April 15, 2010

Biden’s “generated crisis” will be a war against Israel

By Ted Belman, (first posted Oct 24/08)

Senator Biden recently warned about an upcoming generated crises and asked for political support for Obama’s reaction.

    “Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”

I know what he is referring to. At least I believe I do. Fatah, Hamas and Hezbollah will attack Israel in a big way to get Israel to attack them back and the UNSC will then pass a Chapter VII resolution, without an American veto, demanding that Israel withdraw to the greenline and abandon all settlements. The UN sends a force consisting of soldiers from Jordan, Egypt and Syria to enforce it and establish “peace”. Here’s my reasoning.

In May of this year I wrote J-Street and Obama are in full agreement. It included J-Streets Statement of Principles

J Street brings together Americans who seek a new direction for American policy in the Middle East and broader public and policy debate in the U.S. about ways to achieve lasting peace in the Middle East.

We support:

    * Consistent and concerted diplomatic engagement by the United States to achieve Israeli-Arab peace. A negotiated end to the Israeli-Arab and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts serves both U.S. and Israeli strategic and security interests. Achieving it must be a priority for any future U.S. administration; (They insist that Israel be forced to capitulate.)

    * An enduring relationship between the US and Israel that promotes their common interests. We recognize and support Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people, a democratic country that promises equal rights for all its citizens and that has the right to defend itself against external threats; (But not a a Jewish state.There is a difference.

    * The creation of a viable Palestinian state as part of a negotiated two-state solution, based on the 1967 borders with agreed reciprocal land swaps. The future Palestinian state will require unprecedented levels of international economic and political support to succeed, including a resolution of the refugee issue within the new Palestinian state and in current host countries; (These borders would require the transfer of at least 150,000 Israelis.)

    * An Israeli-Syrian peace agreement based on the land-for-peace formula, security guarantees, and details outlined in previous negotiations; (Of what value are security guarantees?)

    * A comprehensive regional peace that builds on the Arab Initiative, leading to recognition of Israel by all its neighbors in the Middle East and the creation of a new regional approach to cooperation and security; (Pie in the sky.)

    * An American policy in the Middle East more broadly based on diplomacy, multilateralism and real partnership with the European Union, the Quartet and others. We support dialogue with a broad range of countries and actors, including Iran, over confrontation in order to find solutions to the region’s conflicts. (They want to appease them rather than confront them.)

Essentially they support the Saudi Plan. I believe they pay lip service to a negotiated settlement and understand that a settlement must be imposed.

Of the utmost importance is the fact that both Obama and J-Street are supported by George Soros if not created by him. The prosecution of AIPAC’s Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman was the first public move, followed by Mearsheimer and Walt’s book The Israel Lobby, in order to undermine the power of AIPAC. Then J-Street was created to replace it.

Thomas Friedman lent a hand by Redefining “What it means to be pro-Israel”

Biden’s remark suggests Pres Obama is going to administer tough love.

Thus the ground work has been laid for “tough love” and now a “generated crises” is needed to set the plan in motion.

I expect that Intifadah III will soon break out which will spiral out of control with Hezbollah and Hamas joining in. Just this week Haaretz reported Top Iran officials recommend preemptive strike against Israel. and DEBKA reported that Iran has developed a series of optional plans for pre-emptively attacking Israel. The “floating dirty bomb.” was intended for this purpose.

And who would complain? Certainly not Olmert, the EU, J-Street or Obama’s foreign policy team.

In an interview in 2002, Samantha Power, who is expected to be in Obama’s cabinet, was asked,

    Would you advise him to put a structure in place to monitor that situation, at least if one party or another [starts] looking like they might be moving toward genocide?

Power gave an astonishing answer:

    What we don’t need is some kind of early warning mechanism there, what we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing—or investing, I think, more than sacrificing—billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you’re serious, you have to put something on the line.

    Unfortunately, imposition of a solution on unwilling parties is dreadful. It’s a terrible thing to do, it’s fundamentally undemocratic. But, sadly, we don’t just have a democracy here either, we have a liberal democracy. There are certain sets of principles that guide our policy, or that are meant to, anyway. It’s essential that some set of principles becomes the benchmark, rather than a deference to [leaders] who are fundamentally politically destined to destroy the lives of their own people. And by that I mean what Tom Friedman has called “Sharafat” [Sharon-Arafat]. I do think in that sense, both political leaders have been dreadfully irresponsible. And, unfortunately, it does require external intervention…. Any intervention is going to come under fierce criticism. But we have to think about lesser evils, especially when the human stakes are becoming ever more pronounced.

Now you more fully understand Biden’s remarks. He is concerned about the “fierce criticism” of the intervention.

In a 1992 Jerusalem Post story, reference was made to a Biden conversation with Begin ten years earlier,in which Biden threatened to cut off all aid to Israel unless all settlement activity was stopped. John Podhoretz discussed this conversation in his recent Commentary article Did Biden Call for a Cut-Off in Aid to Israel?

We already have witnessed UN efforts to demand Israel withdraw and efforts to establish an Arab force to keep the peace in Gaza and Judea and Samaria. Egypt is hosting discussions between Hamas and Fatah. What could they be discussing.

Remember, every time there is an Arab/Israeli war, the UN intervenes to stop it.

[See: Cloward-Piven Strategy - the generated crisis]

Posted by Ted Belman @ 10:50 am | 22 Comments »

22 Responses to Biden’s “generated crisis” will be a war against Israel

  1. Biden is such an educated idiot! I’m just happy that I can read tomorrow’s newspaper and listen to the God of Israel’s plan during his 7 trumpets and 7 bowls of wrath against the anti-Messiah.

    Obama is by far the worst presidential candidate of all history! And Biden, well, he can be okay sometimes, but most of the time acts like a real potato head!

    Ted, I cleaned it up! Howz that?

  2. Ted Belman says:

    Email rec’d

    I very much appreciate your writing on Israel, and your great concern with Israel’s well- being and security.

    I also foresee a possible crisis and war in the coming year. But ‘foreseeing’ is not by any means,’knowing for certain’. The first focus of my concern is the casualties we will suffer, and then the destruction and damage to our infrastructure. The great nightmare is that beside Hizbollah, Hamas, Syria and Iran, Egypt might should we show weakness, attack us.

    Your speculation as to Obama’s policy makes sense, though Debkafile suggests he will be wary of entering in where Clinton, Bush have failed.

    Crises, I might add, could break out in many other places. The Shii-Sunni Iran- Saudi divide is not going away.

    All this is not to deny the scenario you have suggested, but to from experience suggest that we cannot really know where the next surprise will come from. Reports for instance are now that Iran will already be very close to a nuclear capability in Janurary 2009. Perhaps that is the crisis Obama will face.

  3. jrob says:

    I’ve always found it strange that the US responded to 9/11 not by attacking the Saudis, rather by strengthening Iran, presenting 7 years of sympathy propaganda for Islamists, and resurrecting Goebbels’ propaganda from WWII (neocon Jooos, papers on ‘the lobby’, general scapegoating of Israel by the CIA and FBI).

    This is not normal.

  4. Laura says:

    Remember, every time there is an Arab/Israeli war, the UN intervenes to stop it.

    They intervene to prevent Israel from winning.

  5. Pingback: WHY IS BELMAN DEFLECTING FROM THE IRANIAN BOMB BY END OF JANUARY? « 4international

  6. Pingback: Israpundit » Blog Archive » Obama Victory Puts Israel in the Crosshairs

  7. keelie says:

    They intervene to prevent Israel from winning.

    That’s why it will have to be lightning fast and ruthless.

  8. keelie says:

    It looks as if it will be a very stark choice: Either kill Hamas and Hezbolla thugs, or kill American soldiers sent to guard them while they try to destroy Israel. This is apparently what Obama is planning. Perfect propaganda material in the effort to bring Americans into the “hate Israel” fold. And this is why I used the terms “lightning fast and ruthless” above.

  9. ayn reagan says:

    It looks as if it will be a very stark choice: Either kill Hamas and Hezbolla thugs, or kill American soldiers sent to guard them while they try to destroy Israel. This is apparently what Obama is planning. Perfect propaganda material in the effort to bring Americans into the “hate Israel” fold. And this is why I used the terms “lightning fast and ruthless” above.

    Obama intends to destroy Israel.

    Once someone is willing to confront that unpleasant reality, everything that has happened makes perfect sense.

    He will “Gulf of Tonkin” the Jewish State, and do so smilingly.

    That is why it is so depressing that Netanyahu is still trying to mollify Obama.

    Bibi is clueless about the level of malevolence he is encountering.

  10. yamit82 says:

    Peace process: the end has started

    British Advertising Standards Agency banned images of the Western Wall from being used in Israeli tourist ads. The Wall, they say, is an occupied territory and not a part of Israel.

    For the first time, a Western government revealed the true extent of capitulation demanded of Israel. Retreating to the 1948 borders would mean relinquishing the entire Jerusalem, not just the Arab villages around it. And Arab demographic explosion inside Israel has effectively changed the 1948 border into the 1947 one, where Jews settle three narrowly interconnected enclaves among the sea of Arabs.

    When Muslims would have jurisdiction over the Temple Mount, Jews won’t be able to pray at the Western Wall below, anyway, because of the hail of stones.

    Jews quietly swallowed the earlier pill when the agency banned us from advertising Qumran caves – a Palestinian national heritage, indeed.

    Peace process by UK bureaucracy

    The British Advertising Standards Authority pushed Israeli Ministry of Tourism to remove pictures of Qumran from its ads as misleading, because the Brits don’t recognize Qumran as part of Israel.
    Qumran is place where the largest-ever cache of Hebrew scrolls had been found.

  11. yamit82 says:

    Israel’s new enemies: Jews

    IDF trains its soldiers to confront “settler violence,” a catchphrase for peaceful demonstrations by the Jews whom the government had induced to settle in Judea and Samaria and now wants to uproot.

    The protests would only be expected if the government prepares to accept the White House demand to extend the ten-month West Bank construction moratorium and expand it onto Jerusalem.

  12. yamit82 says:

    Iran sanctions dropped

    The six permanent UNSC members debated Israel’s existence – implicitly, by discussing a new round of sanctions on Iran.

    The Russians and Chinese called the talks “very constructive,” which means that the US accepted their demand for diplomatic efforts rather than sanctions. The elusive diplomatic solution never solved any conflict, but who cares.

    To underscore its commitment to Iran, Russia announced that Bushehr reactor will be completed this August. Apparently, the US accepted the Russian view that the reactor is peaceful. Oh sure, Iranians need nuclear energy at six times the cost of natural gas power generation.

    After Russian companies stopped supplying Iran with gasoline, Chinese suppliers stepped in just as I expected.

    In the meanwhile, the three ex-commandos who lead Israeli government are afraid to attack Iran due to Hussein Obama’s objections.

  13. ayn reagan says:

    I was wondering where you were.

  14. RandyTexas says:

    Rather, it is a “degenerated crisis” generated by elitists who see Israel as an obstacle to a world system. They wrongly believe that Arab nations will be manageable once Israel is taken down. It has been my mantra that internationalists pose a greater threat than Islam since they have the power to defeat the latter and are more likely to to conquer sovereign nations through treaties and UN resolutions.

    This isn’t your daddy’s war where weapons were obvious. This war is full of treason, intrigue, abusive power and conspiracies. Unfortunately, when schemes fail the internationalists will resort back to military force like the ‘good ole days’ and the whole world will suffer.

    But yes, Israel will be center stage.

    The battle for Israel is the battle for the world.

  15. yamit82 says:

    I was wondering where you were.

    Something like that. LOL Yesterday you joggled my memory banks with a photo and I woke up this am, and remembered the face

    or rather the tongue!

    How dumb of me. I loved the group and Chaim Witz is a character

    Gene Simmons: Islam a “Vile Culture”

    KISS bassist Gene Simmons’ remarks on Islam to an Australian interviewer, which caused tsunamis of seething in the Australian Muslim community. For one reason or another I didn’t get around to it until now: KISS bassist offends Muslims.

    KISS bass player Gene Simmons has caused an uproar among Australia’s Muslim community by launching an attack on Islamic culture while in Melbourne.

    The lizard-tongued rock god who is touring Australia with the world’s most enduring glam rock band launched an attack on Muslim extremists during an interview on Melbourne’s 3AW radio.

    “Extremism believes that it’s okay to strap bombs on to your children and send them to paradise and whatever else and to behead people,” he said yesterday.

    The Israeli-born US musician went on to say Islam was a “vile culture” that treated women worse than dogs.

    Muslim women had to walk behind their men and were not allowed to be educated or own houses, he said.

    “Your dog, however, can walk side by side, your dog is allowed to have its own dog house… you can send your dog to school to learn tricks, sit, beg, do all that stuff — none of thewomen have that advantage.”

    He went on to say the west was under threat.

    “This is a vile culture and if you think for a second that it’s going to just live in the sands of God’s armpit you’ve got another thing coming,” he said.

    “They want to come and live right where you live and they think that you’re evil.”

    Simmons said the United Nations approach did not work and the west had to “speak softly and carry a big stick”.

    The radio station today fielded calls from Muslims upset at the comments, including Australian Muslim of the year Susan Carland, who said Australian Muslims rejected extremism and did not fit Simmons’ stereotype.

    Ms Carland said she had two degrees, was doing her honours and “certainly do not walk behind my husband”.

    The chairman of the Islamic Council of Victoria, Yasser Soliman, said Simmons’ comments were “very unfortunate”.

    “He’s very famous obviously and popular and, as a result, influential,” he said.

    “Mixing the entertainment world with the political and religious world is a minefield.”

    He said Simmons had begun by talking about extremists but had gone on to vilify the entire Muslim culture.

    “A number of his claims regarding women and what they are allowed to do and not do are wrong — Islam teaches the opposite,” he said.

    Simmons is wrong, of course. About the dogs. Because Islamists Hate Dogs

    Islamists Hate Dogs

    “Conservative” Iranian cleric (conservative apparently meaning “raving mean-hearted creep” in this instance) Hojatolislam Hassani has called for all dogs to be arrested.

    A conservative Iranian cleric has denounced the “moral depravity” of owning a dog, and called for the arrest of all dogs and their owners.

    Dogs are considered unclean in Islamic law and the spread of dog ownership in Westernised secular circles in Iran is frowned upon by the religious establishment.

    “I demand the judiciary arrest all dogs with long, medium or short legs – together with their long-legged owners,” Hojatolislam Hassani is quoted as saying in the reformist Etemad newspaper.

    “Otherwise I’ll do it myself,” said the outspoken cleric, who leads Friday prayers in the north-western city of Urumiyeh.

    “In our country there is freedom of speech, but not freedom for corruption,” he said.

    It must be lonely to be a hate-bound militant Muslim fanatic.

  16. ayn reagan says:

    In 2005, Simmons was sued by a former lover, Georgeann Walsh Ward, who alleged that she had been “defamed” in the VH1 documentary When Kiss Ruled the World, which she claimed portrayed her as an “unchaste woman” and implied that she had been merely a band groupie, rather than a committed girlfriend of Simmons. Ward insisted that she had been involved in an “exclusive monogamous relationship” with Simmons since before Kiss was formed. The suit was settled as of June 29, 2006.

    “unchaste woman”

    So she squeezed money out of old Chaim because he convinced the world that she is “unchaste”?

    Where is my lawyer’s telephone number?

  17. Laura says:

    “Mixing the entertainment world with the political and religious world is a minefield.”

    Except when its leftists doing it of course.

  18. Laura says:

    He will “Gulf of Tonkin” the Jewish State, and do so smilingly.

    Yes, this is what I fear. If hussein can turn the American people against Israel, which is what he is attempting to do, its all over. We can only pray it backfires.

  19. yamit82 says:

    Kassam Fired at Western Negev

    Reported: 22:10 PM – Apr/15/10
    Follow Israel news briefs on Twitter and Facebook

    (IsraelNN.com) Terrorists in Hamas-controlled Gaza fired a Kassam rocket at the western Negev on Thursday evening.

    The rocket exploded in an open are. No casualties or damage were reported.

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    PA Arab Terrorist Cell Shot at Jewish Motorist

    by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

    The IDF has arrested a terror cell near metropolitan Tel Aviv that shot at a Jewish motorist in Samaria Wednesday night. The army also arrested rock-throwing children in the same area, but soldiers still are looking for a rock-thrower near Hevron who wounded one person Thursday evening.

    The army has intensified its efforts to protect Jewish motorists on the heavily-traveled road between central Samaria and Kfar Saba, north of Tel Aviv, following months of almost daily rock-throwing attacks.

    Security officers in the areas told Israel National News that the army is more effective now than it has been in the past.

    After the terrorism escalated into Wednesday night’s shooting attack, the IDF hunted down the source and arrested the cell Thursday morning in an Arab village near the city of Kalkilya, where the Palestinian Authority is responsible for security. A driver and passenger in the car were not injured by the gunshots.

    The IDF search also uncovered a group of youth who hurled rocks at Israeli cars Thursday morning, causing damage but no injuries.

    A motorist between Hevron-Kiryat Arba and the Gush Etzion-Efrat area was less fortunate Thursday evening and suffered light injuries when he drove on Highway 60, the major artery connecting Jerusalem with Hevron and communities north of Be’er Sheva. The incident occurred at the village of Beit Omar, where rock, stones and foreign objects are thrown at Jewish motorists almost daily.

    The attackers often cause serious damage, and sometimes death, by trying to break a windshield, resulting in the driver’s losing control and ending up in a crash.

  20. yamit82 says:

    Return of First Intifada: Dozens of Arabs Attack Cars, Ambulance

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133805