February 29, 2008

Obama Supporters Terrified of Viral E-Mails

“There’s only one rule: stay in the light.” Richard Riddick in Pitch Black
by Bill Levinson

To which we add two rules for swimming with sharks:
(1) Don’t get bitten
(2) If you violate rule #1, don’t thrash around or bleed. It doesn’t help, and it only attracts more sharks.

Barbara Barnett’s A New Round of Anti-Obama Emails Spreads Virally Through the ‘Net shows us exactly what we have to do to keep this phony smile on top of an empty suit out of the White House. We must act on this information as aggressively as possible, and we have posted a couple of viral E-mails for circulation. As stated by Barnett,

Just as the first barrage of emails began to slow to a trickle, a brand new version has begun to circulate within the community. These new anti-Obama emails have been forwarded to me by friends, who received them from someone else. I was one of 10 to 20 addressees on each email. And I guarantee that several of those 10 or 20 people will forward it to 10 more. And thus will it spread virus-like until it dies out. Or doesn’t.

…Always read with skepticism, calm down, check the facts, and then, if you must, (after re-reading with even more skepticism) pass it along. Remember that every email you forward will likely reach halfway around the planet earth within hours. Like feathers cast upon the wind, they are virtually irretrievable; unlike feathers, malicious disinformation can fly unfettered with potentially tragic results.

While we will not condone, support, or circulate disinformation of any kind (we will leave this sort of thing to the National Jewish Democratic Council), Barnett tells us by implication the obvious corollary: the truth can fly unfettered with hopefully devastating results. So far, no one has been able to challenge the truth of the following statements, which we place in the public domain for circulation by E-mail and other media.

Subject: Barack Obama Enables Racism, Hatred and Contempt for Jews and Catholics

In fairness to Barack Obama, I must say up front that I have never heard or read of him personally speaking a word against Jews, Catholics, or white people in general. It is his failure to understand, or more likely failure to care, that his public appearances with and endorsements of professional bigots and hate organizations enables racism, anti-Semitism, and anti-Catholicism that makes him unfit for any office of public trust or responsibility.

(1) Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Ronald Reagan (R-CA) and Lou Barletta (D-PA) were all offered endorsements by hate organizations (Independence Party, Ku Klux Klan). None of them had to be asked to reject these endorsements without hesitation, qualification, or equivocation. Barack Obama, in contrast, refused to use the word “reject” in connection with support from Louis Farrakhan, the racist and anti-Semitic leader of the Nation of Islam, until Tim Russert and Hillary Clinton cornered him like a rat during the February 26, 2008 Democratic debate. Only when they asked him three times to “reject” Farrakhan’s support did Obama, with obvious reluctance, do so. Farrakhan is on record as calling the Pope the Antichrist while saying that white people are “potential humans” who “haven’t evolved yet.”

(2) Barack Obama has made public appearances with, promoted, and endorsed Al Sharpton and his National Action Network. Sharpton’s long record of inciting hatred of white people and especially Jews includes the Tawana Brawley scandal (1988), Crown Heights riots (1991), and Freddy’s Fashion Mart incident (1995) in which one of Sharpton’s deranged followers burned a Jewish-owned store with the loss of seven innocent lives. In the latter incident, the National Action Network, which Obama praised in the highest terms, shouted epithets like “bloodsucking Jew” and “see that the cracker suffers,” to which Sharpton personally added “white interloper.”

(3) Barack Obama has solicited and received the support of MoveOn.org, which published not only a vicious insult to General David Petraeus but also a derogatory photomanipulation of Pope Benedict waving a gavel in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. This “Catholics are taking over America” picture was entirely consistent with the anti-Catholic, as well as anti-Semitic and anti-Evangelical, hate speech that MoveOn.org welcomed on its now disgraced Action Forum. Contrary to MoveOn’s assertions that the Action Forum was an “open forum” for whose content MoveOn was not responsible, MoveOn’s moderators were exercising complete editorial control by deleting material they found disagreeable. The hate speech against Jews, Catholics, Evangelicals, and others was allowed to stand, along with conspiracy theories that blamed the U.S. Government, Jews, and others for 9/11.

(4) Barack Obama is a member of an arguably racist church whose pastor, Jeremiah Wright, said “white America” got a “wake up call” on 9/11. Wright also accompanied Louis Farrakhan on a visit to Moammar Khadafy, and the church recently honored Farrakhan with a Trumpet Award.

Posted by Bill Levinson @ 1:39 pm |

7 Comments


  1. You are missing the point. Whether the allegiations are tru–which they well may be–or false, his is not a campaign but a movement (as per Rush), whilst the empty suit with a smile is a cult figure. Although BHO may appear gaseous at first glance, there is a lot of substance to his name. As a true Leninist-Stalinist he will say anything and everything to advance his goal of establishing an Afrocentrist national socialism in America, so it doesn’t really matter what he says. With total immunity and MSM and the lunatic fringe on his side the only thing his opponent can do is expose BHO’s fallacies and advance a positive action plan for America

    Comment by vova — February 29, 2008 @ 2:22 pm



  2. The viral E-mails are obviously hurting him because NJDC and other Obama supporters are squealing about them like stuck pigs. That means we should get on with the sticking, as widely and as aggressively as possible.

    Comment by Bill Levinson — February 29, 2008 @ 6:48 pm



  3. Obama is being touted as a charismatic speaker. As one who is eloquent and inspiring. Nonsense. He is a Pied Piper.

    Here we have Obama, the orator, speaks: [ Reader: the following lines to be recited out loud, and slowly with passion.]

    “There will soon be a better day where we will all have a better day.

    “The troubles of today will no longer be the troubles of today.

    “Our country is great for we have a great country.”

    And so forth.

    In other words, if you read what he says you will find Obama has brought tautology to a new high! Sound and fury, signifying nothing, to borrow from “The Bard.” He’s jive-talker.

    It makes me wince with anger that any Citizen –or rational human–would support much less vote for him. His support is a symptom of a fundamental malady in America of recent origin and all because we have not won, the “mission” has not been accomplished — quickly, convincingly, conclusively and we are thus bogged down and humiliated. We don’t like that, so we listen to Obama’s snake-oil charm, and become beguiled that his “alternative medicine” –”Change” — will produce an elusive cure.

    Citizens, lend me your ear: No matter who is elected, there will be no fundamental [ underline fundamental ] change!

    Martin Kessler
    mdk4130@aol.com

    Comment by mdk4130 — March 1, 2008 @ 12:15 pm



  4. [...] We have previously shown that viral E-mails that assert “Barack Obama is a Muslim” are causing serious problems for the Obama campaign. We find this assertion objectionable for the same reason that the Philidelphia Inquirer stated in a recent editorial: even if it were true, the implication that being a Muslim (as opposed to an Islamic supremacist) somehow disqualifies someone from office is no better than an implication that being a Jew (”Jew Lieberman” per MoveOn.org), Catholic, woman, or Negro disqualifies someone from office. [...]

    Pingback by Israpundit » Blog Archive » Barack Obama is not a Muslim… (Viral E-mail For Circulation) — March 1, 2008 @ 1:12 pm



  5. total nonsense and American Jews know a bit better, be they for or against Obama. Here:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/us/politics/01obama.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

    Comment by davidstill — March 1, 2008 @ 2:32 pm



  6. [...] is Barack Obama? (Viral E-mail For Circulation) We have previously shown that viral E-mails (E-mails that people circulate to friends and associates, not E-mails that [...]

    Pingback by Who is Barack Obama? (Viral E-mail For Circulation) « The Husaria — March 2, 2008 @ 2:34 pm



  7. I would rather vote for the party that blindly supports glorious heros who celebrated Croatian Independence Day when the Nazi’s ‘liberated’ their land, who throw dangerous people thought to be Israeli agents in prison and throw away the key, who would rather curse Jews because they know the Jews will not support them, who go out of their way to protect people like Arafat from those who try to kill him, who hire cabinet members which belonged to companies openly anti-Israel, who train, arm, and fund Moslem radicals and seek photo opportunities with them, whose ancestors supported the Nazi party in Germany, who honor the fallen Nazi.

    Do I sound like an ardent Nazi or an errant Republican Jew who thinks Reagan-Bush, Inc. are the greatest presidents of the century? Is there a difference?

    Comment by rote — March 5, 2008 @ 1:40 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.