Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 25,445
  • Last 7 days: 117,841
  • Last 30 days: 117,841
  • Online now: 79
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • The Jewish Question (70)

    • yamit82: @ dweller: Your actions were treasonous and by rights you should...

    • dweller: @ honeybee: “I watched a program called ‘Brothers at...

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (168)

    • dweller: @ Max: “There were so many chances to annihilate Hamas....

    • dweller: @ yamit82: “Not that you’re all that much of a Jew even today....

    • the phoenix: @ honeybee: Spanish with a Castillian accent Do you , or anyone...

  • Israeli, Palestinian teen offenders face different fates (20)

    • M Devolin: “I do have different opinion on some scriptures because of...

    • AbbaGuutuu: mar55 Said: Thank you Ted. Can you recommend a forum for Mr....

    • AbbaGuutuu: honeybee Said: didn’t need sympathetic ears, needed guns!!!!!! I...

  • Does Israel’s triumph mean we are guilty? (10)

    • yamit82: SHmuel HaLevi 2 Said: The Jewish people in Eretz Israel has been...

    • yamit82: ArnoldHarris Said: — If it were up to me, I would want to foment...

    • SHmuel HaLevi 2: @ mar55: Yamit is extraordinarily informed and in constant...

    • mar55: @ SHmuel HaLevi 2: @ yamit82: Whenever BB or someone from the Israeli...

    • ArnoldHarris: I am as glad as a man can be in that no Arab associated with...

  • Israpundit is pro-Jewish and pro-Israel (77)

    • mar55: @ bernard ross: I have a problem with trying to excuse CA behaviour...

    • AbbaGuutuu: honeybee Said: I am a Honey Bear. I like both HBs and the Honey...

    • honeybee: @ AbbaGuutuu: I am a Honey Bear.

    • AbbaGuutuu: honeybee Said: Sweet honeybee, XXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I said...

  • Ban Muslims from Temple Mount, too (10)

    • diana: Mira: I think it’s a great idea. I’ll send them some...

  • Islam’s Religious War with Everyone (21)

    • dove: @ honeybee: Do you need a load of ” Oslo Accords No, but thanks for the...

  • Egypt and Saudi Arabia Battle the Jihadist Current (1)

    • bernard ross: US lifting freeze on aid to Egypt White House to seek...

Archives

Sponsor

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND

  • February 1, 2013

    Lapid is a chameleon

    Caveat emptor: The illusion of a political Center

    By MARTIN SHERMAN, JPOST

    Into they Fray: Time and time again the Israeli voter has been hoodwinked into voting for allegedly centrist parties only to have them evaporate later.

    This [remark by Yair Lapid] showed a kind of crude contempt, mixed with a whiff of racism, for those whom Lapid does not consider part of his political camp. Zoabi was duly elected to the Knesset by Israeli voters who supported her party.

      – “Yair Lapid’s mental block,” Haaretz editorial, January 25

    It seems that neither the protests nor the vote for Yair Lapid were ever about “social justice,” in the sense of narrowing the gap between the upper and lower deciles. On the contrary: If Lapid… finds a way to get money from others and bring it to his electorate, as they hope he will, then the income gap… will only grow wider

      – “The wealthy minions of Yair Lapid,” – Haaretz, January 27

    Yair Lapid’s intention of joining up with Netanyahu buries any hope of anything moving on the diplomatic front in the coming years; there’s no point in denying it…. Don’t get your hopes up in the socioeconomic realm either… Lapid won’t fight crony capitalism – because he believes in it; he merely wants to harness it to meet his own goals.

      – “Lapid is Netanyahu’s new twin,” Haaretz, January 28

    Well, it didn’t take long, did it? In fact, all it took was a brief statement by Lapid that he would not join up with anti-Zionist lists to prevent the appointment of Binyamin Netanyahu to head the next governing coalition to incur the wrath of the far-left Haaretz daily.

    Troubling questions

    The charge of racist prejudice was echoed by the head of the left-wing Meretz faction, Zehava Gal-On. Under the emotive headline “Meretz leader equates Lapid to racist Beitar fans,” Ynet reported that Gal-On had posted the following attack on Lapid on Facebook: “Racism has become ordinary, so it seems natural that Yair Lapid is dismissing out-of-hand the Arab factions with the disparaging remark ‘We will not form an obstructing bloc with the Haneen Zoabis.’” Now, while I commend Lapid on his decision not join forces with the likes of Haneen Zoabi who openly identifies with Israel’s most implacable foes, this fierce assault on him from sources that only a short time ago would well have been considered almost political affiliates is remarkable.

    Indeed, it raises serious questions not only regarding the authenticity of many of Lapid’s positions as presented to the public in his election campaign, but also to the gullibility, immaturity and political amnesia of the Israeli electorate – as well as a disturbing lack of depth and direction in the country’s political discourse.

    After all, up until recently there was little daylight between the opinions Lapid was expounding and those held by the supporters of Meretz and the readers of Haaretz.

    ‘Palestinian flag will fly in east Jerusalem’

    Thus, while in his election campaign, Lapid categorically rejected any division of Jerusalem, this was until recently not the case. Quite the opposite.

    Kindly compare and contrast.

    His manifesto waxes so poetic on the city that one might mistake it as being lifted from the platform of Naftali Bennett’s right-wing Bayit Yehudi: “Jerusalem is the eternal capital of Israel and its unity is a national symbol of the first degree.

    Jerusalem will remain united under Israeli sovereignty, for Jerusalem is not just a place or a city but the center of the Jewish-Israel ethos and the holy place to which Jews have turned their eyes throughout the generations.”

    Yet, only a few years ago (May 8, 2008), he expressed a very different position.

    As Haaretz’s Barak Ravid acerbically points out in his trenchant “Will Yair Lapid divide Jerusalem?” (January 28, 2013): “In an interview to Germany’s Der Speigel from May 2008, Yair Lapid unequivocally supported the division of Jerusalem and fiercely attacked the Jewish West Bank settlers whose votes he courted in his recent election campaign.”

    In that interview Lapid confidently asserted that “everyone knows how [the Israeli-Palestinian conflict] will end,” approvingly forecasting that “the Palestinian flag will fly on public buildings in east Jerusalem.”

    Endorsing ‘the right to hate’

    Lapid’s refusal to forge any alliance with the anti-Zionist Arab parties is a welcome development.

    However, some might that it strikes a discordant note vis-a-vis sentiments he stridently expressed in the past.

    For example, in an article titled “The right to hate” (Ynet, May 30, 2009), he fiercely attacked those supporting legal sanctions against Israeli citizens who publicly reject Israel as a Jewish and democratic state or mark Independence Day as a day of mourning. He thus implicitly, but unequivocally, endorsed their right to commemorate the establishment of their own state as a catastrophe – a position that Haneen Zoabi would eagerly embrace.

    Interestingly, others on Lapid’s Yesh Atid list, such as former journalist Ofer Shelah, have expressed harsh criticism of any legal restrictions being placed on Israeli citizens articulating their grief at Israel’s victory in 1948 over its enemies, and at its success in foiling their intention to annihilate it.

    In an article, “The right is overcome by fear,” published almost contemporaneously with Lapid’s (NRG, May 31, 2009), Shelah, who is slated to be charged with charting Yesh Atid’s political/security positions, somewhat abstrusely, tried to dismiss any legal restrictions on public commemoration of sorrow at Israel prevailing over the Arabs’ attempt to destroy it, as akin to previous legal attempts to prohibit homosexuality. Go figure.

    Metamorphosis on settlers?

    The fact that Lapid chose to launch his campaign in Ariel, a city located well across the Green Line, together with his statement that “there is no map on which Ariel isn’t a part of the state of Israel,” reflects a stunning metamorphosis in his former vehemently adversarial attitude to the settlers and the settlements.

    After all, in the not too distant past, Lapid regularly lambasted the “settlers” for virtually every malaise afflicting the country and its citizens.

    In the previously mentioned Der Spiegel interview, he places equal responsibility on the settlers and the Arab terror organizations for any future loss of life. Judge for yourselves: “The greatest tragedy of the Israeli- Palestinian conflict is that everyone knows how it will end…. The only unanswered question is how many more people will have to die along the way. And so we will fight against the extremists on both sides, including our extremists, the settlers.”

    As late as February 10, 2010, in an article titled “Do settlers care about us?” he implies that the real threat to Israel is not its enemies, but “4 percent of Israelis,” i.e. the settlers, who endanger all the others who “must bear the results of a religious ideology they do not share.”

    According to Lapid, the settlers are to blame for a litany of ills: “disintegration, international isolation, and the loss of our national identity.”

    And of course it is the settlers’ fault, not Palestinians’, that “so much of our energy is invested in a struggle with the Palestinians [which] exacts a heavy price, and keeps on increasing with every failed round.”

    Infuriating arrogance

    Last week, I pointed out that Lapid used his widely read column to berate the opponents of the 2005 disengagement, warning of the dire consequences and unbridgeable rift that would result, if they succeeded in persuading the public that expulsion of Jews from Gaza should be aborted. Six months after its completion, in “The essence of being Israeli” (February 15, 2006), he crowed, “Disengagement succeeded because Israelis remembered how to behave as a nation.”

    However, several months later in “Things we couldn’t say during disengagement” (October 13, 2006), when its catastrophic failure was undeniably apparent, he published a galling admission that the disengagement “was never about the Palestinians, demography, the endeavor for peace, [or reducing] the burden on the IDF.”

    With infuriating arrogance, Lapid revealed that the real reason for the traumatic displacement and deportation of thousands of productive citizens was that “the Israelis merely felt that the settlers should be taught a lesson in humility and perhaps in democracy, too.”

    Yet now, the newly metamorphosed Lapid proclaims that not only must Jerusalem remain undivided under Israeli sovereignty as a “national symbol of the first degree,” but that the major settlement blocs including Ariel, Gush Etzion and Ma’aleh Adumin (which presumably includes – gasp – the controversial E1 area) must do so as well.

    Does Lapid – or anyone on his list – honestly believe that there is any serious Palestinian partner who would – indeed, could – countenance agreeing even to start negotiating on those terms – especially in light of the Lapid-endorsed disengagement, which conveyed an unequivocal message to the Arabs: If the Jews are confronted with sufficient violence and resolve, they will capitulate and yield everything for nothing.

    Core vs peripheral constituency

    Lapid’s past positions are important because it was they that precipitated the emergence of the political profile through which he garnered his initial political support and generated his initial electoral momentum. This is what generated his core constituency, which clearly was drawn to, and identified with, his harsh condemnation of the settlers and his identification of them as a source of much of life’s difficulties, both on the personal and the national level.

    However, it appears that much of Lapid’s electoral success came from an additional source, the votes of those who up to the last minute remained undecided, and at the “eleventh hour” chose to cast their ballots for his Yesh Atid, because they found no other acceptable alternative.

    It is more than likely that this last-minute surge of support – Lapid’s peripheral constituency – was influenced more by exposure to his later (campaign-generated) perspectives, rather than his earlier ones. Indeed, had not Lapid very publicly toned down his anti-settler animosity, it is quite likely that many of his later supporters would have voted Naftali Bennett – or abstained.

    Risk of rupture

    This is likely to place severe strains on the integrity of his party. Clearly it will be difficult, if not impossible, to satisfy both his core constituency, which was attracted to him by his previously articulated positions, and his peripheral constituency, which was drawn by his later ones. This is particularly true with regard to what is referred to as the peace process. After all, it is clear that no semblance of progress can be made in this regard if Yesh Atid upholds its commitments to its peripheral constituency to retain a united Jerusalem and the settlement blocs.

    However, many in his core constituency – including dovish people among his MKs, such as former Meretz member Yael German, might find such “intransigence” unacceptable, especially if coupled with peer pressure from outside the party.

    If the hardline Bayit Yehudi – together with a considerably more right-wing than heretofore Likud – form the next government, making “progress” with the Palestinians even more difficult, the potential for fracture in the newly coalesced Yesh Atid might become ever-more tangible.

    Caveat emptor

    Should Yesh Atid rupture and disperse, it would be merely par for the course. As Daphne Netanyahu points out in a telling review of the fate of “centrist parties” (“Israel’s own tyranny of cliches,” Maraah Magazine, January 2013), Israel’s political landscape is littered with the carcasses of such entities.

    Prior to each election for the past 35 years some such party has arisen – and then fallen.

    Such endeavors included Shinui, the Democratic Movement for Change, the Center Party, Kadima and now Yesh Atid.

    Time and time again, the Israeli voter has been hoodwinked into voting for such allegedly centrist parties only to have them evaporate before his eyes.

    Typically, these parties have fielded star-studded lineups of public figures of experience and prominence – from IDF chiefs of staff, generals, heads of security services, internationally renowned intellectuals, and seasoned politicians.

    Some have soared in the polls only to fizzle out and vanish, usually after one, at the most two, terms, leaving behind only disappointment and disillusionment.

    Two pointed questions thus arise: What reason is there to believe that the untried and untested Lapid can succeed, when so many more accomplished figures, with far greater accumulated achievement, have failed? And why does the Israeli electorate repeat a depressingly flat learning curve and persist in pursuing the elusive chimera of an illusionary “Center”?

    Martin Sherman (www.martinsherman.net) is the founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies.

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 11:11 pm | 9 Comments »

    9 Comments to Lapid is a chameleon

    1. Alan says:

      Is Yair Lapid the Chuckie Hagel of Israel?

    2. uzitiger says:

      Lapid is a chameleon but Pipi Netanyau (Peresrahu) is a snake and has a forked tongue. Netanyahu is the one destroying Jewish homes in Yehuda and Shomron in the middle of the night using his non Jewish black uniformed storm troopers who sadistically beat mothers of infants and children then destroy their homes. Pipi has Arabs waiting to ransack the wreckage and steak whatever they please while calling himself a right winger. The duplicitous Lickud party is the one responsible for the destruction of more Jewish homes and driving Jews out of Jewish land more than anyone else since the founding of the state.

      Lapid is the torch of darkness like his father who share hatred of the Jewish faith. He earned the title of ocher Yisrael; a defiler of the Jewish people? Lapid and Netanyahu are both bad for Israel especially if and when they’ll team up.

    3. Shmuel HaLevi says:

      @ Alan:
      Lapid’s father was a virulent anti-religious man and anti-Semitic in camealeon suit. His party was a one season party which served Sharon during the “disengagement”. Lapid the father took advantage to be the most dedicated destroyer of “Gush Katif” and the Jews in there.
      The top layer of his party was recorded saying “there is nothing wrong being a bit anti-Semitic”.
      Lapid the son was used bt Netanyahu who conspired against the Likud list which did not any longer included his cronnies. Netanyahu intentionally attacked Jewish groups so voters would leave the Likud and join at the last moment the young Lapid.
      Lapid has no education and tried to obtain by chicanery a University degree, was found out and the ploy exposed. He did not either serve in Tzahal but laterally as a “correspondent” in the Radio Statin a position that his father may have arranged.
      We really have very easily manipulated electorate. Only that way such element could possibly obtain so much support.

    4. Shy Guy says:

      Alan Said:

      Is Yair Lapid the Chuckie Hagel of Israel?

      More like the John Kerry.

      Folk’s, you’re talking about a guy who has less experience in politics than Obama did voting “present” as a useless senator. The guy is a TV talk show personality, for crying out loud.

      19 seats. Stupid Jews.

    5. Laura says:

      We really have very easily manipulated electorate. Only that way such element could possibly obtain so much support.

      Sounds pretty much like the American electorate.

    6. Shy Guy says:

      Laura Said:

      Sounds pretty much like the American electorate.

      I have comments here before that there are parallels. So, too, the Likud’s shift to the left is similar to what’s happened to the Republican Party over the last several decades. When you compromise your conservative principals to win popularity, you slide left. And then you slide some more.

    7. jew says:

      Lapid and his “party” will explode and decompose quickly, because of the many lies and contradictions but also because of his astronomic ego.

      there was, lahvdil, a similar personallity in germany some years ago: the young and good-looking Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg was nominated minister in 2009 and within a few months arose to the be german’s most popular politician, much more than the chancelor herself. many people saw him as the next chancelor. as minister he started a lot of reforms and new projects and nobody understood how he intended to finance and realize those reforms and projects. but then, before he even could start realizing them, it was discovered that his PhD thesis was a plagiat, e.g. he simply did copy-and-paste from other publications without marking them as citations. so, only two years after being nominated minister, he was forced to resign in 2011, and his political career was finished. he took his wife and children and went to live in the US, far from germany in order to escape the shame.

      i think, Lapid won’t last much longer than this german guy.

    8. Yackums says:

      Shy Guy Said:

      Alan Said:

      Is Yair Lapid the Chuckie Hagel of Israel?

      More like the John Kerry.
      Folk’s, you’re talking about a guy who has less experience in politics than Obama did voting “present” as a useless senator. The guy is a TV talk show personality, for crying out loud.
      19 seats. Stupid Jews.

      I think it was William F. Buckley who once said he’d rather be governed by 100 people picked at random from the Boston telephone book than by career politicians.

      Lapid’s list, in case you didn’t notice, is not 19 clones of Yair Lapid. It does, however, lack noticeably for career politicians.

      Maybe the Jews aren’t as stupid as you think.

      (Full disclosure: I did NOT vote for Lapid.)

      And to those complaining that his current opinions on various issues are different than those he held in 2008 or 2006 or 1996 – what, you’ve never changed your mind about anything? It’s fairly common knowledge that a lot of Israelis have changed their minds about the 2005 Hitnatkut/Gerush/Disengagement/(insert your preferred moniker) in the intervening years since being confronted with the results. Many readers of this forum, myself included, are people who once voted straight Democrat in US elections but now wouldn’t think of it.

      If anyone has examples of Lapid currently and simultaneously espousing conflicting positions depending on his audience, then you can make the chameleon charge stick. Otherwise you’re just mudslinging.

    9. Shy Guy says:

      Yackums Said:

      Lapid’s list, in case you didn’t notice, is not 19 clones of Yair Lapid.

      Actually, they are. Each one individually is a nobody or a certified failure.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    April 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Sponsors

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites