Support Israpundit




June 10, 2011

Moscow opposes Western anti-Syrian motions because of Tripoli bombing

DEBKAfile Special Report June 9, 2011,

Russia is opposed to any UN Security Council resolution on Syria,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich told journalists at a briefing in Moscow Thursday, June 29, after the UK, France, Germany and Portugal moved to condemn Syria’s violent crackdown on anti-government protesters
and demand humanitarian access to the situation there.

The new resolution demands that President Bashar Assad end the violence and lifts the siege of protest cities. It also calls for an arms embargo on Syria.US Ambassador Susan Rice, who did not co-sponsor the draft, dismissed the comparison between Syria and Libya.

Wednesday, June 8, the NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels failed to agree on the expansion of operations against Muammar Qaddafi or persuade more alliance members to join.
debkafile’s military sources add:

    The cost of the war in Libya is constantly rising and beginning to weigh heavily on the defense outlay and state budgets of the US, Britain and France, all of which are battling deep economic crises. Our sources learn that the three governments are contemplating dipping into the frozen funds of Muammar Qaddafi’s regime estimated at over $45 billion – possibly $34 billion in American banks alone – to defray some of the costs.

The relentless air strikes over Tripoli alone cost about $25 million per day.

The use of those funds will be presented as necessary to relieve the hardships of the Libyan population living under rebel rule and suffering attacks from Qaddafi’s forces.

In a statement issued on Thursday morning, June 9 (Wednesday night in the US), Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee Tim Johnson said, “The ongoing violence in Libya has disrupted the economy and left far too many innocent Libyan citizens struggling to simply put food on the table.”

debkafile’s military and intelligence sources say the coalition ran into financial difficulties because they missed realistically evaluating Qaddafi’s financial, military and political strength before launching operations against him in March. They are therefore running out of steam after four months without removing him from power. Some Western capitals and NATO circles are talking about prolonging the war until the end of 2011 or the beginning of 2012.

In March, we reported that the Libyan ruler had stashed most of his financial assets in cash, estimated at nearly $1 trillion, in underground hiding-places in the Libyan desert. The war’s planners, especially in London and Paris, declined to take this into account because they were sure they could topple him in days or, at most, weeks. His private fortune would then have been invested in building the New Libya.

This plan has faded from view.

Even now, under the continuous pressure of NATO bombardments, Qaddafi has a plentiful cash flow to fund his operations. The tribal chiefs in areas where his money is hidden remain loyal to the Libyan ruler and take good care of his money because it keeps them in funds and buttresses their own tribal power.

The West, in contrast, is struggling against a shortage of funds which has become one of the main obstacles to sustaining the war effort against him.

Wednesday, June 8, NATO tried ratcheting up the war effort in two ways:

Air assaults on the government compound in Bab Al Aziziya, Tripoli, were intensified to some 80 strikes in two days, a pitch unprecedented so far. Its object was to trigger a mutiny in the army units still loyal to Qaddafi and an uprising among the capital’s more than 3 million inhabitants.

This did not happen: The rockets landed mainly on empty buildings and bunkers, long evacuated after the first bombardments. The people who paid with their lives, therefore, were a few guards and passersby.

The thunderous assault on Tripoli formed the background to the NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels Wednesday.

The twenty member-governments which have stayed out of the military action so far refused to be drawn in, in the face of the strong pitch made by NATO Secretary Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Sweden, a non-NATO participant, announced it was scaling down its involvement.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in his last appearance at an alliance meeting, pointed to five countries that Washington would like to see play a greater part in the war: Germany, Poland, Turkey, Holland and Spain. But their defense ministers turned him down too.
Diplomats who took part in the meeting said that some of the participants openly admitted a “certain fatigue” beginning to set in among the eight NATO states committed to the war. Yet the Brussels meeting left those eight governments, led by Britain, France and Italy, to soldier on unaided in the drive to overthrow Qaddafi.

Despite US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s confident assertion that Qaddafi’s days were numbered, the downbeat atmosphere in Brussels infected the meeting in Abu Dhabi Thursday, June 10, when coalition foreign ministers committed to the Libyan operation met to discuss the fate of post-Qaddafi Libya.

While the participants were voluble in their support for the rebel cause, very little financial aid was put on the table.

Egypt was invited to join the group but declined: Cairo has its hands too full with grave domestic difficulties to be available for any role in the war on Qaddafi.

All the same, debkafile’s military sources report that this week saw a noticeable decline in Qaddafi’s military and political situation. Heavy NATO bombardments are managing to knock out some of his armies’ military and logistical supplies, while Russia and the countries of the African Union which backed him until now are now saying openly that it is time for him to go. They have embarked on diplomacy for ending the conflict and removing him from power.

Moscow has its own fish to fry: it is in the process of teaching the West a lesson that it will not be allowed to go off on its own and bomb an Arab capital like Tripoli without a UN Security Council mandate, which Russia says NATO has long overstepped. As holder of a Security Council veto, Russia has cited NATO’s “inclusive bombing of Tripoli” as grounds for blocking the new Western draft resolution condemning another Arab government, Syria, and any Western intervention against the Assad regime – even through the International Atomic Energy Agency which Thursday referred the dossier on the plutonium plant Israel bombed four years ago before it was finished.

What’s this all about?
Hundreds of 70 km missiles from Libya to Gaza
Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 10 June 2011

Maariv correspondent Eli Bradstein reports in today’s edition that Israeli
security sources warn that in recent weeks hundreds of Grad rockets (range 60-70 kilometers) have been smuggled from Libya to the Gaza Strip via Egypt. This in addition to many shorter range rockets, arms and weapons.

Posted by Ted Belman @ 11:23 am | 3 Comments »

3 Responses to Moscow opposes Western anti-Syrian motions because of Tripoli bombing

  1. BlandOatmeal says:

    “…after the UK, France, Germany and Portugal moved to condemn Syria’s violent crackdown on anti-government protesters and demand humanitarian access to the situation there…”


    “US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in his last appearance at an alliance meeting, pointed to five countries that Washington would like to see play a greater part in the war: Germany, Poland, Turkey, Holland and Spain. But their defense ministers turned him down too…”

    Put those two quotes together: The Germans want a blank check from the UN to go meddle in Syria, but they don’t want to pay their part of the bill in Libya. The same can probably be said about the other NATO countries, the US included. Libya is a reckless neocolonial military adventure by a group of countries who cannot afford to follow through to fix up the bar after coming in with their choppers to bust up the place. The Russians know this, and can play the part of the wise, restrained big brother.

    The US and NATO have no business in Libya, nor in Syria. The British and French thought they could make a quick killing in Libya, but they miscalculated and overextended themselves. It could be, that Hashem simply wants to destroy them all and therefore He is making them mad (That’s “insane”, for the English-challenged). We’ll see.

    Israel also does well, not to get involved in Syria just now; but they might get drawn into the fray anyway; and it is quite a fray! Bashan would then return to Israel, of course, and probably Lebanon as well. I certainly wouldn’t object to that.

  2. BlandOatmeal says:

    “Turkey to send troops into Syria. Syrian helicopters machine-gun protesters
    DEBKAfile Exclusive Report June 10, 2011, 11:26 PM (GMT+02:00)”


    I was ridiculed, the last time I said that Turkey would soon share a border with Israel, after intervening in the Syria crisis. This is the maneuvering before Ezekiel 38, and Turkey is the Land of Magog. Ridicule away; but if I were a leader in Israel, I would be preparing for an invasion by Turkey and its allies in the not-too-distant future.

  3. Linda Rivera says:

    Let the Muslims fight their own wars with their own oil money, their own weapons and their own military!

Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit





Blog Traffic

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 32,204
  • Last 7 days: 159,828
  • Last 30 days: 385,795
  • Online now: 114
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (58)

    • dove: @ the phoenix: Bye for now….have a good day. :-)

    • dove: That’s funny. My first career was being the first Canadian female...

    • the phoenix: @ dove: door number one… :-)

    • honeybee: @ dove: surnuff

    • dove: @ the phoenix: dentist? denturist? I am waiting for the last of the...

  • The Jewish Question (16)

    • honeybee: @ AbbaGuutuu: I was talking about TX, he my pet scrape eating...

  • Can Israel be both Jewish and democratic (219)

    • honeybee: dweller Said: I said that what you’d WRITTEN was tired &...

    • dove: dweller: anybody who can read can interept but JEWS are subject to...

  • Column one: The disappearance of US will (2)

    • bernard ross: Israel’s military revolution

    • yamit82: PBS, Kerry and Troublesome Jews Darn these Israelis. They simply...

  • Netanyahu loses majority for deal to extend talks with Palestinians (7)

    • ArnoldHarris: Ted, why can you not make the comments look exactly the way we...

    • Bear Klein: Hopefully no more deals let terrorists out of prison will occur!

    • ArnoldHarris: So Israel will not agree to another installment of surrender to...

    • dove: Israel is suppose to ‘turn a blind eye’ to terror attacks...

    • bernard ross: “If Abu Mazen [Abbas] does not condemn the attack fiercely in...

  • Crimea, Ukraine and the Agony of Impotence (Part II) (13)
  • Possible New Wave of Aliyah (3)

    • dove: This is good news. When a Jew decides to make Aliyah to Israel out of...

    • Eric R.: Arnold, If Israel is going to hold onto Judea and Samaria, it should...

  • Jordanian air strike destroyed Al Qaeda raider force heading for US military base (2)

    • dove: @ bernard ross: Divided they fall!

    • bernard ross: From TIP: The Associated Press late Thursday conveyed a...


Dry Bones
Dry Bones


Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Site Membership

Google Site Search


    Ted Belman


    News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.


Will Israel attack Iran

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...



Iran islam



Daily Archives

April 2014
« Mar    

Selected Israpundit Articles


Miscellaneous Info

    All Politic Sites