Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 0
  • Last 7 days: 0
  • Last 30 days: 0
  • Online now: 0
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • Obama Placing ‘Heavy Pressure’ on Israel to Cease Fire (65)
    • honeybee: @ M Devolin: Accepted !!!!!!!!!! Do you enjoy chocolate ??????????
    • the phoenix: @ honeybee: No sense to create a boring banana split. A maple sugared beaver tail...
    • M Devolin: I’m bowing low to you, honeybee. Again, sorry.
    • honeybee: @ M Devolin: A low bow will due.for an apology.
    • honeybee: @ the phoenix: I’ll bring the whipped cream and cherries, if you bring the...
  • 4 killed, at least 6 wounded after mortar fire on Eshkol (12)
    • yamit82: @ Avigail: @ M Devolin: I think he said he was a Karite. I think there are a hundred or...
    • yamit82: @ Avigail: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5rk2aJENSfU
    • M Devolin: I noticed the “You Jews” thing too, Avigail, a while back in one of his...
    • Avigail: @ yamit82: Video doesn’t exist. Was was that?
    • Avigail: @ efirub: LOL. Good catch, but I don’t believe he’s even Jewish. No Jew...
  • Ettinger takes on Kerry (6)
    • the phoenix: @ Avigail: but somehow, it worked: Further to this quote, is not blatantly obvious...
    • AbbaGuutuu: The ambassador knows well what he was talking about. That is the type of person that...
    • the phoenix: @ Avigail: but somehow, it worked: From your link under the picture advertisement...
    • Avigail: @ the phoenix: Butthurt they are but somehow, it worked: http://israelmatzav.blogspo...
    • the phoenix: Obama Administration Fuming over Israeli Criticism of Kerry...

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

”souvenirs”

Archives

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


  • November 18, 2012

    BREAKING: The president knew the truth about Benghazi

    By Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post

    In a blockbuster report, John Solomon, the former Associated Press and Post reporter, has ferreted out the president’s daily brief that informed him within 72 hours of the Sept. 11 attack that the Benghazi attack was a jihadist operation.

    Citing officials directly familiar with the information, Solomon writes in the Washington Guardian that Obama and other administration officials were told that “that the attack was likely carried out by local militia and other armed extremists sympathetic to al-Qaida in the region.”


    He adds:

    The details from the CIA and Pentagon assessments of the killing of Ambassador Chris [Stevens] were far more specific, more detailed and more current than the unclassified talking points that UN Ambassador Susan Rice and other officials used five days after the attack to suggest to Americans that an unruly mob angry over an anti-Islamic video was to blame, officials said.

    Most of the details affirming al-Qaida links were edited or excluded from the unclassified talking points used by Rice in appearances on news programs the weekend after the attack, officials confirmed Friday. Multiple agencies were involved in excising information, doing so because it revealed sources and methods, dealt with classified intercepts or involved information that was not yet fully confirmed, the officials said.

    Solomon cautions that there were bits of evidence pointing to a spontaneous attack but, as Eli Lake of the Daily Beast and others have reported, he writes: “Among the early evidence cited in the briefings to the president and other senior officials were intercepts showing some of the participants were known members or supporters of Ansar al-Sharia — the al-Qaida-sympathizing militia in Libya — and the AQIM, which is a direct affiliate of al-Qaida in northern Africa, the officials said.”

    How could the president and his senior staff then have allowed (or rather, sent) Rice to go out to tell an entirely different tale to the American people on Sept. 16 on five TV shows?

    This report indicates that the president certainly knew that Benghazi wasn’t a rogue movie review gone bad. He had information that plainly spelled out what was later confirmed by additional intelligence. If this information was too confidential to share with the public, at the very least the president and others should not have mislead voters.

    This is a full-blown scandal, and in light of this information, the press corps’s slothful indifference to uncovering the truth at Wednesday’s news conference with Obama is all the more shocking. It is time for the president to come clean. The scandal has now enveloped the Oval Office and will define his second term, if not resolved satisfactorily.

    The irony of this is that Rice may well have been used as a patsy, unaware that she was sent out to spin a misleading tale. My colleagueDana Milbank recounts Rice’s long-standing inability to get along with others and to be circumspect in her pronouncements:

    It’s true that, in her much-criticized TV performance, she was reciting talking points given to her by the intelligence agencies. But that’s the trouble. Rice stuck with her points even though they had been contradicted by the president of the Libyan National Assembly, who, on CBS’s ‘Face the Nation’ just before Rice, said there was “no doubt” that the attack on Americans in Benghazi “was preplanned.” Rice rebutted the Libyan official, arguing — falsely, it turned out — that there was no evidence of such planning. .?.?. Obama can do better at State than Susan Rice.

    Frankly the same could be said of many national security positions at this point. The American people made their choice in November on the president, but it now appears they were duped regarding the real facts concerning Benghazi. What are we going to do about that?

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 12:31 am | 6 Comments »

    6 Comments to BREAKING: The president knew the truth about Benghazi

    1. Bernard Ross says:

      I read that it was an arranged hostage taking with one al quaeda faction that was usurped by another group of jihadists. that the ambassador was meant to be taken hostage and then rescued by seals. Then when it went bad because the seals did not stand down and then it was all a cover up of the deal. Perhaps those who attacked the annex afterwards thought stevens had been rescued and taken there. I also read that the petraeus/allen/broadwell/kelley scandal is a red herring designed to take attention from benghazi and election fraud.

    2. Georg von Starkermann says:

      The President assumes that everyone was as naive he is, so Obama lied thinking that you all was as stupid as he is. I guess that he guessed wrong. No matter, you all voted for him anyway. 70% of eligible Jewish voters voted for this liar. You all received what you bargained for.

    3. AlisonH says:

      Obama’s over the top defense of Susan Rice in his post election press conference reminded me why I detest the man so much.He KNEW the attack on the Benghazi compound was a terrorist attack 72hrs after the event—yet HE sent her out to blame the video.If he didn’t think Rice had “anything to do with Bengazi” then why was she sent out to five different discussion shows to LIE about it? If Obama is worried about Rice’s reputation “being besmirched”(as if it’s the 1940′s & Rice can’t defend herself without a man behind her) then why didn’t HE go out & tell the bloody truth in the first place? Obama needs to be impeached.Nobody died in Watergate & this is much, much worse than that.

    4. Bernard Ross says:

      sudden hamas(MB) provocation of Israel to war is taking media attention off benghazigate and election fraud.

    5. Joseph G Whitson says:

      Focus the investigations on a Botched Kidnapping that resulted in the
      Murder Of Four Americans. Who gains if had been successful?

    6. Erez says:

      More like a run-up for Abbas UN GA state-recognition.”See how we are occupied,attacked, and they are killing our children and women too”.Bernard Ross Said:

      or

      @ Bernard Ross:

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS

    LOVE




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    July 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites