Sanitizing Hamas

Sanitizing Hamas

Hamas won big yesterday in local elections on the West Bank, and that whirling you hear is the washing machine in operation -- the white-washing machine on 43rd Street. Media coverage of the elections uniformly downplayed Hamas's murderous character, but only the New York Times managed to write an entire front-page article on this group's victory without mentioning its claim to fame -- suicide bombings that slaughter civilians.

Yep. This needs to be emphasized: Every single media outlet that I located managed to mention Hamas's record of suicide bombings--except the Times. The Times has previously gone out of its way to whitewash Hamas -- see my item on a Steve Erlanger atrocity last month--and it will happen again. Hey, it's Times policy.

While tastefully omitting any mention of suicide bombings, the Times's Greg Myre turned over the podium to a Hamas "spokesman," who ranted that the election "shows that the Palestinians support reform, resistance and loyalty to the blood of the martyrs."

Myre, not to be outdone, said that Hamas had nominated "well-educated candidates with reputations for probity and piety" -- making them seem more like the College of Cardinals than a terror group that slaughters civilians. They're really good eggs: "Hamas runs many educational and charitable organizations financed with money from outside."

Oh, and all that "terrorism" stuff is just... well, it is just a matter of opinion, that's all. Hamas, Myre said, "is considered a terrorist group by Israel, the United States and the European Union." Rest assured that the Times doesn't feel that way in the least.

You see, the Times believes that turning sixty-year-old women into hamburger is a "military" activity. Myre points out that Hamas "also has an active military branch, which it refuses to disarm." How naughty of them!

That's right, folks. In the view of the Times, suicide bombings against buses and discos and Passover seders, and firing inaccurate rockets into civilian areas, are "military" activities, pretty much as you may have experienced in the service. You know: rifle inspection, close-order drill, map exercises, blowing yourself up in discos, that kind of thing. Soldier stuff.

The Times just loves the "military"-- when it can use that word to sanitize Palestinian terrorists. (What's that old expression? "Send a salami to your boy in the disco-bombing army"?)

Meanwhile, over at Reuters, a hack named Mohammed Assadi portrayed Hamas as a cross between the Better Government Association and the United Way, praising its "corruption-free reputation as well as its charity network." However, even Reuters was able to squeeze in a reference to the group's "dozens of suicide attacks against Israel" -- a little bit of trivia that escaped the Times's attention. Ditto for the AP. Ditto for the Chicago Tribune. Ditto for the Washington Post. Ditto, ditto, ditto -- except at the Times and, I suppose, al-Jazeera and other Israel-basing news outlets.

Mind you, I'm not tossing laurels at any of these hacks. The AP, for instance, inserted a gratuitous reference to Hamas's "fierce resistance to Israel's occupation" -- glamorizing murder missions against civilians in places like the Tel Aviv beachfront. But even the AP managed to mention that Hamas is "responsible for dozens of suicide bombings." And only the Times sanitized the Hamas murderers as "the military branch."

As a matter of fact, disregard what I said earlier about al-Jazeera. (Just setting you up for the punch line.) Even the notoriously pro-Palestinian, pro-terrorist al-Jazeera acknowledged that "the group had carried out numerous deadly attacks against Israel" and "carried out several bombings in Israel during more than five years of fighting." Congratulations, Greg Myre and the Times. You've moved out ahead of al-Jazeera in sanitizing terrorists.

As has been my usual practice when the Times bites the big one, I'm sending a copy of this item to the Empty Suit, New York Times spokesman (a/k/a "public editor") Barney Calame. Something else for you to ignore, Barney, while you shill for management and focus on trivia.

Cross-posted on Mediacrity.

Posted by Mediacrity at December 17, 2005 11:04 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/11719


Comments

1. Leonard said:

Attempts to sanitize Hamas by reporting about them but omitting to make any mention of their main activities ie the "suicide bombings" remind me of a Religious Education Teacher I had in a non-denominational state school when I was ten, who in his first lesson started to lecture the class about Hitler claiming that he was a great man who built roads and got Germany working after the Depression. When I raised my hand and said "what about the concentration camps ? ". His response was "Oh, that was a small detail". It sounds like the New York Times is becoming the American equivalent of the London Guardian in terms of their reporting.

Posted by: Leonard on December 17, 2005 11:39 AM

2. fred lapides said:

If you insist on badmouthing the NY Times, at least get it right! The article referred to makes it clear that Fatah lost because it was split: a group of younger hothead broke away, as in this quote: "The young Fatah rebels are led by Marwan Barghouti, who is serving five consecutive life terms plus 40 years in an Israeli prison for planning the killings of four Israelis and a Greek monk.

Mr. Abbas put Mr. Barghouti, 46, at the head of the official Fatah slate in a vain effort to avert the split, but the jailed leader decided to form his own list anyway. His slate, known as The Future, contains other prominent Fatah politicians in their 40's, including Muhammad Dahlan and Jibril Rajoub, powerful in Gaza and the West Bank, respectively." and then we have this:
Hamas, which is committed to the destruction of Israel and its replacement by a Palestinian state, is considered a terrorist group by Israel, the United States and the European Union."

that makes it perfectly clear that the NY Times is not the evil force you would believe it to be...

Posted by: fred lapides on December 17, 2005 05:19 PM

3. georg von mecklenburg said:

Hitler was a great man for his times. He did employ millions of unemployed Germans and at the same time or afterwoods, he was ultimately responsible for the deaths of 30 or so million people. Hamas is not the bogeyman everyone wants them to be, it is the rest of the Palestinian leadership that are.

Billions of dollars have been wasted on Palestine, its leaders, and people. What have been the results... more grinding poverty, and more corruption. Taking a trip to any Palestinian area only outlines this. If Hamas is the answer to a new day for the Palestinians, then they are going to vote their list in. The average Palestinian just like the average Israeli at this point only want some peace and with that peace some prosperity.

Leaders on all sides only whip the people up in a frenzy of emotions, and everyone loses as a result. Hamas cannot be any worse than Fatah or al Aksas Brigade.

Posted by: georg von mecklenburg on December 18, 2005 09:52 AM

4. t said:

Are you f';';'; serious georg?????/ "Hitler was a great man and Hamas isn t the boogeyman" This just proves what a messed up world we live in!

Posted by: t on December 18, 2005 10:32 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)