Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 25,758
  • Last 7 days: 103,320
  • Last 30 days: 103,320
  • Online now: 90
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (155)

    • mar55: @ honeybee: Thank you honeybee for teaching me how to say it in...

    • Max: There were so many chances to annihilate Hamas. Israelis lack the will...

    • yamit82: dweller Said: Yeah, the heavens do. But no book EVER did — or could....

    • dweller: @ yamit82: “But this is not a courtroom…” “It’s not a back...

    • yamit82: @ honeybee: Are you ticklish???

  • Israpundit is pro-Jewish and pro-Israel (47)

    • Max: M Devolin Said: “You fall into the same ego trap as the Jihadists.” Max,...

    • Bear Klein: I just think this whole thing with CA has become a mini side show...

    • Max: M Devolin Said: “Mass sports are used to twist individual identity which...

    • M Devolin: “Mass sports are used to twist individual identity which is...

    • M Devolin: “You fall into the same ego trap as the Jihadists.”...

  • Ya’alon introduces new punitive measures for ‘violent’ settlements (2)

    • SHmuel HaLevi 2: In all honesty, what else can anyone expect from a fellow...

    • Bear Klein: Israeli civil law needs to applied to all Jewish Towns. Military...

  • Islam’s Religious War with Everyone (11)

    • M Devolin: “you are the propaganda arm of Jihad” You’re an...

    • M Devolin: Hey, Buzz of the Orient, I work as a trainer at a boxing club...

    • Max: Buzz of the Orient Said: Canada has no business shedding it’s citizen’s...

    • Max: Buzz of the Orient Said: You know what, Max. You’re a madman. Canada has...

    • Buzz of the Orient: You know what, Max. You’re a madman. Canada has no...

  • Fatah, Hamas agree to form unity government within ‘next five weeks’ (1)

    • NormanF: Its never going to happen. The terrorists of Fatah and Hamas are in...

  • Anti-Israel BDS Resolutions Seize Campuses in Ontario, Canada (5)

    • Max: AbbaGuutuu Said: like the western democracy part of your comment. In the...

  • Israeli, Palestinian teen offenders face different fates (14)

    • M Devolin: OK. Thanks, guys. I will rein it in. Lost control. It’s a...

Archives

Sponsor

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND

  • August 21, 2012

    Pipes offers a voice of sanity on Syria

    Wait Out the War in Syria
    by Daniel Pipes
    The Washington Times

    Bashar al-Assad’s wretched presence in the Presidential Palace of Damascus may, contrary to Western assumptions, do more good than harm. His murderous, terroristic, and pro-Tehran regime is also non-ideological and relatively secular; it staves off anarchy, Islamist rule, genocide, and rogue control of Syria’s chemical weapons.

    As Syria’s civil war intensifies, Western states are increasingly helping the rebels overthrow Assad and his henchmen. In doing so, the West hopes to save lives and facilitate a democratic transition. Many Western voices call for more than the non-lethal aid now being offered, wanting to arm the rebels, set up safe zones, and even join their war against the government.

    Helping the rebels, however, neglects a fundamental question: does intervention in Syria against Assad promote our own interests? This obvious question gets missed because many Westerners feel so confident about their own well-being that they forget their security and instead focus on the concerns of those they perceive as weak and exploited, whether human (e.g., indigenous peoples or the poor) or animals (whales and snail darters). Westerners have developed sophisticated mechanisms to act on these concerns (e.g.,responsibility to protect, animal rights activism).

    For those of us not so confident, however, fending off threats to our security and our civilization remains a top priority. In this light, helping the rebels entails multiple drawbacks for the West.

    First, the rebels are Islamist and intent to build an ideological government even more hostile to the West than Assad’s. Their breaking relations with Tehran will be balanced by their helping to forward the barbaric force of Islamism’s Sunni forces.

    Second, the argument that Western intervention would reduce the Islamist thrust of the rebellion by replacing materiel pouring in from Sunni countries is risible. Syria’s rebels do not need Western help to bring down the regime (and wouldn’t be grateful for it if they did receive it, if Iraq is any guide). The Syrian conflict at base pits the country’s disenfranchised Sunni Arab 70-percent majority against Assad’s privileged Alawi 12-percent minority. Add the assistance of foreign Islamist volunteers as well as several Sunni states (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar) and the Assad regime is doomed. Assad cannot subdue the ever-widening rebellion against his rule; indeed, the more his troops butcher and maim, the more defections occur and his support shrinks to its Alawi core.

    Third, hastening the Assad regime’s collapse will not save lives. It will mark not the end of the conflict, but merely the close of its opening chapter with yet worse violence likely to follow. As Sunnis finally avenge their nearly fifty years of subjugation by Alawis, a victory by the rebels portends potential genocide. The Syrian conflict will likely get so extreme and violent that Westerners will be glad to have kept a distance from both sides.

    Fourth, the continuing Syrian conflict offers benefits to the West. Several Sunni governments have noted the Obama administration’s reticence to act and have taken responsibility to wrest Syria from the Iranian orbit; this comes as a welcome development after their decades of accommodating the Shiite Islamic Republic. Also, as Sunni Islamists fight Shiite Islamists, both sides are weakened and their lethal rivalry lessens their capabilities to trouble the outside world. By inspiring restive minorities (Sunnis in Iran, Kurds and Shiites in Turkey), continued fighting in Syria could also weaken Islamist governments.

    When the regime falls, the Alawi leadership, with or without Assad, might retreat to ancestral redoubts in Latakia province in northwestern Syria; the Iranians could well supply it by sea with money and arms, permitting it to hold out for years, further exacerbating the confrontation between Sunni and Shiite Islamists, further distracting them from assaulting others.

    The one exception to the policy of non-intervention would be to secure Syria’s vast chemical weapon arsenal, both to prevent terrorist groups seizing it and Assad from deploying it in a Götterdämmerung scenario as he goes down, although this difficult mission could require as many as 60,000 foreign ground troops deployed to Syria.

    Nothing in the constitutions of Western states requires them to get involved in every foreign conflict; sitting this one out will prove to be a smart move. In addition to the moral benefit of not being accountable for horrors yet to come, staying away permits the West eventually to help its only true friends in Syria, the country’s liberals.

    Mr. Pipes (DanielPipes.org) is president of the Middle East Forum and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. © 2012 All rights reserved by Daniel Pipes.

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 11:59 am | 1 Comment »

    One Comment to Pipes offers a voice of sanity on Syria

    1. bahmi says:

      Yes, Assad is bad and Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, et al are good, right? The whorish United States backs these detritic states, calls Assad a bad guy while these nations butcher their citizens left and right. Come to think about it, the US is simply not to be trusted, ever. Why, once the dollar standard is gone, who thinks the US will ever be prosperous again? With their unemployment, their hedonism, their laziness, the nation will sink like a stone. The UN, with US money, appears to be the agency of “good”, but the US is supporting mercenaries who are currently bolluxing up the hard slug in Aleppo and Damascus. The US population will soon feel the wrath and oppression of blatant communism while the Messiah Obama slinks to another country to live in with his wife and family. Obama is the frosting on the cake, it took this impostor, this unknown, to sink the US. Never forget that we as jews comprise nearly ALL of Obama’s czars, we should complain again about not being fairly treated by the US? We own the Congress and White House, how much more do we want? Pipes calls for democracy in an Islamic nation? It’s like calling for snow at the equator.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    April 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Sponsors

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites