How Barack Obama Will Ensure His Victory in 2012
By Selwyn Duke, The American Thinker
[..] The coup de grace Obama will use against rightist opposition is mostly embodied in one word: Amnesty. This, along with some other measures, will both grow the Hispanic voting block and ingratiate Obama to it. This will enable him to create a powerful coalition of blacks, young voters and Hispanics that, along with the older whites he will be able to retain, will constitute an insurmountable electoral force. And this is why amnesty has long been a dream of the Democrats. Even easier than brainwashing new voters (which the media and academia specialize in) is importing them.
The last time the left proposed amnesty for the 20-30 million (a realistic estimate) illegals in our nation, they were blocked by the Republicans. Now, however, with a president who will enjoy great popular and media support, more significant Democrat majorities in the Houses, and with sheer attrition-induced exhaustion in the opposition, I suspect that it will be impossible to forestall.
So how monolithically Democrat will this larger Hispanic voting block be? Well, let’s begin by considering this research by the Pew Hispanic Center:
-
“Hispanics voted for Sens. Barack Obama and Joe Biden over Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin by a margin of more than two-to-one in the 2008 presidential election, 66% versus 32% . . . . Latino youth, just as all youth nationwide, supported Obama over McCain by a lopsided margin - 76% versus 19%.”
A new infusion of foreign-born Hispanic voters will tilt this block even further left, and it isn’t hard to understand why. Most such people have a socialist political orientation, which is why governments in Mexico and much of central and South America also tend to have one. And the proof is in the U.S.-election pudding, too; for instance, in the 1990s, first-time Hispanic voters cast ballots for Bill Clinton by a ratio of 15 to 1. People’s passions don’t change simply because they set foot on American terra firma. [..]
Nothing can guarantee victory for Obama in 2012. It was God who got him elected in 2008 (with Freddie & Fannie collapsing when they did); that’s the uncomfortable thing of it all. Lots of scriptures come to mind. Out of the New Testament, we have Jesus saying, “My kingdom is not of this world”. In TaNaKh, we have the story in Samuel, when the Israelites wanted a king “like all the nations round about”. Christians have ruled much of the world for a long time, and now the Jews have their own state; and at the moment, it seems as though we’re both about to lose everything to an ungodly world conspiriacy… and God is on THEIR side? Why? Because He wants us to look to Him and rely on Him, and not to any promising-looking “messiahs”. He will redeem us all, in due time. So who will win in 2012? God will, and those who love Him will: Even if they’re killed, they’ll win. The rest — all the kings, and those who hope in them — will be forgotten.
Q: Who ruled Spain in 1392?
A: There was no such place.
Q: List all the monarchs in the House of Nero.
A: Nero — That’s it.
The time is coming, when students will be asked:
Who was Barak Obama?
a. a famous hairdresser
b. an actor
c. a national leader
d. a religious leader
and the students won’t know the answer. But when they turn in at the end of the day, they’ll look in their motel bedside stand and find a Bible.
Comment by BlandOatmeal — November 12, 2008 @ 2:52 pm
I am not at all interested in the nonsense being uttered here about Obama. Let us cut him some slack and judge him by what he does and what he fails to do rather than condemning him snippy but stupid comments.
I am interested in the amnesty/illegal situation. Assume for our purposes that there are some 12 million illegal aliens in the U.S. Now, there are many many who do not like this. But then What is to be done? If we can not even keep them out of the nation how can we round them up and deport them? How do you suggest we tackle this problem? It is all well and good to
suggerst–on no evidence whatsoever–what Obama might do, but then, tell us what YOU would do to rectify this situation. If you can not, then why belittle someone’s else’s possible answer?
ps: I am a bit surpised this lovely anti-Obama site did not pick up on the lastest allegation that Obama has bedouin roots:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5142206.ece
Comment by davidstill — November 12, 2008 @ 5:40 pm
deny them citizenship, driving licences and benefits including healthcare.
Comment by Ted Belman — November 12, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
I just read this from NJ Lawyer Leo Donofrio……..
SCOTUS CLERK’S OFFICE CONTINUED SABOTAGE OF NJ CITIZEN STAY APPLICATION FOR 08 ELECTION!!!
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
Thanks!
Comment by Cathie — November 12, 2008 @ 10:21 pm
I am waiting for the creme da la creme from BlandOatmeal announcing that Obama is a long lost relative of his.
Comment by yamit82 — November 13, 2008 @ 1:39 am
The best most effective ways to stop illegal immigration would be to go after the employers of illegal immigrants with stiff fines and imprisonment enforced. Pay legal Americans nice reward for information leading to the arrest and deportation of any illegal caught using their information. Liberals and exploiters of illegal cheap labor will go to the wall on this but it will work and it is effective. The alternative is if left unchecked will be the ultimate destruction of America as the country we know.
See the Second American Revolution Clip: It says it all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDk&NR=1
Comment by yamit82 — November 13, 2008 @ 1:50 am
watch as they eliminate term limits
Comment by yamit82 — November 13, 2008 @ 2:25 am
Sarah Palin saved GOP from landslide defeat
By Dick Morris
Posted: 11/11/08 05:03 PM [ET] THE HILL
http://thehill.com/dick-morris/sarah-palin-saved-gop-from-landslide-defeat-2008-11-11.html
As Richard Nixon wrote, “history is written by liberals,” but the story of the 2008 campaign is too important to cede to them the analysis of what happened. A close analysis of the returns indicates several key realities:
a) Sarah Palin made a vast difference in McCain’s favor. Compared to 2004, McCain lost 11 points among white men, according to the Fox News exit poll, but only four points among white women. Obama’s underperformance among white women, evident throughout the fall, may be chalked up, in large part, to the influence of Sarah Palin. She provided a rallying point for women who saw their political agenda in terms larger than abortion. She addressed the question of what it is like to be a working mother in today’s economy and society and resonated with tens of millions of white women who have not responded to the more traditional, and liberal, advocates for their gender.
b) Turnout did not increase substantially. Despite predictions (by me and others) of a vastly greater voter turnout, it didn’t happen. About 127 million people voted in 2008, compared to 122 million in 2004. By contrast, turnout rose by almost 20 million between 2000 and 2004. The emphasis on early voting and the heavy participation in primaries indicated the likelihood of a huge increase in turnout, but, on Election Day, the turnout was modest.
c) The black vote made a huge difference; but young people did not. Obama, as expected, generated a big increase in African-American voter turnout. Fox News’s exit polls estimate that blacks constituted 13 percent of the turnout in 2008, compared with 11 percent in 2004 and 10 percent in 2000. But voters under 30 years of age were still the same 11 percent of the vote that they were in 2004. The surge of young voters, which was supposed to animate Obama’s rise, failed to happen.
d) The turnout efforts of groups like ACORN made a huge difference. Ultimately, it was the difference in voter turnout among Republicans and Democrats that, in addition to the higher black vote, elected Obama. According to Curtis Gans of American University, Republican turnout dropped from 30 percent in 2004 to 28.7 percent of the electorate in 2008, while the Democratic proportion of voters rose from 28.7 percent to 31.3 percent. Much of this increase came from newly registered voters, many as a result of ACORN’s efforts. Voter registration rose by 6 million in 2008, which may have accounted for virtually all the increase in turnout.
Full article:http://thehill.com/dick-morris/sarah-palin-saved-gop-from-landslide-defeat-2008-11-11.html
Comment by yamit82 — November 13, 2008 @ 2:38 am
According to the stats above one can conclude that this election was lost rather than won. McCain was the worst candidate to field against a new, charismatic, well financed, very organized Democrat. The republicans ran a disorganized underfunded campaign with the wrong candidate, no resonating message, and failed to move too many Republicans and independents to vote when it counted.
That the Democrats left the Republicans reeling but short of a landslide, the Republicans have enough left to fight another day. Barak Obama created an impression that far exceeded his real vote getting ability and strength in winning. It was decisive but not overwhelming which it should have been. Another Republican and better organization, use of modern technology in raising money might have taken it for the Republicans. The Democrats ran a multifaceted modern campaign. The Republicans slower to learn ran the old style 20th century one.
Comment by yamit82 — November 13, 2008 @ 3:01 am