US campuses - whither? (or should it be, "wither"?)

US campuses - whither? (or should it be, "wither"?)

John Ruberry of Marathon Pundit has alerted me to an article by Jay Ambrose, published in the NH Union Leader, concerning the extent to which PC-ness is running amok on US campuses. The section concerning 9-11 and Israel is quoted below.

Of course, there is nothing new about the issues of PC-ness on US campuses, or about the anti-Israel stance of New York's Upper West Side and its ubiquitous campus tentacles; it's nonetheless important, in my view, to amass the documentation, for the time when "they" come with their usual "who, me?"

[I]f you believe that Israelis are justified in fighting back against the suicide bombers who murder their children and wish the abolition of their nation, you are a moral thug intent on further marginalizing an indigenous people whose gravest error was finding themselves next door to the only Westernized democracy in the Middle East.

Let’s get concrete. Let’s visit Chicago’s DePaul University, where a math professor, Jonathan Cohen, talked to me about the politically correct atmosphere, such as the faculty session on Sept. 13, 2001, just two days after terrorists struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The session, he said, was hostile to the United States. One professor advised the others to identify with the terrorists and thereby see where their motivation came from — namely, how U.S. policies were responsible. Cohen gave other examples of how “political correctness has run amok” at the campus, but the major one we discussed is one I have written about before, the case of Thomas Klocek.

An untenured professor at the school, Klocek got in an argument with Muslim and pro-Palestinian students outside the classroom about the Israel-Palestine conflict, taking the Israeli side, and soon found himself removed from a teaching assignment with no other assignments coming his direction.

The school’s after-the-fact rationale is that it was the professor’s “belligerent” conduct that was at issue, but the chief complaint of the students was what he said. To some, it was racist and cause for firing that he identified the Palestinians as purposeful killers of civilians and denied that their claim to nationhood was historically legitimate.

Even though the students had called Israelis murderers and compared their leaders to Hitler, a dean worried in a letter to a student newspaper about how the students’ “perspective was dishonored” and their ideas demeaned. DePaul, she wrote, makes “a particular point of diversity.” And here we had a professor pressing “erroneous assertions,” which is to say, taking positions the dean did not like.

Contrary to what happened at Columbia University, where an ad-hoc committee pronounced everything hunky-dory after professors teaching about the Middle East and other subjects were accused of anti-Semitism and classroom intimidation of students not bowing obediently to their anti-Israel views, Klocek was clobbered. His career seems ruined. His life is wrecked.

Let us bear in mind that when it comes to criticising Arabs and Moslems, the entire world, except for the US, has turned into a pusillanimous collection of sycophants. If we allow the US, still the rara avis, to follow suit, all will be lost.

Posted by Joseph Alexander Norland at April 23, 2005 11:07 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/8368


Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)