easily peel off $2300 to play sugar daddy to a President who will keep those Federal dollars (taken from the pockets of people who work at genuine value-adding jobs) flowing while enacting legislation that will add billions to your bottom line. J.P. Morgan Chase is another bailout beneficiary and, quite frankly, the United States would probably be better off without both firms just as it is better off without would-be climate profiteers Enron and Lehman Brothers.

We also reported that Barack Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency allegedly committed scientific misconduct and academic dishonesty–actions for which any company or university that received Federal grants would be severely disciplined–by ordering a researcher to remain silent about data that contradicted Obama’s cap and trade agenda. In other words, Barack Obama is allegedly using his position to order subordinates to commit actual scientific fraud and to lie (whether by commission or, in this case, acts of omission) to the American people to support his agenda, which is to dance the cap and trade with the ones whose bundled contributions bought him.

Dr. Alan Carlin, a 37-year agency veteran, was muzzled earlier this spring. Dr. Carlin offered a report poking holes in the science underlying the theory of manmade global warming. His superior … complained the paper did “not help the legal or policy case” for Team Obama’s decision to regulate carbon, told him to “move on to other issues,” and forbade him from discussing it outside the office.

The above, if true, meets the generally accepted definitions of academic dishonesty and scientific misconduct, specifically the willful suppression of data that does not support the agenda of the researcher or, in this case, the researcher’s superiors. Computer hackers who admittedly stole E-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit meanwhile allege a widespread conspiracy to commit academic dishonesty and scientific misconduct in favor of so-called climate change legislation to which Obama plans to commit the United States at Copenhagen.

Computer hackers have obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England. These e-mails, which have now been confirmed as real, involved many researchers across the globe with ideologically similar advocates around the world. They were brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not support global warming claims. The academics here also worked closely with the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The United Nations is well known for its dishonesty and pervasive corruption, and nothing it does–ranging from sexual intercourse with pre-teen children (Google on “United Nations” and “sex for food”) to perpetration of scientific fraud would surprise us.