Dealing with Kamikaze
Dealing with Kamikaze
JPost reports:
Gaza militias moving to West Bank
The Popular Resistance Committees, an alliance of various armed militias in the Gaza Strip, announced on Sunday that it would start operating in the West Bank immediately after the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
"We will move our cells to the West Bank," said Jamal Abu Samhadaneh, commander of the Popular Resistance Committees, which has been behind many of the attacks on IDF soldiers and settlers in the Gaza Strip over the past four and a half years.
"We won't sit on the side and watch Israel as it perpetrates massacres in the West Bank. We will start operating there, too."
Thus, the terrorists didn't even wait for the Deportation to take place when they issued this declaration of war, continuing their "Phased Plan" to destroy Israel. And that reminds me...
In July/August 1945, after the Allies had insisted all along on a Japanese unconditional surrender, suddenly there was a change in the Allies' tone: the demand was modified to an unconditional surrender not of "Japan" but of the Japanese Armed Forces. The TV programmes highlighting the 60th anniversary of using the atomic bomb have reminded us again of the reaction of the Japanese Armed Forces to this modification. "See," said the military, "the Allies are already going wobbly. All we have to do is stay the course, and all our demands will be met." But the error of the "modification" was soon corrected in the form of two atomic bombs: in those days, the Allies were led by men of steel, and the media had not yet assume the role of sabotaging our civilization at every turn. And thus, the nation that elected to torture prisoners of war, lead civilians on death marches, perpetrate the murder of 15 million Chinese, and use kamikaze, paid the price.
Things are very different in the multiculti world that has descended upon us. The west, from London to Washington, in cahoots with Israel's current government, believe that the way to go is to appease the Arab kamikaze. If we do not cling to Harry Truman as our guide for dealing with kamikaze, we will all pay a dreadful price.
Posted by Joseph Alexander Norland at August 7, 2005 07:30 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/9871
1.
Ed D
said:
TO ALL NEWS MEDIA, TV, RADIO, NEWSPAPERS: your job as newspeople is to report on the real facts of the story you report on; however, for the sake of ratings, you create a self illusion over the actual facts. The media is supposed to be neutral; however, you project your own spin. By doing so, you create public opinion, good and bad. The ways your spin is portrayed has probably caused the deaths of more innocent people than any terrorist group. I really don't understand how you sleep nights without nightmares. Was this the way liberal professors in the university taught. The USA did very well in WWII in fighting our enemies without reporters crawling all over and preaching disaster. If I had command, there would be no reporters around my action, politics or no.
Posted by: Ed D on August 7, 2005 08:11 PM
2.
georg von mecklenburg
said:
Americans are so naive. They think that their newspapers are not biased... thaqt they should report from a non objective viewpoint. What nonsense.
Do you think that the New York Times is not anti- semitic? Do you honestly think that this "Jewish" newspaper is solidly behind Israel? especially with traitorous Jewish reporters like Thomas Friedman? The world reads the New York Times and just laughs at their anti Jewish, anti Mr. Bush, anti Conservative stance. The New York Times, along with their cousins the Los Angeles Times are quite biased; AS ALL NEWSPAPERS ARE IN EVERY COUNTRY.
Everyone has an axe to grind. American newspapers go just a bit further in their quest for discrimination.
Posted by: georg von mecklenburg on August 8, 2005 09:28 AM
Post a comment
|
Dealing with Kamikaze
JPost reports:
Thus, the terrorists didn't even wait for the Deportation to take place when they issued this declaration of war, continuing their "Phased Plan" to destroy Israel. And that reminds me...
In July/August 1945, after the Allies had insisted all along on a Japanese unconditional surrender, suddenly there was a change in the Allies' tone: the demand was modified to an unconditional surrender not of "Japan" but of the Japanese Armed Forces. The TV programmes highlighting the 60th anniversary of using the atomic bomb have reminded us again of the reaction of the Japanese Armed Forces to this modification. "See," said the military, "the Allies are already going wobbly. All we have to do is stay the course, and all our demands will be met." But the error of the "modification" was soon corrected in the form of two atomic bombs: in those days, the Allies were led by men of steel, and the media had not yet assume the role of sabotaging our civilization at every turn. And thus, the nation that elected to torture prisoners of war, lead civilians on death marches, perpetrate the murder of 15 million Chinese, and use kamikaze, paid the price.
Things are very different in the multiculti world that has descended upon us. The west, from London to Washington, in cahoots with Israel's current government, believe that the way to go is to appease the Arab kamikaze. If we do not cling to Harry Truman as our guide for dealing with kamikaze, we will all pay a dreadful price.
Posted by Joseph Alexander Norland at August 7, 2005 07:30 PM