Poor legislation or poor reporting
Poor legislation or poor reporting
The NYT reports
Britain May Ban 15 Militant Groups
Sarcasm demands that I point out that due to PC you don't have to a "terrorist group" to be banned. Being a "militant group" is enough.
Unfortunately,
"Proscription is an important power and not one to be used lightly," Mr. Clarke said on Monday. The list published on Monday included Islamic militant groups associated with Libya, Somalia, Morocco, Bangladesh and Pakistan. Some were said to have been formed in Afghanistan in the 1990's.
Why weren't groups associated with Syria, Iran, and Saudi arabia included. And most important, why leave out groups associated with the PA?
Posted by Ted Belman at October 11, 2005 08:49 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/10827
1
.
Don Singleton
said:
I tried two different ways to trackback http://donsingleton.blogspot.com/2005/10/britain-may-ban-15-militant-groups.html (HaloScan and SimpleTrac but neither worked.
Posted by: Don Singleton on October 11, 2005 12:46 PM
2
.
Ted Belman
said:
Don
I don't understand your post. What can I do to correct the problem?
Posted by: Ted Belman on October 11, 2005 01:31 PM
![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.israpundit.com/nav-commenters.gif)
said:
Poor legislation or poor reporting
The NYT reports
Britain May Ban 15 Militant Groups
Sarcasm demands that I point out that due to PC you don't have to a "terrorist group" to be banned. Being a "militant group" is enough.
Unfortunately,
Why weren't groups associated with Syria, Iran, and Saudi arabia included. And most important, why leave out groups associated with the PA?Posted by Ted Belman at October 11, 2005 08:49 AM