|
|||
Humpty Dumpty, Nadeem Muaddi's Martyrs, and the ISM/PSM RelationshipTrackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments
Bill Levinson has written one of the most brilliant and helpful pieces , along with Lee Kaplan to expose the lies, hate, and calls for death that the ISM/PSM/Palsolidarity/Al AWDA/MECA/ groups promote. I suggest we all bombard the IRS, and the Homeland Security office , as well as every University that helps the promotion of martyrdom and the murder of Jews . Free speech at what cost? Plans to inflitrate Birthright Programs? Refuse and Resist trainings for destruction of Caterpillar showroom? DIvestment against Israel? Blowing us Buses? If these peole were to plan this type of conference against any other ethnic group they would be considered racist. However, when it come to bashing Jews, they get student funds, the blessings of a Christian University, and the protection of a country, that they hope, one day to destroy with the promotion of radical Islam. Posted by: Allyson Rowen Taylor on January 13, 2006 01:44 PM
Bill, judging by Muaddi's previous post it appears that he has lost interest in continuing this argument with you. I don't blame him either. While he has proven his point and moved on, you've attempted to change the subject numerous times. Perhaps you're fishing for an opportunity to remain on top - I'm not sure. Regardless, I would like to hear a radio debate between the both of you. I believe that it would be rather amusing. In the mean time, I suggest that you pick up a copy of Edward Said's "Orientalism" (1978). Posted by: James Emanuel on January 13, 2006 02:00 PM
Oh please. When was Muddi ever interested in an "argument"? His sole interest was in silencing Bill Levinson, first by threats and later by ridicule, neither of which worked. Posted by: Hal Hartley on January 13, 2006 02:10 PM
Bill, I congratulate you on this brilliant piece in "settings ideals correctly". Not having seen the original piece by this OTHER man, I can conclude that he advocated all violence against Jews. Posted by: Ed D on January 13, 2006 02:57 PM
Bill, your expose of this bunch, the whole bunch, is outstanding, even entertaining. What is really comical is that they think this is just another "Zionist" web site. Having taken the time to read this site for awhile, I can unequivicolly inform them that it's participants are nothing short of brilliant and that they are really in it over their heads. They may have figured this out by now, but I doubt it, hence their pathetic, immature responses, particularly the fake ones. Even I can spot them. It's criminal that these Islamist groups are allowed to infect our universities and churches in North America. I hope your expose is just the beginning of the end of them. They have no credibility with anyone who has taken the time to try and understand the truth about the conflict between Israel and the "Palestinians". Meanwhile, the infection is spreading, and the time to stop it is running out. Posted by: Shelley on January 13, 2006 03:04 PM
James Emmanuel said, "Bill, judging by Muaddi's previous post it appears that he has lost interest in continuing this argument with you. I don't blame him either. While he has proven his point and moved on, you've attempted to change the subject numerous times."
Please excuse me if I inferred #2 from his original article and the context of possibly having to die for one's beliefs. As I said previously, the Internet does not carry mental telepathy and I had no way of knowing he was REALLY thinking about a firefighter who gave his life to save a baby. Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 13, 2006 03:27 PM
He never stated that he wasn't referring to peace activists like Rachel Corrie. She just as well could be lumped into a "martyr" category with firemen and doctors. After all, like them she did dedicate her life to helping people - and died doing it. I'm quite confused over why you would assume that Rachel Corrie's actions were wrong. No Palestinian forced her to stand in front of that bulldozer. She chose to do it because she felt as if the actions of the IDF were wrong. Why are you drawing a parallel between Rachel Corrie's actions and terror activities? Her intentions were pure... she did not deviate from a her commendable principles... and she paid the ultimate price for doing just that. I can't think of any other word to describe her than "martyr". A "hero" would entail that she saved someone, would it not? Perhaps you are being too narrow with your understanding of the word. Posted by: James Emanuel on January 13, 2006 03:42 PM
James, I never said that Rachel Corrie was an evil person or a terrorist; she falls into category #2, a nonviolent person who dies while acting as a human shield. Young adults in their late teens and early 20s have far more idealism than good sense and I do not think the ISM, PSM, or whatever it calls itself next week or next month should be allowed to recruit more Rachel Corries without plenty being said to discourage Georgetown University students from participating. ISM leader George Rishmawi had in fact made a very disturbing statement about it being "useful" to get foreign activists like Rachel killed in confrontations with the IDF, and a Hamas terrorist said openly that she was more useful to "the cause" dead than alive. I also find it very disturbing that her so-called "friends" in the ISM stood and watched her get run over but not one lifted a finger to pull her out of the construction vehicle's path. GU students, parents, and alumni need to know about that so Rachel Corrie is the LAST idealistic peace activist whom the ISM will EVER stand up in front of a bulldozer to die so the Palestinians can write propaganda with her blood. Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 13, 2006 04:05 PM
To Bill Levinson, You have outdone yourself. Whether you are dealing with a Nadeem Muaddi, some other pro-Palestinian supporter or just your regular left wing ideologue, it always seems to turn out the same. You as a pro-Israel advocate posit your views to an internet blog on a topic pertaining to the Israel -Palestinian war or radical Islam and you are met by comments from pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel advocates attacking your views and positing their own contrary views which invariably stay on their ideological and revisionist history message. It is a situation of talking at each other and not engaging in dialgue. Invariably inviting an open debate is ignored or arrogantly rejected as being a waste of time as these pro-Palestinian anti-Israel advocates arrogantly impute to the pro-Israel side, their own intransigent narrow thinking. Unfortunately these narrow single minded pro-Palestinian anti-Israel ideologues are doing just fine in the public forum spewing their lies and disingenuous propaganda through a tolerant accomodating Western media, Western universities that hail themselves as the bastions of free speech and through the internet. They know full well that engaging in an open debate serves your interests and not theirs for they would be the ones who would be at the greater risk of being exposed for the disingenuous propagandists that they are. While it would be great to hear you in action Bill, I highly doubt that you are going to get any takers to debate you from the pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel and left wing crowd. Posted by: Bill Narvey on January 13, 2006 04:21 PM
Humor me: ISM = International Solidarity Movement = adovcates for citizens of the international community to enter the West Bank & Gaza for the purpose of nonviolently resisting illegal Israeli occupation. Obviously they use internationals in order to help publicize the struggle to people throughout the world that may have otherwise remained ignorant. Also, the IDF is less likely to attack internationals than Palestinians. Why? Because we all know that attacking internationals would only bring bad press upon the IDF. PSM = Palestine Solidarity Movement = student organized movement advocating the divestment of funds from companies that do business with Israel. Modeled after the university driven divestment movement targeting South Africa's apartheid regime in the 1970s and 1980s. Does not formally advocate for members to travel to the West Bank and/or Gaza in order to nonviolently resist Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian land. They seem to only be concerned with achieving divestment. Is it possible that some students are members of ISM and PSM? Yes. Is that problematic? Probably not. Having similar acronyms does not equal having the same mission and/or organization. PSM also stands for the popular periodical "Play Station Magazine" - however, there is no correlation. Do you see what I am driving at? Making it seem as if the upcoming PSM conference at Georgetown will be used as a recruiting ground for ISM activists is false. Just because ISM people may attend does not mean it is their conference. Remember, the conference is open to the public. That means even you may attend.
Posted by: James Emanuel on January 13, 2006 04:27 PM
James Emanuel, this is from ISM's website today: "ISM lends support to the Palestinian resistance...through the following activities: ...challenging crippling checkpoints...confronting tanks and demolition equipment...." Clearly, you cannot say with certainty that Rachel Corrie chose to confront that tank that day. She may have been ordered by ISM to go there. In any event, she did go there at least knowing that ISM supports this kind of resistance. And they continue to support it TODAY even though it cost Rachel Corrie her life. Could Rachel Corrie have rationally deduced that confronting this bulldozer would end her life? I don't think so as it had never happened before. Now that it has, I find it repulsive and irresponsible that ISM is still employing this tactic. I can only conclude that they want more "martyrs". Posted by: Shelley on January 13, 2006 04:57 PM
Shelly: A) What do things written on the ISM's website have to do with the PSM? -and- B) What is wrong with "challenging crippling checkpoints...confronting tanks and demolition equipment"? After all, the IDF is there illegally. Furthermore, these are all non-violent tactics of resistance. If I'm not mistaken, many Israeli settlers non-violently resisted the IDF when it came to remove them from their illegal settlements. The point is, there is nothing that can stop them because they aren't breaking any laws. Posted by: James Emanuel on January 13, 2006 05:35 PM
James, re: "What is wrong with "challenging crippling checkpoints...?" Why don't you go to a U.S. airport and try to help unknown persons bypass the security checkpoints that screen passengers for weapons and explosives? You will find out very quickly from your interaction with law enforcement personnel what is wrong with "challenging crippling checkpoints" that are designed to stop terrorists.
Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 13, 2006 06:15 PM
Bill: A) Security checkpoints at airports are deemed legal. However, checkpoints within the West Bank are deemed illegal by not only the Palestinians - but international law as well. -AND- B) I didn't contradict Muaddi. Soldiers and firemen are types of "human shields". It doesn't appear that he was trying to sue you over that. On the contrary, it appears that he was stating that he will sue you because you were making the indirect assumption that he supports terror. Human shields are not illegal - or wrong - as long as the "shield" (if you want to call it that) is willing to participate. Again, there were plenty of "human shields" at the settlements the IDF were dismantling this past summer. Posted by: James Emanuel on January 13, 2006 06:28 PM
ISM itself should be considered a terrorist organization by our government, the same as hamas, hezbollah, al qaeda. Posted by: Laura on January 13, 2006 09:03 PM
More from our good friend Nadeem Muaddi. He seems to have an ambiguity problem with his columns, like this one: http://www.ramallahonline.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2024 "Suicide Bombing: Not the Issue
Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 13, 2006 11:20 PM
James, what you're doing is splitting hairs, b/c you, in Nadeem footsteps, employ semantics, while we, here, talk about real life, something dynamic that doesn't recognize such subtle differences as you point to them, which may be, or even are, correct and accurate. No use to talk w and to them, no use at all, under any circumstances. I don't believe one iota of what they say. The Islamic culture is a culture of deception and delusion, self-addressed and externally. We simply talk two different languages, incompatible by nature. For me, the Jewish revolutionary movement, modern and progressive to boot, the Zionist Movement, in its two oposite factions, the Revisionist and Socialist, is the caravan that is passing by while the dogs are barking. We went thru the valley of death and came out stronger EVERYTIME it happened. This is fact, and no other nation can boast of such fate and history. This caravan, my caravan, our caravan, is passing by, brothers, and will pass by no matter what, no matter who. By God! Dan Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 13, 2006 11:39 PM
James Emanuel, what planet do you come from? Obviously a sympathiser and liar for the ISM. At the Ohio State Palestine Solidarity COnference Adam Shapiro was recorded stating that PSM and ISM are the same thing, a consortium of groups that advocate the end of Israel: www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11010 As for Edward Said, he was a member of the Palestine National COuncil that dispatched the Munich murderers to kill Israel atheletes in 1972. Said once said, "Facts don't matter, only emotions matter. Write your own history." That fits nicely with the paradigm of the ISM/PSM and Arab dissembling. In other words, "lie to get what you want." Said was cenured by the faculty senate at Columbia for throwing rocks at Israeli soldiers and was proven by Justice Weiner to have lied about being a Palestinian, since he was born in Egypt (like Arafat). As for Orientalism, the book is junk sophistry. Said claimed Europeans cannot be experts on Middle East history or culture because they look at it from a "Colonialist" perspective, as if genetics play a role in the study of history. What he really mean was Arabs report history based on tribalism and not facts, the same mentality that keeps the war roiling against Israel forever as they teach bullshit to their children about Israel and the West. I suggest Emanuel you go to google and type in ISM + comcast and read about the ISM. They dissemble by saying they are peace activists, but are a war support group for the PLO and terrorists. Peace activists donot call terrorism "legitimate resistance" and do not take sides. The ISM is clearly a Palestinian front group of AMerican and European Anarchists and Communists. As for Muuadi's article referring to firefighters, Emanuel can I offer you for the price of $100 a full halfownership of the Brooklyn Bridge or some swampland in Florida soon to be a luxury high-rise hotel? Please stop supporting terrorists who callthemselves "peace activists."
Posted by: Abu Abubu on January 14, 2006 12:39 AM
How do you tell when an ISM activist is lying? When he says he is a "peace activist" and supports "legitimate resistance." By the way, 98% of the Palestinian population of the PA is under Palestinian rule so not occupied.What these jerkoffs meanis all of ISrael is occupied and must be dismantled to create another shithole Arab state. Gaza shows what it will be like. Posted by: Jaya Chemayel on January 14, 2006 12:43 AM
It's a shame that you all believe this way. I won't try to change your points of view because you are all probably past repairing. But I will say this: I'm ever so thankful that you only represent the views of a marginalized minority. Such right wing Zionist hate speech does not represent all of our people. Israelis are much more sensible than this. For the most part, we understand that it is settlement supporters like yourselves that is holding Israel back from becoming all it can be. Interestingly enough, I am willing to wager that the majority of you are not Israeli citizens either. Such sadness. Posted by: James Emanuel on January 14, 2006 02:15 AM
James Emanuel, you are right about my not being an Israeli citizen. I am a Yankee infidel pig and kafir, whom the Islamofascists will kill or enslave with every other infidel and kafir on earth if they get their way. The war is not between Israel and the militant Palestinians but between Civilization and Islamofascist barbarism and chaos. In case you hadn't noticed, the dictator of Iran is talking about the Mahdi (Messiah or Expected One) and he claims that his followers see an aura or halo around him when he speaks. He is also trying to acquire nuclear weapons and he has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map." However, in an elaborate public relations ritual, he showed the Israeli flag (on a sphere) falling through an hourglass in which the United States flag already lay broken on the bottom. As far as I am concerned, Israel and/or my own country are justified in taking this guy out with a conventional (and possibly nuclear) first strike. His actions-- a lethal threat coupled with display of the imminent means of carrying it out-- would probably constitute "reasonable cause" for a preemptive response under civilian law, and I suspect the same applies under international law and custom. Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 14, 2006 02:34 AM
"Such right wing Zionist hate speech does not represent all of our people." "Our people" is what? Self-hating Jews? Moonbats? Morons? Note also his casual use of lies such as "illegal checkpoints" and "illegal occupation." Don't you love it when terrorist apologists get all weepy about the "checkpoints" and "occupation" but just stand by and shrug when their pals commit *real* war crimes and violations of interenational law? Posted by: Terry Thompson on January 14, 2006 10:49 AM
Say it again, pls, James! "Beyond repair"? We? I take it as an insult. Mind yourself, your words, and behave, man! The fact that you have something to say and you can do it, something you won't be able to do under the benevolent rule of the IslamoFascist mullas, doesn't give you the right to insult! But since you said it, let me take pride in it, infinite pride. Pls, let me explain why I am so proud of being in the extreme right of the Zionist Movement, why I say that you're splitting hairs in the martyr debate, and what are really the ISM and PSM. Poor beyond repair me - In all revolutionary movements, only people like me, and the like of me, kept the course of the movement from deviating into a defeatist path. I'm aware that I am only a small part of the Jewish body politic and nation, but it is my voice that keeps the flag flying and the hope flickering in the hearts of the John and Jane Does of ours, of the Itzhacs and the Iakovs, of the Sarahs and the Rivkas among us. It is us who blow the winds in the wings of our right and legitimate battle. Recognizing my role as being what I described, I will not stray from my convinctions. We are the ones who pull the cart of our fight, laden with the few who fight it, and followed by the passive masses who don't have the stamina, or the drive to fight. Every liberation movement has those three distinctive parts of participants: The first line fighters, the field fighters, and the masses behind them, conscious or not, approving or not, of the fight. Martyr? In the Islamic Arab lingo context? Exam question. A firefighter? Of course I know the answer: NOT the daisy, NOT the firefighter, NOT the paramedic, and NOT the scout. Guess who! The deluded, bewildered, young martyr of theirs. Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 14, 2006 01:52 PM
I hear Bill Levinson's real name is Rachel Golem. Do you know what a Golem is? A living creature with no soul. Now I understand. I finished. Posted by: James Emanuel on January 14, 2006 02:30 PM
James, the war will not stop with the dismantling of the settlements. Nothing short of the destruction of Israel and the elimination of the Jews will satisfy the majority of the Palestinians and the Arab nations. James, I live in Canada and I am not a Jew, or a Christian for that matter. In Canada, as in all Western nations, there is a well-organized and belligerant network of pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel activists who are gaining in popularity. They are infiltrating our Universities, our churches, our municipal, provincial, and federal governments. They are, in the main, Muslims. Some of these Muslims are Islamists. The Islamists object to any support our government and citizens give to Israel. They seek to diminish Israel by whatever means they can use, through propoganda, demonstrations, conferences, boycotts, and divestment. Their business is the demonization of Israel and they are very good at it. Yes, it is sad, but not in the way that you think it is. Posted by: Shelley on January 14, 2006 03:00 PM
James wrote, "I hear Bill Levinson's real name is Rachel Golem. Do you know what a Golem is? A living creature with no soul."
Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 14, 2006 03:53 PM
I can understand different points of view on different subjects. I cannot understand blindness professed and utter credulity by otherwise perfectly intelligent and somber peersons. James et al, are you here? Reading? Reflecting? Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 14, 2006 04:07 PM
James Emanuel, why thank you for showing that you think we are all morons here. Those checkpoints and bulldozers and other horribly un humanitarian actions you are whining about are all known to be necessary measures to stop smuggling of weapons and explosives used to murder INNOCENT ISRALEI CIVILIANS INCLUDING MUSLIMS AND ARABS!!!!! Fascist MORONS like you need to remember that some of us lived through the Soviet Propaganda campaigns and STILL RECOGNISE THAT TYPE OF ACTIVITY!!! If you seriously believe any of the crap you are unloading here you are stupider than I think you are!!! Posted by: kuhnkat on January 14, 2006 04:15 PM Post a comment |
Humpty Dumpty, Nadeem Muaddi's Martyrs, and the ISM/PSM Relationship
by Bill Levinson
Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass
To: Mr. Nadeem Muaddi,
(cc: Israpundit, Georgetown University: President, Office of Public
Affairs, Assistant Vice President for Communications, Communications
Dept.)
Thank you for your erudite and detailed response (3rd comment on the list). Your elaboration does indeed differ considerably from what you posted in "A Call for Christian Martyrdom."
I think our original misunderstanding arose from the fact that English is probably not your first language. Your response to my letter suggests that a far better title for your Ramallah Online piece would have been "A Call for Christian Service," since you apparently wanted "martyrs" to mean emergency service workers like firefighters and ambulance drivers and people in humanitarian occupations such as doctors. The problem is that Humpty Dumpty's line from Through The Looking Glass, "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean— neither more or less," doesn't work in the real world. The fact that you apparently wanted "martyr" to mean a firefighter who dies while saving an infant, as opposed to someone who dies for witnessing for a religious faith or a cause, does not mean your readers will interpret it that way, unless you add that specific example to your article.
I have posted a more detailed reply in Israpundit with which I will not trouble Georgetown's administrators. GU is a predominantly- Catholic university and I am sure it can assess for itself the contents of your rather-unique definition of "martyrs." The concluding line of your article, however, would have been far less alarming to Americans had it read, "…it's about time more Christians step forward and do humanitarian work for the Palestinians in support of a true and just resolution to the Palestinian issue," as opposed to "…it's about time more Christians step forward and offer themselves up as martyrs for a true and just resolution to the Palestinian issue."
It seems that your statement, "'witnessing in word, witnessing in deed, and exposing oneself to danger, whatever the cost'. If this 'cost' so happens to be death, then one will have become a martyr,'" did not come across clearly in "A Call for Christian Martyrdom." Your words immediately bring to mind the nonviolent "witnessing" of Jesus and many of his disciples that the Romans rewarded with violent death. Now I understand, however, that you ACTUALLY mean that you want Christians to become firefighters or other service workers whose callings may result in their deaths. You are NOT, as I and many others judged from the original context, calling for Christians to act as human shields the way deceased peace activist (and Palestinian- proclaimed shahida or martyr) Rachel Corrie did. We now appear to have satisfactorily put that issue to rest and cleared up the misunderstanding.
You must admit, however— and perhaps you may be excused for the confusion if English is not your first language— that firefighters and emergency workers are not the first people who come to mind when Americans hear the word "martyr" or "shahadat," the other term that appears in your article. From my American Heritage Dictionary (printed long before 9/11 and the Intifada, when the word took on far more sinister meanings), the primary definition of a "martyr" is, "One who chooses to suffer death rather than renounce religious principles." The image of Christians being thrown to the lions for refusing to renounce their faith has been reinforced by classic movies such as "Quo Vadis" and Cecil DeMille's "The Sign of the Cross" as well as many classic paintings.
Neither this nor any other dictionary definition suggests a person in an altruistic and risky occupation (such as an emergency worker or soldier) who dies as a result of that occupation. Americans do not think of emergency workers and soldiers as witnessing for a faith or a cause but rather as serving their communities and countries. "Hero" and not "martyr" is the first word that came to mind when I read your description of the firefighter who died saving an infant. The bottom line is that, when you use a word, it has to mean what it is generally accepted as meaning as opposed to what you want it to mean.
Furthermore, you and the other PSM (or ISM) leaders should agree on a common definition of "martyrdom" to avoid this kind of confusion in the future. ISM co-founder Huwaida Arraf clearly differs from you here. She is reported as writing, "Rachel Corrie is one of over a thousand shahids (holy martyrs) from this intifada. Their posters adorn walls all over Palestine. They are the fighters who are killed in battle and the children shot on their way to school. They are the suicide bombers and the boys who throw stones at tanks in a gesture of defiance."
ISM/PSM RELATIONSHIP
My impression is indeed that the PSM is the student branch of the ISM. You must admit that the ISM has so many interlocking and cooperating organizations that it is hard to keep track of all of them and you must really excuse any resulting confusion. Consider as an example the New York City branch of the ISM:
http://www.ism-nyc.org/involved.shtml
================
I was totally unable to verify ISM-NYC's tax-exempt status from three independent data bases (Guidestar, IRS Pub 78, and the Office of the NY Attorney General's Charities Bureau Registry Search) as well as a phone call to the IRS at 877-829-5500, and the Web page does say to make the checks payable to the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt Brecht Forum. I must therefore conclude that ISM-NYC is a project of the Brecht Forum and not an independent tax-exempt entity.
Now let's look at http://www.palsolidarity.org/main/donations,
Since (to the best of my knowledge) ISM-USA is not tax-exempt either, the Middle East Children's Alliance must be the actual tax-exempt entity to which ISM-USA belongs. So far, then, "International Solidarity Movement" includes at least the Brecht Forum and Middle East Children's Alliance. The ISM hydra has so many heads, and it is involved so closely with the PSM, that you must certainly excuse me for not making out the second hydra (the PSM) among all those heads (affiliate organizations).
More to the point, Lee Kaplan of StopTheISM informs me that he has a tape recording of Adam Shapiro, the founder of the ISM, explaining at Ohio State that the ISM is an amalgamation of all these groups of which Al Awda, SUSTAIN, SJP, etc are all one in solidarity. PSM is what they call themselves in the US but when in the West Bank and Gaza they say ISM. Lee's statement is supported extensively by what I have found online.
http://home.comcast.net/~jat.action/ISM_essay.htm
But this is a "Zionist" Web site so let's go to progressive and pro-Palestinian sources, like the New Jersey Solidarity Movement. http://www.newjerseysolidarity.org/prior2003.html advertises the Third North American Student Conference on the Palestine Solidarity Movement (PSM) to be held at Rutgers University. If the New Jersey ISM and the PSM are not the same organization, they are certainly working closely with one another.
http://www.studentorg.vcu.edu/fpn/lanceshapiroreflection.html
"Next [Adam] Shapiro spoke of the new International Solidarity Movement, which is now starting to catch the attention of the mainstream media. ...Shapiro described the ISM as an entirely Palestinian led movement that seeks to act as one part of the movement for Palestinian liberation by using the power of foreigners in Palestine."
"...After the closing of the event, audience members got to talk to the two speakers one on one. I look forward to future successful Palestinian Solidarity events right hear at VCU." So we have Adam Shapiro of the ISM speaking at a PSM conference at Virginia Commonwealth University. Again, if ISM and PSM are not actually the same organization, they sure spend a lot of time in the same bed. Or, as they say, birds of a feather...
http://www.commondreams.org/cgi-bin/print.cgi?file=/headlines02/0519-02.htm
(Common Dreams is a "progressive" source)
"In the United States, the homegrown Palestinian solidarity movement has had limited political effect so far, acknowledged Adam Shapiro, a movement leader who joined Schurr at the news conference Saturday." But Adam Shapiro is the ISM's leader, isn't he?
And this one is even better: http://www.palsolidarity.org/main/ (ISM's Web site)
Support groups include
Florida Palestine Solidarity Network
New Orleans Palestine Solidarity
Palestine Soldarity Committee/ISM-Seattle
http://www.palestineinformation.org/ism_seattle.htm
"Seattle Palestine Solidarity Committee is the local representative of the International Solidarity Movement to End the Occupation (ISM), a Palestinian-led movement which asks internationals to come to the Occupied Territories and join in nonviolent resistance to the military occupation. "
In summary, if ISM and PSM are not the same organization, they must accept responsibility for the perception that they are given the above evidence. The Seattle Palestinian Committee says outright that it is part of the ISM. But we can easily put this controversy to rest as well. You, Nadeem Muaddi can, as an official PSM spokesperson, openly and unequivocally denounce, condemn, and disown the ISM's advocacy of violent "resistance" (in practice, homicide bombings and other forms of terrorism) by the Palestinians and distance yourself from violence-advocating renegades like Adam Shapiro, Huwaida Arraf, and Charlotte Kates. This is, in fact, an outstanding opportunity for you to practice what you just preached: "To become a martyr, like those in the Bible, you have to be nice. Being “nice” means that you don’t hurt other people or yourself."
Fine; I invite you to become a martyr (witness) for nonviolence and I'll go a step further by becoming one myself and even going first! The Common Dreams article adds, "Shapiro's parents received death threats after he appeared in news broadcasts worldwide as a spokesman for the foreign activists who had joined Yasser Arafat in his blockaded Ramallah headquarters." I openly and unequivocally denounce these terroristic threats to Mr. Shapiro's parents despite my personal disgust for his actions, because that is not the way we do things in the United States. I further remind those who made these threats that it is a criminal offense to threaten people with death or physical violence, and I will in no way sanction or condone such actions even toward people with whom I disagree.
Now it's your turn, Mr. Muaddi. Just a few words in print that denounce the ISM's proven advocacy of violent "resistance" to the Israeli "occupation" along with Palestinian suicide bombings and other forms of terrorism— and to be evenhanded you can also denounce anything you think is unjust Israeli violence— and you will have "witnessed" for Jesus' nonviolent teachings and also cleared up all the complicated misunderstandings about the ISM's and PSM's relationship.
Posted by Bill Levinson at January 13, 2006 12:44 PM