Competing Perspectives
Competing Perspectives
Sharon's Strategic Legacy for Israel:
Dan Diker, JCPA
Some Israeli opinion-makers, seeking to define Sharon's political legacy, are determined to transform him into a political dove due to his unilateral disengagement plan that pulled Israel out of Gaza. They claim that the "new" Sharon was willing to lead Israel in another major pullback - this time from at least 90 percent of the West Bank. This interpretation assumed the West Bank security fence would constitute Israel's eastern border.
However, a careful examination of Sharon's major speeches and interviews since he first proposed disengagement suggests the very opposite. Indeed, on January 6, 2006, Israel Channel 2 television's chief diplomatic correspondent, Udi Segal, disclosed that Sharon told him privately that it was his policy to hold onto eight settlement blocs in the West Bank and not only the three blocs usually mentioned - Ariel, Maale Adumim, and Gush Etzion. Segal added that Sharon did not want to evacuate the Jordan Valley. MORE
Sharon's place in history
By Frank J. Gaffney Jr.
Posted by Ted Belman at January 12, 2006 07:04 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/12028
Competing Perspectives
Sharon's Strategic Legacy for Israel:
Dan Diker, JCPA
Sharon's place in history
By Frank J. Gaffney Jr.
Posted by Ted Belman at January 12, 2006 07:04 PM