November 24, 2008

How does Obama get security clearance when he won’t release his documents

Orly Taitz, lawyer for Alan Keyes in his lawsuit tohave obama declared ineligible advised

To all of the bloggosphere
yesterday at the White House press conference Bush’s press secretary Dana Perrina was asked, if Pres. Bush is concerned about Barack Obama not being eligible for presidency based on the fact that according to the Alan Keyes law suit, he is not a natural born citizen, her response reportedly was “we think, we are fine on that’

I believe we need to do the following:

    we need to write to all the governmental official listed in the attachments, including pres Bush, that due to the fact that Mr. Obama refused to provide proof of eligibility (Hawaii allows to issue birth certificates to children of Hawaiian residents, that are born abroad, and issue them based on a statement of one realtive only) , he cannot be certified as President and he cannot receive National Security CIA briefings.

    We believe all the Secretaries of State should give Mr. Obama 24 hours to sign the consent for release of any and all documents, verifying his eligibility, including, but not limited to a certified copy of his original birth certificate with the name and the signature of the doctor and the name of the hospital, certified copy of the birthing records from the hospital noted in the birth certificate, any and all passports with all the immigration stamps, application and registration forms from Columbia university, Harvard college, Occidental College and the schools in Indonesia, that Mr. Obama attended; and official response from the Governments of Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia in regards to Mr. Obama’s citizenship status in those countries. If Mr. Obama refuses to provide such consent, or if the consent is provided, but the documents show him to be ineligible, no Secretary of State and no Governor of State has any legal right to sign the Certificate of Ascertainment, no Elector has any legal right to sign a certificate of vote, since doing so will constitute aiding and abetting fraud in voting and punishable by up to 3 years in jail (California election code 18500) and similarly punishable by corresponding statutes in other states of the union, it possibly can be viewed as aiding and abeting commission of treason.

    This has to be forwarded to all the media outlets. We need to write to the media, that American citizens are reasonably relying on them to provide them with information in regards to such issues of National Importance. Refusal by Media to publish information in regards to Mr. Obama’s status as a British Citizen by birth and other issues relating to his lack of eligibility to be the President of the US, is de facto aiding and abetting commission of fraud in voting and elections (see above).

    I believe we should contact all sponsors and all advertisers and all citizens that believe in the Constitution of this country an demand that they boycott all the media outlets that refuse to air this information that is akin to a Constitutional crisis. We should start a recall of all the Governors and Secretaries of States that sign the certificates of Ascertainment without proof of eligibility. No member of US military can be expected to risk his life under orders of a Commander in Chief, who was not willing to produce proof of his eligibility for office, no order or law signed by somebody, who was not proven to be eligible will be valid. We have to stop this constitutional crisis.

Orly Taitz DDS Esq

Posted by Ted Belman @ 9:03 pm |

4 Comments »


  1. thanks, this is excellent:
    just sent it to: prager, hewitt, medved, hannity,ingraham.

    please distribute!!!

    Comment by bugsy — November 25, 2008 @ 1:02 am



  2. You do realize, I assume, that if Obama were to be “disqualified’ then Biden would become the president–a fatge you do not relish. You don’t think the runner up–ie, loser–gets the job? Seen one Democrat you have seen them all, right? why then bother wasting time?

    Comment by davidstill — December 1, 2008 @ 5:44 pm



  3. why then bother wasting time?

    Comment by davidstill — December 1, 2008 @ 5:44 pm

    Showing once again that David Still is afraid of the truth and couldn’t care less about having a possible illegal candidate in the White House nor about the trampling of Constitutional law.

    You are what you post.

    BTW, I think most people who didn’t vote for Obama would be much happier to see Biden in the Executive Office any day instead of the useless, careerless prop who will be installed in office next month. These 2 are not the same - far, far from it - to the point where your post is actually a massive insult to Joe Biden.

    Comment by Shy Guy — December 1, 2008 @ 11:53 pm



  4. The fact is ,a “Security Clearance” is NOT required for the POTUS. Go figure!:
    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/10498

    Obama is a national security risk and an anti-JudeoChristian,radical islamist,treasonous usurper:
    http://www.riseupforamerica.com/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUaGe63Aqv4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tlYHC7wYsY&feature=related
    http://opengov.ideascale.com/akira/dtd/6761-4049

    Beware of Barack Obama.

    Shalom. Long live Israel!

    Comment by Robert Laity — June 29, 2009 @ 3:25 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.