|
|||
The Lie That Wouldn't DieTrackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments
Even before commenting on GOI's neglect of the proper management of the media, 2 points must be highlighted; 1. Articles appearing in Norman Podhoretz's Commentary Magazine automaticaly get labeled as tainted. Commentary Magazine is the publication of the American Jewish Committee, an organization with its own agenda. The American Jewish Committee requires a closer look. 2. Corrective action cannot be taken because of the current massive divide in Israel. There are many Israelis in support of the Arabs and will hinder corrective action. Articles do not equate with photos. The photo wins. Go back to any iconic political photo. It wins. No articles can be rehabilitative. The visual image wins. To rectify requires a state of the art public affairs department for preventive matters. GOI declines to develop this modern political weapon nicknamed "the CNN effect". In politics, perception is reality. That photo governs the issue. Kol tuv, Posted by: BobW on September 7, 2005 04:29 AM
Dear all, Posted by: david on September 7, 2005 06:25 AM
A lie travels half way around the world (now all the way around) before the truth gets out of bed. And before the truth can catch up there is another lie to combat. Unfortunately the propagation of each lie has many aiders and abbettors. Posted by: Ted Belman on September 7, 2005 10:07 AM
to Ted, say whaat? Posted by: jon on September 7, 2005 01:33 PM Post a comment |
The Lie That Wouldn't Die
by Gloria Salt
One of the most iconic images of ferocious Israeli evil is the famous photo of Muhammad al-Dura, a twelve-year-old Palestinian boy, lying dead in his father's lap after being shot by the Israeli army during a battle at the Netzarim junction in the autumn of 2000. Over the years that have followed, the boy's death has proved an extremely effective recruiting and motivational tool for Palestinian suicide bombers and other assorted Islamofascists.
When this incident hit the news, I remember hearing quiet comment that it had almost certainly been faked. When I inquired why the Israelis weren't doing everything they could to expose the lie, I was told, again and again, that there was simply no point. Israel's image was so bad that even an attempt to defend herself against such a grotesque blood libel would likely serve only to provoke further mistrust and contempt.
Fortunately, Nidra Poller refused to let the lie rest. In an explosive new piece in Commentary, she exposes the image for the fabrication it is...
As she writes, the lie was so instantly effective at fomenting anti-Israel bias that even to express a doubt as to the image's veracity was to declare yourself hopelessly deluded:
But is it true? Although serious doubts were immediately raised about the veracity of the France-2 news report, they were swept aside by the emotions it provoked and by the flare of violence in the last months of 2000. France-2 indignantly turned down all requests to investigate or even to help others investigate by releasing outtakes. To this day, many people believe that even to raise a doubt about the authenticity of the report is tantamount to denying the reality of the 9/11 attacks on New York City.
The depth of depravity and cynicism required to fabricate such a revolting lie beggars the imagination. But, as Poller argues, the Palestinians who enacted the scene are not the only ones at fault. The incident was disseminated, instantly and at no charge, to the world's media by French TV. She concludes her article by asking: "What was the role of the government-owned French television network, which is to say the French government itself, in devising, implementing, and spreading this atrocious calumny, whose repercussions are with us to this day?"
It's a compelling piece. Have a look at it.
(Via Melanie Phillips.)
Cross-posted on my blog, Apropos of Nothing
Posted by Gloria Salt at September 7, 2005 02:37 AM