Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 25,376
  • Last 7 days: 96,689
  • Last 30 days: 96,689
  • Online now: 74
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • Islam’s Religious War with Everyone (4)

    • Buzz of the Orient: @Max What are you, a South Park Kid? Blame Canada? For...

    • AbbaGuutuu: While Jews and Christians have the provisional status of People...

    • dove: @ Max: Perhaps the army will be more needed on Canadian soil in the not...

  • Israpundit is pro-Jewish and pro-Israel (39)

    • dove: @ M Devolin: Go Montreal Canadiens!!” You bet! They are off to a good...

    • dove: @ the phoenix: That is a statement that I could still stand by… Again,...

    • the phoenix: @ M Devolin: Thanks Michael, but I am not a hockey fan. Used to...

    • M Devolin: Phoenix and Dove (and I know this is way off topic), I usually...

    • M Devolin: “This must end and the anti semites must be treated as the...

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (149)

    • dweller: @ yamit82: “Question for dweller ‘Does Anal Retentive...

    • dweller: @ honeybee: “What type of wine do you produce?” Among...

    • dweller: @ bernard ross: “[H]e keeps missing what everyone else has no...

  • Israeli, Palestinian teen offenders face different fates (15)

    • M Devolin: OK. Thanks, guys. I will rein it in. Lost control. It’s a...

    • dove: @ the phoenix: Poor Ted can’t sleep. :-( Look at the times of his...

    • the phoenix: @ M Devolin: Devolin, you DO crack me up!!! I just ran with the...

    • dove: @ M Devolin: You still make me laugh! Just a heads up – Ted will...

    • M Devolin: “You are doing what CA does. Always telling us to be more...

  • The moral case of Zionism (4)

    • M Devolin: “Which OTHER country is even REMOTELY wasting time with such...

    • AbbaGuutuu: Viiit Said: Majority of today’s Muslim occupying the Land are not...

  • Anti-Israel BDS Resolutions Seize Campuses in Ontario, Canada (4)

    • AbbaGuutuu: Max Said: awful. please lets have world war – clean up the planet...

  • Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech (2)

    • AbbaGuutuu: Now we are here. Our free speech is threatened by islamic...

Archives

Sponsor

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND

  • December 1, 2012

    After UN Vote, Israel Plans J’lem Housing

    by Alana Goodman, Commentary

    Peace Now is calling this a “deal breaker for the two-state solution,” which is a great joke after yesterday’s UN debacle. This is Israel’s reply to the Palestinian Authority’s resolution, and why not? You’d think shredding the 17-year-old Oslo framework might merit some sort of response.

    The New York Times reports:

      As the United Nations General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to upgrade the Palestinians’ status Thursday night, Israel took steps toward building housing in a controversial area of East Jerusalem known as E1, where Jewish settlements have long been seen as the death knell for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

      A senior Israeli official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said on Friday that the decision was made late Thursday night to move forward on “preliminary zoning and planning preparations” for housing units in E1, which would connect the large settlement of Maale Adumim to Jerusalem and therefore make it impossible to connect the Palestinian cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem to Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem. Israel also authorized the construction of 3,000 housing units in other parts of East Jerusalem and the West Bank, the official said.


    Whatever your thoughts on the settlements, this is hardly an eye-for-an-eye retribution. It’s not an explicit violation of any agreements by Israel. Compare that to the PA’s UN bid, which violates article XXXI, sec. 7 of the Oslo accords, which states “Neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status negotiations.” (It’s not as if the PA was unaware of that — a member of the Fatah Central Committee said earlier this month that the day after the vote, Oslo would be null and void).

    Israel made concessions under Oslo that can’t be unmade. The PA, which has been the beneficiary of these concessions, no longer wants to stand by its own obligations. And what’s Israel’s response? Not to tear up Oslo, not to try to collapse the PA, or block funds. But to resume building in East Jerusalem, something that wasn’t considered an insurmountable obstacle to talks until recently. You can argue the construction is unhelpful, but how much does that matter when the PA is openly flouting its signed agreements on one side and Hamas is shooting missiles across the border on the other?

    And, in a way, maybe this actually is necessary for a future two-state agreement. How can the Israeli public be expected to agree to painful concessions if its leaders won’t even hold the Palestinians to account when past agreements are broken? The settlement construction is a way for Israel to show there are penalties for violating agreements while still staying within the boundaries of Oslo.

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 9:22 am | 7 Comments »

    7 Comments to After UN Vote, Israel Plans J’lem Housing

    1. Ted Belman says:

      Israel has wanted to build in E1 for many years and even built a by-pass road to handle Ramallah/Bethlehem traffic.
      But she refrained from doing so due to huge pressure from the US. I would be surprised if the plans for zoning etc weren’t well on their way.

      Planning is one thing, building is another.

    2. rongrand says:

      @ Ted Belman:

      Build baby build.

      I said many times Israel needs to continue to build communities and not worry about outside pressure.

      Israel needs to do what is best for Israel and her people.

      The US needs to stand by the Sovereign Nation of Israel.

      If the US needs to take a side, it should be with our only true friend and trusted ally in the ME, ISRAEL.

      Build, build and build the Holy Land belongs to you Israel.

    3. rongrand says:

      rongrand says:
      Your comment is awaiting moderation.

      Who said the boogie man doesn’t reside here.

    4. Ivan Pope says:

      “Neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status negotiations.”
      I guess Israel actually broke Oslo when it unilaterally pulled out of Gaza then.

    5. Ted Belman says:

      @ Ivan Pope:
      Wrong. The unilateral withdrawal from Gaza did not change its status.

    6. Bernard Ross says:

      It makes no sense to continue to discuss the obligations of Oslo. The UN has killed Oslo definitely by voting the Pal state as opposed to it evolving from negotiations. Oslo is de facto dead and it is only Israel, as usual, who talks about its observation. Pals dont refer to Oslo, unlike the Jews, they refer to what they want(also unlike Israel who has no consensus of what they want to achieve). Jews apparently have no interest in the west bank or gaza beyond east jesusalem and existing settlements. The jews may win wars of survival but the pals will win the rest because Jews cant agree. While the Jews are busy disagreeing the crocodile eats them. The Jews cannot express their goals because they cant agree on what they are. The jews are their own greatest enemy. All current failures emanate from the inability of Israeli Jews to agree. If they had agreed on what they wanted so would everyone else, now it is too late. All this moaning and whining about Obama, US, UN, EU etc is secondary. It has almost become a childish tantrum on the right. Yes, they are all POS but their position cannot be more than that of the Israeli Jews. The “light to the world” which they have shown is that of a lack of desire to accept the land of Israel and the world is merely accepting their decision.
      The only way that Israel will now get the west bank is through a paradigm shift in culture and leadership. At this point diplomacy and PR cannot change the situation, and then change it to what? Only unilateralism and force can change it now and under what scenario and who is capable of such will and courage? It appears apparent that decisions have already been made intentionally or through default of non-action. The policy of “wait and see” at work(this is a euphemism for incompetence).

    7. Bernard Ross says:

      @ Ted Belman: My gut tells me that this is part of the “agreement under the table”. Everyone is getting something. It looks to me that defacto positions will proceed under the appearance of faux “disagreements” whereby none of the constituents leaderships can make above the table deals. Some things will coalesce and reach conclusion and others wont. In the de facto mid term the Jews will solidify east jerusalem and the major settlements, retain the Jordan valley indefinitely until future agreement, gaza might become relatively pacified if the iranian influence is removed. I think there will be an appearance of “disagreement” but it appears to me that there is an under the table interim agreement. Even 2 states disagree on boundaries and engage in war(Georgia, russia?). The argument will devolve from occupation to one of belligerency and border disputes(georgia, russia,etc). Perhaps what appears to be Israeli indecision has been decided but that the “street” makes it impossible to proceed above the table with the agreement. The question is how will the PA proceed as an operative state in all the areas of economics,etc; Both sides will be restrained by “international law” whether overtly or covertly. Perhaps this is what the leaderships both want: the appearance of being forced by circumstances. It looks as if the ME is being re drawn and the key will be Iran. My wager is that the big arab family money wants to get beyond the israeli pal issue and are thinking about their future situation re oil depletion, power retention, personal security, stability as individual families.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    April 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Sponsors

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites