LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS

THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


February 4, 2013

Despite the denials, a major explosion occurred at Fordow

Earlier today I googled for anything I could find on the explosion. It has been out of the news for last 5 days. But when last mentioned, the following denied that the explosion took place; Iran, White House, IAEA. Though London Times reported that Israel officials somewhat confirmed the blast. There was also an article reporting that satellite photos showed no rescue activity the day after the alleged blast. Only WND stood by the story and added to it. I trust them. Ted Belman

NORTH KOREANS AMONG 40 DEAD AT IRAN NUKE PLANT

by REZA KAHLILI, World Net Daily 2013-02-04

The explosions at Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility Jan. 21, killed at least 40 people, including two North Koreans, WND learned Sunday.

Meanwhile, the Islamic regime is labeling WND a “mouthpiece of the CIA” for its exclusive reporting of the blasts.

The bodies of 11 of the technicians and scientists are beyond recognition, a member of the security forces at the facility told WND. According to this source, 60 others are in critical condition and have been transferred to the central base of the 27th Division of Mohammad Rassool Allah, which is equipped with a modern medical facility and is between Tehran and Qom.


At the time of the explosions, the source said, 203 Iranian scientists and technicians along with 16 North Koreans had been logged in at the site, though the initial report listed 240 people.

The day before the explosions, the North Koreans had brought in new equipment, described by the source as touch-screen monitors the size of TVs that were installed in the monitoring room and some new parts that were installed in the centrifuges before the start of the enrichment process.

The explosions were reported exclusively by WND Jan. 24, with updates Jan. 27, Jan. 29, Jan. 30 and Jan. 31, and that the trapped workers included 16 North Koreans: 14 technicians and two military attaches.

The source said many of the centrifuges have been destroyed and rescuers have still not accessed the reserves of the 20 percent stock of enriched uranium to assess the level of radiation.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has not visited the site since the explosions despite media rumors that it has, the source said. Because the regime’s Ministry of Defense covers the project at Fordow, officials of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization were allowed to visit it on Jan. 5.

In an unusual move, the IAEA issued a brief statement on Jan. 29: “We understand that Iran has denied that there has been an incident at Fordow. This is consistent with our observations.”

IAEA spokeswoman Gill Tudor emailed that response to reporters. However, when pushed by WND, Tudor could neither confirm nor deny the incident had taken place and did not say whether inspectors had visited the site after the explosions, despite some media reports that it had.

Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi, representatives of the supreme leader and intelligence officers from both the Ministry of Intelligence and the Revolutionary Guards have visited parts of the site that have been cleared as secure. A counterintelligence committee has been formed to investigate the incident, which already has been called an act of sabotage, with Israel the prime suspect.

The regime is debating about how to explain the incident at a later date depending on the level of destruction, the source said, but because of internal rifts among President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Majlis (parliament), Ahmadinejad or others connected to his team will soon reveal the incident.

Regime media have solely based their denial that the explosions occurred on a statement by White House spokesman Jay Carney, who told reporters on Jan. 28: “We have no information to confirm the allegations in the (WND) report and we do not believe the report is credible.”

However, the Islamic regime’s official news agency, IRNA, in a report on Jan. 30, called WND a “mouthpiece of the CIA” and its reporting mere propaganda by the West before the start of renewed negotiations between Iran and the 5-plus-1 powers – the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China, plus Germany.

IRNA’s report said: “WND, which publishes under the direct control of the CIA, on Thursday, Jan. 24, reported that an explosion took place at Fordow that destroyed much of the facility and trapped 240 personnel. WND in its report interestingly touches on the previous sabotage at Fordow and in a coordinated effort, the White House denies having information and the Israelis state their happiness of such an event. The propaganda by the West continues with the BBC reporting that Iran has denied the report put out by Reza Kahlili, a former CIA spy in the Revolutionary Guards.”

IRNA, in its extensive report, covered all the recent WND revelations about Iran’s nuclear program and Russia’s involvement in it. It said that “Two days prior to the publication of the explosion report, WND reported that an Iranian spy in the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, has informed the Islamic republic that Tel Aviv and certain Western countries have plans on covert ops for the destruction of Iranian nuclear sites. This news agency (WND) in another report states that the recent negotiations between the IAEA and the Iranian counterparts for the inspection of the Parchin military site was a failure and that Iran will resort to publication of documents from the Shah era to further pressure the U.S.”

IRNA concluded that “the West knows this is psychological warfare (and it) will not disrupt the goals of (Iran) in the negotiations, but it tries to fill that void with propaganda against clear and logical policies of the Islamic Republic, which is the result of their hatred against the government of Iran.”

The regime media have also attacked Hamidreza Zakeri, the former officer of Iran’s ministry of intelligence, now living in Europe, who has provided information on the Fordow explosion and other valuable insights into the regime’s illicit activities.

The Fordow nuclear site was central to the regime’s nuclear bomb program, built 300 feet under the belly of a mountain where over 2,700 centrifuges were enriching uranium to the 20 percent level. That level could within weeks be further enriched to nuclear weapons grade.

In a letter to the IAEA two days after the reported explosions, Iran said it plans to install thousands of its upgraded centrifuges at the Natanz facility. The source stated that this was as a direct result of the explosions at Fordow.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and author of the award-winning book “A Time to Betray” (Simon & Schuster, 2010). He serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI).

Posted by Ted Belman @ 4:18 pm | 5 Comments »



5 Responses to Despite the denials, a major explosion occurred at Fordow

  1. Dean says:

    Maybe they had just installed Windows 8 on their computers and that caused so much confusion that the little Korean guys pushed the wrong buttons!

  2. Mietopol says:

    Hey if they want to have nukes why don’t we drop not a few over there ?

  3. CuriousAmerican says:

    Beyond lack of recognition, the bodies are probably highly radioactive.

  4. lobo joe says:

    As the Bard would note, ” The lady doth protest too much, me thinks”

    All those curies concentrated in one location, nobody will be going into that location for quite a while.

  5. BethesdaDog says:

    I’m not convinced about WorldNetDaily. If that’s the site I’m thinking of, I wonder about its credibility. Now this Reza Khalili, he’s on talk radio all the time, with all these scoops from Iran. It’s not his real name, and he was supposedly a double agent with both the CIA and IRG. I find it hard to believe he can still communicate so freely with reliable sources over there then repeat the stuff publicly. I would think the Iranian government would track down his sources and kill them.

    I hope he’s reliable, but something just doesn’t seem quite right about it.

    I would put the whole thing on the same level of credibility as Debka, which arouses my skepticism, and it apparently does the same with some Iaraelis with whom I’ve discussed that site.

    Given all of this, i still hope that Debka and WND, and Khalili, are all highly reliable and right most of the time, and that Khalili and WND are particularly right about this. I was just reading Elliot Abrams’ account of the planning for the attack on the Syrian reactor and everybody ruled out sabotage. Would sabotage be easier with the Iranian facilities? Who knows?

    I hope the truth comes out, and that serious damage was done and that many top irreplaceable technicians and scientists were eliminated. That would be great.

    By the way, weren’t there Debka reports, repeated here, that American military would assist in patrolling the tunnels and other entry points for weapons into Gaza? Did that ever happen? Wasn’t that supposed to be one of the inducements to persuade Netanyahu not to go into Gaza on the ground?

    I have to wonder about why Israel does not seem to be saying publicly anything about the F-16s and tanks to Egypt. Back in the ’70′s, holy hell was raised over the proposed sale of AWACs to Saudi Arabia, a country that never was in direct military conflict with Israel. I remember it quite well, one of my good friends was an AIPAC lobbyist and they fought hard–unsuccessfully–to kill it.

    Now, nothing. Silence. Maybe Netanyahu has a stake in Morsi’s survival? Do they have some understandings? I would always suspect, and expect,the unexpected.

Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 21,572
  • Last 7 days: 142,699
  • Last 30 days: 348,832
  • Online now: 75
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • Steve Goldberg: The Only Viable Option (23)

    • Ted Belman: @ CuriousAmerican:Neither Goldberg nor I recommended...

    • CuriousAmerican: @ Ted Belman: Goldberg says they will go to Arab countries....

    • Ted Belman: A number of you have raised the question of...

    • CuriousAmerican: It seems, he believes that many Arabs could leave without...

    • Ted Belman: The primary change is to narrow the center column so that it is...

  • Can Israel be both Jewish and democratic (206)

    • dweller: @ honeybee: “May I suggest Sweetie, that you read Thomas...

    • dweller: @ honeybee: “You’re still making mistakes, Twinkie”...

    • dweller: @ AbbaGuutuu: You will encounter several here with pronounced axes...

    • dweller: @ honeybee: “…that no man — not even the King himself —...

  • Palestinians must come to the table for peace (3)

    • dove: Oh Dersch….you have been a Defense Lawyer for the wicked for far...

  • Obama Plans to Return Looted Jewish Artifacts To Iraq (43)

    • SHmuel HaLevi 2: @ honeybee: :) Yes. I remember… Good one HB! I have...

    • CuriousAmerican: Enough of answering the furious. ¡Basta! La repuesta es para...

    • CuriousAmerican: @ the phoenix: I wonder why, american… I wonder why…. No...

    • the phoenix: @ CuriousAmerican: But you are so bigoted, that you could not...

    • CuriousAmerican: @ honeybee: Sugar, you know I am as sweet as honey from the...

  • There is No Authentic Right in Israel (41)

    • dweller: @ yamit82: “The most revealing aspect of his character was his...

    • dweller: @ honeybee: ”…’You doth protest to loudly’,...

    • dweller: @ yamit82: “What is the real Meaning of Passover for the Jews?...

  • In the Middle East, Time to Move On (4)

    • CuriousAmerican: Among those principles should be: a Palestinian state in the...

    • mar55: @ bernard ross: I agree with you. We were subscribed to the NYT during...

Sponsor

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Site Membership



Google Site Search

Editor

    Ted Belman

    tbelman3-at-gmail.com

Mission

    News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

Polls

Will Israel attack Iran

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

RECOMMENDED BOOKS




Tolerism2

Iran islam

Sharing

mandate4

Daily Archives

April 2014
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Selected Israpundit Articles

Sponsors

Miscellaneous Info

    All Politic Sites