1. rocky said:

In the world media the ones who have the exclusive rights for playing the role of the victims are the muslims. Remember?

Since that role is already taken, others have no choice but to take a backseat.

2. BobW said:

It's really not right to list CAIR with the White House. CAIR does use propaganda to camoflague it's furtherance of terrorism. The White House has national obligations to maintain political stability. CAIR is being addressed via back channels. The back channels are just not in the limelight.

I'm not too sure that it can be written that "Christian heritage" drove the "Allies to victory". The reference is to WWII Europe and without the Soviet Red Army doing most of the land warfare, umlatts would probably be in use as far west as Brest, France. Asia had to be sacrificed to jell all available forces against the European fascists, less the Soviet fascists.

There's cloudy complexities in the Middle East but it's definitely not correct to say the US "validated terror for decades". In 1982 in Lebanon, the US fought Syrian forces - and lost. Reagan withdrew US forces. Iran was challanged by the US but lost - there's more to "Desert One" than the Time Magazine version. Remember, after the 1975 Church Committee hearings, the US continued its post Vietnam demobilization. It takes years to rectify results of poor policies.

The "jihadists of Palestinian" represents a different matter. A US foreign policy seachange cannot be comprehended by diaspora Jews. Israel is in existential danger not because of the barbarians - Israel's IDF is larger and more powerful than the militaries of the UK, France or Germany - but because every year the United States sends Social Security checks for US$ 450 Billion to about 50 million recipients COUPLED to every year the United States has been spending 1.8 Trillion dollars on health care. Equilibrium needs to be sought because equilibrium will be obtained anyway. It's like gravity. It's why America's job base is larger overseas than in the US. Since the US does not plan to close down like the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies or the Hapsburg Empire, Israel entered the briefing papers. A little conceptual thought is needed to figure out why Israel and not Saudi Arabia or Kuwait. Israel and Israel's supporters in the Democrat Party never heard of George Orwell's "Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals could believe them.". For the record, in the United States, most Jews do not support the political party in power - or even follow the trends - .

The answer is simple but not presented in the essay. The answer is to stop the petrodollar cartel. The answer started already but Israel has a Jewish birthrate bouncing against geometric enemies.

Unamuno also got into real big trouble for his criticism of the Spanish military's performance against the United States. The better example is John Paul Jones and his "une croisade".

Kol tuv,
BobW