Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 0
  • Last 7 days: 0
  • Last 30 days: 0
  • Online now: 0
Los Angeles SEO

Recent Comments

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

”souvenirs”

Archives

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


  • February 20, 2013

    Tzipi Livni, never missing an opportunity to make the wrong decision

    She was the woman of principle who implored Labor and Yesh Atid to join her in blocking Netanyahu. Now she’s traded her integrity for two ministries and a meaningless promise to head peace talks

    By RAPHAEL AHREN, TOI

    Tzipi Livni’s decision to join Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is the first bombshell of the post-election, coalition-building season: In a reversal of her pre-Election Day stance, the woman who went on TV to implore the heads of the two leading center-left parties to join her and build an alliance to thwart the unsuitable Netanyahu’s return to the prime ministership is now the first to join the coalition, all but ensuring that Netanyahu will retain the post.


    This is the same Livni who passed up the opportunity to lead the nation after her Kadima party leader Ehud Olmert resigned as prime minister more than four years ago because she wouldn’t cut a deal with Shas. Now she’ll be a junior player in a coalition led by her bitter rival, almost certainly with Shas, which is applauding her trailblazing move and preparing to follow suit.

    This is also the same Livni who wouldn’t cut a deal with Netanyahu after the last elections in 2009, from a position of relative strength, when her Kadima party (28 seats) was bigger than his Likud (27). She could have been foreign minister, at the very least, with many of her Kadima colleagues in senior ministerial positions, dramatically influencing government policy. But a national unity government with the reviled Netanyahu would be “a coalition that doesn’t allow me to pursue my path, the path … we promised the voters,” she said at the time. Now, from a position of immense weakness, she is the first party leader to break ranks and cut a deal, in exchange for two ministries, lots of assurances, and no means to ensure they are honored.

    As the head of a faction with merely six Knesset seats — as many as Meretz and only two more than Hadash — she will be a junior partner in a government dominated by politicians with whose worldview she fundamentally disagrees. For what? For the post of justice minister, which she held from 2004 to 2006, and the flimsy prospect of advancing peace with the Palestinians.

    Besides constituting a betrayal of Livni’s voters, who supported her and her new Hatnua party believing she’d represent an alternative to Netanyahu, Livni’s decision could turn out to be a coalition game-changer. Firstly, it compromises the political alliance between the Jewish Home and the Yesh Atid parties, which agreed not to help Netanyahu build a government without a pledge from the prime minister that he will seek substantial progress on the question of universal conscription.

    So far, Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid and Jewish Home’s Naftali Bennett have been firm in their stance not to join the coalition until Netanyahu agrees to changes the current conscription laws, ensuring that Haredim will have to shoulder an equal part of the national burden. Yet Livni — who likes to present herself as a figure of integrity and principle — joins the government before any such commitments have been made, weakening the bargaining power of these principled holdouts. Things are moving ahead; the Netanyahu-Livni deal signals to Bennett and Lapid that they better not miss out on the chance to grab a seat at the government table.

    Her entry also changes the coalition arithmetic. With Livni on board, and Shaul Mofaz’s two-seat Kadima likely to follow, Netanyahu can build a stable coalition majority with only one of the allied Jewish Home and Yesh Atid parties: Likud-Beytenu 31; Shas 11; United Torah Judaism 7; Hatnua 6 — that’s 55 seats in the bag, and Kadima makes 57. Either Yesh Atid (19) or Jewish Home (12) makes for a comfortable majority. Without Livni and Mofaz, Netanyahu would really have needed both Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home and Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid, and both were spurning his advances without real commitments on the Haredi draft. Who knows, Netanyahu may now even try to bring in Labor again, and leave both Bennett and Lapid in the cold, or at least threaten to do so.

    It was Livni who called the loudest for the three major center-left parties to work together to prevent Netanyahu from retaining the premiership. “There is a battle to be fought. The fight isn’t over yet. We mustn’t surrender,” Livni said on January 4, on live TV, begging Lapid and Labor’s Shelly Yachimovich to enter some sort of alliance against Netanyahu’s Likud-Beytenu. The goal, she asserted, was to “work together to bring down Netanyahu.”

    With her agreement to join a Likud-Beytenu-led government in exchange for the justice and the environmental protection ministries (and some other minor perks) as well as heading the government’s peace negotiations — though obviously subordinate to the prime minister — Livni is doing the exact opposite of what she said she wanted to do when (re)-entering politics ahead of the elections. Instead of bringing Netanyahu down — or at least enabling Bennett and Lapid to wrench genuine concessions regarding the Haredi draft from him — she is throwing him a lifeline without forcing him to compromise.

    Lapid has made it clear that he will not enter the government unless it adopts his plan for universal conscription, and reportedly said recently he might be able to oust Netanyahu after 18 months in opposition. Labor’s Shelly Yachimovich has said she won’t be a fig-leaf for Netanyahu’s economic policies — but if offered the Finance Ministry and some kind of influence in socioeconomic matters, she might reconsider. Netanyahu really seems to dislike Bennett, but ideologically Likud and Jewish Home are relatively close and if the prime minister sees no other way to build a coalition he might decide to swallow the bitter pill and make his former bureau chief an offer good enough to break his alliance with Lapid.

    This last option seems to be the most probable outcome. Lapid is the least likely to give in and join the government: his new party would lose a lot of credit if it folds on the issue dearest to its voters (universal draft), and with 19 seats and its leader’s high visibility, Yesh Atid may prefer to fight from the opposition. Labor, too, will most probably stay out, if only because Netanyahu — a former finance minister with clear ideas about what’s best for Israel’s economy – is not about to hand over the reins of Israel’s fiscal policy to someone with whom he disagrees on almost every issue.

    Bennett’s right-wing Orthodox constituency, by contrast, will forgive him if the Haredim get away without a drastic change to Israel’s conscription laws. Bennett and Livni disagree fundamentally on the Palestinian issue — she says a two-state solution is needed urgently; he wants to annex much of the West Bank — but the Jewish Home chief said repeatedly that he would not mind too much if the government restarts peace talks.

    Talking can’t hurt, Bennett is probably saying to himself, knowing that as long as Netanyahu is prime minister and dependent on his right-wing coalition partners, no final-status agreement will ever be signed. Anyone slightly familiar with the positions of Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas knows it’s just not realistic. And to be on the safe side, Netanyahu reportedly inserted a clause in the coalition agreement with Livni that any peace plan she might bring home will first have to be approved by the Knesset and the government.

    It is obvious why Netanyahu inked the deal with Livni: he risked very little (besides angering the more hawkish politicians in his faction) but managed to break the deadlock that hampered his coalition building efforts. With Livni in charge of peace talks, moreover, he can present to the international community a government that seems dedicated to renewing serious negotiations — just in time for US President Barack Obama’s visit.

    But why did Livni break her pre-election promises, referring to them as “something being said during election campaigns” in her joint press conference with Netanyahu on Tuesday?

    Does she really believe true progress can be made on the Palestinian front, with Netanyahu in the government’s driver seat and Bennett’s hand grabbing for the wheel? She will not even be foreign minister, where the notion that she could achieve something would be slightly more credible. That post is being saved for Avigdor Liberman, who is adamant that the Palestinian problem cannot be resolved at present.

    Returning to politics for these elections, after taking a time-out when losing the Kadima leadership last year, Livni promised that this time would be different: She stood for a better Israel, and she wouldn’t quit again if the going got tough.

    She’s certainly making a difference; the question is for how long. Netanyahu’s previous unlikely coalition alliance, with Mofaz’s Kadima, lasted about 70 days before collapsing in an orgy of recrimination seven months ago. Tuesday night’s two protagonists will be hoping this match, similarly presented as essential to the national interest, survives rather longer.

    The Abba Eban cliche about the Palestinians never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity has a variant for Livni, much quoted by political analysts on Tuesday, who appears never to miss an opportunity to make the wrong political decision. As one political insider put it, “She’s signed her political death warrant… for about the fourth time.”

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 8:33 pm | 12 Comments »

    12 Comments to Tzipi Livni, never missing an opportunity to make the wrong decision

    1. the phoenix says:

      gravol? anyone?

    2. yamit82 says:

      Livni had the backing of some very deep pocket donors, who backed her very late entry in the campaign. Those backers wanted her in the next government at any cost and that’s what Livni delivered for them.

      What I am convinced of is that those donors or donor where not Israeli origins.

      Why is it nobody asks or checks where the money comes from in Israeli politics?

    3. Dan says:

      You can be certain there’s one Israeli “leader” who never misses an opportunity to turn a nationalist victory into a triumph for the left. If you haven’t guessed, his name is Netanyahu.

    4. yamit82 says:

      @ Dan:
      Dan Said:

      You can be certain there’s one Israeli “leader” who never misses an opportunity to turn a nationalist victory into a triumph for the left. If you haven’t guessed, his name is Netanyahu.

      BB is only the last of PMs and Parties elected by right wing political constituencies and then turned leftward after being elected. Starting with Begin, Shamir Rabin and Sharon BB is only the last of several before him. Rabin was really elected by crossover security minded nationalists who believed Rabin would protect Israels security interests which de-facto means holding territory and not elevating our enemies to a competing national reality.

      BB is not and I don’t believe was ever a true nationalist political leader. If any party on the left would have accepted him he would not be in the Likud today, the same can be said about Sharon who really was a Peres and BenGurion disciple and acolyte. Sharon and BB are populist leaders who are mostly opportunistic and not ideological.

      Begin sold out over Camp David and opening up the Herut party into a broad anti Labor populist tent. That essentially killed secular nationalism in Israel

    5. NormanF says:

      yamit82 Said:

      Livni had the backing of some very deep pocket donors, who backed her very late entry in the campaign. Those backers wanted her in the next government at any cost and that’s what Livni delivered for them.
      What I am convinced of is that those donors or donor where not Israeli origins.
      Why is it nobody asks or checks where the money comes from in Israeli politics?

      She won’t leave the government and neither will Mofaz. They are completely dependent on Netanyahu for their political survival and they pose no real threat to him. That is why he is inking the deal with them. He holds the whiplash.

    6. NormanF says:

      yamit82 Said:

      @ Dan:
      Dan Said:
      You can be certain there’s one Israeli “leader” who never misses an opportunity to turn a nationalist victory into a triumph for the left. If you haven’t guessed, his name is Netanyahu.
      BB is only the last of PMs and Parties elected by right wing political constituencies and then turned leftward after being elected. Starting with Begin, Shamir Rabin and Sharon BB is only the last of several before him. Rabin was really elected by crossover security minded nationalists who believed Rabin would protect Israels security interests which de-facto means holding territory and not elevating our enemies to a competing national reality.
      BB is not and I don’t believe was ever a true nationalist political leader. If any party on the left would have accepted him he would not be in the Likud today, the same can be said about Sharon who really was a Peres and BenGurion disciple and acolyte. Sharon and BB are populist leaders who are mostly opportunistic and not ideological.
      Begin sold out over Camp David and opening up the Herut party into a broad anti Labor populist tent. That essentially killed secular nationalism in Israel

      Netanyahu has never been a Jewish nationalist. But he is a proponent of staying in power. He wants to be around long after Lapid and Bennett are a political footnote. No one tells him they can succeed him. No one is as skilled in outmaneuvering his political adversaries than Netanyahu himself. If he wants a fourth term, no one will be his Heir Dauphin, that is for sure.

    7. Dan says:

      @ yamit82:

      There’s at least one thing Israelis can always count on to keep their leaders honest: The Arabs and the Muslims will never stop trying to destroy them.

    8. Not Ovenready says:

      I smell an axelrod, a soros, and an odious street….

    9. Bernard Ross says:

      yamit82 Said:

      What I am convinced of is that those donors or donor were not Israeli origins.

      Is there any way to find out who the donors are?

    10. the phoenix says:

      Bernard Ross Said:

      Is there any way to find out who the donors are?

      assuming that, as ovenready says, soros et al is shown to hold the smoking gun…so THEN WHAT?
      i happen to think that indeed this may be so.
      but there were soooo many blatantly treasonous acts that just came… and went… and every body is just nonchalantly moving right on…you know, ‘nothing to see here folks, just keep moving!…
      it just seems that everybody is just plain numb and NOTHING seems to stirr any emotion of outrage, or indignation.

    11. jew says:

      BB won’t succeed to form a coalition! He will receive Obama as a failed PM. And Obama will rediculize himself by accepting an invitation of somebody who isn’t a PM in fact.

      And BB will lose the next elections after Passover. The winners will be Benet Lapid and Yechimovitch.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS

    LOVE




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    July 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites