The Consequences of Militant Islamic Immigration: Bestial Rape and Mutilation
by Bill Levinson
Every civilized person, and especially every Scandinavian, needs to see Fjordman’s Immigrant Rape Wave in Sweden. You will see at the top a picture of a beautiful young Swedish woman who was gang-raped, battered, and put in the hospital by militant “Muslims” who were clearly unable to control their primitive sexual urges.
- According to these statistics, almost half of all perpetrators are immigrants. In Norway and Denmark, we know that non-Western immigrants, which frequently means Muslims, are grossly overrepresented on rape statistics. In Oslo, Norway, immigrants were involved in two out of three rape charges in 2001.
Matters have become so bad that some young Swedish women have developed a “reverse chastity belt” with which to protect themselves from the primitive sexual impulses of Islamic supremacist immigrants who think they are entitled to rape any infidel woman they fancy. (We have something more effective in the United States: a point, click, and delete interface known as a firearm.) These militant “Muslims,” in fact, say openly that it is all right for them to rape infidel females:
An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Apparently, he’s not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f***ed before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.”
Nor is this the only documented case of rapes by militant “Muslims” in rut. Per Western Muslims’ Racist Rape Spree
- In Australia, Norway, Sweden and other Western nations, there is a distinct race-based crime in motion being ignored by the diversity police: Islamic men are raping Western women for ethnic reasons. We know this because the rapists have openly declared their sectarian motivations.
When a number of teenage Australian girls were subjected to hours of sexual degradation during a spate of gang rapes in Sydney that occurred between 1998 and 2002, the perpetrators of these assaults framed their rationale in ethnic terms. The young victims were informed that they were “sluts” and “Aussie pigs” while they were being hunted down and abused.
In Australia’s New South Wales Supreme Court in December 2005, a visiting Pakistani rapist testified that his victims had no right to say no, because they were not wearing a headscarf.
Australia is another country with strict gun control laws. In the United States, the victim (or a bystander) would be within her rights to put a bullet in the jihadist’s head, which would solve the problem decisively. The militant “Muslim’s” opinion of what the woman’s failure to cover her face would not matter because no court of law would have a problem with the “point, click, and delete” solution. In any event, Australia: Muslim Rape Gang Leader Smiles As He Is Sentenced reinforces the fact that militant “Muslims” think they really do have an Allah-given or Mohammed-given right to sexually assault any woman they fancy.
In Sydney in 2002, the leader of a group of Lebanese-Australian Muslim gang-rapists was sentenced to 55 years (halved on appeal).
The lads liked to tell the lucky lady that she was about to be “f***ed Leb-style” and that she deserved it because she was an “Australian pig”.
Pan-European Arab Muslim Gang Rape Epidemic adds,
- Today’s news from Germany buries the fact that the gang rapists of a 13 year-old were likely Arab Muslim immigrants:
Racial Gangrape: Another Diversity Disaster
The ritual is known as a “tournante,” meaning “Take your turn,” and it consists of a black male becoming “friendly with” (seducing) a white female, preferably a teenager. Once they’ve become chums, the male lures the girl to a location where his buddies in the gang “take their turns” with her. In the case on trial in Paris, it was no fewer than 14 buddies. Unlike many victims of such fun, this young lady lodged a complaint with the police. As a result, she was gangraped a second time—this time, allegedly, by the 11 who went on trial in April.
We must, however, take issue with the use of the word “black” to describe the males. Their skin color is important only because it reflects their country of origin, which is doubtlessly a militant “Islamic” African nation in which women are regarded as chattels, no better than goats or camels and subject to genital mutilation and sale (as brides) by their fathers. We would prefer “Islamic supremacist males” to “black males” because the former is a primitive, violent, and savage behavioral choice, as opposed to a race. In any event, a country must have some kind of death wish to import the bipedal counterparts of plague-carrying rats: individuals who think it is all right for them to “take turns” with a woman, a practice that civilized countries call “gang rape.”
Western Muslims’ Racist Rape Spree adds,
- In Sudan – where Arab Muslims slaughter black Muslim and Christian Sudanese in an ongoing genocide – former Sudanese slave and now a human rights’ activist Simon Deng says he witnessed girls and women being raped and that the Arab regime of Khartoum sends its soldiers to the field to rape and murder. In other reports, women who are captured by government forces are asked; “Are you Christian or Muslim?” and those who answer Christian, are gang raped before having their breasts cut off.
It is clear that the Islamic supremacist immigrants who now infest most of Europe as well as many parts of Australia, Canada, and the United States wish to import these practices into civilized nations. The article alleges, in fact, that police, whether through physical cowardice (an explanation that generally comes to mind whenever the French are involved) or political correctness, refuse to protect victims and allow the victims to be raped yet again if they file criminal complaints.
In France, in the banlieues, where gang rape is now known simply as tournantes or ‘pass-around,’ victims know the police will not protect them. If they complain, Samir Bellil said, they know that they and their families will be threatened.
This again reinforces the desirability of private ownership of firearms or, in disarmed Europe, baseball bats and steel pipes. As for Sweden, Norway, and Finland (they were all one country long ago), there was a time when they would have known what to do about some jihadist who raped an innocent women and then battered her face into a bloody pulp as shown here, and the solution would not have even been very expensive. Wergild, after all, means MAN-price (compensation paid to a family for the death of one of its members), and rapists were doubtlessly regarded as nithings or nidings: subhuman monsters and enemies of civilization whom anybody was free to kill, and for whom no wergild had to be paid.
In the 21st century, we must look for more practical alternatives, and the one that comes to mind immediately is exclusion of immigrants who are unwilling to assimilate into the host society (which includes leaving behind their primitive and barbaric attitudes toward sexual relations), and the immediate expulsion of immigrants who show their inability or unwillingness to conform to the host society’s rules.
Pingback: pig » Blog Archive » Israpundit » Blog Archive » The Consequences of Militant Islamic …
Pingback: Israpundit » Blog Archive » The Consequences of Militant Islamic … « Immigration
Pingback: Baseball » Blog Archive » The Consequences of Militant Islamic Immigration: Bestial Rape and…
These two legged beasts should be promptly thrown out of the respective countries in which they have invaded and are destroying. In the meantime women in Europe should be allowed firearms so that if any of these islamic male beasts attempts to rape them, they can shoot them right between the legs. This would also insure they are never able to rape again.
Re:
It might even kill them, because that is where their brains seem to be located.
Bill,
This site is starting to look like a tabloid.
Laura,
no comment.
blandoatmeal, how would you describe rapists?
I always thought Muslims valued premarital chastity.
Torahs lesson on rape:
Jacob’s sons slaughtered the people of Schem for raping their sister instead of allowing Schem to marry her, as he pleaded? The background is simple: upon coming back to Canaan, Jacob purchased a field near Schem; Palestinian Arabs call that place Nablus and claim Jews have no business there. Son of the ruler of Schem raped Dina, after which offered to marry her. At that point, Simeon and Levi pretended to accept the marriage, but demanded that the population of Schem circumcise. While the locals were incapacitated after the surgery, Jacob’s sons killed them all, enslaved their wives, and took their property.
Jacob’s attack on Schem wasn’t an act of conquest: immediately after the attack, his clan moved to Beth-El, leaving the large territory of Schem no-man’s land. Simeon and Levi plundered Schem, typically of Hebrews’ retributive raids. They deceived Schemites, and the Bible explicitly sanctions military deceit: “For by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war.” Shimon and Levi acted not without anger, but the Torah praises Pinchas who slew even a Jew engaging in idolatrous sexual rite; contrary to the stance of modern rabbis, Pinchas slew the transgressor on the spot without referring the matter to judges – obvious transgressions need not due process.
Their actions need not comply with legal norms or practicality. Simeon and Levi acted on the higher moral plane, that of revenge. And so their laconic reply to Jacob’s lamentations was, “Should one deal with our sister as with a harlot?”
The lesson Simeon and Levi gave us is straightforward: there are cases when neither intentions, nor repentance matter. Society can deal leniently with a lone criminal, even a rapist, by allowing him to marry the victim. In the national matters, we are the one, and the sister is always ours. Like in the NATO charter, an attack on a single Jew is an attack on every Jew.
Israeli Arabs routinely rape Jewish women.
Re: #7
Let’s see–they wear filthy nightshirts, say that all of Europe will be under Sharia law one day, and bray to Mecca five times daily.
Re: #9
(1) When the Romans raped Boadicea’s daughters, she leveled an entire Roman settlement and killed all the inhabitants.
(2) In Henryk Sienkiewicz’s “Colonel Wolodyjowski,” a militant “Muslim” slit the throat of a Pole’s father and gave his sister to his horde to rape. The Pole found the militant “Muslim” and impaled him on a sharp wooden stake.
(3) Titus Andronicus cut the throats of the two men who raped and mutilated his daughter, and then served them to their mother in a meat pie.
Food (heh heh) for thought.
Toward the end of WWII, Russian Army raped just about every woman in Germany. I’ve never had a problem with that. The wholesale rape was not a military measure by any standard; it didn’t serve to crush the German will to fight which was already at the low point by then. The rape was not an expression of Russian barbarity: female populations of Soviet-occupied Eastern Europe were largely spared. The rape was an act of vengeance, and I wholeheartedly approve of vengeance.
Societies punish criminals vengefully. In terms of prevention, it would suffice to ban, say, corruptioners from their jobs, but societies sentence them to prison. Relatives of the victims of violence long for revenge rather than mere prevention. Hebrews were commanded to exterminate Amalekites for the offenses of their ancestors. Vengeance is not nice, but it restores righteousness.
Defenders of the US nuclear attack on Japan bring up the necessity of crushing Japan’s will to fight to the last man. Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn’t achieve that end. After the first town was annihilated in the nuclear attack, Japan did not react at all. The losses were actually much smaller than in Tokyo’s fire-bombing, and consisted largely of civilians – not a matter of the imperial army’s concern. Still, the US dropped the second nuclear bomb. The role of nukes in the capitulation is still a matter of historical debate in Japan, but most historians agree that exhaustion and the American promise of retaining the monarchy were the critical factors behind capitulation. Nuclear attacks on Japanese cities were a viable, but unnecessary military action. They were a legitimate act of revenge. Such was also the fire-bombing of Dresden – the answer to German attacks on Coventry.
Without vengeance, wars would become a limited liability affair. Aggressors can torture the victim’s civilian population, but the victim – once it gains the upper hand – ostensibly shouldn’t reciprocate. Such an arrangement, if ever implemented, would provoke the aggressors’ brutality: in the best case, they quash the resistance, while in the worst case, their civilians still won’t be harmed.
Fortunately, vengeance prevails in wars.
Re:
Wholesale rape of women is an act of barbarism no matter who does it. The only German women who deserved to be raped (preferably by Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and other so-called Untermenschen) were the sadistic female concentration camp guards like Irma Grese. If gay Jews, Slavs, and Gypsies were available (plus of course all the inmates with pink triangles), the male concentration camp guards could have been given the same treatment. I wouldn’t have had a problem with that although my personal preference would have been to just give them a long drop and a sudden stop, Albert Pierrepoint style. There was at least one incident in which American soldiers, upon taking over a concentration camp, lined the guards up against the wall and machine-gunned them, and then gave the prisoners pistols with which to finish off any survivors. Sounds good to me.
Germany’s Jews would have been justified by retaliating against Germany’s civilian population DURING WARTIME by, for example, lighting flares in blacked-out cities when Allied bombers were overhead. If German women and children were killed by the bombs, it would have been no more than what Germany was doing to the Jews. Once the victim gains the upper hand, though, he will limit punishment to those actually guilty of war crimes if he is civilized.
You seem to have an Ivory Tower concept of right and wrong, justice and injustice and have no concept at all of the emotion and human need for vengeance. Like murder there are no statutes of limitations of time or place in perpetration of vengeance which is time perpetual. Vengeance is the most basic and primal human attribute. The rabbis say: “Yes, when vengeance is needed, it is a great thing” (Brachot, 3a). Or “let the high praises of G-d be in their throat and a two edged sword in their hand – to execute vengeance upon the nations…” (Psalms 58). “The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth vengeance, he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked” (Psalms 58). It is only vengeance that proves that there is indeed a G-d in the world, that there is good and evil and punishment for that evil. When the wicked kill and injustice reigns, surely the wicked cry out: “There is no G-d, for if their was He would punish me.” And the victim in his agony, agrees. When there is no vengeance and punishment and the wicked reign, G-d is pushed from his throne; it is the greatest Hillul Hashem – desecration to G-d’s Name, it is “proof” that there is no G-d.
Read two books the Avengers by Bar-Zohar and the Avengers by Michael Elkins
Does anyone know any new news on the German legal authorities murder investigation into Jewish death squads responsible for the assassination of suspected Nazis after the Second World War.
Many of the assassins became founder members of Mossad.
When two elderly Israelis admitted on German television that they had been part of a death squad controlled from Tel Aviv who, half a century ago had tried to poison with arsenic thousands of suspected Nazis held in an American prison camps near Nuremberg, the city’s senior public prosecutor, Klaus Hubmann, decided he could not ignore the startling claim.
The result was an unprecedented legal investigation that Hubmann admits could have consequences even he cannot foresee.
It was suppose to involve Israel’s former prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir, being questioned, along with Rafi Eitan, the former director of operations for Mossad.
Both had been involved with Nokim, the Hebrew word for Avengers. Founded by Holocaust survivors from World War Two, Nokim consisted of Jewish death squads who roamed through Europe and the Middle East hunting down Nazis.
“They didn’t bother with legal trials. They just executed any Nazis they found,” Rafi Eitan has said. “For them their actions were justified by the Biblical rule of ‘an eye for an eye’.”
Two of those who followed that rule are Leipe Distel and Joseph Harmatz. Both were Holocaust survivors who had made their way to Israel in 1945. They became founder members of Nokim. A year later they returned to Germany. They found work in a bakery that supplied an American prisoner-of-war camp. Another member of Nokim provided them with sufficient arsenic to coat 3,000 loaves of bread.
Bread was the staple diet the Americans provided to their prisoners. But Distel, now aged 77, had publicly admitted on German television that he had failed to ensure the loaves had been sufficiently impregnated with arsenic to kill the prisoners. Instead thousands experienced severe stomach ache – and hundreds were admitted to US army hospitals in Nuremberg.
Recalling the episode, Distel said his only “regret” was that “we failed to kill those Germans”.
His self-confessed collaborator in the plot, Joseph Harmatz, a sprightly 74-year-old, said from his home outside Tel Aviv that “the aim of our action in Nuremberg was to show the world that we Jews were not prepared to silently accept all the murdering that the Germans did to us. We Jews acted with morality on our side. The Jews have a right to take revenge on the Germans.”
The survivors of the Nokim groups have become legendary folk heroes for generations of Israelis, they meet on Israel’s kibbutz. Scattered now throughout Israel, the old men keep in touch, passing the hours reminiscing about when they hunted down Nazis.
While principally operating in Europe, they made trips to Damascus, Cairo and Morocco where former Nazis felt they were safe. The Nokim rallying call was “vengeance has no boundaries”.
A similar justification governed the actions of Yitzhak Shamir. Learning that German rocket scientists were working in 1960 to provide Egypt with long-range weapons capable of destroying Israeli cities, he sent members of Nokim – by then enrolled into Mossad – to assassinate the scientists.
The methods they used to eliminate the scientists were more sophisticated than those devised by Distel and Harmatz.
In a rare interview with me some years ago, Shamir justified his actions in words chillingly similar to those used by Distel and Harmatz. “Revenge is all that matters. Do not talk of morality after what happened to my people,” he said.
The view is not shared by Nuremberg’s senior public prosecutor, Klaus Hubmann. As he had his team of prosecutors press on with the painstaking task of gathering evidence about Nokim’s activities over half a century ago, he will only say, “This is not a question of morality. Like murder, attempted murder does not lapse. Neither will my office be influenced by the fact that members of Nokim had been persecuted by the Nazis. This is not an investigation into Holocaust survivors. It is an investigation into what those survivors may have done.
“Our law says it is the duty of the public prosecutor to investigate crimes, no matter how long ago they happened. And no matter who the suspects or perpetrators are.”
In Berlin and Tel Aviv, the German and Jewish authorities are watching closely the progress of the investigation – and maintaining a firm policy of silence.
But in Israel, former members of Nokim are taking an aggressive stance. One of its leaders, Itzhak Awidow, defiantly said: “So the Germans are investigating? So what? No one who served in Nokim would recognise the validity of such an investigation – let alone lend it any support. Where were these German public prosecutors when we wanted them to prosecute known Nazi war criminals?”
Support for such defiance comes from a surprising quarter. Arno Hamburger is chairman of the small but influential Nuremberg Jewish community. He believes that the city’s public prosecutor is right to pursue men like Joseph Harmatz and Leipe Distel.
“By their own admission these men broke the law. If they had succeeded, they would have killed perhaps thousands of people. They have no proof that all those prisoners were proven Nazis. Such acts of revenge are no compensation for the proper process of law.”
In Tel Aviv, Harmatz dismissed the German investigation as “ridiculous. These people are stupid. Anyway, I don’t recognise Germany. And I certainly have no intention of going there. And there is no way that the Israeli authorities will allow them to come here and question us. We have all had too much of being questioned by the Germans.”
But such outbursts have little effect on the dogged determination of public prosecutor Klaus Hubmann to investigate the activities of the Nokim over half a century ago.
Sources close to the investigation suggest that soon Hubmann may make a formal request, through the German Ministry of Justice, for the right to question former Nokim members still alive and living in Israel.
A reliable estimate suggests they number no more than a hundred. But if two of them had not chosen to speak out on German television, the chances are that their past activities would have remained long forgotten.
“Your enemy shall ye seek; your war shall ye wage, and for the sake of your thoughts! And if your thoughts succumb, your uprightness shall still shout triumph thereby!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV6vwXNQkho&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyZTtwP49Ws
Re: #13
You are talking about hunting down and killing Nazi war criminals, not abusing German women who had nothing to do with the Holocaust or other war crimes. Had some Jews or other Holocaust victims found and lynched Joseph Mengele, I wouldn’t have had a problem with that even if done extrajudicially (as long as they were 100 percent sure it was really Mengele). Had they done it privately, though, it would have been useless sadism (as punishment has three legitimate purposes: to prevent the offender from repeating his actions, to rehabilitate the offender, and to deter others). Deterrence would have required them to mark his body with “Mengele, Nazi War Criminal” or something similar so everybody would know exactly who he was and why he had been killed. While we are at it, the Mossad should have done something about Yasser Arafat as well.
Incidentally, I had only two problems with Abu Ghraib.
(1) Some of the people who were abused were doubtlessly innocent.
(2) Abuse of even the guilty ones is inconsistent with the discipline of the Armed Forces, and I would not rely on someone like Lynndie England or her cohorts to watch my back in combat.
As for what happened to the guilty inmates, though, I really do not care about that because I do not regard terrorists as human beings who have any rights whatsoever. They deserve whatever they get, but soldiers of our Armed Forces should not be the ones to give it to them (unless it consists of immediate bullets through their heads as opposed to capture of prisoners, 100 percent justifiable in my opinion if they are disguised as civilians, guilty of murdering prisoners or hostages, or anything similar). There is a scene in “Saving Private Ryan” in which the Americans are ready to kill a uniformed German who killed (probably by accident, it’s hard to discriminate between combatants and noncombatants with a machine gun) their medic. Later on, the man who urged his squad mates to spare the German kills him when he surrenders again, probably because the squad released him on his parole: a concept from the horse and musket era in which an officer’s word was sufficiently good to allow his release in exchange for his promise to not fight again in the same war. As the German had broken his parole, the American decided he had to kill him.
Yamit
Understand this-it is a purely a racial matter. We all subscribe to the belief that the blood of the arab is inferior to our pure bloodline.We all know that these people must be obliterated from this earth to safeguard our civilization. It is a matter of self defence, the preservation of of our way of life is paramount. The mandate of the Chosen is to act as the vangard in defence of reason and humanity. The rapists of this world must be vanquished. These truths are self evident.
There are many kinds of rape, The physical variety and the rape of ideas, as an example: I never mentioned bloodline nor superiority nor did I speak of Choseness. So you are raping my context and intent. 40% of all rapes of Jewish women in Israel are by Arabs and these are only the reported cases. If an Arab women were raped the family would either kill her, or try to kill the rapist themselves without due process or both. Unless a Sulcha is arranged and the rapist is allowed to expiate his crime by paying a large sum to the victims family. That’s Cultural asshole not racist. That they seek out Jewish women to rape, is part of their ideas of Terrorism against Jews, A religious imperative and just horny primitives denied a sexual outlet within their closed societies who seek opportunities where they find them amongst the Jews.
The only truths here that are self evident are your liberal/leftist/ignorant/fascistic/anti-Jewish/anti Israel/pro Arab/illiterate/Views. In otherwords you are the equivalent of one who is brain dead.
Pal, why don’t you finally come out of the closet? We all know already!
Pingback: Schaschlik « abseits vom mainstream - heplev
Re: #15
Pesky, the things Hitler did WORKED, to the tune of six million Jewish dead, another three million Polish Catholics dead, and tens of millions dead in the war itself (including seven million Germans, who probably weren’t in his original plan). Only an idiot or Peskin (but I repeat myself) refuses to learn from the enemy because he despises that enemy as a person. As an example, the fact that Joseph Mengele was a monster does not mean we should discard all medical science because Mengele happened to abuse it in his experiments on prisoners. Hitler misused the science of propaganda and psychological warfare to perpetrate his monstrous crimes, but we must use the same science to cure Civilization of the walking cancer known as militant “Islam.”
Our side is making exactly the same mistakes Imperial Germany made (and which Hitler cited very explicitly in Mein Kampf) by failing to appeal to the man in the street and yes, the man in the beer hall. We can make all the intellectual arguments we wish, and cite all the facts we wish, but when various European newspapers fabricate news reports about Israeli atrocities, it doesn’t do much good. The beer hall patron isn’t going to read more than one sentence (if he reads that much) of our side of the story. A picture of a militant “Muslim” tearing open the shirt or blouse of a beautiful blond blue-eyed woman (in Germany, Scandinavia, and so on), perhaps while her blond and blue-eyed brother lies on the nearby floor with his throat cut by said militant “Muslim,” will however appeal to his most visceral instincts and emotions, and he will want to reenact the Night of the Broken Glass on the militant “Islamic” cancer that infests his country.
I read that about a third of Europe blames “The Joooooooooooz” for the world’s current economic problems. We need to divert this hatred to the right place by portraying Islamic supremacists as disease-carrying parasites on European welfare systems, with militant “Islam,” throat-cutting, and Sharia being the disease. As an example, we should draw giant leeches with the heads of militant “Muslims” sucking the blood of German and Dutch workers with Nordic features, Italian workers with Mediterranean features, and so on. There are fortunately numerous pictures of Islamic supremacists threatening violence and the imposition of Sharia, i.e. just being themselves, so we have ready-made pictures of the parasites in question. Hitler & Co. doubtlessly got actors to pose for “The Eternal Jew” but our job is easier: no acting is required, just show militant “Muslims” acting like militant “Muslims.”
Bill levinson:
I think before we render any opinions on the views of Bill Levinson, we ought to examine the track record of our distinguished Bill. Several years back Bill wrote a book extolling the virtues of Henry Ford, the pioneer of assembly line production and the founder of the Ford Corp. Bill managed to either omit or whitewash Ford’s position on Hitler, Nazi Germany, and antisemitism. The fact is that Ford was a virulant antisemite and a strong proponent of Fascism.He spent millions on disseminating antisemitic literature.
The question arises, if Levinson’s judgement was so clouded regarding Ford, how can we respect his views with pertaining to our current political and social problems?
I would suggest that any interested reader, not to accept my uncorroberated opinions here, but to purchase the book online (amazon) and read the book for himself. Levinson commits the very same sins of the Mengeles and Thyssens of this world. He is so dazzled by the god of science,efficiency and technology that humanity is either dismissed entirely or relegated to a very secondary position.
Re: #20
I think it is Pesky’s judgment that is clouded. My book about Ford extols his promotion of what we now call lean manufacturing, and his highly progressive labor relations principles. It did not agree with what he said about Jews, his support for Prohibition, or his lousy relationship with his son. It seems to be Mr. Peskin’s position that the distasteful things that Ford did should discourage us from learning from the highly constructive things he did, like making the United States the wealthiest and most powerful nation on earth. My book, which was published in 2002, describes the exact problems that lead to today’s economic mess so, if more people studied Henry Ford, the Dow might still be around 14,000 instead of in the sewer.
Pesky would doubtlessly burn Mein Kampf because it was written by Hitler, as opposed to reading it and learning techniques we can use against the real enemies of humanity. In general, people who read books (no matter what they think of their authors) tend to be a lot smarter than those who burn them.
OK, Peskin, here is a challenge for you. You don’t like Henry Ford. What do you think of Woodrow Wilson and Abraham Lincoln? Before you answer, I suggest that you look up what Lincoln actually said about Black people. It would fit right in with the Stormfront White Nationalist Community. We remember Lincoln as a great man not because he was progressive by our era’s standards, but by those of his own; he did not believe that one human being, even though racially superior (per his own writings) should be allowed to own another, even though racially inferior. As President of Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson (who killed more than 25 Americans for every one who died in Iraq) discouraged Black people from applying.
Ford, incidentally, hired Jews and also Black people in an era in which discrimination was legally and socially acceptable. Women got equal pay for equal work, although Ford would not hire married women whose husbands worked.
Ford’s methods lifted millions of people out of poverty, so science, efficiency, and technology are central to humanity. Ford’s mechanized agriculture fed millions of people who would have otherwise gone hungry or even starved to death.
Pingback: Zitate! « abseits vom mainstream - heplev