The truth about CFR

The truth about CFR

The Council on Foreign Relations Does the Middle East
by Daniel Mandel and Asaf Romirowsky, MIddle East Quarterly

Both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations have faced challenges from the Middle East and Islamist terror. Both administrations wrestled with questions of unilateralism versus multilateralism, the efficacy of military force, failures in Arab-Israeli diplomacy, and rising concern regarding jihadism and weapons proliferation in the region. During the same period, many of the articles and reports coming from the Council on Foreign Relation's Middle East program have opposed U.S. unilateralism and military action, exonerated the Palestinian leadership for their sponsorship of terrorism, supported engagement with rejectionist states and leaders, and downplayed the threat of radical Islam.[..]

Continue reading the full expose.

Posted by Ted Belman at August 29, 2005 04:38 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/10320


Comments

1. BobW said:

Does it escape IsraPundit readers'attention that the CFR would readily feature someone with name tags such as American Jewish Congress or Columbia University but there is a clear absence of tickets such as American Petroleum Institute or JETRO-Japan External Trade Office (They have a branch in Tel Aviv.)?

We all know what's going on.

We all know what a kapo is.

Also note the avoidance of Houston addresses.

We all know what's going on.

We all know Arab oil pricing also benefits some who aren't Arabs.

Kol tuv,
BobW

Posted by: BobW on August 30, 2005 02:10 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)