The Obama Administration: A Systematic Failure
Janet Napolitano’s incompetence is merely the tip of the iceberg.
by Bill Levinson
Many circus and Coney Island sideshow performers have genuine talent and qualifications; the human blockhead act, for example, requires skill and practice to avoid self-injury. In 2008, however, the American people played a sick practical joke on themselves by electing a clown (more like the Joker as portrayed by the late Heath Ledger) with no talent or qualifications whatsoever, and said clown promptly staffed his Administration with a collection of equally unqualified freaks as shown below. Unless voters close this sideshow by removing the Democratic majority in the House and Senate, its admission price will consist of trillions of dollars in taxpayer money and economic damage to the United States.
The Obama Administration: A Systematic Failure
Janet Napolitano demonstrated her total unfitness to lead Homeland Security when she defined gun owners, pro-lifers, veterans of our Armed Forces, and people who oppose illegal immigration (i.e. they oppose something that is a crime under the laws of the United States) as potential terrorists, while apparently overlooking militant “Muslims” who correspond with Al Qaida. After one of the latter allegedly tried to blow up an airplane with explosives he had smuggled aboard, she declared that the system that supposedly protects us from such acts worked. Dolores Umbridge pink is exactly the right color for Napolitano, noting that the fictional villainess of the Harry Potter series said that people like Harry Potter, as opposed to Lord Voldemort, were the “potential terrorists” of her world.
Next we come to Eric Holder’s “Justice” Department, which seeks to prosecute CIA agents who protect us from terrorism (but Lord Voldemort doesn’t exist, and Harry Potter is the boy who lies, correct?) but overlooks alleged intimidation of voters by the Obama campaign, as well as potentially illegal Internet gambling by the Obama campaign. The former was alleged not by Republicans but by Hillary Clinton (Barry’s current Secretary of State) while we have personal knowledge of the latter; we received solicitations for “Dinner with Barack” that required a donation of $5 or more to enter.
Only after complaints from Minnesota law enforcement did the Obama campaign modify this solicitation to allow entry without a donation, thus making it not a lottery. In addition, the announcement of a winner (Dorothy Unruh) before the entry deadline suggested that not every entrant had an equal chance to win, thus making it not only a lottery but a dishonest lottery whose organizers cheated. Even an illegal numbers game that is run by organized crime is more honest, because at least everybody who enters has the same chance to win.
More recently, a veteran Justice Department attorney was removed from his post and transferred–possibly for doing his job by seeking prosecution of stick-wielding Black Panthers who allegedly intimidated voters during the 2008 election.
- The complaint, which accused party members of intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place while wearing black berets, black combat boots, black dress shirts and black jackets with military-style markings, and wielding a nightstick, was later dismissed by Obama administration political appointees at the Justice Department.
Since it is apparent that Eric Holder is going to enforce one U.S. Code Title 18 for Barack Obama’s campaign and the Black Panthers, and a different U.S. Code Title 18 for ordinary citizens, and also Barack Obama’s executive order that grants diplomatic immunity to Interpol agents, we must now familiarize our readers with their rights and responsibilities as jurors and also what to say when questioned by the police (or, more importantly, a member of Obama’s civilian security force, private army, Obamajugend, or whatever): “I have nothing to say, Sir,” or “I have nothing to say, Officer.” See also “Do Not Talk to the Police” as presented by an attorney and a veteran police officer.
The above does not apply, of course, if you see a militant “Muslim” assembling what appears to be a bomb, chanting to Allah, and placing phone calls to Al Qaida while waiting at an airport terminal. In that case, you talk to the police on the spot, and hope you don’t get sued for “profiling.” We meanwhile just reported an illegal online pharmacy to the DEA for offering to sell Xanax over the Internet. “Do Not Talk to the Police” does NOT apply to your moral and possibly legal duty to report a felony, and especially a violent felony, or to testify about what you saw. The YouTube presentation points out, however, that Martha Stewart would not have gone to jail had she simply refused to talk to Federal investigators, and there is the classic example of the traffic cop who pulls you over and asks, “Do you know why I pulled you over?” If you tell him what you thought you might have done, he can write a ticket without having to worry about a successful defense in court. On the other hand, if he was confident that he could write a ticket that would hold up in court, he wouldn’t need to ask.
There was also the situation, admittedly on George Bush’s watch, in which New Orleans police illegally confiscated firearms from city residents during the flood. Citizens could have handled this by replying to the question, “Do you have any guns in the house?” with “I have nothing to say, Officer.” If he asks if he can come inside and look, ask “Do you have a warrant, Officer?” Since he doesn’t, the answer is, “No, Officer, I cannot allow you inside without a warrant.” It is unfortunate that we must discuss these things but, in light of the Eric Holder Justice Department’s two sets of U.S. Codes along with an executive order that grants diplomatic immunity to foreign law enforcement personnel, they now need to be discussed.
Next we come to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, who recently proclaimed a gas we all exhale every few seconds a hazard to human life. The Wall Street Journal published a credible allegation of scientific misconduct, specifically suppression of research or information that does not support a given commercial or political agenda, in Ms. Jackson’s organization. The buck stops with her, and she is responsible for the alleged scientific misconduct and academic dishonesty.
- Dr. Alan Carlin, a 37-year agency veteran, was muzzled earlier this spring. Dr. Carlin offered a report poking holes in the science underlying the theory of manmade global warming. His superior, Al McGartland, complained the paper did “not help the legal or policy case” for Team Obama’s decision to regulate carbon, told him to “move on to other issues,” and forbade him from discussing it outside the office.
Scientific misconduct is cause for a private business or university to be banned from receiving Federal contracts, and Lisa Jackson’s EPA underscores our belief that there is now one set of laws for Barack Obama and his cohorts, and an entirely different set of laws for everybody else. This in turn reinforces the need for what we just discussed above.
Finally we have Obama’s Green Jobs czar Van Jones: the moral equivalent of a Holocaust denier who signed a letter that questions what “really happened” on 9/11. It speaks for itself, and it is vital that Americans end the Democrats’ majority this November to prevent further damage to the country. Then we must correct the root cause of the problem in November 2012.