Today the suburbs, tomorrow the world

Today the suburbs, tomorrow the world

Eurabia on the rampage by Melanie Phillips

The Muslim riots in Paris have now been going on for eight nights. How is Britain reacting to these disturbing events just across the English Channel, four months after its own "wake-up call" from last July's bombings?

With almost total indifference, since far from having woken up Britain is still sleep-walking in its own little trance.

Media coverage has been sporadic and downplayed, and the disturbances have been portrayed as caused by deprivation and race.

The fact that the rioters are Muslim has been mentioned, if at all, only in passing.

But in Denmark, as Viking-Observer has reported, Muslims have also been rioting for days in Arhus, apparently over the publication of cartoons satirising the Prophet.

The cartoons were in turn a response to the difficulties encountered by a children's writer, Kare Bluitgen, who couldn't find an illustrator for his book on the Koran and the Prophet's life since all the artists he approached feared the wrath of Muslims if they drew images of the Prophet. The daily Jyllands-Posten which published the cartoons reported:

Rosenhøj Mall has several nights in a row been the scene of the worst riots in Århus for years. "This area belongs to us", the youths proclaim. Sunday evening saw a new arson attack. Their words sound like a clear declaration of war on the Danish society. "Police must stay out. The area belongs to immigrants...We have planned this for three weeks."

In line with routine contemporary moral inversion, in which the perpetrators of violence are excused and their victims blamed instead by an alliance of Muslims and western decadents (Britain was blamed for the July bombings of its citizens because of Iraq)
the French authorities are being blamed for fanning the flames of discontent by discriminating against the country's Muslims.

Should we also blame the Danes for refusing to accept self-censorship and asserting their own values of freedom of expression?

Is every country to be held responsible for the jihad being waged against it - despite the fact that in every case the alleged provocation is different rather then responsibility being properly assigned to those who have declared war upon the free world?

Much of the coverage of the Paris riots has blamed the policies of France's Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy for abandoning French Muslims inside squalid ghettoes and failing to integrate them.
But as Robert Spencer points out, it is the Muslims themselves who insist on not being integrated.

In her book Eurabia, Bat Ye'or details

a series of agreements between the European Union and the Arab League that guaranteed that Muslim immigrants in Europe would not be compelled in any way to adapt "to the customs of the host countries."

The European Union has implemented such recommendations for decades so far from playing down the differences between ethnic groups, they have instead stood by approvingly while immigrants formed non-assimilated Islamic enclaves within Europe. Indeed, as Bat Ye'or demonstrates, they have assured the Arab League in multiple agreements that they would aid in the creation and maintenance of such enclaves. Ignorance of the jihad ideology among European officials has allowed that ideology to spread in those enclaves, unchecked until relatively recently.

Consequently, among a generation of Muslims born in Europe, significant numbers have nothing but contempt and disdain for their native lands, and allegiance only to the Muslim umma and the lands of their parents' birth. Those who continue to arrive in Europe from Muslim countries are encouraged by the isolation, self-imposed and other-abetted, of the Islamic communities in Europe to hold to the same attitudes.

The Arab European League, a Muslim advocacy group operating in Belgium and the Netherlands, states as part of its "vision and philosophy" that "we believe in a multicultural society as a social and political model where different cultures coexist with equal rights under the law." It strongly rejects for Muslims any idea of assimilation or integration into European societies: "We do not want to assimilate and we do not want to be stuck somewhere in the middle. We want to foster our own identity and culture while being law abiding and worthy citizens of the countries where we live. In order to achieve that it is imperative for us to teach our children the Arabic language and history and the Islamic faith.

We will resist any attempt to strip us of our right to our own cultural and religious identity, as we believe it is one of the most fundamental human rights. AEL founder Dyab Abou Jahjah, who was himself arrested in November 2002 and charged with inciting Muslims in Antwerp to riot (Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt said that the AEL was 'trying to terrorize the city', has declared: "Assimilation is cultural rape. It means renouncing your identity, becoming like the others."


What is now taking place in Paris is merely an intensification of what has been going on since long before the electrocution of the two youths which prompted the current disorder. And the scale of it is astonishing; Sarkozy told Le Monde that
...twenty to forty cars are set afire nightly in Paris' restive Muslim suburbs, and no fewer than nine thousand police cars have been stoned since the beginning of 2005.

Multiculturalism, the doctrine that governs Britain and Europe and which grew out of a war upon their values from within by allowing the values of minorities to trump the majority, has been applied by the west to appease an ideology that has declared war upon its values from without.

The poulets have now come home to roost in France, but the message for the rest of us is just as ominous.

Posted by Ted Belman at November 5, 2005 08:32 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/11113


Comments

1. Bill Levinson said:

Despite the horrors and atrocities it later perpetrated, perhaps the original Spanish Inquisition-- whose mission was to ethnically cleanse Muslims from the Iberian peninsula-- might not have been entirely bad. In those days, as it seems to be now, Islam (the militant form) was not merely a way to relate to God, it was also an ideology that advocated the murder, enslavement (dhimmitude) or forcible conversion of all "unbelievers" (kafirs, infidel pigs). Needless to say, no Christian country could afford to tolerate the presence of individuals who actually subscribed to this ideology and who might serve as fifth columnists in the event of another Islamofascist invasion (like the one that was stopped by Charles Martel at Tours).

The problem with the Inquisition was that it later persecuted innocent people to seize their property or satisfy personal vendettas (e.g. someone would accuse an enemy of being a Jew, Moor, witch, or heretic). The idea of expelling militant "Muslims" who will not assimilate into European society is still, however, a downright good idea.

What now seems necessary is the deployment of military-grade propaganda-- so-called hate propaganda if you will-- to dehumanize the non-assimilable militant "Muslims" as the violent and irrational subhumans they are, who pose a physical threat not only to the "infidels and kafirs" who surround them but also to peaceful Muslims who want to be productive members of the countries into which they have immigrated. The non-assimilable militants must be made to feel unwelcome, and hatred and contempt should be directed at them. http://www.omdurman.org/menace.html provides some ideas.

Before criticizing the above suggestion as reminiscent of Hitler and Goebbels, please bear in mind that the militants are already using similar propaganda against Jews and Christians. It is time for payback, with compound interest.

Posted by: Bill Levinson on November 5, 2005 11:31 AM

2. Ted Belman said:

Its nice to have your voice on Israpundit.

I once read "The Spanish Inquisition" by Cecil Roth. A informative book.

During the fifteenth century Christianity in Spain was reasserting itself. It gradully conquered Southern Spain from the Moors with whom the Jews enjoyed a Golden Era. The Cristians decided at first to maintain the prosperous Jewish communities in what had been Moorish Spain. This began to change as the century progressed and Jews were forced to convert. Jews were attacked on the basis that their fidelity to Judaism was an effront to Christianity and because they had cooperated with the hated Moors. For the first time in history the Jews chose forced conversion over death. But this was in name only. In 1492 the same year as the Moors were finally conquered, the Jews were expelled and Columbus sailed for India.

Those that choose conversion rose to great prominence in Spain unhindered by their religion during the fifteenth century.. Envy then took over. The inquisition followed in 1492. The conversos were burned at the stake for heresy. The inquistion lasted for three hundred years until after the American Declration of Independence if yhou can believe it.

You suggested the inquisition was a response to the enforcement of Dhimmitude in southern Spain. I don't think so.

Posted by: Ted Belman on November 5, 2005 12:02 PM

3. Jovan-Marya Weismiller, T.O.Carm said:

Yes, and when the Inquisition ended, the Spanish peasants rioted, shouting «death to the police! Give us back the Inquisition». The Inquisition had no power over a Jew or a Muslim qua Jew or Muslim. They had power only over Christians. If they were bad Christians who were converts from Judaism or Islam, yes, they got into trouble, but the answer was simple, be sincere in your conversion!

Posted by: Jovan-Marya Weismiller, T.O.Carm on November 6, 2005 03:54 AM

4. Frank said:

Why are you talking about the past? The Inquisition? Are you out of your minds?
What about RIGHT NOW? Do you not feel the hatred of Islam? They are the new Nazis!
Get ready for a fight!

Posted by: Frank on November 6, 2005 10:27 AM

5. Mohammed said:

Hi
look like you are getting paranoic; everything that happens in this world you try to link it to Islam. Riots in Paris are from different people and among them (may be a majority) third and fourth generation. i.e their grand grand fathers were immigrants. First it is not a secret that these people know very little about islam, they are not practicing (many of them if not most dont pray, dont observe fasting, have a similar western youth life i.e girl friends...) and what they are doing has nothing to do with Islam. They are doing this out of ignorance and most likely due to french internal problems (poverty, discrimination...). What strikes me is your readiness to link everything bad to a religion. Some of you even talk about global wars. THIS IS A CLEAR SIGN OF YOUR HATERED that you cant control and that you express at random. This website is a clear example of what many of you are in terms of hating the others. Just a last thing: for those who were fooled to believe that the''others'' hate us and that we have to act accordingly, WAKE UP, and try to realize that there are among you who want to keep you emprisonned in this way of thinking and keep your hearts full of hatered to the others (muslims.. ) for political and material purposes amongst others.

Regards

Posted by: Mohammed on November 6, 2005 11:58 AM

6. Gloria said:

Dear Mohammed,
We are not getting paranoic - just facing reality. This website permits freedom of expression of different viewpoints, unlike Islamic websites I have visited which preach hatred, global jihad and incite violence against tolerant liberal societies. I am Christian and always believe in peaceful co-exitence with our neighbours but there is little evidence of this view being shared by the Muslim world. France accepted millions of arabs and others fleeing from oppressive Islamic regimes and this is how their hospitality has been reciprocated. Its ashame that the Islamic world shows no tolerance whatsoever of other minorities within their midst. Islam claims to be a religion of peace and mercy but there is little evidence of this in the World.

Posted by: Gloria on November 6, 2005 03:04 PM

7. Mohammed to Gloria said:

Hi Gloria,
just tell me what a teenager that does not know anything about islam, cant speak or understand arabic let alone koran verses, who is involved in such a vandalism has to do with Islam?

Regards

Posted by: Mohammed to Gloria on November 6, 2005 03:20 PM

8. Gloria said:

Mohammed - I take your point- It is wrong to pin the riots in Paris on the Muslims. I am not French and don't know enough about the background of the delinquents behinds the riots to apportion blame. I understand that many amongst them are of North African African background and there appears to be a breakdown of parental control and leadership within the respective communities.I am awarethat French society also happens to be racist and anti-semitic. You wrote in generalisations and I responded in kind. I recognise that there are good and bad Muslims in the World like in all societies. It is important for the good ones be more visible and speak up against Terror that is being inflicted throughout the World in their name.

Posted by: Gloria on November 6, 2005 03:43 PM

9. Mohammed to Gloria said:

I totally agree with you: acts of terrors should be denounced by all people. I will tell a story about our prophet; once he tells his companions: seek victory for your muslim brother whether he is oppressed or he is an oppressor. The companions that understood Islam as it should be were annoyed and asked him; we understand that we have to help him if he is oppressed, but what if he is an oppressor. Prophet Mohammed said: stop him from being an oprressor.
So definitel: 9/11 that kills about 3000 people is a criminal act; 7/7 that kills about 70 people in london is a criminal act..They should be denounced.
But again, who is responsible? those who did those acts or those who share the same religion withthem. Cause otherwise, christianity and christians would be responsible for killings millions of jews in WWII; IRA and catholics in Ireland ..? Can we call christians and weter people terrorists because of that? of course no.
Yes you are right, terrorism should be condemmed. Shouldnt be also condemneing the terrorism of western countries in Iraq knowing now that it was based on a complex process of lies (at least 100000 people were slaughtered: though its not human I would ask you to compare this to the total vistims of ''islamic terrorism''). I dont go the further step to say that those who believe in the religion of those copuntries (US, UK..) are terrorists though they have elected such govermnements (we didnt) cause its not true and I urge you to start looking at those who are trying to spread the wrong idea that Islam is a source of terrorism cause those people have managed to some extent to fool people and to instal into them this fear of muslims and Islam.

Regards

Posted by: Mohammed to Gloria on November 6, 2005 04:13 PM

10. spike said:

To be honest, I think that the MSM is not telling the whole story of what is going on in Paris and Denmark because they either want to avoid a panic in the West, or they don't want to give these cretins the publicity they so fiendishly seek.

Posted by: spike on November 6, 2005 10:54 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)