Media Bias and Double Standards
Laura: Big media has no qualms about boldly and repeatedly labeling the Norweigan shooter as a “Christian”, even describing him as a Christian Zionist, despite no evidence that he was any kind of devout Christian whatsoever. Yet till this day the same vile liberal media will not refer to the Fort Hood jihadist as muslim or emphasize the islamic motivation behind the shooting. Neither does government reports on the jihad attack. Yet there was ample evidence that hasan was a devout muslim who massacred our soldiers in the name of islam. He shouted allahu akbar during the shooting spree, he gave out korans on the morning of the attack, he wrote “soldier of allah” on his business cards and he gave a lecture to other doctors that non-muslims should be beheaded, set on fire and have boiling oil poured down their throats. The same dynamic was at work with the Times Square jihad bomber. The media will mention that he’s a Pakistani, but refuse to emphasize that he is muslim and was motivated by islam. The liberal media even tried to laughably imply that perhaps he was motivated by anger over his house being foreclosed. This is why the American public increasingly distrusts and is disgusted with the liars and scoundrels of the mainstream media and is fed-up with their blatant bias and double standards.
The same liberals who lecture to us not to judge all muslims despite the tens of thousands of islamic jihad attacks around the world, have no trouble using this isolated case to go after the entire anti-jihad movement in the west. They have scurrilously and falsely tried to tie this guy to Pam Geller and Robert Spencer. Leave it to liberals to use a tragedy to attempt to gain political advantage. Sick! No matter what one’s political views are they should oppose the imposition of sharia in America. But instead, liberals are abetting the stealth jihad. And no doubt they will use this massacre in Norway to attempt to shutdown and silence any individuals or groups who are fighting to preserve our freedom and the constitution.
1. Anders Behring Breivik was a Fundamentalist Christian
Breivik described himself as not a religious person and mentions praying only once. His plans leading up to the attacks involved multiple visits to prostitutes. In one section of his manifesto he clarifies what he means by Christian.
Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?
no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy
Breivik did call himself a Christian, but meant that in a cultural sense, rather than a theological one. He emphasized that he was not seeking a theocracy, but a secular society. His idea of a Christian Europe had nothing to do with religion.
2. Anders Behring Breivik Hated Muslims
Breivik viewed Muslims as the enemy, but only domestically. He emphasized that; “Knights Templar do not intend to persecute devout Muslims”
And he contemplated collaborating with them on terrorist attacks against Europe. “An alliance with the Jihadists might prove beneficial to both parties… We both share one common goal.” The Caliphate was a useful enemy for his cause.
In Breivik’s own words, this is how such an arrangement would play out; continue