Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 0
  • Last 7 days: 0
  • Last 30 days: 0
  • Online now: 0
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • 4 killed, at least 6 wounded after mortar fire on Eshkol (13)
    • Avigail: @ yamit82: Dude. It’s 1:20 pm and I have to listen to Has_Fled?! (I believe I...
    • yamit82: @ Avigail: @ M Devolin: I think he said he was a Karite. I think there are a hundred or...
    • yamit82: @ Avigail: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5rk2aJENSfU
    • M Devolin: I noticed the “You Jews” thing too, Avigail, a while back in one of his...
    • Avigail: @ yamit82: Video doesn’t exist. Was was that?
  • Obama Placing ‘Heavy Pressure’ on Israel to Cease Fire (65)
    • honeybee: @ M Devolin: Accepted !!!!!!!!!! Do you enjoy chocolate ??????????
    • the phoenix: @ honeybee: No sense to create a boring banana split. A maple sugared beaver tail...
    • M Devolin: I’m bowing low to you, honeybee. Again, sorry.
    • honeybee: @ M Devolin: A low bow will due.for an apology.
    • honeybee: @ the phoenix: I’ll bring the whipped cream and cherries, if you bring the...
  • Ettinger takes on Kerry (6)
    • the phoenix: @ Avigail: but somehow, it worked: Further to this quote, is not blatantly obvious...
    • AbbaGuutuu: The ambassador knows well what he was talking about. That is the type of person that...
    • the phoenix: @ Avigail: but somehow, it worked: From your link under the picture advertisement...
    • Avigail: @ the phoenix: Butthurt they are but somehow, it worked: http://israelmatzav.blogspo...
    • the phoenix: Obama Administration Fuming over Israeli Criticism of Kerry...

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

”souvenirs”

Archives

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


  • November 15, 2012

    Republicans are no different from the Democrats

    After arguing that when it comes to big government spending, the Republicans are no different from the Democrats, McCarthy goes on arguing the same when it comes to embracing the Muslim Brotherhood. Here’s the part dealing with the MB. I especially like the part where he tears into Sen McCain.

    Time To Move On From the GOP? Andrew McCarthy

    [...]
    The Middle East, meanwhile, is aflame. A heavy contributing factor is the American policy of embracing and empowering the Muslim Brotherhood and its Islamists allies, very much including al Qaeda. The Brotherhood is a committed enemy of the United States. In 2007-08, the Justice Department proved that it considers the destruction of Western Civilization from within to be its principal mission in the United States.

    In 2011, President Obama launched an unprovoked war in Libya against the Qaddafi regime, which Republicans had been telling us for eight years had mended its ways and become an American ally – such that Republicans in Congress supported transfers of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Tripoli. Obama’s Libya war was guaranteed to put Islamists in power and put Qaddafi’s arsenal at the disposal of violent jihadists. By refusing to foot the bill, congressional Republicans could have aborted this counter-productive aggression – in the conduct of which the administration consulted the U.N. and the Arab League but not the branch of the U.S. government vested by the Constitution with the power to declare and pay for war. Instead, Republicans lined up behind their transnational progressive wing, led by Senator John McCain, which champions the chimera of sharia-democracy – McCain called the Islamists of Benghazi his “heroes.”


    That pro-Islamist policy is directly responsible for the heedlessness of establishing an American consulate in Benghazi. It led to the attacks on our consulate and the British consulate, and ultimately to the terrorist murder of four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya (weeks after British diplomats had the good sense to leave town).

    The scandal brings into sharp relief an alarming fact that has long been obvious: notwithstanding their abhorrence of America and the West, Islamists are exerting profound influence on our government. Known Islamists and officials with undeniable Islamist connections have infiltrated the government’s policy councils; simultaneously, American policy has moved steadily in favor Islamists – such that the government supports and funds Muslim Brotherhood affiliates that are hostile to us; colludes with these Islamists in purging from agent training materials information demonstrating the undeniable nexus between Islamic doctrine and jihadist terror; collaborates with these Islamists in the effort to impose repressive sharia blasphemy restrictions on our free speech rights; and, we now learn, knowingly misleads the American people on the cause of murderous Islamist tirades, of which the atrocity in Benghazi is only the most recent example.

    A few months back, long before these policies resulted in the killing of our American officials in Libya, and even before these policies abetted the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt (albeit after these policies assured our NATO “ally” Turkey that there would be no blowback for openly supporting Hamas), five conservative Republicans called for an investigation of Islamist influence on our government. Five members of the House – i.e., less than one percent of the Congress – was willing to stand up and confront a profound threat to American national security. The Republican establishment had the opportunity to back them, to prove that the GOP could at least be serious about a profound threat to our national security. Instead, senior Republicans – the Islamist-friendly transnational progressives to whom the party disastrously looks for foreign policy leadership – castigated the five. Speaker Boehner followed suit.

    As the weeks went on, and event after event proved the five conservatives right and the apologists for Islamists wrong, the Republican establishment went mum. When the Islamist empowerment strategy coupled with the Obama administration’s shocking failure to defend Americans under siege resulted in the Benghazi massacre, the Republican establishment was given a rare gift: an opportunity, in the decisive stretch-run of a close presidential contest, to exhibit national security seriousness and distinguish themselves from Obama’s dereliction of duty. To the contrary, Gov. Romney and his top advisors decided to go mum on Benghazi; and congressional Republicans essentially delegated their response to Senators McCain and Lindsey Graham – the very “Islamic democracy” enthusiasts who had championed U.S. intervention on the side of Libyan jihadists in the first place (only after having championed the American embrace of Qaddafi).

    This has to stop. The current crop of Republican leaders has shown no stomach for the fight. In fact, notwithstanding that President Obama lost a remarkable ten million votes from 2008 in his narrow reelection last week (i.e., 13 percent of his support), House Speaker John Boehner is treating him as if he has a mandate to continue his failed policies – as if the country and its representatives have no choice but to roll over on the immensely unpopular Obamacare law and concede on feeding Leviathan even more revenue and borrowing authority without deep cuts in spending (see Jeff Lord’s account, here); as if the country shares Boehner’s insouciance about the Islamist threat.

    By reappointing Boehner and his leadership colleagues today, Republicans are telling us that their answer to failure is more of the same. They have a right to make that choice, but there is no reason why Americans who are serious about our challenges should follow along. The Republican establishment is content with more government, more debt, and more entanglement with our enemies. When called on it, they tell us they are powerless to stem the tide. But the problem is the lack of will and a sense of urgency, not lack of power. It is time to find a new vehicle to lead the cause of limited, fiscally responsible, constitutional government. The Republicans are telling us they are unwilling to be that vehicle. If that is the case, it is time to move on.

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 2:36 am | 10 Comments »

    10 Comments to Republicans are no different from the Democrats

    1. James B - Montreal says:

      American Elites = European Elites = DEVILS :(

      Maybe not as bad as the Eurodevils only because so many Americans have guns.

      GOP is not in the mood to deal with the issue of Islam. More interested in collecting their salaries, their pensions, enjoying great health care ( which they deny to their middle class loyal followers people ), their private gym and the perks ( both financial and sexual ).

      I wish all the best for the Red States to separate and form their own country.

    2. Sam Goldblatt says:

      When Senator Rand Paul mounts a serious challenge for the 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination – he will make McCain look like Meir Kahane. Hillary will be the pro-Israel candidate in the race.

    3. Ted Belman says:

      @ Sam Goldblatt:
      The nomination is Palin’s for the taking.

    4. Laura says:

      I’m in the middle of reading his book “the Grand Jihad”. This book should be required reading for all those dolts in Washington responsible for national security. But they are too dense and too ideologically rigid to be moved from their “religion of peace” mindset in any way.

    5. scottdnok says:

      Makes me long for the good-ol’ days of the Cold War. Will there be a Republican leader that can rally the masses from thier thorazine political shuffle and get things right to vote for something greater than self-interest? Or will it take a concerted multi-generational effort to get non-libs into our educational systems?

    6. Sarah2016 says:

      @ Ted Belman:
      Palin of course will be grest as POTUS2016 but wish she would desengage from McCain who she remains loyal to & is influenced regarding foreign policy. As the article above notes, McCain promotes his neo-Conservative dangerous belief that nation building & elections make for a democracy among backward Islamist barbarian nations/tribes, hence the fatal operation to protect from behind in Libya & maybe evven the gun-running from Lybian Alqaeda to Jihadists in Syria. Unfortunately, Palin defers to McCain (see her latest tweet applauding his expertise regarding Benghazi)& infact supported US flyover type intervention in Libya, too. Would hope that Palin would explicitly denounce any support for Jihadists in contrast to McCain & other neo-conservative/Bushites.

    7. Ted Belman says:

      @ Sarah2016:
      Exactly right. Down with McCain, up with Palin.

    8. Shy Guy says:

      Like the Likud and Labor, ay?!

    9. Georg von Starkermann says:

      Sarah Palin is as dumb as a politician can get. That’s unfortunate. The entire Republican Party is equally as dumb if not finished as a political force in the USA. If this Party could not win an election against the Chicago Thug Machine, what in the future can? Give me a breal. Barack Hussein Obama, a man with a zero past, with a certain zero future gets reelected twice. Are you all kidding me? The Republicans sent up Namby Pamby Walter Mitty against this gangsta, and loses big time. Now you all are endorsing Nutsy Palin for the role of loser in chief. It’s over for the Republicans, get used to it.

    10. Why did Ron Paul lose the nomination?

      he stood for real change.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS

    LOVE




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    July 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites