|
|||
Fight the IslamocaustTrackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments
Your shilling for 'good muslims' doesn't quite fit in with your post of yesterday delineating your 'non extreme' principles. Yes there are meek muzzis but they are not 'good' muzzis. 'Good' muzzis are islamofascists for it is a murderous religion. Take a hundred muzzis and put them on the moon with a copy of the koran and two of them will read it and become jihadis and subjugate the other 98. Then they will force them to send their kids to jihadi brainwashing institutions and in the next generation you will have a hundred jihadis. As long as there are muslims in sufficient numbers to cause trouble with their neighbors ... there will be trouble. Posted by: scott on December 1, 2005 02:58 PM
As a Jew I find some of the language bandied around above very offensive. Its the sort of terminology used by our enemies. Whilst I am very aware of the dangers of and the need to confront global jihad _ I don't think it helps our cause to stoop to their level. Abusing the term "holocaust" in the way its done above will be viewed by many Jews as not only Islamophobic but a trivialisation of the holocaust. There is also no need to alienate the moderate muslims from non-arab countries in the way that such use of terminology is likeli to do. The use of such offensive terms such as "filth,vermin or ape was the language that the nazis used to describe the Jews. I urge you to tone down such language in future postings since all you are doing is discrediting our cause and playing into the hands of our enemies. Posted by: Leonard on December 1, 2005 05:49 PM
Leonard, your comment "The use of such offensive terms such as "filth,vermin or ape was the language that the nazis used to describe the Jews" is 100 percent correct. It is also the kind of language the enemy is using to dehumanize Jews today, and they have other words for Christians (kafir being among them). The enemy has also published a "Jews as Christ killers" picture that shows Jews with exaggerated Semitic features crucifying a woman labeled "Palestine."
In peace there's nothing so becomes a man In summary, we must indeed dehumanize the enemy. We must not let his allies (e.g. Michael Moore) paint him as a "Minuteman" who is fighting American oppressors. Haven't we had enough of the enemy referring to Israelis as "Zionazis?" I say we pay them back with compound interest. I am not going to sing "Kumbaya" with them, I am going to tell them through my actions, "I will not bandy with thee word for word/ but buckle with thee blows, twice two for one!" Posted by: Bill Levinson on December 1, 2005 06:33 PM
Bill - I do access MEMRI TV and other recordings and I am aware of the level of anti-semitism that exists in the arab world and large parts of the Muslim world such as the speech by Matahir the former Malaysian PM, but we are not seeking to appeal to those primative regions. We live in the West where most people have modern liberal values. You must distinguish between the Jihadists and the modernists in the Muslim world and not seek to make new enemies unnecessarily. I recognise its an uphill struggle - but there have been some successes - for example the new President of Afghanistan. Many people in the West have not gaged the level of threat and some even believe all the conspiracy theories of ridiculous individuals like Michael Moore. All I am saying is tone down some of the language and direct any vehemence to the offending party rather than brand an entire religion. Remember its a battle over minds - we don't wish to turn people off. Posted by: Leonard on December 2, 2005 07:17 PM Post a comment |
Fight the Islamocaust
by Bill Levinson
This excerpt is copied with permission from the United American Committee's forum. I agree with it, with the proviso that a clear distinction be made between Islam and Islamofascism. There are many peaceful Muslims who do not agree with what Hitler in a headscarf is doing, and they are often victimized by the militants themselves.
Remember that controlling the language of the conflict is part of the key to controlling the conflict itself. Simple, descriptive, and hard-hitting words are among our most potent weapons. Examples include:
Hitler in a headscarf (Michael Savage's contribution)
Filth in a dirty nightshirt (Savage?)
Vermin in a Turban (mine, noting that Sikhs are Good Guys in Turbans)
Jihad Monkey
Sand Ape (or Sand Nazi)
Islamocaust (what we will get if the enemy wins)
DHIMMI = Dupe, Helpful Idiot, and Misguided Moron for Islamofascism: a stooge or a useful idiot
Ganelon = a fifth columnist for Islamofascim, after the traitor of Roncesvalles. Same thing as a Judas, Quisling, or Benedict Arnold
From Dave at the United American Committee
My own inclination would be to show not a beautiful Islamic palace but a mud hut or lean-to tent because, unlike civilized Muslims, Islamofascists are not capable of building anything taller than one story (except perhaps a gallows on which to hang infidels and apostates). I would in fact show the wreckage of a beautiful mosque among the carnage, with a note explaining that it belonged to the wrong "kinds" of Muslims.
Posted by Bill Levinson at December 1, 2005 12:59 PM