|
|||
Discovering the Jewish JesusTrackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments
What a load of trayf! Do the Christian world a favor Boteach. Don't try and make our Lord into a cheap revolutionary and we won't try and tell you Moses was an Egyptian loving Midianite marrying murderer who became the first Hebrew dictator. Does this guy read the Torah ... or just the commentaries? Any prophet worth his salt would have recognized the Roman occupation for what it was. The hand of G-d. Just as the Babylonian captivity was. Believe me 'rabi', That Prophet did not come as a politician. Posted by: scott on December 20, 2005 09:57 PM
I've always said that the one thing Jews with which the Jews have to come to terms is the Jewishness of Jesus. And the one thing with which Christians have to come to terms is the Jewishness of Jesus. Right now the details are not that important; just the fact that he was a Jew and that this has certain religious implications. Boteach is simply saying this. Lets not get hung up on the other stuff. Posted by: Keelie on December 20, 2005 10:15 PM
Hogwash! Posted by: dawson on December 21, 2005 12:06 AM
Dawson - right on! This Boteach used to be on a Jewish website, until aparently they had their fill of his perversions of Torah. This garbage should never have been posted. It is simply a blivet. (Country folks know what I mean.) Posted by: Yehoshua Kehati on December 21, 2005 01:00 AM
Until we have a reasonable translation of the original scrolls you are all pissing into the wind. Posted by: kuhnkat on December 21, 2005 01:02 AM
Rabbi Boteach says, «Many Jews today believe that the rabbis hated Jesus because he claimed to be divine, but he never made any such claim» The New Testament says (John 8:57-59), «57. The Jews therefore said to him: Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Posted by: Jovan-Marya Weismiller, T.O.Carm on December 21, 2005 01:06 AM
What needs to be recognized is that there is a significant portion of the Christian Church that has never denied Jesus being a Jew, in fact holds this as part of their teachings, and overall honors the Jewish people for their role in what God has done/is doing. "Christians" that hold anti-semetic views are missing a lot of the point of the teachings of Jesus and are merely using the Bible as an excuse for their bias. What is held by my current church, and every church I have ever attended is that Jesus is the Messiah. What was accomplished by Jesus, and the apostles after he left was the spread of the words of God that were originally given to the Jewish people to the whole world. As to much of the article, it is simply taking the picture of Jesus painted in the Bible, stripping it of what is not approved, and trying to pidgeon-hole what is left into a pre-conceived form. It is a process that is wide-open to personal bias. What we are left with is the author's mental image of who the Jewish messiah should be. What is left unconsidered is that maybe the messiah isn't going to conform to the authors pre-conceived notion. I completely agree with the authors main point that Christianity and Judaism need to recognize how Jesus relates to both of them. The commonly held view that Christians hate Jews is simply not true. I have a number of friends who are Messianic Jews-people who are born and raised Jewish, and who have started worshiping Jesus as the Jewish Messiah. Things really aren't as bad as they seem to be presented in the article. Posted by: Joseph on December 21, 2005 01:11 AM
I have no problem with recognizing Christmas even though I do not believe that Jesus was the son or avatar of God. He was an important historical person whose philosophy and teaching changed the world mostly for the better, so his birthday should be recognized like that of any other (good) historical person. Posted by: Bill Levinson on December 21, 2005 01:30 AM
I happened to have studied this subject in great detail and even written a 25 page paper on the subject that agrees with Boteach. Now I know that Christians have their narrative represented by the gospels. That doesn't prevent the Jews from having theirs too. Boteach in capsual form presents the Jewish narrative. Narratives may or may not reflect truth. Each of us has the obligation to seek the truth. There are no givens in this matter. If someone is a proclaimed atheist, Christians have no trouble with this. It doesn't bring them to a boil. But many have an emotional reation as Scott did above if you question whether Jesus lived or whether he was resurrected or whether he was devine. They are insisting on politically correct speech. That's not right. Jews have the right to their view of history and to articulate such views in public. Even more so when they comment on one of their own. When I posted this article I thought I was contributing to further understanding and better relations. I was surprised to see the passionate rejection of what was said and the fact that it was said. Posted by: Ted Belman on December 21, 2005 08:03 AM
In order for Jews and Christians to get along, there must be mutual respect. Christians can believe anything they want about Jesus so long as such beliefs don't lead to attacks on Jews for killing "Christ". or other forms of discrimination. Jews on the other hand are entitled to believe what they want regarding Jesus. In my experience, many Christians are very sensitive to the rejection by Jews of Jesus as Christ. And this has been so for close to two thousand years. Why don't Christians just agree to disagree and leave it at that? Posted by: Ted Belman on December 21, 2005 09:17 AM
Dawson, my old associate. I am not sure what you disagree with. I have no doubt that the Jewish identity of Jesus is very much a part of what is taught in the evangelical churches and perhaps to some extend in the Church generally. I don't think Boteach was implying otherwise. He was just saying that such recognition which is not always emphasized leads to better relations. Boteach says "Like a mummy whose bandages must be removed, 2,000 years of Christian gauze must be stripped away so we may discover the Jewish Jesus." What he means is not that Christians don't believe Jesus was Jewish but that they don't know how Jewish. Boteach points out that everything Jesus taught as set out in the Gospels comes from Jewish thinking and values. So Jesus embraced Judaism rather rejected it or tried to change it. We can both agree that Jesus was against the Jewish establishment that curried favour with the Romans. So what do you take issue with? Posted by: Ted Belman on December 21, 2005 09:30 AM
Sure Ted, Posted by: rocky on December 21, 2005 09:33 AM
Shalom all, It's interesting that Albert Schweitzer's book "Quest For The Historical Jesus" is not mentioned. Otto Rank and Sigmund Freud also wrote about this. More is known about the historical Jesus than about King Richard the Lionhearted. Many words from lore have been mistranslated such as "messiah", "manger", (holy) "grail". There have been historical studies about the Exodus also. With hope that I do not offend anyone - I do not mean to - 2 of the Commandments were already adopted by the people's leadership prior to the mountain climbing expedition. Freud wrote about this from material developed by Charles Darwin. Kol tuv, Posted by: BobW on December 21, 2005 10:29 AM
What is this sacriligious muslim crap doing here? Posted by: scott on December 21, 2005 01:23 PM
I have never removed a comment because I din't like it. But I must admit that I am tempted to do so because Islam has enough propaganda sites and I don't want this platform to be one of them. Besides who cares what the Koran says about Jesus or Moses for that matter? I don't. Besides, Islam is what Islam does, and it ain't pretty. Furthermore that post is totally irrelevant to our discussion. I think I will remove it shortly. Posted by: Ted Belman on December 21, 2005 02:13 PM
I taught it was a platform for discussion and it accepts other views of the story. You removed my poster about how Islam sees Jesus (peace be upon him) as a prophet for Jews and how islam sees his mother Mary (peace be upon her). Then you removed a poster answering the poster 14 which is basically just saying I am here to remind you whi is blinded by hatered and you kept 14; for a discussion platform, it is unfair! Posted by: Mohammed To Belman on December 21, 2005 02:32 PM
Mohammed If you want to comment on the issue at hand ie the different narratives between Christians and Jews please do so. But your information about what the Koran says was irrelevant. When we are discussing Islam or how it is a religion of war not peace feel free to argue what you want. But don't ignore reality in order to paint a false picture. Honest debate is always welcome. Posted by: Ted Belman on December 21, 2005 03:11 PM
I'm grateful for this view. It's how I read the NT too. In fact, I think Christians and Muslims are all Jews. Rather, because the Koran prefers Israeli/tes to Jews, I now label myself Israelite. Hey, politically the Koran has gifted us who come from the tribe of Jacob, who come from Abraham via Mommy Sarah.
And don't forget, long before RaMBaM, Greek philosophy was merged with the Israeli/te experience. It's that wonderful library, that our Catholic friends have saved for us, Apocrypha. If you want to know how to overcome addiction read IV Maccabees. The Septuagint is all Jewish. In fact, it was us Jews who mistranslated "almah" into "virgin". That's because they lost the "sense" of the Hebrew 2000 years ago. You know what Allah and Muhammad said? The Jews and Christians fight over the same scriptures. That's all the way back 1400 years ago. So I guess Muhammad, the politican, said "A pox on both your houses. I'll simply write history my way." :) You know this Khanookah season is a great time to face historical data. Historically, not hysterically. So I am lucky to now be included in Talmud Torah. And the globe has a decision to make, opt for Jesus or opt for Talmud Torah. Both happened simultaneously. BTW, I love JESus CHRIST SUPERSTAR. Can anyone email me the Hebrew and Arabic, transliteration, I wish you a merry solstice and a happy new year? Bevakasha?
Posted by: macnietspingal on December 21, 2005 08:09 PM
Ted, Posted by: rocky on December 21, 2005 09:19 PM
Ted, let Mohammed post here. It's most important that everyone know the facts about Islam when they're stated correctly and read the disputations when over-the-eyes-wool-pulling is being employed by Islam. Let it go. Macnie, I've never tried Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds but the effects seem spectacular. Posted by: ShyGuy on December 22, 2005 03:15 AM Post a comment |
Discovering the Jewish Jesus
SHMULEY BOTEACH, THE JERUSALEM POST
Jesus Christ is the most famous Jew of all time, but is today remembered as a Christian. Surprisingly, the Jewish community has accepted this distortion of history, and tends to regard Jesus as an apostate. How odd that the Jews would accept a Christian version of one of their brethren rather than seeking to discover the man entombed beneath the myth. Like a mummy whose bandages must be removed, 2,000 years of Christian gauze must be stripped away so we may discover the Jewish Jesus.
We may do so by reading the original story of Jesus in the New Testament, before it was modified by Pauline and Lucan editors, who worked after the failed Jewish rebellion against Rome in the years 66-70, and whose intention it was to make Jesus less Jewish and more Roman, less a political rebel against Roman rule and more a Jewish religious revolutionary who inveighed against a corrupt Jewish hierarchy. These Christian editors hid the real Jesus' message of political revolution against Rome, thereby transforming him into a sound-bite-speaking do-gooder who loved the Romans and hated his people.
THE REAL Jesus was a deeply religious Jewish patriot who despised the Romans for their cruelty to his people and for their paganism. He never once abrogated the laws of the Torah, and expressly condemned those who advocated doing so (Matt. 5:18). Jesus walked the earth with a yarmulke and a beard rather than a halo and a cross. The portrayal of Jesus as being at odds with the Pharisees, the Jewish rabbinical leadership, is a later Christian device designed to implicate the Jews in Jesus' death. The proof that Jesus was a committed Pharisee throughout his life can be gleaned from how nearly all of his teachings are merely restatements of classical biblical and Pharisaic (talmudic) teachings.
Examples include some of Jesus' most celebrated sayings, like the Sermon on the Mount's "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth," which is a restatement of Psalms 3: "The meek shall inherit the earth, and delight themselves in the abundance of peace."
Likewise, Jesus' pronouncement that "If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also" (Matt. 5:39) is a restatement of Lamentations 3:30: "Let him offer his cheek to him who smites him." When Jesus is described by the Gospels as desecrating the Sabbath, he offers well-reasoned talmudic arguments for doing so, arguments based on sound Pharisaic teachings. As Hyam Maccoby writes in The Mythmaker: "Jesus' celebrated saying, 'The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath' is found almost word for word in a Pharisee source, where it is used to support the [rabbinical] doctrine that the saving of life takes precedence over the law of the Sabbath."
Jesus shows no interest in founding a new religion or in converting non-Jews, a point he makes repeatedly in the Gospels. Indeed, at various points Jesus expresses contempt for Gentiles (Matt: 10: 5-7, Matt. 15:22-26), an attitude that would be consistent with the extreme anti-Romanism he preached.
WHILE CLAIMING to be the Jewish messiah, Jesus did so only in the Jewish historical sense of a promised Jewish king who would arise to fight Israel's enemies, evict them from Israel and re-establish Jewish sovereignty over the Holy Land. Fired by his religious zealotry, Jesus' intention was to lead a political insurrection against Roman occupation, for which he was killed.
Luke 23:2 makes it abundantly clear that the charge against Jesus as political rebellion: "We found this fellow perverting the nation and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he himself is Christ, a King." This is also why we find Jesus instructing his followers each to buy a sword, in preparation for a military action with the Roman cohort in the Garden of Gethsemane.
The Romans ordered his swift execution because any claimant to the throne of David was met with instant crucifixion. Jesus' enemy was therefore the corrupt Jewish High Priest, Caiaphas, who was Rome's political muscle in Jerusalem and was despised by his fellow Jews as a collaborator.
Indeed, Luke 13:31 makes it clear that the rabbis had previously saved Jesus' life, and that the Pharisees later saved the lives of Peter, Paul, and the rest of the apostles from execution by the corrupt High Priest and his cronies (Acts 5:33-40; 23:6-9).
MANY JEWS today believe that the rabbis hated Jesus because he claimed to be divine, but he never made any such claim. His oft-repeated _expression, "Son of Man," is common among Jewish prophets, especially Ezekiel. Likewise, Jesus' penchant for speaking in God's name in the first person singular is practiced by Moses in deuteronomy and by Elijah in the book of Kings. Prophets often failed to distinguish between themselves and God, since they were deputized to speak in God's name. Later, after millions of Jews were killed in the revolt of the years 66-70, the Gospels were edited to purge Jesus of any trace of anti-Roman vitriol. The story was changed to a conflict between Jesus and the hated Jews rather than Jesus and the powerful Romans. But the editing was incomplete, and a great deal of the original story remains, especially since there were so many different Gospel texts. The transformation of Jesus from lover of Israel to a sworn enemy of the Jewish people, with John 8 quoting Jesus as berating the Jews as children of Satan who are condemned to damnation in hell, is a contemptible act of character manipulation that led to 2,000 tragic years of Christian anti-Judaism.
Restoring Jesus to his Jewish roots, by contrast, could usher in a new era of Jewish-Christian rapprochement. Jews and Christians may not meet through the same religion. But for the first time in two millennia they can forge a bond of kinship using the personality of Jesus of Nazareth as a bridge, even as they continue to understand him in completely different ways.
==============
The writer, a rabbi and author, regularly participates in broadcast
discussions with leading Christian scholars and is currently working on a book on the Jewish identity of Jesus (www.shmuley.com).
Posted by Ted Belman at December 21, 2005 08:06 AM