Israpundit Daily Digest

Blog Traffic


Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 25,112
  • Last 7 days: 57,216
  • Last 30 days: 57,216
  • Online now: 69
garcinia cambogia effets secondaires

Animated Shorts

Human Rights Voices


Dry Bones

Dry Bones

Chit Chat

Recent Comments





Selected Israpundit Articles

Archive Calendar

October 2015
« Sep    




 Donate USA  Donate
  • June 12, 2011

    Obama’s Not Done Hammering Israel on 1967 Lines

    Tobin attacks Obama’s call as the wrong tactics. I think it is also a matter of substance. Ted Belman

    By Jonathan S. Tobin, Contentions

    While President Obama’s apologists have been busy trying to spin his ambush of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last month as not a sign of his hostility to the Jewish state, the administration spent the past week attempting to hammer Israel into submission on the question of the 1967 lines. As Eli Lake reported in the Washington Times on Friday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton renewed the demand that was the highlight of Obama’s May 26 Middle East policy speech: that Israel accept the 1967 lines as the starting point for future Middle East peace negotiations.

    While the administration is trying to sell this pressure to Jewish supporters as being part of a master plan whose aim is to head off a vote in the United Nations on Palestinian statehood, it is a mistake to view it as anything other than a renewed attack on Netanyahu. Once again, the administration is misjudging both the Palestinians and the diplomatic situation.

    What is most astonishing about this strategy is that it should have already been made clear to both Obama and Clinton that any time they call for a unilateral Israel concession in the hope that it will entice the Palestinians to return to peace talks, their move has the opposite effect. Obama’s calls for settlement freezes in the West Bank and Jerusalem only caused the Palestinians to adopt these Americans demands as preconditions for talks. The same is now true of the president’s ill-advised emphasis on the 1967 lines. Since the Palestinian Authority knows that it cannot sign a peace accord recognizing the legitimacy of Israel no matter where its borders may be drawn, they will seize upon any excuse not to talk and Obama has supplied them with just what they wanted.

    Moreover the reported desperation of the Americans to avoid casting a veto in the United Nations of the Palestinian attempt to gain a state without recognizing Israel and ending the conflict is also misplaced. The Palestinians know their gambit has no chance and will die as soon as the Security Council takes it up. Appeasing them in this manner will not deter them from trying but it will damage Israel’s position. An Israeli concession on borders prior to talks even beginning will deprive them of their one bargaining chip. But since the president refused to demand that the Palestinians give up their call for a right of return for the descendants of refugees, they would still have it in their pocket in the unlikely event of negotiations re-starting.

    The administration can’t have it both ways. It can’t claim that it is supportive of Israel while at the same time hammering it to give in on borders. The notion that Obama must pressure Israel for its own good is an argument that might fly with Israel-bashers or the leftists of J Street. But it is not one that ought to make any sense to mainstream Jewish groups as well as to the Congress that gave Netanyahu dozens of standing ovations last month.

    Share Button
  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 4:05 pm | 5 Comments »

    5 Comments to Obama’s Not Done Hammering Israel on 1967 Lines

    1. NormanF says:

      This is to be expected.

      Obama wants to remain popular with Russia, Europe and the Arabs.

      A little more pressure on Israel will keep him looking “cool.”

    2. MethanP says:

      The left has been anti-zionist and anti-semitc for a long time. And this president has a long
      history of assocciating with these types. (Rev. Wright comes to mind). Why is anyone surprised?
      Why does any Jew support this guy?

    3. Dr. Sanford Aranoff says:

      Israel must be proactive. Israel must publicize details, names, words, etc., of this pressure. Also Israel must reiterate that Obama’s words are meaningless, as he is America’s first unconstitutional president. Obama was not born the U.S. Everyone knows this, but are afraid to speak up.

    4. Shy Guy says:

      Dr. Sanford Aranoff says:
      June 14, 2011 at 3:20 am

      Obama was not born the U.S. Everyone knows this, but are afraid to speak up.

      No, “everyone” doesn’t know this. And, no, “everyone” is not afraid of their own shadows or being chased by black helicopters.

      But if you insist on going on discussing this claim, the best place to do it right now is here.

    5. “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton renewed the demand that was the highlight of Obama’s May 26 Middle East policy speech: that Israel accept the 1967 lines as the starting point for future Middle East peace negotiations.”

      Israel: please ignore the sideshow freak in the White House. It will be gone as of January 2013. We Americans played a sick practical joke on ourselves by electing it and we will fix the problem next November.

    Site Membership


      Ted Belman

      tbelman3- at-


    MANTUA BOOKS (recommended)



    Politics and war


    Anonymous soldiers


    Iran islam





    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites