An Interview With Israeli M.K. Dr. Arieh Eldad
by Jerry Gordon, New English Review, November, 2008
Israeli Knesset Member, Dr. Arieh Eldad, is a nationalist gadfly among the country’s politicians. He is a member of the Moledet party list of the minority National Union faction that favors the willing transfer of “Palestinian” Arab refugees from the disputed territories of Judea and Samaria to the de facto Palestine: Jordan. With more than 70% of Jordan’s population composed of Palestinian Arabs, Eldad considers that the real ”two state solution.” Jordan has plenty of territory to absorb their fellow Arabs now languishing in the squalid UNWRA camps in Samaria, Judea and Gaza. Eldad and others in his party argue that international investment in agricultural production, water, energy, urban and jobs development in Jordan is required to help facilitate absorption.This has not made Dr. Eldad, a world ranked plastic surgeon and reserve Brig. General in the IDF Medical Corps by profession, a welcome party in the current discussions between the Kadima government and PA President Mahmoud Abbas leading to a possible “peace agreement.” Neither would secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in the waning days of the Bush Administration look with interest on Dr. Eldad’s suggestions. The agreement under discussion is virtually in tatters given the waning days of the Bush Administration in America and the prospects for a general election in Israel. Eldad is pleased with this outcome, as it stifles any ‘shelf agreements’ from being concluded.
Eldad, however, has a more expansive agenda. He is gathering world parliamentarians in Jerusalem in December, 2008 to attend a conference on “Facing Jihad.” He considers Israel as the “canary in the mines of radical Islam,” something his fellow Israelis would rather not think about. He is bringing courageous Dutch parliamentarian, Geert Wilders to show his controversial film “Fitna” (strife or chaos in Arabic) and legislators from Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, the U.K. and America to formulate a declaration against Islamization among Western democracies. Eldad deems it to be crucially important for Israelis to become educated about the nuances of this existential threat that seeks to extinguish the Jewish state as well as other non-Muslim nations.
Eldad has traveled to conferences in Brussels and America to confer with anti-Jihadists and in the process create an alliance to oppose the Grand Jihad. In Manhattan in late September, while attending a Hudson Institute conference featuring Wilders, he took time to speak at a protest rally against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad outside the Grand Hyatt Hotel, where the latter was attending an interfaith Iftar dinner during Ramadan. (Continue Reading this Article)

eldad for pm now!!!!!!!!
Teddy Kollek and Israel Eldad exchange views about Jerusalem. …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L38w37MDSHg
The Holy Land: To Whom Does It Belong? (Hebrew)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU9JaRsyi-I
http://www.saveisrael.com/eldad/eldadhebrew.htm
Actually, the intention in framing the title of this lecture is to negate it, and arrive instead at “principles for the redemption of Israel.” This is the goal. The very concept “liberation movement” includes a hidden contradiction: the term “liberation” is modern, we translated it into Hebrew, took it from other peoples. The Jews gave the world the concept “redemption” (“the redemption of Israel,” personified by the “Messiah”). Over the past few years, when we began relating to redemption from a practical point of view, we failed to call it redemption; instead, we spoke of a national movement, or a revival, and so forth, which we translated into Hebrew. But if a “Hebrew liberation movement” is really Hebrew, it must be called a “redemption movement.” This term carries with it obligations totally different from those on which Zionism, which really is a liberation movement, is based.
An Introduction to the Book of Shmot
by Dr. Israel Eldad
“One leaves Beresheit(Genesis)and enters Shmot,(Exodus) as one leaves the home of mom and dad, where even the arguments were warm and heartening . . . . No more whistling of flocks, but rather whistling of the masters’ whips; not one person’s prayer, but rather the crying of the multitudes; not a dream, not one single dream, but a difficult and bitter reality; no visions in the night, no but rather a People drowning in water, and an entire People yelling in thirst in the desert ‘Bring us water;’ not a son who buys from his father a blessing and the freedom at their divine father and demand to be returned to the fleshpots.
Contemplations of the Bible, Tel Aviv, 1986