Israpundit Digest

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 22,028
  • Last 7 days: 146,500
  • Last 30 days: 536,107
  • Online now: 84
fabricant de lanterneaux

Chit Chat

Recent Comments

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

Advertisments

”souvenirs”

December 2014
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

SUPPORT ISRAPUNDIT

 Donate USA  Donate
ISL
 Donate
CAN
  • January 12, 2013

    Anti-Zionism by stealth

    By DAVID MATAS, JPOST

    The recent decision of the European Court of Justice is not an isolated incident. It is just the most recent example of the continuing global pattern of anti-Zionism by stealth.
    The European Parliament building in Strasbourg

    The European Parliament building in Strasbourg Photo: REUTERS/Vincent Kessler
    Anti-Zionism corrupts democratic institutions because it works in secrecy. Canada lived through the experience with Rights and Democracy, a now defunct government-created NGO.

    A recent judgment of the European Court of Justice reminds us that the Canadian experience was part of a global pattern of non-disclosure of information about taxpayer funded grants to anti-Zionist NGOs.


    NGO Monitor attempted to get from the European Union disclosure of the evaluation of the grants the EU lavished on anti-Zionist NGOs. The European Commission refused to provide the information. NGO Monitor president Gerald Steinberg took the European Commission to court.

    The European Court of Justice in late November 2012 upheld the non-disclosure decision. The commission reasoned that, with public disclosure of the evaluations of the grants to the beneficiary NGOs, “there is a high risk that information would be used by opposing groups or persons to damage the reputation of those NGOs.” The court limited itself to determining whether procedures were respected, holding that the decision on the merits fell within the discretion of the commission.

    The notion that information about evaluation of public funding should be withheld because its release might damage the reputation of the beneficiary is antithetical to democratic principles. The public has a right to know how their money is spent and whether the money is well spent or not.

    THOUGH THE form of non-disclosure was different, the effort in Canada to hide from accountability was the same. When Israel began Operation Cast Lead in December 2008, to defend itself against rocket attacks from Hamas in Gaza, the staff of Rights and Democracy, a government-funded agency, attempted to get approval of a one-sided press release condemning Israel from its board of directors. Then-acting board chairman Jacques Gauthier, on behalf of the board, in early January 2009, refused.

    The staff then did an end run around the board refusal, deciding at a management committee meeting in late January 2009 to use discretionary funding, without disclosure to the board, to pay Al Mezan, Al Haq and B’Tselem for confabulated, decontextualized “research” on the Gaza conflict. This “research” claimed that Israel had committed a wide range of human rights violations for what in reality was nothing more than self-defense efforts against Hamas attacks.

    This “research,” at least in the short term, bamboozled Richard Goldstone and became the backbone of the one-sided Report of the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, chaired by Goldstone. Goldstone, when he got hold of the real facts, eventually repudiated the report under his name.

    The Rights and Democracy board finance committee innocently attempted, at its meeting in March 2009, to find out how discretionary funding was being spent. The staff flatly refused to give the committee that information, taking the bizarre position that only the full board was entitled to disclosure and not the finance committee.

    The reason for the stonewalling became evident when the information was eventually released to the board (but only after the staff had lined up their friends on the board to support the staff position). In January 2010, after the board composition changed, taking away the staff’s supporting majority, the board voted, belatedly, to repudiate the grants.

    Like Goldstone, Rights and Democracy president Rémy Beauregard had an about-face. He voted with the new majority in favor of the motion repudiating the grants which he had earlier approved. He acknowledged at the board meeting that “we could have done our homework better.” Tragically, he died of a heart attack that night, leading to a sustained public controversy.

    The grant beneficiaries were themselves not open. Al Haq well over a year later disclosed the grant in its financial statement as a contribution to core funding.

    B’Tselem, on its website, does not disclose the funding.

    Information about the grant, in Hebrew only, dated a year and a half after the payment, is found on the website of GuideStar, an organization which gathers and publishes information about Israeli non-profits.

    Al Mezan, on the cover of a report published in Arabic in June 2009 and in English in August 2009, “expresses appreciation” to Rights and Democracy for its “major contribution to the success of this documentation project.” The report does not indicate how much money was given or when.

    The government of Canada through its 2012 budget abolished Rights and Democracy. At some point, an institution needs to be established to replace it. All government agencies, including the European Commission and the eventual successor to Rights and Democracy, though, need to lay in their defenses to prevent their seizure by staff running their own agenda without disclosure.

    The recent decision of the European Court of Justice is not an isolated incident. It is just the most recent example of the continuing global pattern of anti-Zionism by stealth.

    The writer is an international human rights lawyer based in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and the longest serving board member of Rights and Democracy.

    Share Button
  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 5:36 pm | 13 Comments »

    13 Comments to Anti-Zionism by stealth

    1. Bernard Ross says:

      Like Goldstone, Rights and Democracy president Rémy Beauregard had an about-face. He voted with the new majority in favor of the motion repudiating the grants which he had earlier approved. He acknowledged at the board meeting that “we could have done our homework better.” Tragically, he died of a heart attack that night, leading to a sustained public controversy.

      Where is the tragedy in a crook, attempting to blood libel and harm the Jews, dying of a heart attack? War needs to be waged agianst these termites and it should bein in Israel against the leftist Jewish NGO’s. Those working to expose the way in which these crooks are being funded by govts are to be lauded.

      The commission reasoned that, with public disclosure of the evaluations of the grants to the beneficiary NGOs, “there is a high risk that information would be used by opposing groups or persons to damage the reputation of those NGOs.

      NOt only the reputations of the NGO’s but the commissioners should be investigated for corruption: Mossad should get the skinny on these crooks and espose them in compromising situations. I am sure they are infested with corruption. The European commission is known to be an ongoing corrupt criminal enterprise, as evidenced by past scandals, and the Europeans are well deserving of such service.

    2. Dean says:

      Israel knows who the culprits are – it is strange that they just don’t ban them. No country has an obligation to treat enemy NGO’s with the respect and dignity that they do not deserve. When they enter the country, arrest them, try them, fine them and jail them if necessary. Surely there must be laws against lying, corruption, falsifying information that vilifies and endangers Israel, Israeli citizens and the Jewish people. We have had enough Hitler-style propaganda and there is no way that Israel should be complying/allowing the leftist Nazis and their Islamist financiers to run us into the ground once again.

    3. Sam Goldblatt says:

      George Soros and Bill Gates fund a lot of these groups. Gates’ wife Melinda is a close friend of the former Jordanian Queen, the rabid Israel hater Queen Noor.

    4. Andy Lewis says:

      @ Sam Goldblatt:

      And not only that, but Windoze sux.

    5. Nigel Shaw says:

      bla bla bla

    6. steven l says:

      The war of the white of the West against the Jews goes unabated.
      IL needs to dramatically develop its relationship with the Far-East.
      At least they do not have this antisemitism in the “genes”.
      Jealousy is an incurable and fatal condition.

    7. Freedom of speech can be made to apply only to citizens. Israel can compel foreign agents ( based on funding) to register and fully disclose if it likes, on pain of confiscation. Aid directly to State organs would, of course, be exempt, but not to political parties.

      This would, of course, limit corruption, and might not get the Knesset votes needed. Dunno if under Israeli law the Prime Minister can do this without Knesset support.

      In the most egregious cases of terrorist funding there is also the law and the Shin Bet.

      Handling of funding outside Israel is quite another matter

      @ Dean:

    8. As to the presenting incident, the only remaining recourse is to national governments of the EU, and to any funding discretion they may have toward the EU. When lawfare, legislation, and appeal to public opinion fails, wringing one’s hands is useless. Better to move on to (legal) action than has a good chance of success.@ David Sternlight:

    9. steven l says:

      While the EU is leading a war against Israel, the Islamists supported by the fanatics from Saudi Arabia and the countries of the Gulf have opened multiple fronts against the West. The West refuses still to admit (and to act accordingly) that there is a war between the Islamic world and the West.

    10. yamit82 says:

      Sunday, November 13, 2011
      EU threatens Israel over NGO legislation (Israel Matzav)

    11. yamit82 says:

      New Israel Fund’s Agenda Exposed: Can’t Beat Them? Join Them!
      Raananim Religious Zionist Movement exposes a video interview which shows that the NIF plans to target religious Zionist groups from within.

      Protest Against ‘Bribe Checks’ from the New Israel Fund

      Members of Raananim protested outside the offices of Ne’emanei Torah Va’Avodah and called them to stop accepting money from the NIF.

    12. yamit82 says:

      NIF Exposes its own Involvement in Social Protests
      A message on the New Israel Fund’s website has revealed the radical organization’s involvement in the social protests last summer.

      Thursday, November 08, 2012
      Anti-Israel NGOs keep on pumping out lies

    13. yamit82 says:

      Read, it’s all here:
      Israel watchdog of anti Israel NGO’s:
      NGO Monitor Reports

    Site Membership



    Editor


      Ted Belman

      tbelman3- at- gmail.com

    Search

    Polls

    Why doesn't Bibi want to go "all the way"

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    MANTUA BOOKS (recommended)




    Tolerism2

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS


    Iran islam


    apes

    LOVE


    Sharing

    mandate4

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites