Rachel Corrie: NEVER AGAIN

Rachel Corrie: NEVER AGAIN

by Bill Levinson

Justice for peace activist Rachel Corrie will come when her family looks Tom Dale, Joe Smith, and the other International Solidarity Movement activists who were present at her death in their eyes and demands, "Give Rachel back to us, you manipulative liars." Meanwhile, we can get at least a little justice by assuring the shutdown of the Palestine Solidarity Movement conference at Georgetown University in mid-February and, more importantly, make sure Rachel Corrie is the last idealistic college student to become a "martyr" for Palestine.

The Corrie family currently blames Israel and Caterpillar Corporation for their daughter's death in bulldozer to which her own misguided actions contributed. Rachel knelt in front of a bulldozer that was demolishing arms smuggling tunnels (the ISM told her and the media that they were protecting Palestinian houses) in an attempt to get it to stop. She unfortunately did not realize that the driver could not see her and the ISM's own alleged photograph shows quite clearly that the bulldozer blade would easily obstruct the driver's view of a kneeling person. (The picture actually looks like a photomanipulated fraud, which speaks for itself of ISM/PSM's character and integrity but, if we accept it as truth, it proves that the driver could not have seen a kneeling person in front of the blade.)

Suppose that a group of men in their twenties encourage a young woman with more idealism than good sense (as was probably characteristic of most of us at that age) to stand in the middle of a superhighway, where she is then struck and killed by a Chevrolet. Boycotting or suing Caterpillar over Rachel Corrie's death makes as much sense as suing General Motors in the case I just described. While the Chevy's driver certainly has an obligation to avoid hitting even a reckless pedestrian-- if he sees her-- the pedestrian's own conduct is of course the primary contributor to the accident and plenty can also be said of the "friends" who encouraged her to play chicken with moving automobiles.

The testimony of the ISM members involved shows almost a callous disregard for the life and safety of a young woman who considered them her friends and trusted them. Per "Making of a Martyr" by Sandra Jordan, Guardian Newspapers,

The activists said the driver saw Corrie. 'As the mound grew higher she climbed up, getting to eye level with the driver. He saw her in her fluorescent orange jacket. But he kept on going,' Smith said.

A traumatised Smith raised his camera and took photographs: Rachel standing in front of the bulldozer; then her bloodied body being pulled from the freshly turned soil; being cradled in the arms of her friends.

'If only they'd had a video camera,' one Palestinian journalist lamented. 'A film of the Israelis killing an American in cold blood would have ended the intifada.'

Pay very close attention to the second paragraph. When Smith saw Rachel standing in front of a bulldozer that was clearly not going to stop, his first priority was not to yell a warning or to try to pull her out of the way, but to raise his camera and take pictures-- none of which seem to have been published anywhere on the Internet. The Palestinian journalist's first reaction was to wish the ISM activists had had a videocamera, as opposed to wishing that one had pulled Rachel out of the slowly-moving bulldozer's path.

Her British friend and fellow activist, Tom Dale, 18, from Lichfield in Staffordshire, said he saw her die. First, he said, there was fear on her face as she realised that her defiant gesture was going wrong. Joe Smith, 21, who went to college with Corrie, said that, although they acknowledged the danger, they saw death as a 'small, unlikely, potential risk'.

Dale testified that he was standing only ten meters away, a distance that an able-bodied adult male ought to be able to cover in less than three seconds, that the bulldozer was moving "slowly," and that he could see the fear on her face. Yet neither he nor any other ISM member even claims to have tried to pull her out of the bulldozer's path. Is "coward" a word that might fit each one of them, perchance? That is what a pusillanimous yellow coward does: he encourages a young woman to perform a very dangerous action, and then he stands there with his arms at his side or reaches for a camera when something goes wrong.

Don't worry, it gets even worse. ISM director George Rishmawi and a Hamas terrorist state openly a motive for wanting Rachel to be killed.

Recently, the Director of the Solidarity Movement, George Rishmawi, explained to the San Francisco Chronicle that the recruitment of American student volunteers is useful to the Palestinian Movement because "if some of these foreign volunteers get shot or even killed, then the international media will sit up and take notice."

A Hamas terrorist said openly that Rachel was worth more dead than alive. "'Her death serves me more than it served her,' said one activist at a Hamas funeral yesterday. '...Her death will bring more attention than the other 2,000 martyrs.'" Making of a Martyr by Sandra Jordan, Guardian Newspapers

When you are more useful to your friends dead than you are alive, it is time to find new friends-- quickly. It is too bad that Rachel Corrie did not live long enough to realize this but what we can do in her memory is to make sure she is the last American college student the Palestine Solidarity Movement will EVER stand in front of a bulldozer.

Here is what you can do to help. The ISM/PSM's advocacy and facilitation of terroristic violence is well known and we can make our views clear to the administration of Georgetown University as well as The Hoya, Georgetown's student newspaper. Don't let ISM/PSM recruit more "martyrs" at Georgetown University. One Rachel Corrie was one too many; let us make sure there is never another.

Posted by Bill Levinson at January 23, 2006 11:46 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/mt-tb.cgi/12196


Comments

1. Dan Barkye said:

Finally, a call to action. I call for such collective action since 2 Jan, in "US hidden goals".

I contacted my local Jewish Fed today.

BUT I do not agree with the language. "sons of bitches" is not an expression I use, and cannot join. I would, though, call them "barabrous", "bloodthirsty", "wantonly, willingly cruel", and so on, these being descriptive terms of their character as witnessed by their actions and words. Their declarations unmask the extremely cynical use they make of these young, bewildered, activists. This post should be cross-posted on any other blog available and brought to the attention of the press, beside all the other Isr info re this. It should be sent to the GU.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 23, 2006 02:19 PM

2. Bill Levinson said:

Dan, I called them exactly what I think they are. No, I take that back because if I called them what they really are, I would have had to use words for which one can be fined for using on a radio program. Needless to say, this is not the language I would use for a one-on-one conversation; it is for public consumption. Since you might want to use the entry for such purposes, I have changed the language to something a bit more polite. :-)

Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 23, 2006 03:51 PM

3. Bill Levinson said:

Dan: P.S. I just apologized to my dog, who is female, for the language I used to describe Joe Smith, Tom Dale, and the other ISMers. I am sure that all her puppies, male and female alike, turned out to be far better contributors to the world as a whole.

Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 23, 2006 03:56 PM

4. Dan Barkye said:

Bill, I don't have an issue calling the child by its name, i.e.,
"barbarous", "bloodthirsty", "savages", "hypocrites from head to toe", "liars", etc.
Much more effective. I'm sure you agree. Yes, in fight effective words have to be used, no doubt.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 23, 2006 08:20 PM

5. Bill Levinson said:

Dan, I think I've found the basic problem with my language. The English language simply lacks simple words to describe the kind of "people" with whom we are dealing. I went to http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=vandal to try to get a good word for the behavior of the Palestinians who wrecked the greenhouses and synagogues in Gaza. There isn't one; the synomyms offered are "defacer, despoiler, destroyer, hoodlum, looter, mischief-maker, pillager, pirate, plunderer, rapist, ravager, thief." Rapist does not apply as they were admittedly not guilty of rape; mischief-maker downplays their actions to the level of a Halloween prank, as does defacer (one thinks of graffitti). "Looter, pillager, pirate, plunderer, ravager, and thief" all suggest RATIONAL if illegal behavior, because looters and so on enrich themselves with their ill-gotten gains.

The Palestinians destroyed their own property (the greenhouses) and usable buildings (the synagogues) simply for the sake of destroying and not even for self-enrichment. In fact, the locusts to which I compared them enrich themselves when they destroy a field (by eating the grain or whatever). The Mongols and Huns were infamous for plundering, pillaging, and burning but the property they stole or destroyed belonged to their enemies; the greenhouses the Palestinians wrecked had been purchased for them as gifts by American philanthropists. I have several advanced degrees and a fairly wide vocabulary but I quite honestly don't know of a simple English word that describes irrational destruction on this scale.


The only one that comes to mind is "potlach," a ceremony in which someone demonstrates how wealthy he is by destroying his property. There was an example from Henryk Sienkiewicz's "The Deluge" in which a wealthy Pole had a pair of goblets (whose beauty Sienkiewicz described in such detail that it took half a page), and I knew what was coming; the Pole offered a toast and then smashed one of the goblets. It was disgusting and Sienkiewicz doubtlessly wrote it into the story to illustrate the problems with the ruling Polish nobility of the 17th century. What the Palestinians did was even more mindless and there is really no good word that describes it.


Now we come to the Palestinians' habit of routinely breaking truces, and the ISM's actions regarding Rachel Corrie. "Oath-breakers" describes the first and "betrayers" the second, but neither word really encompasses the outrage I was trying to convey. Hence my less-scientific "vermin" and "SOBs," each of which contains the basic concept in a single word or short phrase. They are, however, quite imprecise because they can mean so many other things.


In fact, the only single word I have ever seen that really describes the Palestinians' endless litany of broken peace agreements is out of an Orson Scott Card science fiction book. The humans were classifying alien races as either "raman" or "varelse." A "raman" was an alien with whom you could communicate, negotiate, and trade, and who could be your friend even though he differed from you physically. A "varelse" was something like a rabid dog, a dangerous entity with which effective communication and negotiation was impossible. The only way to deal with a "varelse" was to kill it. Plague bacteria and Card's fictional Descolada virus are examples of "varelse," and the behavior of the militant Palestinians-- their total unwillingness and inability to keep peace agreements and their ongoing litany of terroristic violence-- seems to place them in this category as well.


In conclusion, matters are very sad indeed when I have to use a made-up word from a science fiction novel to describe the behavior of Islamofascists. See also http://www.israpundit.com/archives/2005/12/palestinians_ra_1.php.

Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 23, 2006 11:01 PM

6. Bill Levinson said:

Fadi Kiblawi, Nadeem Muaddi, or "Lee Kaplan" (if you prefer to call yourself that), I would have cared enough about Rachel Corrie to pull her out of the bulldozer's path, as opposed to the pusillanimous yellow-bellied white-livered Poltroon, excuse me, Palestinian Solidarity Movement, PUNKS who stood her in front of the bulldozer and then let her die.


The English language also lacks a good word for the kind of man-- and I use "man" very loosely-- to describe Joe Smith, Tom Dale, and the others-- who would encourage a young woman who thought they were her friends to kneel in front of a bulldozer and then stand there and watch, or in Smith's case take pictures, while she was run over. The word I am looking for has to encompass both "coward" and "Judas" and I really can't think of one despite my rather-wide vocabulary. The closest seems to be the Polish word haniebny (shameful, dishonorable to the extent that most human beings would rather be dead than haniebny), or what the Klingons might call "without honor." "The ISM activists who were with Rachel Corrie are haniebny." I suppose that will have to do for now.

Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 23, 2006 11:18 PM

7. Hello Goodbye said:

I apologize for being a little bit off topic. However, I was just informed that Todd A. Olson, Vice President for Student Affairs at Georgetown University, sent out an email to the entire student body today assuring them that the PSM conference would be carried out as planned. Furthermore, he stated:

It has also come to my attention that some members of the Georgetown community have received unsolicited emails criticizing the conference, its organizers, and the University. While we have and will continue to investigate these messages to the best of our ability, it may not always be possible to determine their origin. We anticipate
that such emails may continue. Conference organizers have informed the Office of Student Affairs that at least one such email, representing itself as from the Palestine Solidarity Movement, is fraudulent.

I thought you were in contact with them - and that the conference would be cancelled soon. What happened? From what members of the GU community are telling me, everything is progressing smoothly. What's the deal Bill?

Posted by: Hello Goodbye on January 23, 2006 11:59 PM

8. ShyGuy said:

They want Rachel Corrie back?

That's one big flat-pack envelope Fedex better have in-stock!

Posted by: ShyGuy on January 24, 2006 03:47 AM

9. Lee Kaplan said:

The Lee Kaplan post above is not from Lee Kaplan but froman ISM activist in San Francisco. I will be breaking the actual taped footage of Corrie the day she was killed that proves what liars the ISM are. Placing a false post with my name is the same "by any means necessary"
attitude that also led to Corrie's death. Rachel Corrie died protecting a weapons smuggling tunnel, a type of "direct action" activity she had been doing for months before her death.

Posted by: Lee Kaplan on January 24, 2006 06:23 AM

10. Zal said:

As a golden proverb says "silence is golden"..
You are talking about such a non-sense like this little bitch corrie... why?...what for?...
It's not worth a single letter to talk about her and why..what...when..
This garbage only serves the nazis, "solidarity"-nazis..zombies..brainwashed teenagers... and all other degenerates, perverts and other unstable retards.
This is exactly what these "solidarity" mafias are.
So, stop wasting the time and resources here talking about things that has always caused and will always cause a negative impact.
This is the reason why Israel doesn't care not about corrie and not about other garbage you're talking here. Because this is really is not Israel's concern. Period.
My suggestion - start talking about positive things in Israel, about what Israel's everyday achievemnts in HiTech, medicine, science, computer technology...etc, and let Israel handle the politics. Nobody here will change Israel's policy.
The media picks up all the garbage you post here.
Absolutely everything is total sewage, you degrade Israel's image.

Posted by: Zal on January 24, 2006 08:55 AM

11. Dan Barkye said:

Lee, what was your pt, exactly? Zal at least analyzed the issue and proposed a line of action. What you do is to denigrate Bill publicly when you don't have a clue what he really feels. Maybe he cares about her. How do you no he's not?

I'm in perfect agreement w Zal's analysis. Kill the lie when it's still young by not repeating it and so, magnifying it. This is a BASICS in deflecting false accusations at large. Ask marketing people dealing w competitor false claims.

All we have to do is:

- Defend and explain the Jewish historical right for the land of Israel;

- Unmask the Pal/Arab/Muslim lies;

- Stand behind Israel (w/o her, the Jews don't stand a chance all over; it's our shield).

Unity and Endless Truthful Propaganda, in short.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 24, 2006 11:18 AM

12. Bill Levinson said:

Dan, Lee Kaplan did not write the material in the post to which you refer (which seems to have been deleted). An ISM activist forged Lee's name to the post, which is Internet abuse just like Nadeem Muaddi signing me up for unwanted electronic newsletters. As the real Lee Kaplan said, the forged postings came from San Francisco. This will be yet another embarrassment to lay on President DeGioia's desk to show him why GU should not host the ISM/PSM.


Zal, the reason I am talking about Rachel Corrie and will continue to do so is to show the world how a bunch of two-bit PUKES took an impressionable young woman, got her killed, and then used her innocent blood to write propaganda.

Posted by: Bill Levinson on January 24, 2006 12:01 PM

13. Dan Barkye said:

I'm sorry I didn't see the correction that Lee posted.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 24, 2006 12:45 PM

14. Shadi Fadda said:

My family home in town of Akka (Acre) in Israeli Court of Justice. It is an Illegaly Built "Court of Justice" of a "Jewish State".

Posted by: Shadi Fadda on January 24, 2006 01:02 PM

15. Dan Barkye said:

Perfidious people! It's amazing how this culture allows its members, young in this instance (which goes a long way to say with whom we deal!!!), to commit so easily such perfidies. No remorses! Everything goes w/o any second thoughts, or doubts, all in the name of the filthy Machiavelistic maxim "The end is justifying the means". And Georgetown University is proud to host their conference in the name of the free speech and expression. But why wonder? Money wipes any stain.

Adam Shapiro and Israel Shamir and all the other traitors and turncoats from our midst, must be very proud to be counted in such unscrupulous company. Esp when you read that Israel Shamir is said to consider very carefully an invitation to the Holocaust Denial Conference, if it's extended to him, as rumored. He is notorious for his spins that his life took in its course - Commie, then ardent Zionist, then Commie again, then anti-Zionist, and then shaking hands w the avowed enemies of his mother and father, and ultimately his, too, as happened in so many instances w so many naive young and bewildered kids who went to them and found themselves deep in earth, literally.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 24, 2006 01:17 PM

16. Dan Barkye said:

Shadi Fadda, let' start a little conversation. If you're willing, that is -)))))))))))


Now, be so kind and amiable and allow me, please, to ask you a few questions. Thank you!

First, this three:

When did your family come to Accre?
From where did your family come to Accre?
Why is the building "illegal"?

Now, not that I'm sarcastic, not at all, I am utterly serious and willing to listen to you. and so I am now telling you that MY family was exiled from Israel and you and your P/p/als and Bedouin tribes from all over the area, as far away as Iraq, came and ILLEGALLY took my home, knowing all this time that I never, ever, renounced my right on it. This is a fact that was and is known to any calif, prince, emir, sultan, pasha, potentate, of each Arab and Muslim country in the MidEast, during all this time of my exile.

This fact is recognized by the Holly Kur'an as told by the great prophet Muhammad in the name of Allah, and it is recognized by al-Qaeda and bin-Ladin (read the article stating the official al-Qaeda stand on this, below):

"Al Qaeda’s New Publication: “The Jews” Are Unworthy of the Promised Land", DEBKAfile’s Exclusive Report, August 1, 2005, 10:10 PM (GMT+02:00)
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1064

Also, don't tell me that it happened two thousand years ago, b/c time is of no essence here. What WAS mine IS still mine, forever and ever, till the end of time, no matter how much time passed, a day or a million years.
My family was exiled and you and your P/p/als came and took ILLEGALLY my home.
What WAS mine IS still mine, no matter how much time passed, a day or a million years.
Also, don't give me the irrelevant argument of the few thousands of Kazars that converted to Judaism a few hundred years ago, b/c Jews returned to their homeland in the exercise of a full and legitimate right ot their ancestral land from ALL OVER the world, not only from a certain part, so leave this silly and futile argument where it belongs, in the trash bin.

Also, please don't give me the (irrelevant) argument of the few thousands of the Kazar tribe that converted to Judaism a few hundred years ago, b/c Jews returned to their homeland, in the exercise of a full and legitimate right to their ancestral land, from ALL OVER the world, not only from a certain part, even from Egypt and Syria, adjacent countries to Israel, so leave this futile argument where it belongs, in the collection of irrelevant and utterly misperceived arguments.

Waiting patiently for your kind answer.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 24, 2006 02:31 PM

17. Dan Barkye said:

Sorry for the repetition of passages.

Posted by: Dan Barkye on January 24, 2006 03:07 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)