Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit





Blog Traffic


Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 0
  • Last 7 days: 0
  • Last 30 days: 0
  • Online now: 0
Los Angeles SEO

Recent Comments



Dry Bones
Dry Bones



Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Support Israpundit




  • January 12, 2012

    Germany Attempts to Silence Criticism of Islam


    German authorities have officially confirmed that they are monitoring German-language Internet websites that are critical of Muslim immigration and the Islamization of Europe.

    According to Manfred Murck, director of the Hamburg branch of the German domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), his organization is studying whether German citizens who criticize Muslims and Islam on the Internet are fomenting hate and are thus criminally guilty of “breaching” the German constitution.

    The BfV’s move marks a significant setback for the exercise of free speech in Germany and comes amid a months-long smear campaign led by a triple alliance of leftwing German multicultural elites, sundry Muslim groups and members of the mainstream media, who have been relentless in their efforts to discredit the so-called counter-jihad movement (also known as the “Islamophobes”) in Germany.

    Opinion polls show that growing numbers of ordinary German citizens are worried about the consequences of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged mass immigration from Muslim countries.

    Germans are especially concerned about the refusal of millions of Muslim immigrants to integrate into German society, as well as the emergence of a parallel legal system in Germany based on Islamic Sharia law.

    In an effort to reverse this tide of public opinion, the guardians of German multiculturalism have been working overtime to regain the initiative by accusing the critics of Islam of engaging in hate speech to try to intimidate the so-called “new right” into silence.

    The media campaign has been led by two financially troubled newspapers, the Berliner Zeitung and its sister publication, the Frankfurter Rundschau, as well as Der Spiegel, a leftwing magazine based in Hamburg that has long served as the mouthpiece for German multiculturalism.

    In a January 4, 2012 interview with the Berliner Zeitung andFrankfurter Rundschau, Murck said the owners of anti-Islam blogs “have a disturbed relationship to the democratic constitutional state” and often promote “infringements of human rights protected under our constitution.”

    Murck continued: “I also see evidence of criminal relevance, such as making threats and public invitations to crime.” He said criticism of Muslims and Islam constitutes “an attack against the freedom of religion, which is protected by Article 4 of the Basic Law.”

    The Berliner Zeitung and Frankfurter Rundschau interview was conducted by Steven Geyer und Jörg Schindler, two journalists and propagandists who have been leading an ongoing effort to shut down a highly popular German-language Internet website called Politically Incorrect (PI), which over the years has grown into a major information resource for Germans concerned about the spread of Islam in their country.

    PI’s motto reads “Against the Mainstream, Pro-American, Pro-Israel, Against the Islamization of Europe” which encapsulates everything the German left abhors.

    The Berliner Zeitung and the Frankfurter Rundschau, for example, have fomented the hysteria by publishing dozens of agitprop articles, some by Mely Kiyak, a first-generation German whose parents were Turkish-Kurdish immigrants. Kiyak, who calls herself a “political pioneer,” portrays all critics of Islam as hate-mongers.

    One article, entitled, “Politically Incorrect: Vulgar, Uninhibited, Racist,” says that, “the Internet portal ‘Politically Incorrect’ is part of an international network of Islam haters and Muslim stalkers. This is confirmed by research conducted by the Frankfurter Rundschau.”

    Another article, “PI News: Prototype of the New Right,” links criticism of Islam with anti-Semitism: “The ‘New Right’ has been growing for ten years and has momentum. The blog ‘Politically Incorrect’ shows what the movement looks like. The director of the Center for Research on Anti-Semitism, Wolfgang Benz, sees parallels to anti-Semitism.” Open expressions of anti-Semitism are illegal in post-war Germany; the inference here is that those who criticize Islam are guilty of committing a crime.

    Other Berliner Zeitung and Frankfurter Rundschau articles are entitled: “Politically Incorrect: Where the Internet Stinks;” “Rightwing Populists: United in their Hatred of Muslims,” and “Politically Correct Hatred.”

    A frenzied article, “Politically Incorrect: Inside the Network of Islam Haters,” asserts: “PI is far more than a harmless website. It is rather a highly conspiratorial organization that works to demonize an entire faith community. It plays a vital role in an international network of those who hate Islam. It provides racists and glorifiers of violence who share the world view of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik with a forum.”

    Spiegel magazine, sifting through a stock of more than 10,000 private emails that were stolen from PI, published an article, “Politically Incorrect Closely Knit to Far Right Scene,” in which it asserted that the people behind PI are undemocratic and pose a threat to the German constitutional order.

    Another article, “Germany’s Anti-Muslim Scene: Authorities Debate Surveillance of Islamophobes,” asserts that right-wing populism is a new form of extremism: “There are concerns that the anti-Muslim scene is becoming increasingly dangerous. In essence, the question is whether the hatred of Muslims is enough to endanger freedom of religion and international understanding, or whether it is a radical but legitimate expression of opinion by individual authors within the limits of the constitution.”

    In any event, Spiegel magazine has worked hard to portray all critics of Islam as belonging to the “far right” even though opinion polls overwhelmingly show that voters from across the political spectrum are concerned about the spread of Islam in Germany.

    An opinion survey called “Perception and Acceptance of Religious Diversity,” conducted by the sociology department of the University of Münster in partnership with the prestigious TNS Emnid political polling firm, shows that the majority of Germans disagree with a statement by German President Christian Wulff, alleging that Islam “belongs in Germany” because of the four million Muslims who now live there. Germany has Western Europe’s second-biggest Islamic population after France, with Turks the single biggest minority.

    The study shows that only 34% of the West Germans and 26% of the East Germans have a positive view of Muslims. Fewer than 5% of the Germans think Islam is a tolerant religion, and only 30% say they approve of the building of mosques. The number of Germans who approve of the building of minarets or the introduction of Muslim holidays is even lower.

    Fewer than 10% of the West Germans and 5% of the East Germans say that Islam is a peaceful religion. More than 40% of Germans believe that the practice of Islam should be vigorously restricted.

    Only 20% of the Germans believe that Islam is suitable for the Western world. Significantly, more than 80% of the Germans agree with the statement “that Muslims must adapt to our culture.” More than one million immigrants living permanently in Germany cannot speak German.

    Another survey, “Global Views on Immigration,” conducted by the London-based Ipsos global research firm, found that more than half the Germans believe “there are too many immigrants” in their country.

    In response to the polling question “Would you say that immigration has generally had a positive or negative impact?” 54% of the Germans said the impact has been negative. Nearly 60% of the Germans agree with the survey statement: “Immigration has placed too much pressure on public services” in Germany.

    Another report, “Muslim-Western Tensions Persist,” published by the Washington, DC-based Pew Research Center, states that 61% of the Germans believe their relations with Muslims are bad. The poll also shows that 72% of the Germans believe Muslims in their countries do not want to integrate; and that 79% of the Germans believe Islam is “the most violent” religion. More than two-thirds of the Germans are worried about Islamic extremists in their country.

    A separate poll conducted by the Pew Global Attitudes Project states that 71% of the Germans believe Islamic veils should be banned in public, including in schools, hospitals and government offices.

    Another survey, published by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, a think-tank linked to the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), found that 55% of the Germans believe that Arabs are “unpleasant,” and over 33% believe the country is being “overrun” by immigrants. The study also noted that “far-right attitudes” are not isolated at the extremes of German society, but to a large degree are “at the center of it.”

    These surveys clearly and consistently show that most Germans are worried about the impact that Muslim immigration is having on their daily lives.

    In a country stifled by decades of political correctness, Politically Incorrect has been giving a voice to millions of frustrated Germans who see the harm being wrought by the cult of multiculturalism. But Germany’s establishment now seems determined to use all means at its disposal to silence free speech in the nation.

    Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Relations at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 7:55 pm | 15 Comments »

    15 Comments to Germany Attempts to Silence Criticism of Islam

    1. This is what happens when you pass hate crime laws.

      The laws originally intended to protect Jews and Gypies after WW2 now protect Arabs.

      You are better off with free speech even if it is ugly.

      The ADL wants to pass the same laws in the USA.

      Unfortunately, sometimes the Jewish community is the agent of its own destruction.

    2. 4israel says:

      I wouldn’t exactly call Germany the Jewish Community. Whatever happened to constructive criticism? The problem with so called free speech is that all it does is give license to the hate mongers to freely rant while silencing others – that is not free speech.

    3. C.R. says:

      This is a direct result of political correctness, i.e., cultural Marxism! Cultural Marxism among other things promotes hatred and works to undermine the host society and government.

    4. C.R. says:

      It not Arabs–its Godless hate filled Islam which is being protected!

    5. BlandOatmeal says:

      Curious, I agree with every word. A terse and accurate post.

    6. Laura says:

      Will there be any such monitoring of hate speech coming from muslims?

      A frenzied article, “Politically Incorrect: Inside the Network of Islam Haters,” asserts: “PI is far more than a harmless website. It is rather a highly conspiratorial organization that works to demonize an entire faith community. It plays a vital role in an international network of those who hate Islam. It provides racists and glorifiers of violence who share the world view of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik with a forum.”

      Might it be that the 18,000 islamic terrorist attacks worldwide, sharia enclaves, “honor” murders and so forth have a role in demonizing an entire faith community?

      The left is collaborating with islam to wage jihad on the west and destroy our civilization from within. This makes the left an even greater danger than islam which by itself cannot overtake us. Something must be done to end the grip the left has on the culture, media and governments in the west.

    7. Laura says:

      I also agree with curious.

    8. Ted Belman says:

      Jews are not better off because the Muslims continue to preach hate against the Jews. Somehow, there’s gotta be a law…

      On the other hand the law should not restrict everyone from preaching what is wrong with Islam and some of its practitioners, actually most of them if you measure by the number of Muslim voices who are silent about the hateful parts of Islam.

      You have to craft laws that restrict one and not the other.

      The Canadian Criminal Code provides as follows;

      Public incitement of hatred

      319. (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

      (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

      (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

      Wilful promotion of hatred

      (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

      (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

      (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.


      (3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2)

      (a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;

      (b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;

      (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or

      (d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.


      (4) Where a person is convicted of an offence under section 318 or subsection (1) or (2) of this section, anything by means of or in relation to which the offence was committed, on such conviction, may, in addition to any other punishment imposed, be ordered by the presiding provincial court judge or judge to be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province in which that person is convicted, for disposal as the Attorney General may direct.

    9. Tzvi says:

      Would posting extracts from the Koran with regards to anti-Semitic and anti-Christian passages be anti-Islamic? Would arguments against posted Islamic sites be hate speech? Would news items about Egyptian Moslem actions against the Coptic church be anti-Islamic? It seems anything that just might hurt there feelings is anti-Islamic.

    10. david frankel says:


    11. Ed Katz says:

      Laws of any kind will not not stop crime from being committed. Laws make criminals much harder to apprehend and prosecuted. What the Jews need today is the reinstitute of the Stern Gang as used in 1948.

    12. Joseph G Whitson says:

      Any country and its citizens that will not stand up and confront
      Islam and deal with the realities of what it has done, is doing and
      plans to do, is blind to “THE TRUTH” of their Objective of World
      Domination. Islam will give you and yours two choices; Convert to
      Islam or die!! PERIOD!!
      Joseph Whitson

    13. TG says:

      Wow, hoo’da guessed it? The principle defenders in Germany (and elsewhere in the dumb West) of the ‘rights’ of Moslems over and above rights of those who criticize Islam’s exclusiveness and draw attention to its plans to take over Europe and the entire infidel world so as to set up a Caliphate Reich are: “a triple alliance of LEFTWING German MULTICULTURAL ELITES, sundry MUSLIM groups and members of the MAINSTREAM MEDIA”. Aren’t these the very same groups all over the [still] free world (including ISRAEL!) which are given free rein not only to ‘criticize’ Israel but to lie, libel AND incite to violence against it and its citizens – and even participate directly in violence against it, as in the weekly riots led by Israeli Far-Left ‘Anarchists Against the Wall’ in the ‘palestinian’ villages Bi’ilin and Ni’ilin?

    14. Joseph G Whitson says:

      Islam,aided by the laws of our free society and a sympathetic
      and supportive President, has gone to great lengths in this country
      to disguise itself as a tranquil, peace loving religion. It is neither!
      Islam has cultivated a cunning and skillful game plan to instill fear and
      intimidation in the minds of the public. A major contributor to the success
      of this mind game among the people are The Pulpits. They should be at the
      tip of the spear in standing up for The Truth and educating the people of
      this cancer among us. They haven’t! Why do they remain SILENT?

    15. Bart Brooks says:

      Good comment. I wonder if one would be allowed to debate that a religion is evil whose basic tenants revile other faiths, condones deception, allows deflowering female youth of their innocence by old men, and has no problem with slavery?
      Bart Brooks

    Site Membership

    Google Site Search


      Ted Belman


      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.


    Why doesn't Bibi want to go "all the way"

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...




    Iran islam



    Daily Archives

    July 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun    

    Selected Israpundit Articles


    Why doesn't Bibi want to go "all the way"

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites