LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


June 30, 2011

U.S. to resume formal Muslim Brotherhood contacts

Barry Rubin commented. “First of all, the headline is basically a lie. The US has never had “formal” contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood but only informal ones. This represents a major policy shift.”

REUTERS

By Arshad Mohammed

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States has decided to resume formal contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, a senior U.S. official said on Wednesday, in a step that reflects the Islamist group’s growing political weight but that is almost certain to upset Israel and its U.S. backers.

“The political landscape in Egypt has changed, and is changing,” said the senior official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “It is in our interests to engage with all of the parties that are competing for parliament or the presidency.”


The official sought to portray the shift as a subtle evolution rather than a dramatic change in Washington’s stance toward the Brotherhood, a group founded in 1928 that seeks to promote its conservative vision of Islam in society.

Under the previous policy, U.S. diplomats were allowed to deal with Brotherhood members of parliament who had won seats as independents — a diplomatic fiction that allowed them to keep lines of communication open.

Where U.S. diplomats previously dealt only with group members in their role as parliamentarians, a policy the official said had been in place since 2006, they will now deal directly with low-level Brotherhood party officials.

There is no U.S. legal prohibition against dealing with the Muslim Brotherhood itself, which long ago renounced violence as a means to achieve political change in Egypt and which is not regarded by Washington as a foreign terrorist organization.

But other sympathetic groups, such as Hamas, which identifies the Brotherhood as its spiritual guide, have not disavowed violence against the state of Israel.

The result has been a dilemma for the Obama administration. Former officials and analysts said it has little choice but to engage the Brotherhood directly, given its political prominence after the February 11 downfall of former President Hosni Mubarak.

STIRRING UP DEMONS

U.S. President Barack Obama will surely face criticism for engaging with the Brotherhood, even tentatively.

Howard Kohr, executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, made clear the pro-Israel group’s deep skepticism about the group in a speech last month.

“While we all hope that Egypt emerges from its current political transition with a functioning, Western-oriented democracy, the fact is the best-organized political force in Egypt today is the Muslim Brotherhood — which does not recognize Israel,” Kohr said.

Former U.S. diplomats said the United States had to engage with the Brotherhood given its influence in Egypt.

“We cannot have a free and fair election and democracy unless we are going to be willing to talk to all the people that are a part of that democracy,” said Edward Walker, a former U.S. ambassador to Egypt and Israel who now teaches at Hamilton College.

“It’s going to stir up demons,” he added. “You have got an awful lot of people who are not very happy with what the roots of the Brotherhood have spawned … There will be people who will not accept that the Brotherhood is of a new or different character today.”

Egypt’s parliamentary elections are scheduled for September and its military rulers have promised to hold a presidential vote by the end of the year.

DIPLOMATIC FIG LEAF

U.S. dealings with the Brotherhood have evolved over time and officials have found ways to keep lines open under the cover of one diplomatic fig leaf or another.

“We have not had contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood,” then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in response to a question at the American University in Cairo in June 2005. “We have not engaged the Muslim Brotherhood and … we won’t.”

The reality is more complex.

In the 1980s, U.S. diplomats had open dealings, visiting the group’s Cairo headquarters to call on members, including the Brotherhood’s supreme guide, according to the text of a May 2008 speech by Francis Ricciardone, a former U.S. ambassador to Egypt who is now the U.S. ambassador to Turkey.

By 1994, when Walker became U.S. ambassador in Cairo, he said the policy was to avoid direct contacts and to deal with trade unionists or other prominent figures who happened to be members of the group.

This gave Washington a way to keep tabs on the Brotherhood’s thinking without antagonizing those who opposed such contacts or the Mubarak regime, which maintained its status as a banned political organization and imprisoned many members — but also allowed it to run social welfare programs.

Despite his animus toward the group, Mubarak himself indirectly facilitated U.S. contacts by allowing its sympathizers to win seats in parliament as long as they ran as independents, handing Washington a justification for contacts.

HELPING MODERATES?

Elliott Abrams, a deputy national security adviser handling Middle East affairs under former President George W. Bush, said he favored dropping the ban on formal contacts — but approaching any actual dealings with great caution.

Abrams said positions espoused by some Brotherhood members — such as favoring religious tests for public office, questioning the rights of women and limiting freedom of religion or speech — were “anathema” to the United States.

The group says it wants a civil state based on Islamic principles, but talk by some members of an “Islamic state” or “Islamic government” have raised concerns that their goal is a state where full Islamic sharia law is implemented. The group says such comments have been taken out of context.

“It’s critical … that we make it very, very clear to Egyptians, if we are going to do a meeting, that we are no less opposed to the ideas they represent,” Abrams said, noting that there are splits among Brotherhood members.

“We have to think about whether we can use meetings to deepen those splits and to help, quietly, those who are trying to moderate the positions of the Brotherhood,” he added, saying the United States should choose its interlocutors with care and that the talks need not be conducted by the U.S. ambassador.

The U.S. official who declined to be identified said U.S. diplomats “will continue to emphasize the importance of support for democratic principles and a commitment to nonviolence, and respect for minority and women’s rights in conversations with all groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Posted by Ted Belman @ 7:50 am | 1 Comment »

One Response to U.S. to resume formal Muslim Brotherhood contacts

  1. Laura says:

    “The political landscape in Egypt has changed, and is changing,” said the senior official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “It is in our interests to engage with all of the parties that are competing for parliament or the presidency.”

    The landscape in Egypt has changed because the Obama administration facilitated this change.

    The article, typical of leftist western media outlets, spins the mb as a reasonable, non-threatening, moderate and benign organization.

    The group says it wants a civil state based on Islamic principles, but talk by some members of an “Islamic state” or “Islamic government” have raised concerns that their goal is a state where full Islamic sharia law is implemented. The group says such comments have been taken out of context.

    Naturally the media and our government buy into the mb’s claim that comments about implementing sharia law were taken out of context. And I’m sure that statements about destroying Israel and killing Jews were also taken out of context.

    “We have to think about whether we can use meetings to deepen those splits and to help, quietly, those who are trying to moderate the positions of the Brotherhood,” he added, saying the United States should choose its interlocutors with care and that the talks need not be conducted by the U.S. ambassador.

    The U.S. official who declined to be identified said U.S. diplomats “will continue to emphasize the importance of support for democratic principles and a commitment to nonviolence, and respect for minority and women’s rights in conversations with all groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood.”

    Our persistently clueless government maintains the notion that we can talk jihadists into being moderate.

Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 32,684
  • Last 7 days: 163,505
  • Last 30 days: 392,173
  • Online now: 93
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • Column one: The disappearance of US will (7)

    • honeybee: @ yamit82: Very good. Poor Kerry, BB, Abbas & Putin gave him a...

    • AbbaGuutuu: There is a direct correlation between the US elite’s...

    • honeybee: @ AbbaGuutuu: yawl have a nice Easter Holiday.

    • AbbaGuutuu: But with Americans across the ideological spectrum pretending...

    • yamit82: Comment to Bernard Ross blocked by spam filter Pls retrieve and post.

  • Netanyahu loses majority for deal to extend talks with Palestinians (10)

    • yamit82: @ Steve Goldberg: Because they are all political whores, every one....

    • Bear Klein: @ Steve Goldberg: If the article is accurate you are correct. So...

    • Steve Goldberg: It is appalling that anyone is even considering making such...

    • ArnoldHarris: Ted, why can you not make the comments look exactly the way we...

    • Bear Klein: Hopefully no more deals let terrorists out of prison will occur!

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (60)

    • dove: @ yamit82: Snow? What’s that? ha ha…doesn’t get a hearty...

    • yamit82: @ dove: Snow? What’s that? :P

    • dove: @ the phoenix: Bye for now….have a good day. :-)

    • dove: That’s funny. My first career was being the first Canadian female...

    • the phoenix: @ dove: door number one… :-)

  • Can Israel be both Jewish and democratic (220)

    • dove: @ dweller: And just to make it perfectly clear you said anybody who can...

    • honeybee: dweller Said: I said that what you’d WRITTEN was tired &...

    • dove: dweller: anybody who can read can interept but JEWS are subject to...

  • Into the fray: The Jerusalem Post Conference, my retrospective perspective (1)

    • AbbaGuutuu: According to the foreign minister, the BDS movement should not be...

  • The Jewish Question (16)

    • honeybee: @ AbbaGuutuu: I was talking about TX, he my pet scrape eating...

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

”souvenirs”

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Site Membership



Google Site Search

Editor

    Ted Belman

    tbelman3-at-gmail.com

Mission

    News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

Polls

Will Israel attack Iran

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

RECOMMENDED BOOKS




Tolerism2

Iran islam

Sharing

mandate4

Daily Archives

April 2014
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Selected Israpundit Articles

Sponsors

Miscellaneous Info

    All Politic Sites