May 1, 2010

Israel has become a wedge issue in US politics

Glick points out the overwhelming evidence of the Republican embrace of Israel and the Democrat turning away from Israel. She points out that the vast majority of the members of AIPAC are Democrats and thus are trying to paper over the difference. But the key issue is that this partisan divide on Israel has made Israel a key issue in the coming campaign with the Republicans and Israel on the winning side of the issue. Sarah Palin will continue to voice her support for Israel. Ted Belman

Republicans, Democrats and Israel

By Caroline B. Glick

Bipartisan support for Israel has been one of the greatest casualties of US President Barack Obama’s assault on the Jewish state. Today, as Republican support for Israel reaches new heights, support for Israel has become a minority position among Democrats.
[..]
AIPAC also has institutional reasons for papering over the erosion in Democratic support for Israel. First, most of its members are Democrats. Indeed, AIPAC’s new President Lee Rosenberg was one of Obama’s biggest fundraisers.

Then too, AIPAC is concerned at the prospect of its members abandoning it for J-Street. J-Street, the Jewish pro-Palestinian lobby is strongly supported by the Obama administration.

According to Congressional sources, AIPAC’s desire to hide the partisan divide has caused it to preemptively water down Republican initiatives to gain Democratic support or torpedo Republican proposals that the Democrats would oppose. For instance, an AIPAC lobbyist demanded that Gohmert abandon his efforts to advance his resolution on Iran. Sources close to the story say the AIPAC lobbyist told Gohmert that AIPAC opposes all Iran initiatives that go beyond support for sanctions.

And now of course, as Obama makes a mockery of AIPAC’s sanctions drive by watering them down to nothingness, AIPAC’s sanctions-only strategy lies in ruins. But again in the interest of promoting the fiction of bipartisan support for Israel, AIPAC can be expected to pretend this has not happened.

And many prominent Republican Congressmen are loath to call their bluff. Like the Israeli government itself, Republican House members express deep concern that blowing the lid off the Democrats will weaken Israel. As one member put it, “I don’t want to encourage the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to attack Israel by exposing that the Democrats don’t support Israel.”

While this argument has its merits, the fact is that many Democrats remain staunch supporters of Israel. Representatives like Shelley Berkley, Nita Lowey, Steve Israel, Anthony Weiner, Jim Costa and many others have not taken stronger stands in support Israel because thanks to AIPAC, they haven’t been challenged to do so. If going into the November midterm elections House Republicans were to initiate an aggressively pro-Israel agenda as members like Lamborn, Franks, Gohmert, Cantor, Roskam, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and others are already doing, they would compel Democratic members to join them or risk being criticized for abandoning Israel by their Republican opponents in November’s elections.

And that’s the thing of it. While under Obama bipartisan support for Israel has eroded, popular support for Israel has grown. Indeed polls show a direct correlation between Democratic abandonment of Israel and popular abandonment of the Democrats. What this means is that the partisan divide on Israel is a good election issue for Republicans.

If as projected Republicans retake control over the House of Representatives in November, they will be in a position to limit Obama’s ability to adopt policies that weaken Israel. And due to the widespread expectation that Republicans will in fact take over the House, if the Republicans set out clear policy lines on Israel today, their declared policies will immediately impact Obama’s maneuver room on Israel. So too, a clear Republican policy on Israel will motivate pro-Israel Democrats to more stridently distance themselves from Obama on issues related to Israel.

Take the Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad’s threat that he will unilaterally declare Palestinian independence in August 2011. To date, Obama has refused to say if he will recognize such a unilaterally declared Palestinian state. Fearing that he may recognize such a state, Israel has gone out of its way to appease Obama.

If House Republicans and Republican House candidates were to collectively pledge to cut off US funding for the PA in the aftermath of such a declaration, they could neutralize the threat. And if they pledged not to fund a US embassy in such a Palestinian state, they would make it impossible for Obama to continue holding his decision over Israel’s head.

As for Iran, if Republicans win the House, they will be in a position to use omnibus budgetary bills to force the administration to provide Israel with the military equipment necessary to win a war against Iran and its allies. This would limit Obama’s capacity to threaten Israel with an arms embargo in the increasingly likely event that the Iranian axis attacks the Jewish state.

In some House races, Democratic abandonment of Israel is already a key issue. For instance, in Illinois, the race between Republican challenger Joel Pollak and incumbent Democrat Jan Schakowsky has been dominated by Schakowsky’s close ties to J-Street and tepid support for Israel. And recent polling data indicate that once a long-shot candidate, Pollak is steadily closing in on Schakowsky’s lead.

Exposing the Democrats’ abandonment of Israel will be an unpleasant affair. But it won’t add to the dangers arrayed against Israel. Israel’s enemies are already aware of Obama’s animus towards the Jewish state. Demonstrating that the Democrats on Capitol Hill are following his lead on Israel will not add or detract from Iran’s willingness to attack Israel either directly or through its Arab proxies, or both.

Moreover, forcing Democrats to account for their behavior will have a salutary long-term effect on their party and on the US as a whole. Support for Israel is a benchmark for support for US allies generally. Obama’s abandonment of Israel has gone hand in hand with the cold shoulder he has given Colombia, Honduras, Britain, Poland, the Czech Republic, Japan, South Korea and other key US allies worldwide. In the long-term, it will be catastrophic if one of the US’s two political parties maintains this strategically disastrous policy.

By using support for Israel as a wedge issue in the upcoming elections Republicans will do more than simply constrain Obama’s ability to harm the Jewish state. They will be setting a course for a Democratic return to strategic sanity in the years to come. And nothing will guarantee the return of bipartisan support for Israel more effectively and securely than that.

Posted by Ted Belman @ 5:22 am | 25 Comments »

25 Responses to Israel has become a wedge issue in US politics

  1. ayn reagan says:

    The conservative political movement is usually catalyzed by the conservative punditocracy.

    Mark Levin has been highly critical of Obama’s animus towards Israel, as have Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

    It is imperative for these leading voices to refine their critique, focusing on the complicity of Congressional Democrats in the abandonment of Israel. Specifically, John Kerry and Carl Levin refused to discuss the Iranian peril with the Israeli prime minister, insisting instead upon promoting the Palestinian agenda.

    What would ignite the entire process is a public declaration of grievances by Netanyahu.

    Tragically, Likud has just endorsed his strategy of recoiling into the fetal position.

  2. rongrand says:

    What would ignite the entire process is a public declaration of grievances by Netanyahu.

    Ayn your right on. I said a number of times the PM needs to come to America and not meet with that jerk in the while house (I should define that since there are a number of them – barry hussein obama).

    He is very popular with Americans and he needs to publicly denounce the administrations hostile actions towards Israel.

    I am sure he would be a welcomed guest on the Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and a few moderate media outlets.

    This administration continues to support terrorist neighbors while criticizing Israel.

    Let’s be frank, the Palestinians are only interested in killing Jews, disrupting Israel while expanding their occupation of Israel.

    Once and for all Jerusalem cannot be and will not be a divided city. Jerusalem is the capital of Israel the one and only state in Israel and the Holy Land.

    Time to move the Palestinian and other Arabs (the rock and stone throwers, land scavengers and agitators) to Jordan where they can establish their state or asylum.

  3. ayn reagan says:

    ron,

    That is the best idea I have read yet on this site.

    Netanyahu should do an hour each on Limbaugh and Hannity and Levin.

    Explain everything that has happened since Obama became president.

    It would be the perfect message delivered in the perfect forums.

    No need to have the message filtered by the Israel-hating media.

    Tell it straight to the public, and in the process personally involve the most important opinion makers of the GOP.

    For devising such a good approach, you receive the ultimate reward: Papaya chutney.

  4. rongrand says:

    Ayn, he is a scumbag and he is a lying sack of XXXX.

    I just got a call from my oldest. He went turkey hunting this AM an as usual I worry about him being alone in the mountain woods and he called a little while ago to let me know around 7:15 AM he called in a bird and got his turkey and was on his way home. Was in the woods since 5 AM. He called the girls and they were excited.
    Not sure how they will respond to a dead turkey. I’ll take a ride over and check it out myself.

    You know it makes me think how you never stop worrying. Years ago when the guy were in the teens they would tell me I don’t have to worry about them anymore. Sure. I told these knuckle heads it’s not like a faucet, something you turn on and off at will. I’ll worry about you guys and likewise your children (now we have added the granddaughters to the worry list). It doesn’t end.

  5. ayn reagan says:

    Have you ever steamed a turkey?

    Raised its elevation in a big pot and then steamed it in water that you have seasoned?

    It cooks faster and stays moister.

  6. rongrand says:

    Have you ever steamed a turkey

    No, but I bet it is good. Somewhat like cooking the bird in peanut oil. Keeps the bird moist tender.

    When I got to Mark’s house he was cutting out the breast. He then cut out the wing bones. His hunting friend from where he hunted (now lives in Virginia) makes turkey calls from these bones.

    Mark use to bow hunt but now settles for turkey hunt and fishing. Had a lot of hobbies, told him with a family they have to come first, wife and children are No. 1 hobby, the most important.

  7. ayn reagan says:

    The anti-Semites are becoming less inhibited. First Jones. Now Mearsheimer.

  8. ayn reagan says:

    Obama permits anti-Semitism

    While President Obama criticizes Arizona for enforcing immigration laws, his national security chief Gen. James Jones is making jokes stereotyping Jews as greedy merchants.

    Come to think of it, the way Obama has been treating Israel lately, the joke fits. If Jews were trying to cross our southern border illegally, Obama would put up a barbed wire fence faster than you could say “Happy Hanukkah.”

    ALAN CULTON

    Hillsborough

    http://www.heraldsun.com/view/full_story/7250292/article-April-30–2010?instance=most_commented

  9. RandyTexas says:

    Netanyahu should do an hour each on Limbaugh and Hannity and Levin.

    I’ve been saying for a while that Netanyahu should take advantage of US public support to turn the Israeli issue into a US political issue which would weaken Obama. However, it may not be wise for Netanyahu’s direct involvement. If he is made the face of criticism of US Israel policy, he will create a vulnerability and possibly weaken the effort by giving leftists a target of personal attack. The movement for Israel in the US would be better served as a mass movement without a face. This is the strength of the Tea Party—diverse and independent groups and individuals united under principled belief and for a common purpose. A movement for Israel should be grassroots and undefinable other than by principles and rights it stands for.

  10. Laura says:

    The anti-Semites are becoming less inhibited. First Jones. Now Mearsheimer.

    Comment by ayn reagan — May 1, 2010 @ 6:07 pm

    When we accuse such “critics of Israeli policies” of being anti-Semites, we are immediately dismissed as paranoid and making false accusations of anti-Semitism in order to stifle criticism of Israel. But eventually these “critics” of Israel reveal their true Jew-hating selves.

  11. Laura says:

    To give you a better sense of what I mean when I use the term righteous Jews, let me give you some names of people and organizations that I would put in this category.

    Translation: “Righteous Jews” being self-hating Jews who share the muslim desire to wipe Israel from the map. john mearsheimer is a skunk.

  12. rongrand says:

    The anti-Semites are becoming less inhibited. First Jones. Now Mearsheimer.

    They are so blinded by hate of Jews they are in denial when it comes to the Palestinians, Hamas, Hezbullah, and the rest of the Arab terrorist Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians, Saudis and Iranians. I don’t recall any Israeli suicide bomber blowing up any Arabs or Israel sending rockets into the Arab world indiscriminately hoping to kill innocent civilians and children.

    Mearsheimer is an asshole.

  13. ayn reagan says:

    Politico
    Ben Smith

    Report details U.S. threat to Israel on U.N.

    The White House yesterday strongly denied a threat, in a letter to Mahmoud Abbas, to permit a U.N resolution condemning Israel for undermining trust in the peace process.

    But the Times reports today that the threat was narrower, and delivered by George Mitchell’s team — and the White House isn’t denying this one:

    Mr. Mitchell’s deputy, David Hale, indicated to the Palestinians that if Israel proceeded with the construction of 1,600 housing units in Jerusalem’s ultra-orthodox neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo, the United States would abstain from, rather than veto, a resolution in the United Nations Security Council condemning the move.

    This isn’t inconsistent with yesterday’s denial, and the U.S. posture seems to be that they’d abstain from a resolution attacking a specific Israeli move, but continue to veto broader censure of Israel.

    That would still be a major shift. The traditional U.S. posture isn’t that the U.S. vetoes anti-Israel resolutions because they’re specifically incorrect, but on the grounds that the U.N. is broadly unfair and overly focused on Israel.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0510/Report_details_US_threat_to_Israel_on_UN.html?showall

    The election is in November.

    If ever there was an opportune time for Israel to tough-shit Obama, this is it.

    The Israelis should repeatedly provoke BO to condemn them prior to the election.

    He wants to provide a fig leaf for liberal Jews to justify yet again supporting the Democratic Party despite its anti-Israel policies.

    Israel should drag both Obama and his pseudo-Jewish gerbils out of the closet.

    Right now.

    Of course, Netanyahu is too busy groveling.

  14. ayn reagan says:

    To give you a better sense of what I mean when I use the term righteous Jews, let me give you some names of people and organizations that I would put in this category. The list would include Noam Chomsky, Roger Cohen, Richard Falk, Norman Finkelstein, Tony Judt, Tony Karon, Naomi Klein, MJ Rosenberg, Sara Roy, and Philip Weiss of Mondoweiss fame, just to name a few…

    This really should be “Checkmate”.

    Review the names on Mearsheimer’s list.

    Chomsky and Finkelstein openly support Hezbollah.

    Cohen admires Ahmadinejad.

    The others never met an anti-Semite they didn’t like.

    Mearsheimer has exposed himself as being a degenerate anti-Semite.

    But few will choose to notice.

  15. RandyTexas says:

    If ever there was an opportune time for Israel to tough-shit Obama, this is it.

    The Israelis should repeatedly provoke BO to condemn them prior to the election.

    Obama is working behind the curtains because his ME policy is a political disaster once it goes public mainstream. I agree, I too haven’t seen a better opportunity to drag him through the mud of his on doing regarding Israel. All it would take is for the Israeli PM and high officials to start shouting from the house tops. Instead, they are acting like politicians. Drop the diplomacy, and they could get things going in the right direction, or at very least, expose Obama for what he really is. Once people realize who Obama really is, he’s toast.

  16. ayn reagan says:

    Steven Plaut:

    “A Jewish liberal is someone who thinks that Mexicans with no US visa have the right to move to East Los Angeles but Jews must be prevented from moving to East Jerusalem.”

  17. rongrand says:

    Randy I agree and I know Ayn likewise. Now is the time for the PM and high officials to shout from the roof tops. Americans need to know the truth and the liberal left wing media and the anti-Semitics will not cover it.

    I will would like to see PM Netanyahu visit, Neil Cavuto, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and any fair and balance media out there.

    He needs to tell it like it is and Americans will know this bastard BHO and the 3 stooges (Clinton, Beiden & Mitchell [the Arab]) are no good, nothing but a bunch of anti-Semitic bastards.

  18. ayn reagan says:

    Speaking of “deviant cults”…

    From NRO.com:

    They were probably upset about Gitmo … or Israel … or the plight of the Palestinians … or a cartoon … or … [Andy McCarthy]

    From Compass Direct News (with thanks to Robert Spencer):

    SARGODHA, Pakistan, April 28 (CDN) — A Christian barber in this Punjab Province city is still recovering from broken bones and other injuries sustained earlier this month after eight Muslims allegedly beat and sodomized him for cutting the beard of a Muslim.

    Marwat Masih, 29, initially refused the request of 19-year-old Qandeel Cheema to cut his beard in Sargodha’s Gulshan-e-Bashir town on April 13, knowing that area Sunni Muslims believe the Quran prohibits it. But Cheema, a high school student, told Masih that he had lived and studied in Lahore and therefore wanted a more modern look, the bed-ridden and feeble Masih told Compass.

    “I refused to shave his beard, but he showed me his packed bags and said that he would leave the town straight after the shave, and so no one would ever know that I had shaved his beard,” Masih said.

    Eyewitnesses told Compass that as Masih was cutting Cheema’s beard, the client’s older brother – local radical Muslim land owner Shakeel Cheema – was returning by tractor from his fields and, noting the family Jeep in front of the Marwat Hair Stylist shop, stopped in.

    “When Shakeel Cheema saw me shaving his younger brother’s beard, he became angry and started vandalizing mirrors, the sound system and chairs, and he desecrated a wooden cross perched on the top of the front mirrors,” Masih said. “He also started beating my head with his shoes.”

    Eyewitnesses told Compass that Shakeel Cheema shouted orders to his companions to tie Masih up and throw him into the wagon attached to his tractor, and that he ordered his younger brother to leave for Lahore at once.

    Masih said that he was blindfolded with a black cloth and taken to an unknown place where he was locked in a room. An hour later, Shakeel Cheema and seven others arrived and began striking him with clubs, breaking his ribs, a wrist and leg bones.

    “Shakeel Cheema said, ‘Now we are going to teach you a real lesson for shaving the beard of a Muslim man,” Masih said, and after a long, pained pause he related how Cheema and the seven others sodomized him. “I started bleeding and fell unconscious.”

    His father, Laal Masih, older brother Hassrat Masih and other relatives had begun searching for him, and after midnight that night they found him lying half-naked and unconscious off the main street of Gulshan-e-Bashir town, his father told Compass. They immediately took him to Rural Health Centre, where doctors kept him under observation for two days and treated him for internal bleeding and the broken ribs, leg bones and wrist….

    05/01 11:31 AM Share

  19. rongrand says:

    Speaking of “deviant cults

    These bastards are not normal, no they are not civilized. When will the so called civilized Muslims speak out against these radicals.

  20. ayn reagan says:

    When will the so called civilized Muslims speak out against these radicals.

    It is a definitional matter, ron.

    If civilized Muslims existed, by definition they would have already spoken out.

    Byron York
    Ten Dumbest Things Said About Arizona’s Immigration Law

    1. “The statute requires police officers to stop and question anyone who looks like an illegal immigrant.”

    – New York Times editorial

    2. “As the Arizona abomination makes clear, there is a desperate need for federal immigration action to stop the country from turning into a nation of vigilantes suspicious of anybody with dark skin.”

    – Dana Milbank, Washington Post

    3. “I can’t imagine Arizonans now reverting to German Nazi and Russian Communist techniques whereby people are required to turn one another in to the authorities on any suspicion of documentation.”

    – Cardinal Roger Mahony

    4. “This law creates a suspect class, based in part on ethnicity, considered guilty until they prove themselves innocent. It makes it harder for illegal immigrants to live without scrutiny — but it also makes it harder for some American citizens to live without suspicion and humiliation. Americans are not accustomed to the command ‘Your papers, please,’ however politely delivered. The distinctly American response to such a request would be ‘Go to hell,’ and then ‘See you in court.’”

    – Michael Gerson, Washington Post

    5. “In case the phrase ‘lawful contact’ makes it appear as if the police are authorized to act only if they observe an undocumented-looking person actually committing a crime, another section strips the statute of even that fig leaf of reassurance. ‘A person is guilty of trespassing,’ the law provides, by being ‘present on any public or private land in this state’ while lacking authorization to be in the United States — a new crime of breathing while undocumented.”

    – Linda Greenhouse, New York Times

    (Greenhouse’s “trespassing” allegation was based on an early version of the Arizona bill that was not the bill that became law. Her mistake was later removed from the Times site, but you can see original version here.)

    6. “Federal law treats illegal immigration as a civil violation; Arizona law criminalizes it by using the legally dubious mechanism of equating the mere presence of undocumented immigrants with trespassing.”

    – Washington Post editorial

    (This editorial makes the same mistake as Linda Greenhouse’s “trespassing” column above.)

    7. “I am saddened today at the prospect of a young Hispanic immigrant in Arizona going to the grocery store and forgetting to bring her passport and immigration documents with her. I cannot be dispassionate about the fact that the very act of her being in the grocery store will soon be a crime in the state she lives in…An immigrant who is charged with the crime of trespassing for simply being in a community without his papers on him is being told he is committing a crime by simply being.”

    – Bishop Desmond Tutu, Huffington Post

    (Tutu is perhaps relying on the erroneous information in the New York Times and Washington Post above.)

    8. “It harkens back to apartheid where all black people in South Africa were required to carry documents in order to move from one part of town to another.”

    – Cynthia Tucker, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, on ABC’s “This Week”

    9. “You can imagine, if you are a Hispanic American in Arizona…suddenly, if you don’t have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you’re going to be harassed.”

    – President Barack Obama

    10. “This week, Arizona signed the toughest illegal immigration law in the country which will allow police to demand identification papers from anyone they suspect is in the country illegally. I know there’s some people in Arizona worried that Obama is acting like Hitler, but could we all agree that there’s nothing more Nazi than saying ‘Show me your papers?’ There’s never been a World War II movie that didn’t include the line ’show me your papers.’ It’s their catchphrase. Every time someone says ’show me your papers,’ Hitler’s family gets a residual check. So heads up, Arizona; that’s fascism. I know, I know, it’s a dry fascism, but it’s still fascism.”

    – Seth Myers, “Saturday Night Live”

    Liberalism is a psychological disorder.

    Like lycanthropy.

    Being a werewolf.

    But much worse.

    Because werewolves only go apeshit during a full moon.

  21. Laura says:

    I will would like to see PM Netanyahu visit, Neil Cavuto, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and any fair and balance media out there.

    I don’t know about Beck. I don’t think he is sympathetic towards Israel.

  22. rongrand says:

    I don’t know about Beck. I don’t think he is sympathetic towards Israel.

    Laura I may be wrong but I do recall him speaking well of Israel and decry the actions of this administrations behavior toward our trusted friend and ally Israel.

    Bottom line is PM Netanyahu needs to speak openly in the US. He is very popular with Americans and the truth needs to be known.

  23. Shy Guy says:

    Glen Beck is a mixed bag/hit or miss. “Actor” is the best description.

  24. Birdalone says:

    PM Netanyahu needs to speak openly in the US.

    not a good idea. even worse to be on Fox unless it is Chris Wallace on Sunday morning if you want to be taken seriously by independents and open-minded Democrats.
    better for Caroline Glick to make the most of her scheduled visit to Chicago in September.
    and, let American politicians and candidates make the point.