The Consequences of Militant Islamic Immigration: Bestial Rape and Mutilation
by Bill Levinson
Every civilized person, and especially every Scandinavian, needs to see Fjordman’s Immigrant Rape Wave in Sweden. You will see at the top a picture of a beautiful young Swedish woman who was gang-raped, battered, and put in the hospital by militant “Muslims” who were clearly unable to control their primitive sexual urges.
- According to these statistics, almost half of all perpetrators are immigrants. In Norway and Denmark, we know that non-Western immigrants, which frequently means Muslims, are grossly overrepresented on rape statistics. In Oslo, Norway, immigrants were involved in two out of three rape charges in 2001.
Matters have become so bad that some young Swedish women have developed a “reverse chastity belt” with which to protect themselves from the primitive sexual impulses of Islamic supremacist immigrants who think they are entitled to rape any infidel woman they fancy. (We have something more effective in the United States: a point, click, and delete interface known as a firearm.) These militant “Muslims,” in fact, say openly that it is all right for them to rape infidel females:
An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Apparently, he’s not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f***ed before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.”
Nor is this the only documented case of rapes by militant “Muslims” in rut. Per Western Muslims’ Racist Rape Spree
- In Australia, Norway, Sweden and other Western nations, there is a distinct race-based crime in motion being ignored by the diversity police: Islamic men are raping Western women for ethnic reasons. We know this because the rapists have openly declared their sectarian motivations.
When a number of teenage Australian girls were subjected to hours of sexual degradation during a spate of gang rapes in Sydney that occurred between 1998 and 2002, the perpetrators of these assaults framed their rationale in ethnic terms. The young victims were informed that they were “sluts” and “Aussie pigs” while they were being hunted down and abused.
In Australia’s New South Wales Supreme Court in December 2005, a visiting Pakistani rapist testified that his victims had no right to say no, because they were not wearing a headscarf.
Australia is another country with strict gun control laws. In the United States, the victim (or a bystander) would be within her rights to put a bullet in the jihadist’s head, which would solve the problem decisively. The militant “Muslim’s” opinion of what the woman’s failure to cover her face would not matter because no court of law would have a problem with the “point, click, and delete” solution. In any event, Australia: Muslim Rape Gang Leader Smiles As He Is Sentenced reinforces the fact that militant “Muslims” think they really do have an Allah-given or Mohammed-given right to sexually assault any woman they fancy.
In Sydney in 2002, the leader of a group of Lebanese-Australian Muslim gang-rapists was sentenced to 55 years (halved on appeal).
The lads liked to tell the lucky lady that she was about to be “f***ed Leb-style” and that she deserved it because she was an “Australian pig”.
- Today’s news from Germany buries the fact that the gang rapists of a 13 year-old were likely Arab Muslim immigrants:
The ritual is known as a “tournante,” meaning “Take your turn,” and it consists of a black male becoming “friendly with” (seducing) a white female, preferably a teenager. Once they’ve become chums, the male lures the girl to a location where his buddies in the gang “take their turns” with her. In the case on trial in Paris, it was no fewer than 14 buddies. Unlike many victims of such fun, this young lady lodged a complaint with the police. As a result, she was gangraped a second time—this time, allegedly, by the 11 who went on trial in April.
We must, however, take issue with the use of the word “black” to describe the males. Their skin color is important only because it reflects their country of origin, which is doubtlessly a militant “Islamic” African nation in which women are regarded as chattels, no better than goats or camels and subject to genital mutilation and sale (as brides) by their fathers. We would prefer “Islamic supremacist males” to “black males” because the former is a primitive, violent, and savage behavioral choice, as opposed to a race. In any event, a country must have some kind of death wish to import the bipedal counterparts of plague-carrying rats: individuals who think it is all right for them to “take turns” with a woman, a practice that civilized countries call “gang rape.”
Western Muslims’ Racist Rape Spree adds,
- In Sudan – where Arab Muslims slaughter black Muslim and Christian Sudanese in an ongoing genocide – former Sudanese slave and now a human rights’ activist Simon Deng says he witnessed girls and women being raped and that the Arab regime of Khartoum sends its soldiers to the field to rape and murder. In other reports, women who are captured by government forces are asked; “Are you Christian or Muslim?” and those who answer Christian, are gang raped before having their breasts cut off.
It is clear that the Islamic supremacist immigrants who now infest most of Europe as well as many parts of Australia, Canada, and the United States wish to import these practices into civilized nations. The article alleges, in fact, that police, whether through physical cowardice (an explanation that generally comes to mind whenever the French are involved) or political correctness, refuse to protect victims and allow the victims to be raped yet again if they file criminal complaints.
In France, in the banlieues, where gang rape is now known simply as tournantes or ‘pass-around,’ victims know the police will not protect them. If they complain, Samir Bellil said, they know that they and their families will be threatened.
This again reinforces the desirability of private ownership of firearms or, in disarmed Europe, baseball bats and steel pipes. As for Sweden, Norway, and Finland (they were all one country long ago), there was a time when they would have known what to do about some jihadist who raped an innocent women and then battered her face into a bloody pulp as shown here, and the solution would not have even been very expensive. Wergild, after all, means MAN-price (compensation paid to a family for the death of one of its members), and rapists were doubtlessly regarded as nithings or nidings: subhuman monsters and enemies of civilization whom anybody was free to kill, and for whom no wergild had to be paid.
In the 21st century, we must look for more practical alternatives, and the one that comes to mind immediately is exclusion of immigrants who are unwilling to assimilate into the host society (which includes leaving behind their primitive and barbaric attitudes toward sexual relations), and the immediate expulsion of immigrants who show their inability or unwillingness to conform to the host society’s rules.