Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 29,121
  • Last 7 days: 145,016
  • Last 30 days: 145,016
  • Online now: 76
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (202)

    • honeybee: yamit82 Said: Cuckoo’ I give you the bird of up-state NY, damn...

    • yamit82: honeybee Said: And then again it could be “THE GREAT TERADACYLE”...

    • honeybee: the phoenix Said: …there goes the neighborhood What...

    • honeybee: yamit82 Said: sampling the merchandise What do you have worth...

    • honeybee: yamit82 Said: a large rodent And then again it could be “THE...

  • Israpundit is pro-Jewish and pro-Israel (93)

    • dove: @ M Devolin: I’m just taking a quick break. I am actually working...

    • M Devolin: “I always questioned the church.” For me there was no...

    • honeybee: Bear Klein Said: mainly mainly or manly

    • dove: @ Bear Klein: Oh Yogi….you are funny!

    • Bear Klein: @ honeybee: I believe that is mainly hungry disgusting Polar...

  • National Intel Misled Congress About Brotherhood Contacts (9)

    • the phoenix: Just make sure you do not end up in the adjacent meeting room by...

    • Yidvocate: IPhoholics Anonymous – Huray!

    • dove: @ the phoenix: Hi! My name is phoenix, and I am addicted to IP Hi...

    • dove: @ Yidvocate: lol. I hear ya. I don’t have the time either to be...

    • the phoenix: @ Yidvocate: Just finding that I’ve been spending too much time...

  • Material Support to Terrorism: The Case of Libya (1)

    • the phoenix: Material Support to Terrorism: The Case of Libya...

  • The Trouble with Gaza (4)

    • keelie: @ ArnoldHarris: That situation can be undone solely by Israel...

    • dove: Hashem will guide and direct the Jews as to how to dismantle this...

  • Does Israel’s triumph mean we are guilty? (16)

    • M Devolin: “May Hashem bless him and all his family.” And may his...

  • Ya’alon introduces new punitive measures for ‘violent’ settlements (13)

    • honeybee: @ Bear Klein: Disappointing, no wonder bears are an endangered...

Archives

Sponsor

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


  • May 3, 2012

    More shameful BBC propaganda against Israel

    The BBC has now sunk to pinning its stories against Israel on people who refer to the Jewish state in terms of Nazism and Apartheid

    By Robin Shepherd, The Commentator

    It was another one of those do-I-laugh-or-do-I-cry moments as I came across the latest piece of flagrant anti-Israeli propaganda on the BBC‘s website.

    It started off badly enough with the headline – UN “appalled“ by Israel treatment of hunger strikers. Sorry, that’s just not a story. The UN is always “appalled“ by something to do with the Jewish state, and that’s because its members are overwhelmingly in thrall to an obsessive anti-Zionist bigotry which appears to know no bounds.

    So, it was clear from the outset that this was going to be something of a gratuitous hatchet job. Then again this is the BBC, so no surprises there. But even I have to admit to having been surprised about just how gratuitous it was going to be. Here are the first two paragraphs from Yolande Knell’s story:

      “A UN expert has said he is appalled by the “continuing human rights violations in Israeli prisons”, as Palestinian inmates continue a mass hunger strike.

      “Special Rapporteur Robert [sic] Falk said Israel had to treat hunger strikers in line with international standards.“

    Oh dear, oh dear. The BBC is pinning its stories on the words of Robert Falk. Or rather, that’s Richard Falk – the BBC was obviously so excited at the prospect of a piece of Israel bashing that in the news room’s heightened state of euphoria nobody bothered to check out the man’s name. (I have remarked before that the hysteria which usually drives anti-Zionism frequently results in an abandonment of basic standards of normal behaviour and practice.)

    Now, Richard Falk is actually rather well known, and here’s why.

    Most bizzarely, perhaps, he’s a high profile “truther“ about the events of September 11, 2001. In other words he thinks the attacks may all have been cooked up in the White House, quite possibly by the dreaded neo-Cons.

    His abilities as a judge of events and character are also amply demonstrated by his musings on Islamist mass murderer Ayatollah Khomeini, who led the Iranian revolution and then unleashed a reign of terror. Back in 1979, Falk’s view was that the new regime in Iran “may yet provide us with a desperately-needed model of humane governance for a third-world country.“

    But it is his views on Israel that have really earned him his reputation. And if BBC reporters and editors either do not know or do not care what that reputation entails, they should not be working for a (supposedly) public service media organisation.

    In a nutshell, Falk is so hostile to Israel that he’s a de facto anti-Israel activist. But even that fails to do justice to the sheer viciousness of his diatribes against the Jewish state. Here’s just a smattering of examples of his approach. First there are the suggested comparisons with Nazi Germany. He has sometimes claimed that he doesn’t quite mean it literally. On others he has talked of Israeli policies as “genocidal“.

    He’s ambivalent about Hamas as a terrorist outfit. His language about Israel is peppered with references to “apartheid“, “criminality“, “collective punishment“ and so on. The picture is clear enough.

    I can’t see how he can be described as anything other than an obsessive, anti-Israeli fanatic.

    Which brings us back to the BBC and its decision to hang an entire story on the testimony of a man with a record like that. I find it difficult to believe it was pure ignorance. Falk has been on the scene for years, and his attacks against Israel are legendary. The BBC’s story did not even include a single line informing the reader of his anti-Israeli reputation.

    And this is how the propaganda against Israel is spread: a mainstream media outlet feeds an unsuspecting public with a story purporting to hang on an objective source, all the while knowing that 95 percent of the readers will swallow it because they don’t know Richard Falk from Adam.

    It’s another shameful day for the BBC, or rather it should be. But over the years a once great media outlet has demonstrated time without number that it knows no shame on Israel and the Middle East, and on many other issues too. One day there’ll be a reckoning for all this, and when there is they’ll have no-one to blame but themselves.

    ** The BBC, in response to this piece has now made a change to its story: it has finally changed the name of the fanatical anti-Israel UN “expert” on which it runs the story from “Robert” to “Richard Falk”.  We understand that anyone can make a mistake. But this is so basic that it speaks to an extreme agenda that views Israel as a pantomime villain (and they needed us to tell them a full 24 hours after their piece was published). Usual journalistic practice is to check and verify sources as a matter of course. When it comes to Israel, the BBC does not do this. We would like to know how this “mistake” happened and why even after the correction the story was not withdrawn in its entirety due to the complete lack of credibility of the source?**

    Robin Shepherd is the owner/publisher of @CommentatorIntl Follow him on Twitter @RobinShepherd1

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 5:57 pm | 3 Comments »

    3 Comments to More shameful BBC propaganda against Israel

    1. NormanF says:

      Richard Falk is so extreme he is one of only four Jews banned from entering Israel due to their connection with anti-Israel terrorist groups.

      You have to do something pretty extreme not be allowed in Israel. Richard Falk is not one to sit in moral judgment of the Jewish State.

    2. Alan says:

      Richard Falk loves Hitler. As does Soros. Period.

      As for the BBC, once a great voice of freedom and reason especially when Hitler’s bombs were raining down on London.

      Nowadays, a refuge for Stalinazis, Islamohitlerites, and the British insane asylum inmates.

    3. Laura says:

      At least the BBC ought to be honest and label itself the pro-jihad, pro-hamas, Jew-hating network.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    April 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Sponsors

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites