Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit





Blog Traffic


Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 0
  • Last 7 days: 0
  • Last 30 days: 0
  • Online now: 0
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments



Dry Bones
Dry Bones



Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Support Israpundit




  • September 16, 2011

    Ann Barnhardt: “Islamic Sexuality: A Survey of Evil”

    Militant Islamic Awareness Week continues
    posted by Bill Levinson

    Ann Barnhardt’s excellent contribution to awareness of Islam as practiced in the less advanced parts of the world, and in Sharia-compliant enclaves in Europe.

    “Islam is Not a Religion. Islam is a Political System.”
    “Mohammad created Islam to enrich Mohammad, raise an army, and facilitate and legalize Mohammad’s sexual perversions” (note the part about consummation of a marriage to a 9 year old girl)
    “Sharia law is sedition”

    Barnhardt adds that Hitler tried to morph Nazism into a religion as a substitute for religion, and throws in the torchlight rallies at Nuremberg:

    All that are missing are the torches and the swastikas. Barnhardt goes on to compare militant Muslims in the U.S. to the German-American Bund.

    Part 2 (We do not however agree with the exclusion of loyal Muslims from our Armed Forces.) The video defines militant Islamic sexuality as “pure evil,” an observation with which we agree. Some really good information at 5:40 or so. Her observation about one man’s testimony being worth that of two women is accurate. The following is 2.282″>straight from the Koran.

      [2.282] O you who believe! when you deal with each other in contracting a debt for a fixed time, then write it down; and let a scribe write it down between you with fairness; and the scribe should not refuse to write as Allah has taught him, so he should write; and let him who owes the debt dictate, and he should be careful of (his duty to) Allah, his Lord, and not diminish anything from it; but if he who owes the debt is unsound in understanding, or weak, or (if) he is not able to dictate himself, let his guardian dictate with fairness; and call in to witness from among your men two witnesses; but if there are not two men, then one man and two women from among those whom you choose to be witnesses, so that if one of the two errs, the second of the two may remind the other; and the witnesses should not refuse when they are summoned; and be not averse to writing it (whether it is) small or large, with the time of its falling due; this is more equitable in the sight of Allah and assures greater accuracy in testimony, and the nearest (way) that you may not entertain doubts (afterwards), except when it is ready merchandise which you give and take among yourselves from hand to hand, then there is no blame on you in not writing it down; and have witnesses when you barter with one another, and let no harm be done to the scribe or to the witness; and if you do (it) then surely it will be a transgression in you, and be careful of (your duty) to Allah, Allah teaches you, and Allah knows all things.

    At about 12:00, the issue of infertility in Afghan women is studied. The women were not getting pregnant because the men had learned (from their own experience at being sodomized) the wrong way to have sex. Female genital mutilation also is discussed.

    Part 3 (warning, graphic content re: female genital mutilation). At 8:20 or so, she describes how one imam proclaimed that Allah was busy on Thursday nights and could not see what militant Muslims were doing (NAMBLA or equivalent). “Minor attracted persons” = kiddie diddlers (= many United Nations personnel).

    Part 4 5:30 discusses incest and its consequences, including low intelligence. At about 7:30, Ayatollah Khomeini condones sex with livestock, although the animal must then be killed. At about 10:00, an imam says death does not alter a marriage contract so a man can have sex with his freshly deceased wife.

  • Posted by Bill Levinson @ 6:49 pm | 15 Comments »

    15 Comments to Ann Barnhardt: “Islamic Sexuality: A Survey of Evil”

    1. “Alternate sexual lifestyles” in the militant Islamic world:

      (1) A man who would rather have consensual sex with a woman than stone her to death
      (2) A man who would rather have consensual sex with a woman than rape her
      (3) A man who would rather have sex with a woman than with a boy
      (4) A man who would rather marry a woman and have consensual sex with her than blow himself up so he can get 72 virgins in Paradise

    2. C.R. says:

      Nazism was and is a religion–a genuine relationship with the one true God–the God of the Bible–is not a religion; religion is man made and Satanic inspired as a substitute for a genuine relationship with the one true God.

    3. cali says:

      This woman has balls,and I’m glad she explains,graphic or not, what Islam really is!

    4. Underzog says:

      How do we know the Muslims are loyal? Jews thought the Muslims in Hebron were their friends. The Hebron massacre of 1929 shattered that illusion. Islam should be banned from America! Pedestrial Infiden: a proposed Constitutional Amendment.

      Since Muslims are supposed to make war on infidels even if they be people of the book (us dhimmis) and slay the non believers when you find them, it is only a matter of time before many take those sayings of the Koran and hadiths literally and take care of us.

    5. Catarin says:

      One of the first rules of studying the ancients is you not apply modern morals to their situations. I got most of my information on Mohammed from Will Durant’s book, _The Age of Faith_. From what I understand about Mohammed’s several wives, many were widows whom he married so they would have support. I guess Muslim men did not live all that long because of warfare and other dangers of those times.

      Durant said the wives lived separately from Mohammed in their own “cottages”, and Mohammed took care of his own cottage himself. He could be seen sweeping the floors and mending his own clothes. I don’t think Mohammed cared that much about riches. The greatest complaint of his wives was he did not give them enough pocket money. He lived frugally, and he expected his wives to do so also (good luck with that).

      I guess Mohammed was married to some of the daughters of his companions, and there’s a story that one of the wives griped about Mohammed to her father, and the father, incensed that they would dare talk about the prophet that way, went over to the wives’ cottages to chew them out. They told him to mind his own business. Later, when he was telling Mohammed about this, Mohammed laughed and laughed.

      I’m repeating what is in Durant’s book, and as for being true, Durant must have found writing reflecting this. Durant has great admiration for Mohammed as being the only world figure who took a ragtag group of people, suffering from heat exhaustion and starvation, and turned them into a nation in his lifetime.

      We have to give credit where credit is due. This says nothing about the way Islam has evolved through the centuries.

    6. says:

      Credit where credit is due.O.k. I credit mohamed with personally beheading 800 Jews, and mutilating(while alive) the Rabbi of the village where the jews lived because he would not disclose where they buried they valuables.Source their (so called)holy book.This they regard as the perfect man to be emulated.

    7. Ira Curtis says:

      Even though most of the facts that Ann Bernhardt brings up about islam ARE true, I wouldn’t use her as my speaker as she it a total nutcase and cause more damage to our propaganda than helps it. I know (I think) to separate the wheet from chaff but those who don’t will resent her. And they are the majority.

    8. Ira Curtis says:

      Catarin, you wrote: “Mohammed’s several wives, many were widows whom he married so they would have support”
      So did King David.
      The question is who killed their husbands? if infact it is true.
      The BIG difference is that there was a man to stand up and criticise him, The Quran will never permit criticism.
      And King David didn’t hide his reasons for doing this. Another thing the Quran will never permit, admit your weaknesses as a human being.

    9. Catarin says:

      Mohammed treated Arabs who did not want to become Muslims the same way he treated the Jews. Muslim tradition says Mohammed’s companions and others memorized verses given to Mohammed by Gabriel/Allah so they could be collected later. One companion of Mohammed was in a battle with an Arab tribe who did not want to be Muslims, and they killed the companion, thereby depriving the Quran of the verses he had memorized.

      Islam is almost fully based on Judaism, with a pinch of Zoroastrian and Christianity added. Mohammed was friends with the Jews living around him and must have gotten his information from them. There is a story that Mohammed invited Jews to his home to tell them about Islam, and the Jews said it sounded a lot like Judaism.

      Ira, Durant’s book says that many of the wives Mohammed married were headed toward middle age. One wife was a Jewess. Mohammed really didn’t like making the rounds with all these wives (neither did the wives) so that when the young daughter of Abu Bakr, Aisha, became his wife, he didn’t bother any more.

      Mohammed’s first wife, Khadija, was a widow older than Mohammed and the owner of a merchant trading company, who went to work every day. They had a happy marriage during which Mohammed lived well. He worked for his wife as a trader, so I have a hard time believing Mohammed was totally illiterate. He never took another wife while married to her and was heartbroken when she died. She was the second Muslim after Mohammed.

    10. zechariah823 says:

      Christianity is also ALMOST fully based on Judaism. However, neither Islam nor Christianity is the REAL DEAL. Why bother with ALMOST duplicates when you can follow the ORIGINAL and be right? In both cases, Christianity and Islam, the respective religions were started by ONE man ,respectively Paul-Saul and Mohammed, who heard from a secondary source, Jesus and Gabriel respectively, about what was the supposed WORD of HaSh-m. However, at Sinai, HaSh-m Himself spoke to THREE MILLION people to make sure HIS WORD was DEFINITELY UNDERSTOOD and what was to be followed from then on, for HE knew that FALSE PROPHETS would arise in the future and HE wanted to be perfectly clear what the WORD was and that a stiff-necked people would stubbornly cling to IT from then and for all time. B”H.

    11. Shy Guy says:

      zechariah823 says:
      September 18, 2011 at 10:41 am

      Christianity is also ALMOST fully based on Judaism.

      Not at all. It merely claims to be the historical continuation of Judaism but in its essence it both denies the Torah in its essential pagan beliefs and dismisses 99% of G-d’s commandments. It’s not even a shell of Judaism.

      In contrast, Islamic scriptures are filled with commands and Islam’s sha’aria teachings go into detail in a similar fashion to the Talmud’s documentation and expansion of Oral Torah and Rabbinic law. In addition, Islam is very much geared on concentrating on each Muslim’s working on perfecting himself through various abstentions, acts of kindness and charity to fellow Muslims and imitating what Islam imagines is the will of G-d, whom they call “Allah”.

      Whatever you do, don’t get the mistaken notion that I have anything positive to say about the Religion of Hate, Rape, Thievery, Butchery and Seething.

    12. Catarin says:

      Where did the 3 million people come from? The highest number I have heard put forth is 600,000, and that seems very high to me.

      Yeah, I always thought there was something a little screwy about the Holy Ghost. It sounds to me like it’s a big joke.

    13. zechariah823 says:

      600,000 men, rest women and children.

    14. zechariah823 says:

      Primitive Christianity was almost fully BASED on Judaism. They only knew Torah. And the entire Hebrew Scriptures were incorporated into the Christian Bible, unlike the Islamic Koran. Now, though the BASIS was there does not mean that the church (catholic) fathers did not twist its words, like a pretzel, in translation to make it seem to be a foreshadowing of their Christian deity. Still many Christians are able and do read the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament to them), which is about 3 times as long as their attached Christian gospels, and even with the twisted and mistranslations in part, they find a jarring mismatch between the two and become conflicted when they can’t get logical answers from their priests and ministers. And many of them are starting to turn to the Sheva Mitzvot (7 commandments given to Noah) that they may follow a righteous path as gentiles.

    15. Eduard says:

      The number 600,000 applies to men of arms bearing age. There was also a significant number of old men and boys.

    Site Membership

    Google Site Search


      Ted Belman


      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.


    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...




    Iran islam



    Daily Archives

    July 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun    

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites