Hillary Backers Decry Massive Obama Vote Fraud
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman
With accusations of voter registration fraud swirling as early voting begins in many states, some Hillary Clinton supporters are saying: “I told you so.”
Already in Iowa, the Obama campaign was breaking the rules, busing in supporters from neighboring states to vote illegally in the first contest in the primaries and physically intimidating Hillary supporters, they say.
Obama’s surprisingly strong win in Iowa, which defied all the polls, propelled his upstart candidacy to front-runner status. But Lynette Long, a Hillary supporter from Bethesda, Md., who has a long and respected academic career, believes Obama’s victory in Iowa and in twelve other caucus states was no miracle. “It was fraud,” she told Newsmax.
This matter should be investigated.
Comment by Michael Ejercito — October 28, 2008 @ 10:12 am
Why is Newsmax only reporting on this accusation by some Clinton supporters against Obama that Obama and his supporters stole the Democratic nomination for President from Clinton by election fraud?
Why are Clinton supporters not banging down the doors of the Main stream media organiziations to get broad and sustained coverage for their publicly accusing Obama and his supporters of stealing the democratic nomination from H. Clinton by election fraud.
Now the prospect of election fraud again being associated with Obama through his close association with ACORN only reinforces the gravity of the connection between election fraud and Obama as regards his win over H. Clinton.
This kind of evidence and dirt is ordinarily the stuff of headline news and intense scrutiny of any politician that comes within the ambit of the shadow of such allegations. The known facts so far strongly suggest election fraud on the part of Obama and his people. The expression where there is smoke there is fire comes to mind.
The media don’t see things that way obviously.
Why is the main stream media not dealing with election fraud associated with Obama’s win over H. Clinton and which is now again rearing its ugly head and tie with with Obama and his people as Obama tries to win the White House from McCain?
Any politician so tainted with even rumours of election fraud would be put under intense scrutiny by any responsible media organization.
Any politician that is except B. Obama it seems. Now why is that?
Comment by Bill Narvey — October 28, 2008 @ 1:06 pm
Money ! Clinton owes millions and worked out a deal with Obama that he would clear her debts.
Comment by yamit82 — October 28, 2008 @ 2:51 pm
Source, Woodstein?
Comment by Shy Guy — October 28, 2008 @ 3:17 pm
No Yamit, it is not that.
Clinton supporters were very angry with the Obama win and you will recall Clinton was not entirely successful in getting her supporters to bury their hatchets and join with her in supporting Obama in a unity ticket. Quite a number said they were going to vote for McCain.
Now that more facts have emerged on how Obama and his supporters engaged in election fraud to cheat Clinton of a win, I highly doubt Clinton supporters are going to let that pass.
They despised Obama before when they suspected him of voter fraud. Now that evidence has come out that his team did engage in voter fraud to steal the nomination away from Clinton and now the further evidence of his mutual support and association for the criminal electoral/voting fraud organization ACORN, they will despise Obama all the more.
My question therefore still goes unanswered.
Why are these several or so enraged Clinton supporters not banging down the main stream media’s doors to ensure they get broad coverage about Obama and his supporters having committed election fraud and who are now proven to be closely linked to ACORN, an organization devoted to getting Obama elected by any illegal election fraud means?
Comment by Bill Narvey — October 28, 2008 @ 4:03 pm
“Ha’sin’ah mekalkelet et ha’shurah”. Loosely translated, it means “hate is blind”. Witness Peskin, for example.
Comment by Shy Guy — October 28, 2008 @ 4:24 pm
Narvey:
You can’t be serious, you know the answer to your question-after 8 year of monstrous governence, all Democrats will work together to rid America of any or all vestiges of the past.The average American has suffered enough.
Comment by h peskin — October 28, 2008 @ 10:00 pm
peskin:
Really? Wait till Obama shows them change , Americans haven’t seen nothen yet!!! Do not despair Canda will suffer even more!
Comment by yamit82 — October 29, 2008 @ 3:01 am
Peskin, your snarky comments do not make for intelligent discussion. You must know that so why bother commenting at all?
Comment by Bill Narvey — October 29, 2008 @ 8:48 am
Narvey: There is nothing snarky about my comments. My point is dead serious. Your response is a total COP-OUT.
Comment by h peskin — October 29, 2008 @ 10:15 am
Bill, what Peskin means is that all leftists seething at America are snarky, not his comment per se.
Comment by Shy Guy — October 29, 2008 @ 10:19 am
Peskin, your comment is seriously brain dead, which suggests I am responding to a zombie.
Almost all your contributions to me and others are immature sarcastic one liners as if you are mentally trapped in a second childhood again going through the terrible twos of contrariness and rebelliousness.
Come on Peskin - grow up.
Comment by Bill Narvey — October 29, 2008 @ 10:39 am