Democratic Jews have their priorities ass-backwards
by Caroline Glick, JPOST
American Jews have good reason to be ashamed and angry today. As Iran moves into the final stages of its nuclear weapons development program – nuclear weapons which it will use to destroy the State of Israel, endanger Jews around the world and cow the United States of America – Democratic American Jewish leaders decided that putting Sen. Barack Obama in the White House is more important than protecting the lives of the Jewish people in Israel and around the world.
On Monday, the New York Sun published the speech that Republican vice presidential nominee and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin would have delivered at that day’s rally outside UN headquarters in New York against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and against Iran’s plan to destroy Israel. She would have delivered it, if she hadn’t been disinvited.
The rally was co-sponsored by the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, the National Coalition to Stop Iran Now, The Israel Project, United Jewish Communities, the UJA-Federation of New York and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs. Its purpose was to present a united American Jewish front against Iran’s genocidal leader and against its genocidal regime which is developing nuclear weapons with the stated intention of committing the second Holocaust in 80 years.
Palin’s speech is an extraordinary document. In its opening paragraph she made clear that Iran presents a danger not just to Israel, but to the US. And not just to some Americans, but to all Americans. Her speech was a warning to Iran – and anyone else who was listening – that Americans are not indifferent to its behavior, its genocidal ideology and the barbarity of its regime. Rather, they are outraged.
After that opening, Palin’s speech set out clearly how Iran is advancing its nuclear project, why it must be prevented from acquiring nuclear weapons and why and how the regime itself must be opposed by all right thinking people – not just Israelis and Americans – but by all people who value human freedom.
PALIN’S SPEECH was a message of national – rather than simply Republican – resolve against Iran’s nuclear weapons program and its active involvement in global and regional terrorism. She made this point by quoting statements that Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton has made against the Iranian regime.
IF PALIN had been allowed to deliver this speech at Monday’s rally, she would done just what the organizers of the rally, and what the Jewish people in Israel, America and worldwide need to have done. She would have elevated the imperative of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and the implicit moral and strategic imperative of overthrowing the regime in Teheran to the top of America’s national security agenda. Given the massive media attention she garners at all of her public appearances, Palin’s participation in the rally would have done more to steel Americans – across the political spectrum – to the cause of opposing Iran than 10 UN Security Council sanctions resolutions could do.
It was a remarkable speech, prepared by a remarkable woman. But it was not heard. It was not heard because the Democratic Party and Jewish Democrats believe that their partisan interest in demonizing Palin and making Americans generally and American Jews in particular hate and fear her to secure their votes for Obama and his running-mate Sen. Joseph Biden in the November election is more important than allowing Palin to elevate the necessity of preventing a second Holocaust to the top of the US’s national security agenda.
The rally’s organizers invited both Clinton and Palin to speak. It was a wise move. In light of Iran’s monstrous oppression of Iranian women, had the two most powerful women in American politics joined forces in opposing the regime and its war against human freedom, their appearance would have sent a message of American unity and resolve that would have reverberated not just throughout the US and in the US presidential race, but throughout the world and into Iran itself. But it was not to be.
The moment that Clinton found out that she was to share a stage with Palin, she cancelled her appearance. By cancelling, she signaled to Jewish Democrats – and Democrats in general – that opposing Palin and the Republican Party is more important than opposing Ahmadinejad and the genocidal regime he represents.
THE JEWISH Democrats on the rally’s organizing committee got the message loud and clear. Two of the rally’s co-sponsors – the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and the UJA Federation of New York demanded that the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations disinvite Palin.
The JCPA is led by Steven Gutow. Before joining the JCPA, he served as the founding executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, which is the Jewish support arm of the Democratic Party. The UJA Federation of New York is led by John Ruskay, who began his Jewish communal career as an anti-Israel “peace” activist in the radical CONAME and Breira organizations. Among their other endeavors, CONAME and Breira opposed US military assistance to Israel during the Yom Kippur War and called for US recognition of the PLO after the group massacred 26 children in Ma’alot in 1974.
Gutow and Ruskay were supported in their demand to disinvite Palin by the National Jewish Democratic Council and by the new Jewish pro-Palestinian lobbying group J-Street.
In an attempt to assuage Gutow and Ruskay, the rally organizers invited Biden to speak. But he had a scheduling conflict. So the organizers contacted the Obama campaign and asked it to send a representative. The campaign offered Congressman Robert Wexler.
But the Democrats knew that Wexler would be no match for Palin. So they continued on the warpath, absurdly claiming that by inviting Palin (and Clinton, Biden and Wexler), the organizers were endangering the sponsoring organizations’ tax-exempt status. That is, through Ruskay and Gutow, in their bid to prevent Palin from appearing at the rally, the Democrats threatened to bring down the organized Jewish community.
Never mind that the threat is absurd. The likelihood that the Internal Revenue Service would open an investigation against every major American Jewish organization for daring to invite Palin to a rally opposing Ahmadinejad’s appearance at the UN and Iran’s stated intention of annihilating Israel is just slightly smaller than the prospect of Ahmadinejad wrapping himself in an Israeli flag and singing “Hatikva” on the UN rostrum.
But no matter. The fear that these Democratic Jews would openly split the Jewish community on the need to confront Iran frightened the organizers. The notion that the Democratic Party, and its Jewish supporters would openly turn their backs on the need to confront Iran to advance the political fortunes of their party and their party’s presidential slate was too much to take. Palin was disinvited.
LIBERAL AMERICAN Jews, like liberal Americans in general, and indeed like their fellow leftists in Israel and throughout the West, uphold themselves as champions of human rights. They claim that they care about the underdog, the wretched of the earth. They care about the environment. They care about securing American women’s unfettered access to abortions. They care about keeping Christianity and God out of the public sphere. They care about offering peace to those who are actively seeking their destruction so that they can applaud themselves for their open-mindedness and tell themselves how much better they are than savage conservatives.
Those horrible, war-mongering, Bambi killing, unborn baby defending, God-believing conservatives, who think that there are things worth going to war to protect, must be defeated at all costs. They must intimidate, attack, demonize and defeat those conservatives who think that the free women of the West should be standing shoulder to shoulder not with Planned Parenthood, but with the women of the Islamic world who are enslaved by a misogynist Shari’a legal code that treats them as slaves and deprives them of control not simply of their wombs, but of their faces, their hair, their arms, their legs, their minds and their hearts.
The lives of 6 million Jews in Israel are today tied to the fortunes of those women, to the fortunes of American forces in Iraq, to the willingness of Americans across the political and ideological spectrum to recognize that there is more that unifies them than divides them and to act on that knowledge to defeat the forces of genocide, oppression, hatred and destruction that are led today by the Iranian regime and personified in the brutal personality of Ahmadinejad. But Jewish Democrats chose to ignore this basic truth in order to silence Palin.
They should be ashamed. The Democratic Party should be ashamed. And Jewish American voters should consider carefully whether opposing a woman who opposes the abortion of fetuses is really more important than standing up for the right of already born Jews to continue to live and for the Jewish state to continue to exist. Because this week it came to that.
email rec’d
I replied
Letters to the Editor
The New York Times
Your Sept. 23 Metro Section, topped by a picture of a lone anti-Iran protestor, and a few straggling NYPD officers, to introduce Clyde Haberman’s piece on the huge anti-Ahmadinejad rally that took place outside the United Nations on Monday, Sept. 22, confirms my reasons for ending my subscription to the Times years ago. You never fail to slant the news so that the public gets a distorted report.
Where were the pictures of the thousands of people who attended the rally to protest Ahmadinejad’s presence in this country, in NYC, at the United Nations? Where were photos of all the signs denouncing the Iranian president’s genocidal wishes? In the wisdom of the Times editors, these were unimportant. What was shown was the aftermath, the clean-up. How disgraceful!
Haberman wrote about the decision to bar Sarah Palin from the rally, once Hillary Clinton withdrew as a speaker. He neglected to write about the countless signs and demonstrations of support for Palin and McCain that were present at the rally. They were carried by those who, like me, were disgusted by the decision of the establishment Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organization. The Conference leaders were undoubtedly pressured by the liberal Jewish Democrats, who love the NY Times, to keep Palin off the speakers’ platform, for fear she would deliver a tough message against Iran.
When once again the world is facing a would-be genocide perpetrator, and the free world should be united against the threat of nuclear extinction, petty political considerations and power-plays rule the day. It’s pitiful.
Ted, well done. Such letter appropriately edited should also be sent to the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, Steven Gutow of JCPA, John Ruskay of the UJA Federation of New York as well as their respective boards of directors with copies to AIPAC, B’Nai Brith and any other Jewish organization which might share your concerns.
How do people who are anti-Israel get to lead mainstream Jewish organizations? There is something truly sick about our community.
Regarding #4,
I am sorry to be so harsh, but I am really upset about the way the Jewish organizations handled yesterday’s rally. I’ve occasionally wondered why Jews who were alive and safe in America during the 1940s didn’t do more to call attention to the Holocaust. I guess some were insecure about being Jewish and didn’t want to appear as though they put the interests or well-being of Jews before others.
I don’t have to wonder why today’s Jews didn’t do more to oppose Iran going nuclear, presenting an existential threat to Israel and the possible killing of 6 million more Jews. They were more concerned with electing Barack Obama. Doing anything that would put the lives of millions of Jews, for at least a day, as a greater priority than the Obama campaign would trigger the same insecure feelings among much of the Jewish community. They don’t want to appear provincial, standing up for Israel and the Jews. Fine be cowards, but don’t become leaders of Jewish organizations, if all you really care about is how you look in the eyes of your non-Jewish lefty friends, who despite all their open-mindedness, don’t truly accept you for who you are, particularly when you have to passionately serve every fashionable interest group, but never your own people.
It is time that Jewish community organizations are run by people who are pro-Israel, patriotic Americans and unashamed of their heritage. Isn’t that the least that the rank-and-file could ask from those who claim to speak in their name? Perhaps we need new organizations where donations and left-wing commitment aren’t essential qualifications to leadership positions and the organization focuses on those issues most important to the people they purport to represent. There are other groups one can join to support abortion or save the caribou. The time, energy and money of the Jewish community organizations should go, first and foremost, toward life-and-death Jewish concerns, such as making sure that Israel’s 6 million Jews have a future.
Less than 10% of all Jewish donations to charity are committed to Jewish Charities and Jewish causes which include Jewish education and day schools. This statistic I believe goes to the heart of the American Jewish communal present and future. What future?
Pingback: AnyoneButObama.org » Blog Archive » Are US Jews blind??
Pingback: Nobama Roundup « A Defending Crusader…