Syria gets green light from Washington
Syrian Troops Enclose Lebanon, Rice Contacts Hamas
From DEBKA-Net-Weekly updated by DEBKAfile, October 25, 2008
As part of the incipient thaw in US relations with Damascus, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has relayed a friendly message to Hamas political leader Khalid Meshaal through Syrian foreign minister Walid Muallem’s aides.
The message, described by Moussa Abu Marzouk, one of the heads of Hamas’ Damascus headquarters, as a “verbal communication.” was received as four Syrian divisions completed their deployment on Lebanon’s borders last week (see exclusive map). In the message, Rice praised the Palestinian terrorist group for halting its missile fire into Israel.
In my (Ted Belman) article It looks like a peace deal has been cut with Syria in June 08 I wrote
All these events are connected and suggest that a deal has been cut for he return of the Golan and final peace with Lebanon and Syria. It may be that the real reason for the “lull” with Hamas is to enable these events to play out. As I suggested in another article another reason for accepting the lull may be the belief that a future worse conflict can be avoided.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly 369 of Oct. 24 exposed the complete deployment - from the Syrian 4th Division along Lebanon’s northern border and the 10th, 12th and 14th Divisions on Lebanon’s eastern frontier opposite the Hermil mountains and the Beqaa Valley, and down to the Hermon Mountains facing South Lebanon and northern Israel.
Neither the Americans nor the Israelis had expected Damascus to round off this troop concentration so fast. It was taken for granted that Damascus would wait to the spring of 2009, after the rainy season. However, president Bashar Assad saw two advantages in going ahead before the Nov. 4 US presidential election:
First, Israel would be unlikely to strike in the days leading up to the US election and, second, Damascus would present the new man in the White House with a fait accompli.
The first concentration of 6-8,000 Syrian troops was disclosed in DEBKA-Net-Weekly 367 on Oct. 3 when two Syrian commando brigades of the 4th Mechanized Division took up positions along 2 km of the El Kebir River which marks that sector of the border - opposite northern Lebanon and its largest town of Tripoli.
Then, last week, Damascus consigned the 12th Mechanized Division to the border of the Lebanese Beqaa Valley and its central mountains, so completing the encirclement.
Syrian military positions now range from points opposite the northern Lebanese town of Al Qaa on Mt. Hermil to points further south up to the Massena border crossing 50 km north of Beirut. The Syrian 4th and 12th Divisions abut on the 10th Division ranged opposite South Lebanon and the disputed Shebaa Farms enclave. The military chain continues with the 14th commando division positioned on the Syrian slopes of Mt Hermon opposite Israeli military positions.
Not only are Lebanon’s borders enclosed, but Syria, in conjunction with Iran, has also established a military presence inside Lebanon. In the summer, they emplaced radar stations on the tall Lebanese peaks of Mt. Sannine and Barukh of the central mountain range, giving them a detailed view of every move on Lebanese territory, in northern Israel and on the eastern Mediterranean.
All these movements were performed with a nod and a wink from Washington.
Three years after forcing Syria to quit Lebanon, the Bush administration was ready to okay Syria’s massed troop concentration on Lebanese borders. Permission was granted in an apparently cursory meeting between Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Syrian foreign minister Walid Muallem on Sept. 27 at UN Center in New York.
Damascus counted this as validation of its drive for restored domination of Lebanon by dint of its military.
Washington also satisfied itself that the deal promised major profits:
-
1. The Assad government sounded willing for the first time to obstruct Hizballah and hold up its supplies of military hardware.
Syria’s 4th and 12 Divisions are in position for blocking Hizballah’s primary smuggling routes.
2. It was inferred that Damascus was at last beginning, albeit two years late, to honor UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which banned arms supplies to Hizballah as part of the ceasefire which ended the Israel-Lebanon war. Syria and Iran mocked that resolution for two years by smuggling weapons in bulk to the Shiite terrorists.
3. Damascus’ implied willingness to go against Hizballah was taken by Washington as a measure of Assad’s readiness to stand up to Iran at present - and break away in the future.
4. And might not that willingness be extended to embrace Tehran’s other terrorist protégés, the Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami, both of whose headquarters have long been welcome in Damascus?
DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s Middle East sources stressed that, for the time being, all these exciting benefits are no more than fond hopes, which the Bush administration cannot hope to see fully developed in the short months remaining of its term - if at all. Bashar Assad’s relations with the United States are littered with a trail of broken promises, as Rice’s predecessor, Colin Powell, can affirm.
Nevertheless, the secretary of state keeps pushing on.
DEBKAfile’s Washington and Middle East sources reveal that the message she addressed to Hamas’ political chief Khaled Meshaal in Damascus was the first communication ever from a senior US official to the Palestinian fundamentalists, which Washington lists as a terrorist group. Rice even complimented Hamas for halting its missile and rocket fire into Israel and voiced the hope that Palestinian organization would go further and join Palestinian-Israeli diplomacy.
After Moussa Abu Marzouk on Oct. 22, spilled the beans of what he called American recognition of his organization, the state department issued a hurried denial and set up an interview for Assistant Secretary of State David Welch with the London-based Saudi paper Shawq al Awsat.
The interviewer, Manal Lutfi, pushed hard for an admission of the US-Syrian détente, citing examples. But Welch stuck to his guns: “…I say there is no revision of our policies towards Syria.”
Formally speaking, he was truthful. However, the groundwork has certainly been laid for the major revision which he denied. Syrian troops have been allowed to openly close in on Lebanon without a demurral from the Bush administration. Washington has been caught out communicating with Bashar Assad’s extremist Palestinian guest, Hamas, for the first time.
The outcome of these preliminaries - milestone in themselves – will no doubt come to light only when a new president sits in the White House and Israel has a new government after a general election early next year.
The question becomes: what is the difference between having Hezbollah control Lebanon or a Greater Syria given control over Lebanon (a Syria that is backed by Iran and with renewed influence over Hamas [and Hezbollah] and with a new US recognition of Hamas)?
The Syrians know that whatever they promise the US right now can be erased with ease once the new administration takes over. Syria has probably not been asked for any long term peace in exchange for the US promises to look in the other direction, to strengthen its ties to Hamas and to give the Golan to Syria. The US and Israel will lose a lot and receive nothing except for a stronger enemy with a better strategic position and a more unified structure to confront in the future.
Whatever temporary stability the Syrian army can offer by controlling and exercising influence over Hezbollah and Hamas at the present will be unleashed at a later stage of the hudna.
Comment by Gary — October 25, 2008 @ 5:18 pm
Ezekiel 15 and 23 address the issue of prostitution with the Syrians quite well. I urge all of you to read these two chapters.
Daniel’s conclusion shows us the writing on the wall:
MENE MENE TEKEL PARSIN
Comment by Michael Sunstar — October 25, 2008 @ 10:24 pm
Debka like a fiction writer is using factual threads to stitch together its surmises and suppositions about the intents of Syria, Iran and Hezbollah and of course Washington.
That Rice sent a message to Hamas praising Hamas for halting its missile fire into Israel and expressing the hope Hamas becomes part of the Israel-Palestinian negotiations, could be true. It says no more however then Rice’s other mindless public wishful utterances and expressed hopes on the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
As for Debka’s reporting on Syria’s possible intentions vis a vis Lebanon, Iran or Hezbollah, that is so much ifs, ands and maybe’s.
Significantly, Debka ignores the more likely possibility that Syria with Iran’s blessing sees American weakness as a splendid opportunity for it to regain control of Lebanon from within and will do so by continuing its alliance with Iran and this time partnering with Hezbollah. The new arrangement will be like a company with lower, middle and upper management with you guessed it, Iran in the upper managment position.
Ask yourself, just what good will come to America from such a scenario?
Debka should be asking that before they write fiction like they have in this piece.
Comment by Bill Narvey — October 26, 2008 @ 8:03 am