Sharon is in fact saying that there will be no further withdrawals other than pursuant to negotiations on a permanent agreement which may never take place. Until such time, Israel will retain control of Judea and Samaria.

Is Sharon really disagreeing with Erad?

When Sharon was acting on his disengagement plan the Quartet demanded to know that the plan would not replace the Roadmap and Sharon was quick to agree. So too, here. I fail to understand what is so sacrosanct about the roadmap but the Quartet and Israel are hugging it like the bible. The Palestinians have a different bible.

The roadmap is divided into three stages and the first most important stage requires parallel steps. The Palestinians so far have been unable to take even baby steps. Sharon worries that the Quartet will fudge on the Palestinian obligation and will attempt to water it down. So for Sharon, the Roadmap protects Israel because final status negotiations come only after incitement ends and the terror apparatus destroyed. Also by using the word "solely" he is relying on assurances that were given to him by Bush that there would be no other plan put forward.

What is abundantly clear is that the Palestinians will never take the steps required of them. I say this not only because it seems apparent on the ground but because terrorism and incitement are indispensable to the Arab efforts to destroy Israel. Furthermore Abbas has rejected the idea of a provisional state as anticipated in the second stage and wants to bypass both the first and second stage and go right to final status negotiations. Sharon will never agree to this.

What did Sharon mean by denying further "territorial changes"? For sure it means that Israel will retain control of the Judea and Samaria. But the fence will proceed and small settlements will be abandoned. Sharon does not consider that these are "territorial changes".

Erad is saying nothing different. Israel will determine its "borders" independently by building the fence and removing some small settlements on the east side of it. The "borders" so created are demographic borders but not political borders. Israel will retain control of all of the West Bank.

In effect Israel gets the best of both worlds. It gets the benefits of sovereignty over the West Bank and Jerusalem without the need to give citizenship to the Palestinians living there. It also gets the time (decades) to consolidate its hold on Jerusalem and Maaleh Adumin.

Benn reports

Sharon's associates said that there would be no diplomatic or political logic to launching a new initiative involving territorial withdrawals now. The whole purpose of the disengagement, they said, was to perpetuate the status quo in the West Bank until the Palestinians change.

The last sentence is the key. "Perpetuating the status quo" does not mean freezing the situation. It means retaining control and using that control to continue unilaterally putting facts on the ground.