If you want to believe The Crooke

If you want to believe The Crooke

Today [December 10], The terrorist-huggers at The Guardian have surpassed themselve. In an article by a certain Mr Crooke [subsequently, "The Crooke"], we are advised that "It is essential to talk to the 'terrorists'", which is the article's heading.

Here are the major arguments made by The Crooke's:

Insistence on the terrorism label carries a high price. It has prompted the west to make the wrong assessment of what challenges we face in Muslim societies, and led us to deploy the wrong means to combat it.
...
[T]his is a struggle to restore the standing of Muslim societies; to assert Muslim identity and autonomy from western imposition, and to find the transition to modernity of their economies and society on Muslim terms - not on western secular ones.
...
[T]he overwhelming bulk of Islamists and Muslims support elections, good governance and freedom (more so than in some European states, the polls show).
...
Never have I seen insurgencies defeated by bombing. Traditional military thinking categorises these actions as "wearing down the enemy". Generally, it just made ordinary people mad. I recall what is described as the "Jenin paradox". The Israeli military justified an incursion into Jenin in the West Bank on the grounds that there had been 10 terrorists in the city and after the military action there were only four. The threat was reduced. Six had been killed. But to others, and to Jenin's inhabitants, there was a different perception. There had been 10 resistance fighters, the Israeli military had killed six - and now there were 24. The question is: was the use of superior military force a tool for subtraction or multiplication?
...
We need to recognise the "other" and acknowledge that Muslim values do not pose a threat to the strategic values of western society. Muslims do not hate our values. They hate our policies. We need dialogue at all levels. And we need to demonstrate in practical terms that there is an alternative approach beyond laying waste to large segments of the region's landscape. We believe it is possible to find common ground on the basis of respect for difference and a toleration of others.
The arguments presented by The Crooke are so absurd, that I will not waste my time refuting them. Rather, I would like to underscore the insidious way The Crooke and The Gurardian are trying to soften our resolve to fight terrorism.

To summarize in one sentence: The Guardian, The Crooke and Britain deserve each other.

Posted by Joseph Alexander Norland at December 10, 2004 05:35 PM


Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)