The Violent History of the Hajj

The Violent History of the Hajj

By Andrew L. Jaffee, netwmd.com

What's up with the violence that seems to occur almost yearly at the Muslim Hajj in Mecca? And one has to wonder how a ritual stoning can be an integral part of a major religion's most holy event. The Muslim community has tough questions that it can only address itself. Today, the BBC reported:

More than 100 Muslim pilgrims have been killed in a crush in the stone-throwing ritual during the Hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia, officials say.

A BBC correspondent at the scene in Mina saw dozens of bodies lined up on the ground. Doctors warned that the death toll could reach 300.

Last week, a hotel hosting Muslim pilgrims in Mecca collapsed. 23 people died and 60 were injured.

According to the AP:

The hajj has suffered numerous tragedies in recent years. The worst occurred in 1990 when 1,426 pilgrims were killed in a stampede in an overcrowded pedestrian tunnel leading to holy sites in Mecca.

In 2004, on the final day of the ceremonies, 251 people were trampled to death when the crowd panicked during the ritual stoning of the devil. Three years earlier, 35 hajj pilgrims were killed during a stampede at the same ceremony.

In 1998, about 180 pilgrims were trampled to death in the panic after several of them fell off an overpass during the ritual. Four years earlier, in 1994, some 270 pilgrims were killed in a stampede during the stoning ritual.

During an anti-U.S. demonstration staged by Iranians in 1987, some 402 people, mostly pilgrims from Iran, were killed and 649 were wounded in the crash of a Pakistani jetliner carrying hajj pilgrims Jiddah to Riyadh, the Saudi capital.

As one of netWMD's contributors put it in 2003:

A Muslim asked for an association conjured by the phrase "throwing stones" will think not of David and Goliath, but of the rituals of the haj, which require the pilgrim to throw stones on each of three successive days at first the small, then the middle and, finally, at the grand pillar erected upon the spot where the Devil stood and tried to persuade Abraham not to obey God. In Islam, the flung stone is not the weapon of the weak against the mighty; it is the weapon of the righteous in the fight against evil.

Too much righteousness; too little humility.

To paraphrase another great religion, Hinduism, "you create your own reality." The Hindu concept of karma seems also to apply to the current state of Islam -- negative karma, that is. Homicide bombings, beheadings, slavery, and ethnic cleansing are all now endemic in Muslim regions of the world. It is time for Muslims to take a hard look at the direction in which their religion is heading.

Cross-posted at IsraPundit and netwmd.com

Posted by Andrew Jaffee at January 12, 2006 11:20 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.israpundit.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/12024


Comments

1. Bill Narvey said:

When Andrew Jaffee says, “it is time for Muslims to take a hard look at the direction in which their religion is heading”, just which Muslims are you speaking of?

The Haj to Mecca draws tens of thousands of the faithful each year.

Apart from symbolically throwing stones at the devil, this Islamic multitude listen to Imams preaching about the joys and superiority of Islam and explaining Islam’s fall from grace and power because of Western perfidy, most of which has been at the hands of the Jews and Americans, though some room is made to include all infidels as having had a hand in humiliating Islam.

In the result, much of the Imams’ religious teachings and preachings to the faithful gathered at the Haj are laced with the most virulent and vile anti-American, anti-Israel and anti-Semitic rhetoric which serve to stoke the fires of their religious fervor.

There are countless examples over many years of Islamic religious leaders preaching their gospel of hate and calling for the deaths of other non-Muslims, whether that preaching is done during the Haj or just regular services in Mosques in Muslim countries or if you are a Westerner, in a Mosque near you.

This is not at all the kind of message Rabbis, priests and ministers preach to their congregants.

With that, it is hard to wrap one’s mind around those Western leaders who insist on describing Islam as a religion of peace, harmony and goodwill.

The Haj is covered by the media and much of what is seen and heard by those making the Haj to Mecca reaches the eyes and ears of countless more Muslims.

Radical Islam incorporates many of the themes of Muslim victimization at the hands of the evil infidels and consequential Muslim humiliation and hatred for the West, America, Israel and Jews.

The Saudis, amongst others zealously follow Wahabbism, a radical version of Islam. The Saudis have for a great many years been carrying out a successful campaign of spreading and indoctrinating a great many more Muslims, be they in Islamic states or Western Muslim communities in the ideology of radical Islam.

The tired phrase “moderate Islam” coined by some pundit searching for some pat phrase to describe non radical Islam, is as devoid of meaning now as it was when it was first introduced.

Does Moderate Islam mean all Muslims but for the front line of radical Islam that is prepared to wage war against non-Muslims and get its hands bloody? Does it also include supporters and financiers of radical Islam?

Is the phrase, “moderate Islam” meant only to include those Muslims who seek to practice their religion in peace and show tolerance and respect for non Muslims? If so, why was the phrase “peaceful Islam” not chosen?

To be sure there are many Muslims who eschew Islamic radicalism and who would prefer to practice their faith in peace and who wish to engage with the west in mutual respect and tolerance. Unfortunately we hardly hear from them and when we do, their voices are barely a whisper against the din of radical Islam.

Western leaders continue to repeat ad nauseum that the vast majority of Muslims are peace loving followers of Islam while the radical Islamists are relatively few who have high jacked Islam? Really??

These wishful thinking bromides sound great, but all the evidence points to radical Islamic ideology directing a very great many Muslims and to some extent at least, influencing and shaping the thinking of a very great many more Muslims.

It is not for Western leaders and pundits to disingenuously or wishfully declare the virtues of Islam.

It is incumbent upon those Muslims who truly are seeking to practice their religion in peace and to interact with the West with mutual respect and tolerance to prove to the West that Islam is the religion of peace, harmony and good will that Western leaders keep saying it is.

That proof will only come when such Muslims stand up themselves to reject and denounce radical Islam and gain a vast following that march against and render radical Islam irrelevant and powerless.

It seems from what has been observed over the last 50 years or so, radical Islam has gained a lot of steam and Islam is exactly where a great many Muslims want it to be and is going in the direction that a great many Muslims pray for.

So just which Muslims is Andrew Jaffee speaking of?

Posted by: Bill Narvey on January 12, 2006 12:43 PM

2. The City Troll said:

Great Blog. I have been looking for a good Blog from Israel to link on my site and your it. I hope you don't mind.

The City Troll

Posted by: The City Troll on January 12, 2006 02:43 PM

3. Nannette said:

Estepona, there's been antisemitism in this world for a few thousand years now, and why should these youngsters show any tolerance for Jews when they're so busy arse kissing Islamists!

Let them boycott Israel and the Jews, but let them dispose of their computers, diabetic, cancer and heart medicines, and the voicemail and texting technology of their mobile phones.

Let's see if any of them have the guts to really show their hatred and boycott these things.... imagine if they took their themselves, their parents or grandparents off cancer, diabetic and heart medication - then there would be far fewer antisemites.

Posted by: Nannette on January 13, 2006 12:36 AM

4. The City Troll said:

To all concerned Both David Vance & Andrew McCann of A Tangled Web did NOT post those comments. A Tangled Web which is their Blog is a STRONG SUPPORTER of Israel and would be aghast when I let them know their names were used for such comments....

Posted by: The City Troll on January 13, 2006 12:57 AM

5. Nannette said:

thanks for pointing that out City Troll - these cowards can't even post in their own names and have to use someone else's identity.

Posted by: Nannette on January 13, 2006 08:09 AM

6. David Vance said:

Hi Everyone,

As a proud Friend of Israel, and as someone who has written extensively from a pro-Israeli point of view (Check out IsraelInsider back articles) I find the comments attributed to me and my colleague Andrew just pathetic. Perhaps you would be kind enough to remove them when you get a chance - I appreciate there are many crazies out there but I'll not have my support for Israel besmirched by some sad anti-Semitic goon. And as far as the saddo is concerned who is impersonating me - if you're reading this -why not find the courage to come over to A TANGLED WEB - we know how to deal with your ilk there.

Posted by: David Vance on January 13, 2006 11:39 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)