Israpundit Digest

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 28,442
  • Last 7 days: 161,565
  • Last 30 days: 562,118
  • Online now: 49
fabricant de lanterneaux

Chit Chat

Recent Comments

Sponsors

.

Sponsor

.

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

Advertisments

.
”souvenirs”

Monthly Archives

December 2014
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

SUPPORT ISRAPUNDIT

 Donate USA  Donate
ISL
 Donate
CAN
  • February 18, 2013

    Senate testimony: Obama uninvolved as Americans were killed

    By Diana West: Below is my write-up from Dispatch International of jaw-dropping Senate testimony from both SecDef Panetta and JCC Gen. Dempsey that, following an initial briefing at 5pm on 9/11/12, neither President Obama nor anyone from his White House staff ever once checked in with either Panetta or Dempsey during the night and early morning of 9/11/12 and 9/12/12 while US personnel and interests were under attack in Benghazi.

    I have informally polled some experts and reporters (sometimes one and the same) as I have come across them since Panetta and Dempsey testified and they are roughly divided as to whether Panetta and Dempsey are telling the truth.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. As President Obama builds a cabinet for his second term, his nominees for the top spots are coming before the U.S. Senate for confirmation. Some – such as the new Secretary of State John Kerry – are sailing through. Others – such as former Sen. Chuck Hagel (Nebraska Republican) are foundering.


    One reason for Hagel’s delay is that the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee held its vote on Hagel’s nomination hostage to an appearance by current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. Why? Senate Republicans wanted to ask Panetta about the terrorist attack on the US compound in Benghazi last 11 September in which four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, were killed. One the many enduring mysteries about that night is why no U.S. or allied forces ever arrived in Benghazi to aid Americans under fire during two coordinated attacks which altogether lasted nearly eight hours. Two of the four Americans who lost their lives, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, were killed defending the secret CIA “annex” during the final hour of the attack.

    Last week, Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin E. Dempsey came before the Senate committee to discuss Benghazi. Under sometimes-tough questioning, their testimonies were as remarkable for what the two men admitted to as for what subsequently went under-reported, if not completely unreported following the hearing. What they both attested to – and what was only spottily covered in the media – was that from where they sat at the Pentagon, President Obama was virtually uninvolved if not detached from the unfolding Benghazi attack.

    The senators saw to it that there could be no doubt about this shocking admission. After the two defense officials said they informed the president shortly after the attack in Benghazi began at around 5 pm Washington time, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (New Hampshire Republican) asked, “Did you have any further communication with him [Obama] that night?”

    Panetta: No.

    Ayotte: Did … he ever call you that night to say how things were going, what’s going on?

    Panetta: No. But we were aware that as we were getting information on what was taking place there – particularly when we got information that the [ambassador’s] life had been lost – we were aware that the information went to the White House.

    Ayotte: Did you communicate with anyone else at the White House that night?

    Panetta: No.

    Ayotte: No one else called you to say how were things going

    Panetta: No.

    Both defense officials went on to reveal under questioning from Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas Republican) that neither one of them ever heard from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during the course of the attack either. Nothing from the woman at the helm of U.S. foreign policy while the U.S. compound in Benghazi was overrun, the CIA annex was coming under precise mortar fire, and a senior U.S. diplomat was missing for hours until his dead, and possibly violated body was found. (Stevens’ autopsy report has not been released.)

    This absence of direct input from the president and secretary of state into the military response to a terrorist attack on U.S. interests on the anniversary of 11/9 seemed to flummox the senators. They kept returning to the topic as if to make sure that they and the American people grasped the situation. “So you talked to him [Obama] for 30 minutes, one time, and you never talked to him again, either one of you, until afterwards,” said Sen. Lindsay Graham (South Carolina Republican) to Panetta and Dempsey. The two defense officials concurred.

    Graham then moved on to an even more contentious topic: the failure of the U.S. military command to respond to American distress calls from Benghazi. Panetta and Dempsey both hewed to the administration’s assessment that no “appropriate” military assets were near enough to Benghazi to be deployed in time to save American lives. AC-130 gunships, Dempsey said, were too far away; however, he also ruled them out at any distance as a “good platform” from which to defend the consulate due to the risk of “civilian casualties“. Similiarly, F-16s stationed at Aviano, Italy were left idle, despite the fact that the U.S. military has routinely and non-lethally dispersed militants on battlefields with overflights of screaming jets. Dempsey stated it would have taken as much as 20 hours to get an F-16 from Italy to Libya. The flight time for such aircraft, however, is about 90 minutes.

    So what would have been an appropriate “platform”? Sen. Graham inquired. Dempsey replied: “Boots on the ground ahead of the event.” After further back-and-forth, Graham brought up the saying that the U.S. military leaves no man behind. “Don’t you think that saying’s been undermined here?” Then, with his allotted time running out, Graham changed topic: “Did you know how long the attack was going last, Secretary Panetta?”

    Panetta: No idea.

    Graham: Well, it could have lasted for two days. Now, my question is, was one airplane anywhere in the world deployed in aid of the consulate?

    Dempsey: If you’re talking about strike aircraft, no, senator.

    Graham later asked whether “anybody” – any single Pentagon asset – was “in motion before the attack concluded”. The answer was no, not until aircraft were dispatched to evacuate attack survivors. The survivors, incidentally, are thought to number some 30 people who remain to this day incommunicado to press and Congress. As many as three survivors remain hospitalized at a military hospital near Washington five months after the attack.

    Graham returned to the subject of America’s absentee commander-in-chief. “Are you surprised,” he said, “that the president of the United States never called you, Secretary Panetta, [to] say how’s it going?”

    Panetta: We were deploying the forces, he knew we were deploying the forces, he was being kept updated …

    Graham (interrupting): I hate to interrupt you but I got limited time. We didn’t deploy any forces.

    Panetta (interrupting): No, but …

    Graham (interrupting): Did you call him back …

    Panetta (interrupting): The event was over … before we could move any assets.

    Graham: It lasted almost eight hours and my question to you is during that eight hours did the president show any curiosity about how is this going, what kind of assets do you have helping these people? Did he ever make that phone call?

    Panetta: Look, there is no doubt in my mind that the president of the United States was concerned about American lives …

    Graham (interrupting): With all due respect, I don’t believe that’s a credible statement if he never called and asked you, are we helping these people, what’s happening to them?

    Panetta: As a former chief of staff to the president, the purpose of staff is to be able to get that kind of information and those staff were working with us.

    Graham then asked Panetta if he thought Obama’s behavior was “typical” of a president with citizens under fire. The president is “well-informed about what is going on, make no mistake,” Panetta replied.

    Which leaves the question hanging.

    Share Button
  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 11:39 am | 21 Comments »

    21 Comments to Senate testimony: Obama uninvolved as Americans were killed

    1. Steve says:

      There are 2 sides to every story so I would like to hear from the President. I find it very hard to believe that President Obama was not involved.

    2. the phoenix says:

      “Senate testimony: Obama uninvolved as Americans were killed ”
      the musloid equivalent of sargent schultz…
      i know NOOOOTHING!
      i see NOOOOTHING!

    3. Laura says:

      Aaron Klein, through his Middle East sources, is certain the administration was gunrunning to the Syrian “rebels” through that Libyan mission. As if that isn’t bad enough, the Obama administration then just allowed these four Americans to be slaughtered without coming to their aid. I would love to hear from the survivors, but they are being hidden away. No doubt there is a massive coverup going on.

    4. Canadian Otter says:

      Wow, Bibi, we never knew! – Bill Maher says the Israeli government controls the US State Department! Video – http://israelmatzav.blogspot.ca/2013/02/obamas-million-dollar-donor-israelis-do.html#links

      BTW, this Maher fellow is the same guy who called singer Andy Williams a “Tea Bag Idiot” only hours after Williams had passed away. There’s class for you.

      – Remember Andy, escape reality and indulge. It’s OK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dfAxRlaYAM
      The music is lovely. The pictures on the video are completely over the top. So, just listen.

    5. Honey Bee says:

      @ Steve:

      The other sidee of the story************ Obama was hiding under his bed!!!!!!!!!!!

    6. Canuck Frank says:

      @ Honey Bee:
      Remember Hilary’s question to Obama in 2008: What will you do when the phone rings at 3 o’clock in the morning? Now we know the answer…

    7. Honey Bee says:

      @ Canuck Frank:

      Do you think he was sucking his thumb?

      Really Ted, must the math be difficult 63×7, maybe Yamit and Bernard Ross can figure that problem out, but a bee cannot.

    8. Canuck Frank says:

      @ Honey Bee:
      Well, at 3 a.m. he surely wasn’t golfing with Tiger (who, in any case, may have been otherwise occupied)

    9. Honey Bee says:

      @ Canuck Frank:

      Aside ffrom golf,I don’t he and Tiger share the same interest,if you get my driff.

    10. Canuck Frank says:

      @ Honey Bee:
      The same interest, born of narcissism? I think I got it. By the way, my questions are kindergardenish; a reflection of my intelligence?

    11. steven l says:

      Looks like the Obama OK the transfer of weapons (off the record) but if discovered, Stevens and others would be on their own. In a way, disavowing the all operation. Pr. O & H. C. do not want to take the fall since the transfer might be against the US law??? Does this make sense?

    12. Honey Bee says:

      @ Canuck Frank:

      I taught 1st grade, 6yr olds are the wisest people on earth.

    13. Honey Bee says:

      @ steven l:

      Sugar Pie, its called “gun runing”, The Mexican smuglers would not have made such a mess of it either.

    14. Canuck Frank says:

      @ Honey Bee:
      @ Honey Bee:
      I agree, but as I am rather on the other side of the age spectrum, maybe ?+5+11 is appropriate for me. Incidentally, I enjoy your comments and find it hard to disagree with too many, if any, of them.

    15. Honey Bee says:

      @ Canuck Frank:

      Thank-you Maple Sugar Pie,but my Heart beongs to Ted!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    16. Canuck Frank says:

      @ Honey Bee:
      Oh well…at least my wife is happy (I think)

    17. the phoenix says:

      Honey Bee Said:

      but my Heart beongs to Ted!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      honey bee…you are such a heartbreaker..
      :( … sigh…

      ;-)

    18. Honey Bee says:

      @ the phoenix:

      Don’t tell c’boy, I need him to work these ALFULL math problems. I like multiplying without having to think about what Iam doing.

    19. the phoenix says:

      @ Honey Bee:
      Dear honey bee, my lips are sealed.
      And furthermore, who is Ted, yamit, David, Bernard ( I have to slow down and catch my breath …. The list is still long…)?
      Never heard of them.
      ;-)

    20. Honey Bee says:

      @ the phoenix:

      Do you live in Greese or Arizona? Compared to you the list means nothng

    21. Honey Bee says:

      @ Canuck Frank:

      Buy her flowers!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      That’s C’boy does to get out of the dog house.

    Site Membership



    Editor


      Ted Belman

      tbelman3- at- gmail.com

    Search

    Polls

    Why doesn't Bibi want to go "all the way"

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    MANTUA BOOKS (recommended)




    Tolerism2

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS


    Iran islam


    apes

    LOVE


    Sharing

    mandate4

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites