Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 24,265
  • Last 7 days: 31,862
  • Last 30 days: 31,862
  • Online now: 65
Los Angeles SEO
Current Entries

Recent Comments

  • One person can make a difference (12)

    • SamG: Contrary to what many of us have been brainwashed to believe almost the...

    • honeybee: @ Eric R.: I love the manner in which the bureaucratic mind...

  • The Jewish Question (64)

    • dove: I see that there are still some glitches. I received a response from M...

    • Vinnie: @ honeybee: Ohio.

    • dove: @ M Devolin: Better yet….come join us in Israel. I’ll...

    • M Devolin: Good to hear from you, Yamit. Yes, hope Laura is OK.

    • bernard ross: M Devolin Said: How’s that Yamit fellow? Is he still tougher...

  • ‘The Temple Mount Has Been Occupied By Hamas’ (90)

    • mar55: @ the phoenix: Something important we could start doing straight away....

    • mar55: @ honeybee: Yo tambien te quiero abejita. Mi mejor amiga. I posted...

    • honeybee: yamit82 Said: I do!!!!! Pheromones , sugar!!!! Leads the Bees to...

    • yamit82: honeybee Said: Yamit82 stinks better then you do, Cutie pie I do? :(...

    • honeybee: dweller Said: . Since when would you ever acknowledge your...

  • Can Israel be both Jewish and democratic (272)

    • yamit82: bernard ross Said: (are you being facetious?) Faith is belief that...

    • dove: @ M Devolin: I really missed you too! Almost quit this site a few times!

    • M Devolin: “Because of the golden calf doh doh – ancient...

    • bernard ross: AbbaGuutuu Said: Proof is the evidence of your belief/faith in...

    • dove: @ AbbaGuutuu: Don’t insult my intelligence You seem to totally...

  • ‘For Kerry, Israeli blood is cheaper than American blood’ (4)

    • honeybee: @ bernard ross: Thank you, it is said the are using the incident to...

    • bernard ross: @ honeybee: dont know a lot about this one and nothing about...

    • honeybee: @ bernard ross: You are my “go to guy” on conspiracies....

Sponsor

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND

  • February 27, 2013

    Hagel wins, Israel loses, J-street cheers

    This is an enormous victory for the anti-Israel crowd both because, 1) Hagel with all his faults passed muster. Thus he will be able to push the J-Street line which is to pressure Israel into a peace agreement 2) It is further evidence of the decline of the Right, and the ascendency of the Left. In particular it underscores how the Democratic Party can no longer be seen as pro-Israel. For a list of what the democrats ignored or embraced about Hagel go to Jeff Dunetz at Breitbart. And let me remind you, AIPAC sat this one out as did the ADL. Ted Belman
    JStreet – The political home for pro-Israel, pro-peace Americans It’s official: the hawks have lost again. Despite an unprecedented smear campaign leading to the first-ever filibuster of a Defense Secretary nominee, Senator Chuck Hagel has been confirmed by a vote of 58 to 41. Over the last few months you have stood with J Street in supporting Senator Hagel’s nomination. From our activities on Capitol Hill, to our work in the community, and of course our “Smear a Bagel, not Chuck Hagel” campaign, together we’ve made the pro-Israel, pro-peace case for Sen. Hagel’s fitness to lead the Pentagon.
    Groups and individuals like Bill Kristol’s Emergency Committee for Israel, Elliott Abrams, Jennifer Rubin and /The Weekly Standard/ have thrown everything they have — and then some — at efforts to derail Hagel’s nomination because he doesn’t ascribe to their narrow, hawkish views of what ‘pro-Israel’ should mean. *Thank Senators [...] for voting yes on Chuck Hagel’s nomination and proving there’s a better way to be pro-Israel. * You should know how far your support went. J Street was the first pro-Israel organization to back Senator Hagel’s nomination and you provided a critical counterweight to the smears, lies and distortions that groups like ECI spent hundreds of thousands of dollars promoting. We are glad to see a bipartisan majority of Senators reject the spurious accusations, outright lies and fear-mongering the far-right has employed. Just like in November, the hawks have turned every screw they could, trying to keep the old rules on pro-Israel advocacy in play. And just like November — it didn’t work. Secretary Hagel knows the only way Israel can remain a democratic homeland for the Jewish people is through a two-state solution. And, most importantly, he isn’t afraid to say so. As part of President Obama’s national security team with Secretary of State John Kerry, he has an opportunity to make real progress in reaching a two-state solution on Israeli-Palestinian peace over the next few years. *Join me in sending Sens. Warren and Cowan a quick thank you for voting for Secretary Hagel’s confirmation. * Thank you, Dylan Williams Director of Government Affairs
    Posted by Ted Belman @ 8:16 am | 15 Comments »
  • 15 Comments to Hagel wins, Israel loses, J-street cheers

    1. andrew says:

      This is like a bad dream. Hagel during his confirmation hearing looked like he was stoned or hungover or couldn’t care less.

    2. Bill Narvey says:

      Has J Street become more powerful than AIPAC?

    3. yamit82 says:

      Bill Narvey Said:

      Has J Street become more powerful than AIPAC?

      AIPAC HAS NOT WON a PR BATTLE IN OVER 30 YEARS!! Rich Fat cat political Jews mostly tied to the democratic party I might even say they are an extension of the Liberal wing of the Democratic party. They will tow the Obama line down to the last Jew in Israel. There is no contest between AIPAC and J-STREET, AIPAC Ha s vacated the field of contention to the enemy. AIPAC’a reputation is built on the perceptions and lies of Jew/Israeli hating antisemites images cultivated over the years. Reagan buried them over the Saudi AWACS deal and it’s been down hill for AIPAC ever since.

    4. Laura says:

      @ Bill Narvey:
      AIPAC didn’t even enter the fight.

    5. Laura says:

      The problem is that we essentially have no opposition party in Washington. The Republican establishment is worse than useless.

    6. Laura says:

      Despite an unprecedented smear campaign leading to the first-ever
      filibuster of a Defense Secretary nominee, Senator Chuck Hagel has been
      confirmed by a vote of 58 to 41.

      Smear campaign? All Hagel’s opponents did was quote Hagel himself. JStreets kvelling makes me sick.

    7. Bernard Ross says:

      what is curious to me is that I haven’t even seen reasons given by those who support Hagel as to why they think he could possibly be suited for the position. Apparently even they don’t see him as being good for the job as they dont’t even bother to conjure up spurious rationalizations. Talk about contempt for the voting public, even their own.

    8. steven l says:

      IL cannot fight every single battle. She must win the wars.

    9. Honey Bee says:

      @ yamit82:

      You can add the ADL to the list of losers!

    10. Honey Bee says:

      @ andrew:

      True that. Man proposes: G-d disposes! We shall see.

    11. Anonymous says:

      On another level — the nomination of Hagel, and the smiling approval of this antisemite by Jewish Democrats — calls into question their presumed “hostility” (is it fake, is it feigned?) for antisemites. Thus what sort of credibility does a Dershowitz now have when he calls some would-be pope-contender an antisemite? Sure, Mr X is an antisemite who wants to be pope. But,hey, that’s just so easily resolvable — all a Dersh need do is imagine the would-be pope is an Obama appointee — so long as an Obama endorses it — Voila! All is right with the world; problem solved.

    12. Anonymous says:

      IMO Obama is a psychopath (he has severe personality disorders — not the least of which are his continual, pathological lies). He is an extreme menace. If one has ever had the misfortune of dealing with such deviants — one knows that they do “loyalty tests”. I believe this is why the deviant psychopath picked Hagel. It was done so as to sort out the blind sycophants (who will go to any extreme to demonstrate their personal loyalty to Obama) from the “not so blind.” Obama won (the ironic inverse of Purim).

    13. Honey Bee says:

      @ yamit82:

      Thanks for defending me to Dweller, sorry about the Dictionary remark,couldn’t help myself I’am the daughter of a lawyer.

    14. CuriousAmerican says:

      The debate on Hagel was waged badly.

      Once Hagel was criticized for not being pro-Israel enough, the battle was lost.

      The Secretary of Defense is supposed to look out for the USA, not Israel necessarily.

      The issue should have been whether he was good for the USA? He probably is not.

      A lot of Jewish groups get upset if you talk about the Jewish/Zionist lobby; but the effort made by so many makes the charge of Jewish Lobby look realistic.

      This was played badly, very badly.

      They could have shown that Hagel’s dismissal of Iran’s threat was bad for the USA; and he might have lost.

      Once the issue was … is he good for Israel? … a lot of people asked … who runs the government?

      Hagel’s weakness could easily have been shown to have compromised America. That is how the fight should have been waged.

      Bringing Eliot Abrams into it was a disaster.

      Obama has his man. If you wanted to stop Hagel’s nomination, the Israel issue should have been avoided. Only Iran had to be brought up.

      It is a nasty world out there.

    15. yamit82 says:

      CuriousAmerican Said:

      The debate on Hagel was waged badly.
      Once Hagel was criticized for not being pro-Israel enough, the battle was lost.
      The Secretary of Defense is supposed to look out for the USA, not Israel necessarily.
      The issue should have been whether he was good for the USA? He probably is not.
      A lot of Jewish groups get upset if you talk about the Jewish/Zionist lobby; but the effort made by so many makes the charge of Jewish Lobby look realistic.
      This was played badly, very badly.
      They could have shown that Hagel’s dismissal of Iran’s threat was bad for the USA; and he might have lost.
      Once the issue was … is he good for Israel? … a lot of people asked … who runs the government?
      Hagel’s weakness could easily have been shown to have compromised America. That is how the fight should have been waged.
      Bringing Eliot Abrams into it was a disaster.
      Obama has his man. If you wanted to stop Hagel’s nomination, the Israel issue should have been avoided. Only Iran had to be brought up.
      It is a nasty world out there.

      I agree; the Republicans used Israel and we allowed them to. The Jews stayed for the most part outside of the debate.

      I predicted from day one that Obama would get all of his nominations approved. Essentially what these nominations and approvals show if not prove, is that no Jew and especially Israel cannot rely on America and that includes the mythical pro Israel congress.

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    April 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Sponsors

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites